Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
David_Orr

GET UPDATES FROM David_Orr
 

Time to Tackle our Housing Crisis

Posted: 22/10/2012 09:39

Can you afford your home? If you want to buy your own home can you afford to build the average deposit of £50,000? Are you confident about where your children will live or your parents as they get older?

If you can answer 'yes' to all these questions, you are very lucky. For millions of people the answer is a deeply troubling 'no'. And it's getting worse.

Our report 'Home Truths 2012' found that in the last three years, 420,000 more working people have had to seek the support of housing benefit to pay their ever increasing rent - an astonishing 86% increase in the last three years alone. These numbers are rising by around 10,000 households every single month.

These people now relying on benefits to pay their rent are the 'strivers', the people who work hard and are trying get on in life, doing the right thing as David Cameron said at his recent party conference. These are working people who still can't keep up with the rising cost of renting. For far too many people, their rent is taking up 40% or more of their income. In the private sector rents have risen by over a third in the past five years, and are set to continue at the same alarming rate. That is simply unsustainable.

Of course, there are more and more people in private renting because they long ago gave up the dream of being able to buy their own home. In ten years, incomes have risen by 29% while house prices have risen by 94%. What was already tough has become impossible. It's made even harder now by the scale of deposits mortgage lenders ask for. Ten years ago an average deposit was equivalent to nine months pay. Now it's equivalent to three years pay. So strivers, the people doing the right thing, are locked out of buying their own home.

What an unholy mess. We all know there's a recession and the economy is flat lining, but that's not what has caused this mess. Put simply (and yes, the cause is very simple) we haven't been building enough new homes for 25 years. That has become particularly acute recently, which has made an already bad position even worse. There are 62 million people in the UK and that number continues to rise. 390,000 new households were created last year but we only built 110,000 new homes.

This creates havoc. The short supply of houses increases demand, pushing up the cost to buy and rent them. The impact of this mismatch is that it's desperately difficult for people trying to make ends meet and support their children. It undermines confidence and diminishes personal aspiration. When people can't afford the homes they need it stops them from moving for work, it prevents young couples starting families. Ambition is stopped in its tracks.

It's economically disastrous for the country too. One of the biggest constraints on growth is when businesses can't expand because there are no homes for the people they want to employ. Failure to build new homes puts construction workers on the dole and means that far fewer people are buying paint and wallpaper, carpets and curtains.

If the cause of all this is simple, the answer is equally simple. We need to build more homes. That's it. We can try to ration better, or take in lodgers, or move people around to make better use of what we've got but none of that will make any real difference. The gap between supply and demand continues to grow. As it does, rents will go up further (up a staggering 35% over the next six years), house values will rise again, the cost of housing benefit will increase and the personal price paid by individuals and families will become ever more acute. What happens if you can't afford to buy and can't afford to rent? Where are you meant to live?

The situation is so serious now, and for the next generation that we need to create a noise that can't be ignored, so that the next election is fought on who promises to build the biggest number of new homes. Let's cut to the chase. For people, for neighbourhoods, for the economy, for aspiration, for the strivers and all of those who do the right thing, we must say Yes to homes.

www.yestohomes.co.uk

 
FOLLOW UK POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:05 PM on 10/22/2012
How about less ridiculous prices?
08:55 PM on 10/22/2012
Down on the South Coast we have loads of new empty flats, bought off plan by property speculators. Also holiday lets, empty half the year, and second homes for investment purposes (Who lives in a second home?). So there is plenty of accommodation, just needing some tax tweeks to open the doors.

Now then, which political party other than the Greens has the bottle to deal with this? Deafening silence.
11:12 PM on 10/22/2012
Any jobs there for the new occupants to pay the mortgage or rent though Tony? Though I'm sure job seekers and single mums on housing benefit would love to live by the seaside with you. Suggest it to your Green Party representative. :)
09:43 AM on 10/23/2012
Fair comment. There are jobs but they tend to be low wage in catering, retail and service sectors, often seasonal. Also public sector schools and health care.

Ms Lucas (Green) is a marvelous person but unfortunately she is in the smallest group at Westminster.
08:13 PM on 10/22/2012
Perhaps the answer is more mobile home parks, like in the US, they can be sited virtually anywhere and quickly. Having lived on one when I was first married it was a pleasant experience not having to share accommodation and the mobile home was detached, self contained and with all mod cons, much like the prefabs after WW2. Enabled my wife and I to save for a house in the future as well.

I note that the government is putting through legislation to protect mobile home owners on parks from unscrupulous site owners, that has always been a problem and hopefully soon to be resolved.
08:01 PM on 10/22/2012
Yeh, lets use the 14 billion we waste overseas on new homes
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:14 PM on 10/22/2012
heres an idea take the unemployed and teach them a trade so they can build houses for a decent wage and then we could solve the youth unemployment problem and the housing crisis while a
massive increase in the housing stock will force rents down and reduce the housing benefit
budget.....just a thought...............
09:04 AM on 10/23/2012
good idea that - surprised our eton educated cabinet of millionaires have not thought of it!
06:44 PM on 10/22/2012
There's tons of cheap affordable empty homes in the north. The housing shortage in the south is created by a tsunami influx of immigrants, condoned by successive governments, corporates. Plus the immigrants all want to be in London or at the very least,the south east.

of course the property builders will want more & more green belt, agricultural land, to be allowed to be built on. Stop the tsunami immigration, you'll cut the housing lists, shortage of housing.

As for those calling for rent controls, it's been done & failed in the late 60s. All that happens, is the landlords stop letting,well, would you let for a price which doesn't pay for repairs, maintenance, & more importantly your time spent on it?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MelRoy
I think, therefore...here I am
11:30 PM on 10/22/2012
Correct. I've read the studies. Those in need should be settled in available housing. The other problem (compared with most of the rest of Europe) is that social housing is technically available to anyone - including people with enough money to pay market rents (or buy). I know people who have lived in very nice social housing in posh areas of London due solely to tenure and not linked to income. Tenure should be for most two years, and based on income, except perhaps in the case of the elderly (although some would argue there should be an exception for the elderly, as well).

As for rent controls, they work very well in other countries because it is illegal for landlords not to pay for repairs and maintenance. But then again, anyone who gets public funding for housing should not expect a palace, but a place to live that would pass a full health & safety inspection - warm, dry, damp and mould-free, cooker, water, electricity all in good working order.

There's a hell of a lot of new apartments in London sitting empty and I am quite sure the developers don't even exist anymore (i.e. they are owned by the banks). So since we bailed out the banks they should give these to central government/local authorities (in penance). They are all new/modern, nice if compact apartments and available NOW.
05:04 PM on 10/22/2012
What a silly comment, build more homes? Immigration over the past 14 years or so is the problem, migrant workers in the millions are the problem. When do we say population is destroying this country, at 70 million 80-90-150 million. The goodness when are we going to get a quality of life. These people need to think things through before they print such utter rubbish.
05:02 PM on 10/22/2012
for years house builders have bought land to limit the number of houses built knowing prices would rise, they now want the GOV to subsidise them building homes on the land they bought so they can maximise their profits. If they can sell the houses cheaper why arent they? then demand would increase, naturally other homes would then decrease in price meaning the sector would begin moving again. was it spain that built houses that they cant sell because they all still want top dollar even though there is no one to buy them. spain forgot that the people living in these home need to have jobs doing something other than building as when you have built the last house you will have a massive unemployment issue and homes no one can buy. if all we needed were house prices to fall why not just cap house prices at 100000 for a three bed etc, why not state all new homes will not cost more than that because we need an economy that is built on people manufacturing, building and services etc concentrating on one area too much will cause collapse.
lastpost
see biography
02:11 PM on 10/22/2012
“simply unsustainable”
Then wouldn’t it be sensible to debate and devise a sustainable strategy, and follow it? Even if we could cover the country in homes, what would those who follow us do then? Where exactly are we going without a plan to our names?

“We need to build more homes. That's it.”
Sounds as eminently obvious as the financial sectors’ unspoken axiom. Make more profit, what ever the long term cost.

“the next election is fought on who promises”
to keep their promises? Good luck with that. Alternatively, we could re-jig the election system as well while we are at it. So we end up with a form of governance that provides for the needs of the people, rather than some pusillanimous party.
01:26 PM on 10/22/2012
Its all very well David but the Housing Federation and housing associations have been going through various government policies to create more and more bizarre solutions to this crisis,it is time for the social housing sector to stand up and adress the problem and stop with these perverted non-happening short term solutions that address the government of the day and not the housing crisis
12:25 PM on 10/22/2012
Really good blog, and quite shocking. While I agree that more affordable housing is required, and that an increase in supply would naturally reduce prices, surely we also need to be addressing and regulating to stop landlords, estate agents and others inflating prices and rents so dramtically (as they do, for instance, in Germany).
In addition, on the day it is revealed that there are over 1.5 million people with second homes and reportedly over 100000 vacant homes in London alone, surely we need to better manage our existing supply?
03:05 PM on 10/22/2012
Rent controls lead to shortages of rental property, and landlords cherry-picking the most credit-worthy tenants. They can't house anyone, only move people around in the existing housing stock.
04:04 PM on 10/22/2012
None of that seems to be an issue in Germany. Process there is simply that if you want to raise rent, you have to convince the local authority that it's justified. We used to have similar laws in this country.
Admittedly they have much more affordable, state owned or subsidised housing, but they also don't have the buy-to-let culture that allows people to buy and rent out properties without taking real responsibility.
From what I understand, there are also no mandatory licences for setting yourself up as a lettings agent (only for selling). Hence more potential for irresponsible, cowboys to inflate rents for their own benefit and no way to regulate them.
12:24 PM on 10/22/2012
It is in interests of Tory donors to keep house prices/rents high. Greed is still good for the political elites, the CBI and btl landlords. Uncontrolled immigration is the elephant in the room yet Mr.Orr and his ilk avoid the real issues.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dombeyandson
12:10 PM on 10/22/2012
Can you afford your home? If you want to buy your own home can you afford to build the average deposit of £50,000? Are you confident about where your children will live or your parents as they get older? ONLY if you are an MPand claiming unreasonable expenses which supplement the income and not recompensing you for business expense
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:47 AM on 10/22/2012
The tories will never build new homes because it will send the price of their houses soaring down.
12:28 PM on 10/22/2012
Hear hear. One of the biggest factors making housing unaffordable is land hoarding by Tory corporate donors. Tony Blair made a fortune from opening the borders whilst not building affordable housing. We are all in this together.