Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ben Bowler

GET UPDATES FROM Ben Bowler
 

The Worst Idea in History

Posted: 24/09/2012 00:00

This week has seen a new eruption in the tensions between competing worldviews, as once again certain elements within Islam clashed with the secular West. Much has been written about the underlying causes of the violence seen around the world, with most experts attributing the events to more than just a silly and offensive movie. The scenes of anger have been interpreted against a backdrop of long-term political, economic and cultural humiliation fanned by religious extremism. This is a potent mix of fuels that when exposed to the oxygen of disrespect and ridicule can and does explode into violence, damage and death.

Many (though certainly not all) Muslim leaders have been at pains to denounce the violent aspect of the protests. Typically, these moderate voices have faced an uphill battle for airtime in the mainstream media whose semi-official motto is "if it bleeds it leads". Subsequently people are left with such overwhelming images as a five-year-child holding banners demanding beheadings (as happened here in Australia) and not surprisingly, existing suspicions of Islam and prejudices towards Muslims have been further reinforced. For the outright opponents of faith in general, it is another opportunity to make the case that religion poisons everything.

So what is the real cause of all this suffering and unease? This is what we would need to answer if we are to prescribe a cure. Some say the antecedent causes stem from past colonial subjugation and a modern history of war and invasion; some say that Islam has an innate tendency to aggression and that herein lies the problem while others say that the real disease is religion itself (i.e all religion).

The issue is certainly highly complex and attributing cause cannot be done concretely without referring to the economic, historical and political realities. That been said, the deeper underlying issue here is philosophic immaturity born out of ignorance. This in turn comes from a lack of genuine experience with and understanding of viewpoints contrasting to our own.

Philosophic hubris that leads to circumscribed thinking might not sound too ominous at first glance, but such bigotry has been the root cause of much of history's bloodshed. The Crusades were, in large part, the result of believing that Christianity was the truth and the crusaders were fulfilling the will of God by conquering and killing in his name. Sound familiar? The sins of western colonialism were committed by powers who believed they were exporting a superior culture. Nazi Germany was born out of national humiliation and the ensuing seductive delusion of racial superiority. Stalin's Gulag was the fruits of believing in the absolute supremacy of the communist state. Islamic fundamentalism sees its own religion as the final, fullness of truth given by God himself. Other loyalties, such as to fellow humans or to secular laws, wither in comparison.

Thinking you've got a monopoly on truth is the biggest mistake of all. This applies not just in the religious sphere but also to political and economic thinking and it applies regardless of the belief system: a Southern Baptist who believes they are in total possession of the truth is just as far from the mark as an atheist who thinks the same thing, or a Muslim. There is always more to learn and truth is always bigger than any book, any system, any religion.

The wisest and most inspiring people in history (in my opinion) have understood this. Rumi, Ghandi, Dr. King, Thich Nhat Hanh -all deeply rooted in their own tradition, even to the point of being true heroes of their tradition - all demonstrably knew their religious philosophy was mere scaffolding for the unseen temple of eternal truth.

There is no final revelation. There is no perfect religion. There might be the thing we call Truth but it is never a possession, it is at best a destination. Thinking you've got it all right and others are wrong is a sure path to disaster.

Nothing is gained however in pointing out potential flaws in other traditions while we all still have such beams in our own eyes. In the case of Islam it is best for Muslims themselves to critique the religion, encouraging more genuine historical criticism of the Qur'an. It is for the Muslim community to bear the greater load in meeting the challenge of Muslim extremism though they ought to be supported in every possible way to achieve this. We have no need of the firebrand believer denouncing other traditions but rather it is the dissident who is brave enough to call her own tradition to account that is required. Such leadership exists in Islam but needs wider public recognition in order to do the job.

As someone who comes from a Christian background I am heartened to see a rising level of self-criticism coming from both the Catholic and Protestant hemispheres. Such healthy and somewhat open discussions are not damaging the religion; they are far more likely redeeming it.

And the secular atheist worldview can hardly watch on smugly from the sidelines as depression and suicide, disconnection and despair run rampant through suburbs where unprecedented material wealth is only matched by the scale of the spiritual poverty. Fundamentalism of any kind is to be avoided but fundamentalist secular-materialism is one of the most sinister, dressed in the garments of "liberty "but cold and empty inside.

The answer lies in more education, more interaction between cultures, and more actual experience with people of different faiths and perspectives. This is one reason we run our cultural immersion programs into various religious traditions and why we are working towards the interfaith celebration of U DAY in Thailand this December.

We must all strive for more humility, more rigorous self-criticism, a willingness to engage sincerely with worldviews other that our own while always remaining open to the possibility of discovering new horizons of truth. Of course if you've already "found the truth" you are unlikely to keep seeking it.

Ben is the founder of World Weavers and can be contacted at ben@worldweavers.com

 

Follow Ben Bowler on Twitter: www.twitter.com/monkforamonth

FOLLOW UK
This week has seen a new eruption in the tensions between competing worldviews, as once again certain elements within Islam clashed with the secular West. Much has been written about the underlying ca...
This week has seen a new eruption in the tensions between competing worldviews, as once again certain elements within Islam clashed with the secular West. Much has been written about the underlying ca...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 134
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
researcher
researcher
07:01 AM on 10/02/2012
Well written article.

Now that said you left out buddhism as a religion that claims these truths and will not look outside what they deemed that the buddha taught.

I have even heard some buddhists call the buddha the perfect one which he like jesus never claimed.

I have learned one thing among many and that is not to look to science or religion or politicians for an understanding into these mysteries of life. they have powerful beliefs and agenda's to protect at all costs.

Now that said all religions including the religion of science have knowledge to offer any seeker just dont get caught up in thinking now you know all truths. the human ego is that deceptive as it wants to be known for knowing.
08:09 PM on 10/16/2012
Intersting - where do you get the idea that Jesus never claimed he was perfect?
06:15 AM on 09/27/2012
Excellent
02:00 PM on 09/26/2012
I really respect how Mr. Bowler does not minimize the seriousness of any of the issues, does not absolve any of the combatants in this cultural battle, but instead brings perspective and clear vision.
Great article!
09:51 PM on 09/24/2012
A suggestion for greater communication on this topic: can we generate a glossary of terms to use in discussion?
What is a religion - this term is now used for faiths that do not believe in God, and even political beliefs.
What is christianity - if someone tells me he is a christian, I don't really have much idea what he believes.
How do we distinguish between the beliefs of Jesus and those of the various christian churches?
What do you mean by a god - seems we might need a whole raft of definitions here.
Who was Mohammed what did he actually say? (I have the same problem if someone tells me she is a muslim - I don't know what she believes).
Truth, not what is the truth, but what we mean by truth, needs to be described (there can of course be many definitions of this).

Until we can create a common language that we can all use, any attempt to understand each other's views is generally pointless, as we will continue speak our belief's magic phrases to each other and understand nothing.

A simple example of the problem: I am an Atheist in the sense that I believe there is no supernatural god or creator, however I am an Agnostic in the sense that I have no idea how the universe came into existence.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Ben Bowler
12:40 AM on 09/25/2012
Good points Phil, well made. This discussion here is not the forum for a definition of terms and the article was not broad enough to go into every point & detail. I am not attacking individual atheists at all (you are not saying this but there is a lot of atheist anger in comments below). Mnay people see that the secular revolt against ecclesiastical power has swung the pendulum too far the other way, so all things that are unseen and exist beyond our "metrics" are deemed not to exist. I well understand the rational desire for proof but there are some things that lie beyond the domain of the rational and the provable and there is not much we can do about it except leaving room for the mystery and striving to keep both our hearts and minds open. I commend your honesty in declaring the great mystery of our existence and agree that a clear definition of terms is essential.
07:35 AM on 09/25/2012
" I well understand the rational desire for proof but the......"

I don't think many atheists expect proof for religious belief, but just a teeny bit of evidence that doesn't originate in, for example, a single very old and much-amended book would be welcome. (The Turin shroud and similar Catholic nonsense don't qualify).

In any event how can there be a proof of a particular faith or god? Proof of one would require the debunking of hundreds of others. Similarly even a little bit of evidence for one might seriously deplete the credence of hundreds of others. That's why there is no proof and there is no evidence. Atheists find this incompatibility of the innumerable religious beliefs too much to swallow and prefer to reject the lot.

If and when a shred of reasonable evidence turns up, they will be happy to think again, which is more than most religious believers would do under any circumstance.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fandabidozi
05:16 PM on 09/25/2012
//(you are not saying this but there is a lot of atheist anger in comments below). //

I'd appreciate it if you could state just where.

All I have seen are cogent rebuttals and the anger coming from the religious who haven't quite mastered the art of debate,

Simply stating something that isn't actually true to bolster an argument,well,doesn't.
09:49 PM on 09/24/2012
Ben, nice of you to talk about tolerance, understanding and not having the monoply on truth and then dedicate a whole paragraph attacking the secular atheist world view. Oh, the irony that appears to have passed you by.

Look to yourself first before preaching to others. please.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Ben Bowler
12:51 AM on 09/25/2012
I am attacking closed mindedness Richard of all types across the spectrum, if the shoes fits...
photo
Ian Llangan
Your Invisible Sky Friend Is Morally Abhorrent
07:19 PM on 09/25/2012
Well you have made some rather sweeping, uninformed assumptions by stating "And the secular atheist worldview can hardly watch on smugly from the sidelines as depression and suicide, disconnection and despair run rampant through suburbs where unprecedented material wealth is only matched by the scale of the spiritual poverty."

As if secular atheists, under a barrage of exhortations to believe in a plethora of non-existent beings, somehow sit in some shallow, suicidal suburban(?!?!) pit of "spiritual poverty". Certainly that does not qualify as one of the more accurate over-generalizations I have ever read. Yes, even materialistic suburban atheists do ponder life's great questions (why are we here? how did we get here? what is our purpose? etc., etc,) Just because they do not visibly and vocally invoke some magical invisible (fictional) being to explain it all away does not mean they are smug. Quite the reverse actually. Most of them are wondering what our fate as a species will be when so many people are willing to abdicate both credit for good and blame for bad to a non-existent entity.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nate35
05:01 PM on 09/24/2012
"Fundamentalism of any kind is to be avoided but fundamentalist secular-materialism is one of the most sinister, dressed in the garments of "liberty "but cold and empty inside."

Not to nit-pick an otherwise admirable article, but nothing about the act of believing in a deity stops you from being cold and empty. Most of religion seems devoted to ignoring the basic lack of meaning in human life rather than addressing it.
photo
philhellene
Far Left and Proud of It!
04:12 PM on 09/24/2012
The world would have been so much better if a few of its organized religions did not have words to the effect encouraging/demanding proselytizing.
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
04:09 PM on 09/24/2012
You forget one thing. People who don;t believe are not all atheists. Most of them are agnostics... our view is that we don't know truth and we are looking for it on a rationale way, always looking for answers and information. We reject superstitions. And we are not willing to be overwhelmed in our lives by the superstitions of others.

I don't say "there is no god". I am saying "show me the proof and I'll agree with you. In the meantime, the most likely answer is that you have been educated a certain way to accept certain things without knowing why."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nate35
04:58 PM on 09/24/2012
Most atheists are agnostics and vice versa. Most atheists you encounter will not say "there definitely and certainly is no God" in a serious, literal manner.
05:15 PM on 09/24/2012
Let's change the word " god" to "Santa clause" and restate your contention.

"Most atheists you encounter will not say there definitly and certainly is no Santa Clause in a serious, literal manner."

Sounds silly, no?
This comment has been removed.
02:23 PM on 09/24/2012
PS:
To my atheist siblings, I was once one of you. I recommend you don't give up on God. Spirit reality is most real of all, notwithstanding its apparent intangibility. God can be experienced, there are three levels of being, the physical, the mental/emotional, and the spiritual. Of the three, the spiritual is the most real, and ultimately, the most satisfying. Atheism may do good, but it is not goodness. Religion may do good too, but it also points to the source of absolute goodness. Atheism has only relative and manmade goodness, destined for unending disagreement and division. Sooner of later, all religions will get over themselves (or perish) and unify under the God of peace and love they so exuberantly extol.
02:22 PM on 09/24/2012
Ben seems to be thinking like I do, that evolved religion is subordinate to personal religious experience, true religion. Almost all evolved religions think their scared writings are infallible, but all contain both truth and errors. Real religion is not in a book, it is communion with our Maker. The only proof is inside, where God is.

But religions do serve in that they preserve and validate the spiritual experiences of our forebears, even if they do exaggerate and distort them. Somehow some adherents are able to sort thru the real and false and find the way to Spirit, in spite of dogma, doctrine and deeply flawed intermediaries, often fraught with political and social agendas.

Yes, Islam has militancy and misogyny issues, but so does Christianity, they all are still evolving. One of the best ways for every person on the planet, theist or atheist, to live in peace is to know each other better. I think Ben is onto something with cross cultural exchanges, borrowing another's belief system for a few days. One day, one great day, people won't take their religion as handed down, they'll live it anew.
This comment has been removed.
05:24 PM on 09/24/2012
So what you are saying is your belief system is superior to everyone elses. How humble of you!
Also, you seem to be saying that the supreme creator of the universe lives inside me?
What about when I eat a curry? And my friend is incredibly sweaty, hairy, and flatulent. I don't think god would like living in him either.

But I would agree that Islam and Christianity are evolving. Eventually we will all be rational atheists.
02:22 PM on 09/24/2012
Ben Bowler The answer lies in the revelation--note that, revelation--of Jesus Christ by the power of the Holy Spirit and not by any use of the intellect. Then you know the weaknesses of the flesh. Peter.
05:26 PM on 09/24/2012
Advising people to stay ignorant and blissful seems a rather fatuous solution.
08:09 PM on 09/24/2012
Thank you for your reply Abdul. There are too many intellectuals in charge of religious affairs in the Christianty of our present day. If we see a decline in Christian influence it is due entirely to the lack of activity by the Holy Ghost at this present time. Bible College and University graduates have taken over the supervision of Christianity but this hardly replaces the preaching of the Christian gospel as it was in the days of Jesus Christ. Peter.
09:43 PM on 09/24/2012
He he. Always my favourite kind of answer......Your first sentence simply makes no sense at all and yet is the type of answer that always appears in this type of article.
11:33 PM on 09/24/2012
Thank you for your reply. After reading the article by BB my comment was to be critical of all professional journalists and writers and those who pretend their views are to be taken seriously because of qualifications obtained at a university or Bible college. If it confuses you there is nothing I can do about it. Peter.
07:14 PM on 09/25/2012
And his second sentence is a non sequitur.
lastpost
see biography
02:09 PM on 09/24/2012
“the underlying causes of the violence seen around the world”
Police throw rocks back at rioters below. Why not grab the bull by the bullhorn, and invite the most eloquent representative from the crowd to come forward? To present and be questioned on their worldview. Then when they've stopped laughing, they can go home.

“a potent mix of fuels”
Or impotent mixed up fools? In agreement with your fellow anarchists? How so? When not aware of what each individually believes?

“Muslim leaders”
on a TV discussion, wholeheartedly agreed with each other and a non Muslim. When it transpired their goals were essentially common.

"if it bleeds it leads"
What a bl**din’ way to earn a living.

“religion poisons everything.”
There are other poisonous ideologies that are not religions. Ergo, the poison is a factor of the process creating ideologies. Human imagination.

“The issue is certainly highly complex”
Not. Don’t confuse manifestations with the mechanism. Address the device flaw.

“viewpoints contrasting to our own”
All understandings are erroneous. Hands up, who is 100% right?

“fulfilling the will of God”
as he/she/or it isn’t up to it.

“the biggest mistake of all”
Mistaking unique subjective renditions of reality for reality itself.

“There is no final revelation”
except an improbable direct mental connection (bypassing the wiring) with external reality.

“atheist worldview”
There is no god, or I’d know about it? Doh!

"The answer lies in more"
questions. Only truth has, and wants to share and test them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saint wright
Dyslexic old chippy
01:55 PM on 09/24/2012
The reports shows the Pakistani men regard non-Muslim white girls as fair game little better than meat. It also shows most other Asians are not involved it’s a Pakistani hate crime.

The Times concludes that the Police and Councils failed to act because it was easier to blame the girls as if they invited their own abuse, rather than inflame the host community when the details became known from Court cases. Terrible sex crimes against young white girls have gone unpunished and the girls left to bear the wounds inflicted to body on soul.

We should all demand that the Government acts now to prevent further abuse and prosecute the offenders so far left free to abuse and the Police and Councils Official’s for their failure to prevent this sexual abuse and cover it up for over a decade?

Wonder if there will be major protests in the UK Muslim community concerning these terrible crimes or is it just criticism of Islam & cartoons that offends them?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saint wright
Dyslexic old chippy
01:53 PM on 09/24/2012
Police Files Reveal they played down Muslim abuse of young White Girls for a Decade?

Back in 5/1/11 the Times revealed that serving Police Officers from across the North and the Midland’s had asked the Times to publish the inconvenient fact that Muslims sex gangs mostly of Pakistani origin were preying on young white girls, which lead to 68 people being found guilty .
Today 24/9/12 the Times front page informs us that 200 secret Police reports show the problem is far greater than we had been told “the biggest child protection scandal of our times.” Yet most of the sex offenders have not been prosecuted and the abused girls given no help, in fact betrayed by the state.

The Times reveals that in one authority South Yorkshire the police and child protection agencies had extensive knowledge and evidence of sexual grooming in its area, and girls being taken around the Country to be repeatedly raped by Pakistani men. The reports show that thousands of girls have been abused by organised gangs since 2000, without the Police taking any action to prevent it continuing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Fowler
I try....I really do!
01:27 PM on 09/24/2012
You write,in part, "The answer lies in more education...."

Sadly, in many countries, a child is simply a form of cheap labour and gets no education; or worse, only gets a "religious" education and thus is indocrinated for life.