When the first Euros were printed in 1999, Europe chose a bold new future.
Economic and monetary union was a symbol of a new European self-confidence: the first currency union in Europe in modern times, within the world's largest trading bloc, and a degree of political co-operation that belied our troubled past.
But beneath the surface, the new European economy was built on shaky foundations. For many years the availability of cheap credit masked serious underlying structural problems. When the US mortgage markets collapsed, Europe's lack of competitiveness left us deeply exposed.
Now Europe finds itself at a crossroads. Our choice will set Europe's course for a generation. One path leads to protectionism and stagnation; the other to competition and growth. Which will we choose?
The decision is one of the biggest we have faced. The answer is clear: Europe must go for growth.
When Chancellor Merkel, Prime Minister Cameron and other Heads of Government meet at next month's EU Council, we must take strides towards a new growth agenda for Europe.
The work that has already been done on fiscal discipline and debt reduction is a necessary precondition, but not a guarantee of growth. The next stage involves stating our commitment to two priorities: completing the Single Market, and getting more strategic investment in the areas that will deliver growth in the future.
We have spent years talking about these things but achieving little. Now the time for warm words is over. When we meet in Berlin today we will be focusing on actions.
The Single Market is a huge achievement, but it is still work in progress. We can no longer afford to turn a blind eye to lax enforcement of the rules which govern the market: in tough times, it is even more important that EU countries and the countries we trade with believe that the market works equally for all. The June European Council should focus on clearer implementation and stronger enforcement.
We should push for completion of the single market for the digital, postal and services sectors. Implementation of the Services Directive to date has already added 0.8% to EU GDP - completion could add a further 1.8%. The benefits would be even greater if steps could also be taken to raise the bar on restrictive practices in Member States and explore further areas for liberalisation. Completion of the digital single market could bring really substantial benefits - an estimated 4% increase in EU GDP. Commitment to completion is good for our consumers, good for our businesses, and good for growth.
Making the Single Market work better for Europe also means extending its reach into new sectors. We should secure more competition and further liberalisation in the railway sector, and make similar progress on energy: increasing interconnections and continuing our work to integrate clean energy.
Another driver of growth is smarter regulation: for example, the Commission has already committed to exempt micro businesses from new red tape wherever possible. We need to turn that commitment into practical measures to reduce existing burdens for businesses in Germany, the United Kingdom, and elsewhere.
Market reforms will provide opportunities for trade and prosperity, but we will also need targeted investment in projects that will generate growth. We can do more to mobilise private capital for strategic investment, through public private partnerships that are budget neutral. More strategic private investment can be matched by smarter spending of public funds, too, for example by raising and increasing the quality of spending on R&D.
And now is the time to deliver on an ambitious, protectionism-busting external trade agenda, especially with a view to developing third-country markets by Free Trade Agreements with emerging economies and others. Swift progress on a Free Trade Agreement with the US, based on equal commitment from both sides, could pave the way for an all-new comprehensive transatlantic marketplace.
These changes are significant; but so are the challenges before us. It is not enough for Europe to indulge in another round of empty declarations. Now is the time to deliver real change, because the alternative does not bear thinking about. We must summon the political will and return to two of the founding principles of both the Single Market and the Union itself: economic integration and liberal, open trade, delivering growth for all our citizens.
Britain and Germany are united in this belief: fiscal discipline, debt consolidation and structural reforms are all preconditions for a more prosperous, stable future for all Europe's citizens.
Together, we must signal our commitment to overcome the current crisis and lay the foundations for future success. Such a commitment requires vision and political leadership in equal measure. We have reserves of both: now is the time to summon them. Once more, we must choose a new future for Europe.
Willard Foxton: Is it Time for Britain's Nuclear Circumcision?
Mike Robb: Time for Less Talk and More Action on Infrastructure
Louie Matthews: Shared Parental Leave: Clegg's Got it Right for Once
Callum Jones: How the Coalition Can Move Forward From the 2012 Queen's Speech
European sovereign-debt crisis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Euro Crisis: Why a Greek Exit Could Be Much Worse than Expected ...
Eurozone crisis | Business | The Guardian
How the euro crisis will affect you - CNN.com
The euro crisis is now deadly serious. Where - Daily Mail
Euro Crisis: Is the Currency (Finally) Doomed?
Euro crisis pain primes Britain for more stimulus
Safe-Haven Currency ETFs Shine in Euro Crisis
Shunning Euro Crisis Helps Boost Funds for Aberdeen Stock Picker
The market requires inequlaity.
Politicians are hell bent on the same costs in labour, energy, tax etc - equality.
Like perpetual motion, a market without difference is impossible - it becomes no market at all.
There is no need to go to Europe if costs are the same here, there would simply be a higher cost to transport goods from afar.
No-one thought out this pipedream.
Next week... Global Warming
For years, Clegg and his fellow Whigs have been touting the single currency as a pancea for all ills, together with ever closer integration, and stronger centralisation of the EU.
Now we see the whole edifice is crumbling, and what is the response? To sum up, Nick Clegg thinks that the answer is "more of the same".
It couldn't work, it was never going to work, it never will work - German interests are now manifestly and obviously shown to be miles away from Greek, Spanish, Italian, Dutch and British interests.
Get a grip, Clegg. You were wrong, are wrong, and will continue to be wrong unless you wake up and smell the coffee.
Democracy or Dictatorship? Sorry, no referendum on that.
"Europe chose"
Q.E.D.
"monetary union was"
not in the small print.
"European self-confidence"
Ignore the qualifying safeguards, it’ll be alright.
"built on shaky foundations"
unaccountable politicians, unbalance-able accounts.
"Which will we choose?"
The third option.
"fiscal discipline and debt reduction"
has not yet kicked in. Watch out when it does.
"The Single Market is a"
tower of babble.
"We can no longer afford"
it, or mismanagement of biblical proportions.
"restrictive practices in Member States"
COMMON Marketplace?
"clean energy"
HS2 or Severn barrier?
"red tape"
We follow it, they don’t.
"an all-new comprehensive transatlantic marketplace."
The Titanic Galleria?
"economic integration"
Cats escaped!
"fiscal discipline"
What’s the daily Draingeld figure?
"Such a commitment requires vision and political leadership"
of the caliber that got us here?
"a new future for Europe."
Failure, on an apocalyptic scale.
strong state rights really isnt working for so many national problems - HSR for one - cross state lines & u r screwed by bureaucracy & bribes
in the same way as some states - 48+ 4 gods sake - r not a good fit really - some members of eeu seem poor brides/hubbys
med countries r not N europe, nor for long to come
This may be argued is the position of the outsider.
It is also the position of the weak, the undecided and the fearful.