Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Caroline Frost

GET UPDATES FROM Caroline Frost
 

'I'm A Celebrity' Has the X Factor, But Time for 'X Factor' to Get Out of Here!

Posted: 22/11/2012 00:00

This week's nonsense on X Factor is only the latest evidence that this show has X-pired its sell-by date. Meanwhile, I'm A Celebrity... Get Me Out Of Here! goes from strength to strength. What does this tell us about what viewers want?

Crowds booed and Twitterers tweeted in disgust as the two performers with any vestige of ability were forced into the bottom two, but the biggest surprise was their surprise. X Factor has never been about making music, it's about making money.

Tulisa and Louis' 'mutual dislike', the source reports about backstage backstabbing, Gary's disgust, the ongoing battles for alpha-female supremacy... can we not smell the cunning hand of a busy publicist at work? In his biography of Simon Cowell, Tom Bower spelt out, for those who hadn't guessed, how these stories are placed in the press during the week to spice up curiosity and ratings in time for the weekend.

From its inception, X Factor was never about music. Simon Cowell was desperate to get away from the grip of Pop Idol or, more accurately, his rival Simon Fuller, so he had to come up with a sufficiently different format. It wasn't to ensure better talent emerged, it was to escape a lawsuit. Which he did. And it was great. Huge salute.

Arthur Schopenhauer once told us that while the proof of talent was to land the target where no one else could hit, genius involved hitting a mark no one else could see. And the charismatic toilet brush has done just that, turned musical snobbery on its head, made TV a primary vessel for shifting records, turned dancing dogs into stars and filled his coffers in the process.

But now it's time for him to sail away on his yacht. What he sowed, he must reap and, just as he has never pretended to be invested in his artists' development, so we're no longer interested in his shows. They're bubble gum pop and the bubble has popped. Simon Cowell, more than anyone, would understand and appreciate the irony.

Meanwhile, over in the jungle, the antics of a bunch of 'celebs' are drawing in upwards of ten million viewers, even on a school nightly basis. Why does a bunch of people stuck together with no makeup and little food inspire such fascination?

The celebrity angle is obviously key. Because we're sold such a load of airbrushed gloss the rest of the time, it's great fun to see them behind the curtain - pot bellies, big legs, eye-bags and all. They are just like us in their mottled skins, and we like them so much more for it.

Obviously, our huge delight is reserved for when the ones who rely most on their physical attributes (exhibit A - Helen Flanagan) find that, sans mascara, they are ill-equipped for jungle life, and all the shrieks that follow.

Our greatest glee comes when these more theatrical, diva-esque types try to bring their sense of privilege into the camp, and get short shrift from the others. Because, from the dawn of time, we've always loved a good ruck - one that hasn't come from a publicist's pen, but from the simple social disaster of too much time spent in the same limited company. When Limahl told Helen, "You're always saying 'ridiculous', and you don't even mean 'ridiculous'", it could have been two people stuck together on the warehouse floor, one with an annoying whistle. Murders have been committed for less, and it's something we can all relate to.

Simon Cowell in the jungle - now that would make good television...

The underlying subtext of the whole show remains robust - helped along by Ant and Dec conspiring very much with the viewer against the 'celebs' (even though this cheeky pair's fortunes dwarf most of the rest combined) - that these celebs in all their normality, fragility and everyday nonsense will be revealed, and nowhere more so than in the torture chambers of the bush tucker trials.

Because critters can't be scripted. Termites don't know the difference between a Corrie star and a mere boxing champion - they bite and poke democratically. Animals and nature are God's great levellers, and in this age of celebrity worship and arbitrary adulation, a show like this isn't just a guilty pleasure, it's actually a necessity to remind us that, however many free shampoos and nightclub invites some privileged people receive, in the final reckoning, everyone has to be able to heat a bowl of beans, cope with a twig in their hair and ultimately sleep with the light off.

 

Follow Caroline Frost on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Frostalicus

FOLLOW UK ENTERTAINMENT
This week's nonsense on X Factor is only the latest evidence that this show has X-pired its sell-by date. Meanwhile, I'm A Celebrity... Get Me Out Of Here! goes from strength to strength. What does th...
This week's nonsense on X Factor is only the latest evidence that this show has X-pired its sell-by date. Meanwhile, I'm A Celebrity... Get Me Out Of Here! goes from strength to strength. What does th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:22 AM on 11/24/2012
Schopenaeur and Cowell in the same sentence! Colour me deconstructionalist. Even now Derrida must be rotating in his grave. intellectual analysis gone bananas.... One program involves a rehash of opportunity knocks, the other how low can a celeb go. Neither justifies an ounce of thought beyond the simple analysis; Pop Will Eat Itself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ian Rennie
It irritates people that I'm a librarian :)
07:56 PM on 11/22/2012
I disagree. They could both get off my television and the only reason I'd notice is that my twitter feed would be slightly less irritating and I would be more capable of ignoring Nadine Dorries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Wilson
What's the story mourning Tories?
05:43 PM on 11/22/2012
I sooooo agree! IACGMOOH's key to success is that isn't on TV for months at a time and it seriously tries to do different things each year. X Factor has a habit of using the same songs every year. Has there ever been a year when someone didn't sing 'over the rainbow'? Everything about X Factor drags and is repetitive, case in point: Louis.
02:49 PM on 11/25/2012
I don't really see what is different on I'm a Celeb this year as opposed to last year; it's still makeup-less 'celebs' being forced to lie in coffins with bugs thrown over them in order to secure a meal. It's hardly ground breaking.
05:30 PM on 11/22/2012
why not put Celebs into the Jungle with normal members of the public and offer the winner says £1 million pounds doing the trials like having to get your own food by catching it etc
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
999criticalmary
03:18 PM on 11/22/2012
''get me out'' increasingly necessary?

Please explain WHY?

I've seen this prog ...once. Heard a lot of '' stuff'' about it.
It appeared boring, sounds boring from what i read.

''Panorama'' I'd classify as a necessary programm, Surely not The Jungle Bumble
12:41 PM on 11/22/2012
well written :- )
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Platt
11:54 AM on 11/22/2012
They're both farces. The difference is, I'm A Celebrity has no illusions about what it is and cheerfully alternates between celebrity torture and voyeuristic camp politics - cheap thrills, in other words. It's about the least pretentious thing on TV and that makes it incredibly likeable.

The X Factor on the other hand is a mess. Markets itself as a singing competition when it's clearly a popularity contest - see contestants tripping over themselves to be the one with the saddest backstory/most public sympathy. The auditions phase is an exercise in laughing at people who are deficient in some way. And in the end, the winner usually gets their Christmas hit and then vanishes without trace.

It's all very mean-spirited and cruel, and I think that's why people are moving away from it. It's becoming a caricature of itself in the same way that Big Brother did - going out of its way to find wacky people to manufacture good telly in this incredibly cynical (and therefore unlikeable) way.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
999criticalmary
03:27 PM on 11/22/2012
Have to say Tom. I think from my quick trip into the Jungle ,, I found at least two very pretentious beings.

One who constantly wanted to be on camera the whole time = pretending to be something she wasnt , pretending to be in the show, pretending she cared, pretending she was scared.
All in the name of '' more publicity the better'

And the dare i say..- dizzy Dorris....totally pretentious.. Pretends she's a caring MP. Pretends she cares about anyone other than self interests. pretends she cares about her constituents. pretends she cares about her elected job as an MP. pretends she's on the show for altruistic reasons. Today she pretends ( as a change of stance) shes on the show to demonstrate a ''different'' side of M P's

I can't see what people are watching. I cant see beyond the silliness of it all. Maybe that's the thing eh? maybe people just need to zombie out = laugh at others.?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Platt
04:37 PM on 11/22/2012
I was talking about the show, not the people on it. The X Factor presents itself as a talent show disingenuously when it is in fact a popularity contest. I'm A Celebrity on the other hand is straight-up about borderline torturing celebrities, seeing them with their slap off, getting the attractive ones naked and finding a hero amongst them. No hidden agenda, no attempts to manipulate the public. I think that's why it's so much more popular.

The X Factor tries to find a star among normal people, and usually fails. I'm A Celebrity makes stars into normal people, and succeeds. That's why I'm A Celeb does better.