Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Carla Buzasi

GET UPDATES FROM Carla Buzasi
 

The Week That Was

Posted: 08/01/12 00:00

You'd have been forgiven for thinking The Sun had taken over the national press this week what with all the column inches devoted to British women's breasts - although sadly actual bags of silicon don't make for such eye-catching pictures as boobs bolstered by them.

As thousands of women counted down the days and hours to discover the official line on the potential ticking time-bombs sitting within their bodies, arguments raged over whether it was fair the tax payer foot the bill for the removal of the PIP implants and in amongst it all we appeared to gloss over the more important issue at hand: why so many thousands of women, year after year, feel compelled to have surgery in the first place.

Right up front, let me say this isn't a polemic against those who choose to have surgery, a debate I've already had with a number of men this week who were unable to understand the depths of depression the 'wrong' size breasts can and do cause for millions of women.
I'm very much in favour of changing things that make you unhappy. Hate your weight: do more exercise. Unfulfilled in your job: look for a new one. Miserable in your relationship: end it. There is no point moaning about something to everyone around you if you're not prepared to be proactive yourself.

However, and this is a big however, taking risks with your health is very infrequently the answer. It is a wonderful thing that medical science has evolved so that women who suffer from breast cancer can face the world again with reconstructed breasts, and I loved the positivity that Hollywood star Christina Applegate faced her double mastectomy with some years ago saying, "I'm going to have the best boobs in the nursing home."

However, we can't ignore the fact we live in a world where a mother buys her seven-year-old daughter a plastic surgery voucher for her birthday and a liposuction voucher for Christmas.

It's not just the surgery of course, it's the cosmetic injections - the Botox and fillers - that are available on every high street now, unregulated and potentially dangerous. As recently as Saturday, senior surgeons called for fillers to be reclassified as medicines (they are currently classified as 'devices') and their use to be more tightly moderated after women who'd had them injected 10 years back came forward and complained about how the substance had moved around their faces, causing discomfort and disfigurement.

The silver lining to this medically complicated cloud is that the debate about cosmetic surgery is back in the spotlight - now we need to begin having a sensible conversation about it.

As a start, society needs to start taking responsibility for the impossible ideals of womanhood we keep thrusting forwards: the tiny waists and huge bosoms (and not a wrinkle in sight).
Better instead the gorgeous photos of Jessica Ennis in next month's Marie Claire, popping up in numerous newspapers yesterday. If we're looking for a poster girl for young women, scratch that, women of every age, here's a front-runner (no pun intended) for the job. And yet even lauded for her success and gracing the cover of a glossy fashion mag, those deep-rooted, omnipresent female insecurities are ever present. "I don't even see myself as that attractive. My fiancé would say I am but I don't see it," Ennis admits in the accompanying interview.

However, there's a positive message to take away. "I've gone through teenage years when I wanted a figure like everyone else," she adds. "But as I've got older, I've been able to see my body in a different way - it's a tool for my job."

We can't all have the bodies of Olympic athletes, but healthy fit bodies seem something more aspirational to strive for than artificially curved ones.

 

Follow Carla Buzasi on Twitter: www.twitter.com/CarlaBuzasi

You'd have been forgiven for thinking The Sun had taken over the national press this week what with all the column inches devoted to British women's breasts - although sadly actual bags of silicon don...
You'd have been forgiven for thinking The Sun had taken over the national press this week what with all the column inches devoted to British women's breasts - although sadly actual bags of silicon don...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
23:49 on 08/01/2012
Lets be clear here - the vast majority of pressure on a woman's perception of her physique is heaped upon her by... other women. This idea that it is men that drive women toward smaller waistbands and enhanced breasts is totally unfounded. The comment by Jessica Ennis is a case in point - her fiance (as with the overwhealming majority of men with their female partners) is more than happy with her physical appearence but she isn't convinced. When are the women going to give themselves a break?
22:17 on 08/01/2012
As a tax payer for over 40 years I cannot agree that I should help towards paying to get someone's wife's tits sorted out. If they could pay for the implants in the first place then surely it is even more important to pay to have those implants removed. Or they need to bring private prosecution to the surgeon or implant manufacturer or both for medical incompetence. However I do agree with "Cruze" that the Government/tax payer should step in if those implants were part of a health issue.
20:04 on 08/01/2012
Every one knows that surgeons working in the N.H.S also do private work so what happens when you go to see your N.H.S surgeon and he says the N.H.S wont take them out ,but as a private surgeon i will take them out for £2600 and put some more in for another £1000 ?

By the same token you could get the same surgeon who did it privately and knew they were substandard ,to be the same surgeon working for the N.H.S who may or not take them out !
19:52 on 08/01/2012
the company that made these implants were making millions for the french government the fact that they were not fit for purpose did not come into it ,i heard that they were in business for 13 years and that people in America did some research into failiure the rate was put at 15% .

The surgeons that used the pip implants knew they were using sub standard silicone because they were so cheap , the clinics that did these operations have a corporate moral responsibility to the clients .

The British governments response ,was to say the least disgusting ,telling the women they had nothing to worry about ! and asking the clinics for reports on failed procedures ,
Every other country in world affected by this problem is doing something about it apart from the British government !
19:37 on 08/01/2012
Yes, the cost should fall on the manufactur­es to shoulder any costs incurred in replacing them and if they go bankrupt make the Government of that Country pay. They would want make Britain pay, as usual.
15:37 on 08/01/2012
If these implants are not fit for purpose the surgeon who put them in or that practice/clinic should take them out.. If you have teeth implants and they don't work for whatever reason the dentist who put them in takes them out and bears the cost, so pray tell me the difference, ( except that teeth implants are not only for cosmetic reason but for reasons of health.. ) I would however say that if the implants are as part of surgery after breast cancer or any other illness and it was carrried out on the NHS the the NHS should bear the cost.. I don't see the problem.. you cannot run to the NHS when the private clinics cock up!!! point made I think.
10:58 on 08/01/2012
It seems quite clear to me that these implants were not fit for purpose and so it should without doubt fall on the manufactures to shoulder any costs incurred in replacing them. Certainly not on the british tax payer.