Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Charlie Ivens

GET UPDATES FROM Charlie Ivens
 

Where now for Resurrected Left-Pop Iconoclasts Pulp?

Posted: 01/09/11 11:14 BST

Pulp play two sold-out nights at Brixton Academy this week, ending a summer of triumphant festival appearances. But one lifelong fan won't be there. Charlie Ivens explains why.

Sun 3 July 2011, 9.30pm, at the Wireless Festival in London's Hyde Park. Pulp are midway through their first UK show in nine years, having been officially "on hiatus" since their (underrated, in retrospect) final album We Love Life failed to ignite the charts as its three predecessors had. The six-piece band look bullish, proud to be back at the top - and, it's impossible to ignore, not only old enough to know better than to join the often depressing indie heritage merry-go-round, but also grimly prepared to offer a swift uppercut to anyone questioning their decision.

Luckily, theirs is a flawless, seamless, rocket-fuelled performance. Truly, it's like they've never been away. As thousands of now slightly balding, slightly paunchy men and their now slightly laughter-lined, slightly more tired other halves relive their twenties with wide grins and evocative singalongs to 'Mis-Shapes', 'Disco 2000', even early-set surprise 'Mile End', singer Jarvis Cocker reminds the throng why Pulp were once so important. He quotes Shelley before 'This Is Hardcore', and muses about the irony of the working class Sheffield band playing on the London doorstep of scores of crazy-wealthy plutocrats and oligarchs up the road in Knightsbridge and Kensington.

But is it really ironic? For all their "grass is something you smoke/birds are something you shag/take your Year in Provence/and shove it up your ass", urban class warrior schtick of yore - both 'I Spy' and inevitable teary-eyed finale 'Common People' sound doubly venomous in Hyde Park - the band that provided both soundtrack and context for a generation of outsiders, bookworms, introverts and geeks are more part of the establishment today than they've ever been. Their decision to reform for the 2011 festival season (20 international festivals and a couple of side shows since May) could reasonably be viewed as one final, unapologetic tilt at the capitalist dream, for a band of self-confessed dyed-in-the-wool lefties. But they've given no interviews on the subject, so fans are left guessing.

By way of context, I'm one such fan. Around the end of 1993, hearing 'Razzmatazz' on John Peel's Festive Fifty led to Pulp rapidly replacing The Cure in my post-adolescent mind as The Band - y'know, The Band, the totem, the everything, the one by which all others will be judged, so help them. And there they remained for the next decade - becoming, in the process, the subject of the first live review I ever had published, in April 1994 - joined occasionally by close running mates but still miles ahead... for their absurdly crunchy take on artful pop music; and for their wonderful taste in clothes and culture; and for Jarvis's peerless way with a devastatingly well observed, darkly witty rhyming couplet.

Hell, his couplets often didn't even rhyme - 'I Spy' again: "The crowd gasp at Cocker's masterful control of the bicycle/skilfully avoiding the dog turd outside the corner shop" - but they truly spoke to me, made me laugh as much as they made me think (and dance, and drink and screw)... and to thousands of others, who a decade earlier would've been transfixed by Morrissey, another decade earlier by Bowie or even Jake Thackray, and another by Ray Davies or (perchance to dream) Anthony Newley.

I heard friends burbling with unabashed, redole(sc)ent joy at seeing the first Pulp comeback show at Spain's Primavera festival in May (which I was meant to have attended), and then witnessed it myself in London in July - the band absolutely owning the stage, the audience and the venue (it's surely no surprise their 1998 live DVD, also filmed in London, was titled The Park Is Mine) at Wireless. I then watched with (yes) ill-placed paternal pride as Pulp racked up rave review after rave review across Europe and Australia, fans and critics alike united in adoration, repeating the new orthodoxy that states that in the battle between Blur and Oasis, Pulp were the real winners (never mind that Pulp started as the little Art Rock Engine That Could, as contemporaries of The Smiths and The Fall and James a decade earlier). I heard all this, and then I thought... enough.

Because what can they do now? As a band of perennial underdogs, whose very existence was arguably founded on Having Something To Prove, Pulp are fresh run out of motivation. Sure, there's a new generation to entice - as the also recently reunited Suede have realised successfully - and no doubt a fair percentage of the Brixton crowd will be younger folks wondering who the hell might represent them, when the adults in their line of sight seem intent on exposing themselves as venal, self-serving liars, and their own peers' self-appointed spokespeople are woolly-minded, self-destructive druggies or cold-eyed, MBA-wielding careerists.

But Pulp, really, with all the greatest will in the world, are over - and they may actually have failed. The world they sing about no longer exists, but the class divide is more yawning than ever, and no doubt it won't be long before an odious MP is vaulting blithely over the point and proclaiming himself to be a fan of old, just like David Cameron did with The Jam and The Smiths. Jarvis, such a welcome addition to the BBC 6 Music roster, may feel duty bound to echo Johnny Marr's "banning" of Cameron's fan status, but he might also stop to think about the mis-shapes he left behind, and the fact that the substantial cash Pulp have no doubt earned during this tour could take the band further from the roots they so love.

Damned if they do (and they did); damned if they don't (and there are plenty of passionate quotes suggesting they never would). Pulp have covered themselves in glory with a perfectly pitched, dignified but determined reunion run. They've reasserted their position as UK pop's last great outsiders, and they've reminded two or three generations of their sizeable arsenal of deathless, uniquely speckled, potentially life-altering tunes.

But now - in a post-Manics, post-Gaga, even post-Amanda Palmer world, where there's plenty of representation for people who don't feel at home among the Normals - it's time for Pulp to stop before it all becomes unedifying. I still maintain a great love for Pulp, and for exactly that reason, I'm staying at home.

 

Follow Charlie Ivens on Twitter: www.twitter.com/whereismyquiz

 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:07 PM on 09/02/2011
what a load of absolute rubbish this article is. so, you meant to travel to spain to attend their first festival appearance, managed to miss their 20 other gigs, but decided to not attend their gigs at the o2? and why? what point are you trying to prove? that you'd miss your 'favourite' band because the things they sing about aren't relevant anymore? i think otherwise. i think if teenagers listened to their lyrics, they could mold them to fit our world now. music doesn't go out of style and people (myself included) will see pulp as long as they choose to tour.
01:42 PM on 09/02/2011
oh yeah and a "post-manics, post gaga, post amanda palmer" world means there's no space for Pulp exactly how? I'm staggered by the lameness of this point. Lady Gaga is great but her self-proclaimed "outsider/eccentric" status is her least convincing, most fabricated attribute.. her tunes are brilliantly constructed but her persona lacks the authenticity of Cocker's knowing and caustic lyricism. I feel like a dork for even responding to this utterly nonsensical comparision. the Manics reference is even worse - they've been around since the early 90s and haven't made anything but handwringing boring dadrock since the early 90s.. and AMANDA PALMER? what does a cringible american burlesque cheesemonger have to do with this most cherished, gloriously seedy, fiery, intellectual and idiosyncratic english pop band. what's next? "in a post "Fall Out Boy" world, we don't need Pulp". Good god man.

Dismissing Pulp as irrelevant because they have made a brilliant, successful and frankly life-affirming career out of resonating with the country/the world's misshapes, mistakes and misfits marks you out as someone doesn't really understand the band's ethos.. I don't claim to speak for the band but I know it's not about accepting marginal/outcast status and spending your life in a worthy little rut. Pulp are huge and they've never sold out anything but shows.. that's the way to do it man. anyway I hope you had fun at home on Weds/Thurs tweeting people while we were having a party
01:26 PM on 09/02/2011
What a terrible article.. please tell me you didn't get paid for that. It's always sad when some no-name journalist decides to be the "voice of a generation" or in this case the "voice of a band's fans" or whatever malarkey. "ooh I have liked the band since 1993 so I'm qualified to pronounce on whether or not they are relevant". No thanks..no one cares that you didn't get tickets to the show either.. I went on the 31st Aug and it was easily the best gig I've been to all year, and yes I was at Hyde Park. Pulp is a band best seen in the dark, indoors, filled with lithe sweaty hardcore fans .. Wireless was a great affirmation of what a mammoth and resonant band they still are, but seeing them play b-sides and rarities in the cavernous yet still somehow intimate Brixton academy was just perfect.

Not attending one of your so-called "favourite" bands best gigs ever (and I've seen em enough times to know) because of some vague wishy-washy BS about future tory MPs namechecking the band (?!) is already totally sad and wrongheaded.. but writing a weak article about said sad decision is some next level nerdiness.
12:24 PM on 09/02/2011
20,000 people standing in a field sure enjoyed the comeback (or for many people the first taste of pulp), now its time to put the pulp comeback to rest (at least until the festival season)
03:50 PM on 09/01/2011
I seriously doubted their return to the festival circuits, especially when they didn't do any press bonanza. And especially now that Jarvis turned himself into Tom Green's twin brother professor, Pulp's strength relied on Mr. Cocker's charismatic good looks and now it's gone ( he just needs to wash). So yeah, the reunion juggernaut was quite impressive.
With only 2 more shows left, I'll not be surprised if they announce a North American tour and some shows in their hometown Sheffield before calling it a day. All signs are indeed pointing to us seeing the last days of the now famous Cocker heels (formerly known as the Cuban). Unless they plan to change their official twitter name to "#pulp2011andbeyond". As to why he convened his boys (and girl), remains unanswered. Apart from huge bucks, of course. He had Retromania author and anti-nostalgia music critic, Simon Reynolds, as guest on his 6 music show last June and he asked Simon about his opinion on reuniting bands. Jarvis didn't give any clue nor defend his band against accusations of cashing in on nostalgia (Simon himself was very careful).
Where now? Remember that Jarvis Cocker was Julian Casablancas' present age (32) when he hit bigtime. Anything is possible and lots of unfinished business. There's still Bono to flash his arse at. They still have to get back at Simon Cowell for that Robson and Jerome's edging of Common People. But if he fails, he can always resurrect his other band - "Relaxed Muscle".