Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Bill Coles

GET UPDATES FROM Bill Coles
 

Like It or Lump It: Brace Yourselves for Queen Camilla

Posted: 12/02/2013 23:00

A decade ago, it would have seemed unthinkable, but after one of the most outstanding rehabilitation exercises that has ever been orchestrated, Camilla the Duchess of Cornwall is bang on course to become Queen Camilla.

When Prince Charles and Camilla got engaged in 2005, it was inconceivable that she would ever been taken on the title of 'Queen'.

Instead, Charles peddled the line that she would be his 'Princess Consort'. But let us be candid: this was only ever a sop to the British public.

If, ten years ago, people had thought that Camilla was going to be the Queen, there would have been rioting in the streets. If the matter had come up in 1997, after the Princess Diana, the public outrage would have been so visceral that today we probably wouldn't even have a monarchy.

But now that Camilla's public rehabilitation is all but complete, we might as well cut the cackle: when the Queen dies, there will be no abdication, there will be no Prince William leap-frogging onto the throne, and Prince Charles will become Charles III.

Further to that: Charles's wife is going to be right by his side - and she will not be his 'Princess Consort', she will be his equal. She will be The Queen.

For a few diehards, this title will very much stick in the craw. Camilla is, after all, the woman who seemingly stole Prince Charles away from his Diana. Who the hell is this schemer, this adulteress, to think that she can lord it over the rest of us and become Charles' Queen Consort of Great Britain, Ireland and her other Realms and Territories?

But that is how it is: in over a thousand years of British Monarchy, the King's wife - no matter how loathed - has automatically become the Queen. Do not think for a moment that this practice is going to stop when Charles takes the throne.

The title of 'Princess Consort' was merely a ruse to give the flinty-hearted British public enough time to warm to Camilla. It seems that they have now done just that.

There are still, of course, a minority of Brits who have never warmed to Camilla, and who will for ever be Princess Diana's champions. But though the majority of Brits may not have accepted Camilla into their hearts, they are at least slightly endeared to her.

For her part, Camilla has played an absolute blinder. Since she married Prince Charles in 2005, she's not set a foot out of line. She hasn't said a single word out of turn, or dropped a single Prince Philip-like clanger; she has thrown herself into her royal duties and her various charities; and, most important of all, Camilla has seemed loyal and supportive to both Harry and William, not to mention the latest Royal darling, the Duchess of Cambridge.

So: pish to all this babble about Prince Charles abdicating from the job that he's been groomed for since the day he was born; and double-pish to this cant that Camilla will one day just be his 'Princess Consort'.

Though these two debates have provided endless entertainment for the masses over the past decade, it is time to say things as they are: when Charles takes to the throne, Camilla will be the Queen, and when we meet Her Maj, we all of us will be expected to be bowing and scraping like the best of them.

 
 
 

Follow Bill Coles on Twitter: www.twitter.com/WilliamColes1

FOLLOW UK
A decade ago, it would have seemed unthinkable, but after one of the most outstanding rehabilitation exercises that has ever been orchestrated, Camilla the Duchess of Cornwall is bang on course to bec...
A decade ago, it would have seemed unthinkable, but after one of the most outstanding rehabilitation exercises that has ever been orchestrated, Camilla the Duchess of Cornwall is bang on course to bec...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:30 PM on 02/14/2013
I realise this might be unwelcome information to some, and I apologise if it upsets anyone, but facts are facts. And the fact is, the wife of the King automatically becomes the Queen Consort when the King is crowned.

That's the way it has always been, and that's the way it will be when Charles becomes King. His wife will be Queen Consort. It isn't a matter of who 'deserves' the title or who doesn't. The title of Queen Consort is based solely on the fact that the woman is the wife of the King. That's it. The title of Queen Consort can't be earned or given as a symbol of merit, and it can't be taken away for those reasons either.

Bottom line: The spouse of a King is Queen Consort. The spouse of a Queen is Prince Consort. Both titles have been that way for more than a thousand years, so it's extremely doubtful things will change.
02:35 PM on 02/16/2013
I don't see any reason why something can't change just because it has "been that way for more than a thousand years". You don't think anything in the world has changed in a thousand years? It just bothers me that the sexes are not equal. If a King's wife is a Queen, then a Queen's husband should be a King. If a Queen's husband is a Prince, then a King's wife should be a Princess. If they can change the succession rules they can change other things too.
03:29 AM on 03/05/2013
A bit puzzling....The present Queen's Father became King, right ?
His existing wife was known as Queen, was she not ?
And later, when her daughter was made Queen, 'Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother'
Our wonderful Queen Elizabeth II was married to Philip before she became Queen, and then he was 'Prince Philip', not 'King Philip'.....
Diana was a 'commoner', yes?
She married Prince Charles, and became a Princess.
Kate, also a 'commoner', married Prince William, yet is only a Duchess.....
As long as they can all find some happiness, that's all...we all only have one life....
but you see my confusion ?
Please explain, someone?
Thank you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
11:42 AM on 02/13/2013
There is a certain grim satisfaction in seeing so many who apparently were heart broken at Diana's death now being cheerleaders for the woman who was in a long term adulterous relationship with Charlie SaxeCoburg.
It just underlines how much of a soap opera monarchy is. Whats on the other channel ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pat Brand
Getting on a bit, but loving every day I get.
10:13 AM on 02/13/2013
She is a very common commoner. I would never defer to her (or him for that matter).
10:10 AM on 02/13/2013
But she won't be "his equal" will she? Camilla may well be Queen Consort, but a such she will have no constitutional rôle. The only "equal" monarchs we've ever had were William III and Mary II: that was officially a "dual monarchy".

Mr Coles may not think that this detail matters, but disregard for inconvenient facts is the essence of sloppy journalism!
photo
hearthammer
If left is right and right is wrong, decide!
09:50 AM on 02/13/2013
Jeez, there's that Sycophant tab again?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ian Rennie
It irritates people that I'm a librarian :)
09:06 AM on 02/13/2013
The exact title given to the this person is of far less concern to me than the fact that it's 2013 and we still seem to think that a hereditary head of state is a good idea.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:55 AM on 02/13/2013
Di's well and truly gone, and Charlie surely wasn't the only monarch to have strayed (or galloped) outside the marital bed. You love who you love, and he loved Camilla. Get over it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
11:39 AM on 02/13/2013
Saying he strayed from the Roya maritial is inaccurate, it would seem he only visted frequently enough to prouduce the children and returned to his normal bed of chice in between.
02:21 PM on 02/13/2013
then he should'nt have married Diane, he should have had the guts to follow his heart..I would not like him to be King and certainly not ''that'' woman as queen,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saidas
12:58 AM on 02/13/2013
The Brits apparently haven't had their fill of horses yet!

*rimshot* "Thank you. Thank you. I'll be here all week."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deluk
disgusted.
11:03 AM on 02/13/2013
We have our fill of good comedians....I wouldn't apply for the role of court jester just yet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saidas
03:21 PM on 02/13/2013
C'mon now deluk. Where's your sense of humor? I was just horsin' around! *rimshot*
12:52 PM on 02/13/2013
@Saidas

Ouch!
The rumours that Camilla is entered in the 3:30 at Ascot are just- rumours. :-/
02:22 PM on 02/13/2013
I;ve seen better looking horses
10:30 PM on 02/12/2013
Camilla, at most, should achieve the title Pricess Consort - no more. The law was changed only a few years ago to let Charlie boy remarry and retain his right to the throne - anything more would be an insult.

Queen Victoria had Prince Albert as a Consort - Charlie boy deserves no more.
02:11 AM on 02/13/2013
Queen Victoria was a Queen in her own right,Camilla would be Queen in name only.
10:29 AM on 02/13/2013
My point is that there is no reason to bestow the title Queen on her since Prince Albert (a prince in his own right) never achieved the status of King - even in name only.
10:22 PM on 02/12/2013
She should at best be referred to as the Princess Consort - no more. The law was changed so that the heir (Charlie boy) retains his right to the throne but we didn't throw out all our traditions and values.

Victoria took the throne with a consort at her side - Charles is worth no more.
07:03 PM on 02/12/2013
Explain why Camilla is not known as The Princess of Wales, then? Why does the official Prince of Wales FAQ still insist she will be known as The Princess Consort?
08:16 PM on 02/12/2013
Actually Camilla IS The Princess of Wales as she takes on the feminine version of all of Charles' titles. It was out of respect for the late Diana that I believe she has chosen to be styled as The Duchess of Cornwall. The Duke of Cornwall actually is Charles' oldest title. Actually it will take Parliamentary legislation for Camilla to be titled as The Princess Consort in her own right as women in the UK take their titles from their husbands. If Charles is King, Camilla will be Queen.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThinkinPerson
10:01 PM on 02/12/2013
Well great. Will she be any more willing to sit down with the treaty holders of Canada given that the words require so and its embarrassing to watch the Queen let the oil companies write her laws?
03:48 AM on 02/13/2013
Ah, respect for *Diana*! Camilla being Princess of Wales is merely a technicality. Perhaps her being Queen will also be merely a technicality as well. The article implies that Camilla will be known as Her Majesty Queen Camilla, not just technically.