Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dr Robert Lambert

GET UPDATES FROM Dr Robert Lambert
 

Answering the EDL in Tower Hamlets

Posted: 04/09/11 01:00 BST

Even though Tower Hamlets is just a short tube or bus ride from Westminster it is disappointing that no members of the government bothered to stand shoulder to shoulder with their local neighbours in the face of threats and intimidation from the English Defence League on Saturday.

Had she found the time Home Secretary Theresa May would have been able to explain to puzzled residents how by banning an EDL march she knowingly facilitated an equally threatening 'static' demonstration by the very same organisation. She would also have had an opportunity to explain to the well behaved, multi-faith, multi-cultural United East End coalition why she had decided to ban their wholly benign march as well as the EDL's malign one. Moreover, if she had listened to the speeches of the Reverend Alan Green, Rector of St John on Bethnal Green and Leon Silver from the Nelson Street Synagogue (delivered by his Christian friend Green as Saturday is the Jewish Sabbath) in support of their Muslim neighbours she might have learnt something about the symbolic importance of East End solidarity and unity - not least in a year in which East Enders mark the 75th anniversary of the Battle of Cable Street.

Instead it was left to Lutfur Rahman, the Mayor of Tower Hamlets, to lead a team of councillors and Town Hall staff on a tour of the borough today to ensure that all residents of this multicultural London borough felt safe and secure enough to go about their normal business. This exercise in community reassurance was more than just a token gesture, in the prevailing circumstances it was vital and effective. Not only does the EDL pose a real and current threat to community safety and confidence but its provocative behaviour also raises unhappy recent memories for many local residents.

During the course of my research in Tower Hamlets I am always struck by the vivid and frightenening accounts of a large number of local people who experienced the violence and intimidation that accompanied the extremist politics of the British National Party and the National Front two and three decades ago. Numerous residents recall having windows broken and facing a routine barrage of racist abuse and intimidation. After years of suffering assaults described by their assailants as 'Paki bashing' (even though most victims had family backgrounds in Bangladesh) they fought back and drove the racist thugs out of Tower Hamlets. Policing in Tower Hamlets then was not the partnership operation it was today with the Mayor, local councillors and communities. But such experience leaves its scars, and this has become problematic now that more tightly focused anti-Muslim hate crimes and Islamophobia generally have become more prevelent during the last decade.

On a brisk walk about the borough Mayor Rahman stopped to chat to shoppers and shopkeepers in Brick Lane before entering the Brick Lane Mosque for prayers. I spoke to a local resident outside the mosque who recalled the day when the racist David Copeland known as the Nail Bomber tried to bring terrorism to Brick Lane. Copeland is safely imprisoned but his willingness to kill inocent civilians came back to mind when Anders Breivik resorted to terrorism in Norway in pursuit of the same anti-Muslim political agenda as the EDL. It is wrong to bracket the EDL with Breivik in all respects but it would be negligent to ignore the anti-Muslim bigotry they share.

Throughout the day Mayor Rahman and his team offered real leadership and encouragement in the face of a day long threat that the EDL would attend and endeavour to intimidate the local Muslim community and provoke violence. Working hand in hand with the Metropolitan Police the Mayor ensured that local people were reassured that EDL demonstrators were being robustly marshalled by the police away from the heart of Tower Hamlets. When in the afternoon approximately 1,000 EDL demonstrators arrived on the borough boundary at Aldgate they were expertly marshalled by police so as to reduce their ability to intimidate local people.

Earlier in the day in the heart of the Borough in Whitechapel Road near the East London Mosque the target of ill informed EDL campaigning, the Mayor addressed the same solidarity event as Rev. Alan Green and showed sound leadership skill by commending community solidarity while urging calm and close co-operation with the police. The Mayor was followed onto the platform by Dilwar Hussain Khan, chairman of the East London Mosque, who recalled his own experiences of racist violence in Tower Hamlets in the 1970s, 1980s and early 1990s.

Today Khan's mosque faces a specific threat of intimidation from the EDL because of the EDL's ill informed assessment of 'Muslim extremism'. Worryingly for the Home Secretary the EDL base their flawed 'extremism' assessment on the one provided by her cabinet colleague Michael Gove in his book Celsius 7/7. In my new book I explain why Gove is wrong, why it matters and why the policy of demonising loyal and effective Muslims like Khan and their mosques is dangerous and counter-productive as well as unjust.

I will send a copy of my book to Theresa May - along with a copies of the speeches by Mayor Rahman, Rev. Green and Lionel Silver she missed in Tower Hamlets today. It is time she understood how the EDL campaign against Tower Hamlets is nurtured by too many of her colleagues in neighbouring Westminster.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:11 PM on 09/05/2011
Bob, when you say "during the course of my research in Tower Hamlets", you fail to disclose the apology you had to issue to several individuals precisely because of your inaccurate research there.

Here's part of the apology:

"The first versIon of this report published on 29 november 2010 contained a section ‘Barbarians at the Gates of the City’ that has now been removed from the report and the university of exeter has issued this apology:

The university has become aware [of]...serious errors of fact which may lead a reader to misconstrue the conduct, actions and the intentions of Councillors helal abbas, denise jones, Ken Clark, joshua peck, rachael saunders, michael Keith and jim Fitzpatrick mp.

...the university has received information and comments from the above individuals, and wish to make it clear that it is not [our] position that the actions and intentions of those individuals were Islamophobic or racist...The University apologise unreservedly."

In your article, you talk about how people in Brick Lane suffered in the Seventies. One was aforementioned Cllr Helal Abbas.

During Lutfur Rahman's mayoral election campaign, Abbas was labelled a wife-beater in an advert placed by a false "women's refuge charity" in the London Bangla newspaper.

I and others repeatedly asked Lutfur to condemn the advert. He failed. Did he show "real leadership" on that issue?

I'm not sure who you're talking to in Tower Hamlets when you research, but can I suggest you broaden your sample?
01:58 PM on 09/06/2011
Ted, I like to think that I am not too old to learn from mistakes! No intention of hiding apology - its very prominent on our webpage. I do aim to broaden my research in Tower Hamlets and would appreciate your local knowledge and help in doing that. Will get in touch. Bob
11:48 AM on 09/05/2011
Bob,
I have to say I find it ironic you invoke a Rabbi in your column, when your Center in Exeter has a prominent member of Hamas on its board. This is an explicitly anti-Semitic organization--regardless of your position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. So what is the difference with EDL, which is indeed a despicable organization? Well, I guess that Hamas explicitly value and undertook the killing of civilians. What would you say of an organization that put a representative of EDL on its board--even without the mass killing?

Human rights mean something because they do not discriminate.
06:49 PM on 09/04/2011
It is revealing how these middle class commentators display an utter ignorance of English working class life - after all it's not these well-heeled middle class academics and liberals who compete with immigrants for jobs, homes, schools and access to the NHS. Not one word of analysis about why those couple of thousand working class English people have been driven onto the streets to complain about the enforcement of the multi-cultural, big business agenda. Wages driven down, impossible to find affordable housing, no jobs for the young, rotten living conditions, sink comprehensives for the kids ....the list go on.
06:17 PM on 09/04/2011
Bob

Your quote below is excessively carping.

"how by banning an EDL march she knowingly facilitated an equally threatening 'static' demonstration by the very same organisation"

Both you and I wanted the Home Secretary to ban the EDL march. Both you and I know that the law does not prohibit static demonstrations, since we live in a free country. Accordingly your use of the phrase "knowingly facilitated" is unworthy of you.

Regards
Amin
08:13 PM on 09/04/2011
Amin
As you know I place great value on your judgment so I have pondered your post for a while before replying.
I think we may have to agree to differ but I do hope I can at least convince you that the part of my blog you quote is not in some way 'unworthy of me'.
Briefly, I did not call for the EDL march to be banned still less for all other marches in the neighborhood to be banned on Saturday. I did call for the Home Sec to give very careful consideration to a ban and as part of that consideration I expected her to consider that a 'static' EDL demonstration would be a probable outcome of a ban of the kind she imposed. In particular I expected her to assess the evidence of violence and intimidation arising from other 'static' EDL demonstrations around the country. In addition I expected her to understand that by banning all marches she missed a vital opportunity to single out the EDL and to support Muslim communities around the country who are facing threats of intimidation from the EDL on a routine basis. At the very least the Home Sec could have alerted the residents of Tower Hamlets that her banning order would have a limited impact on the EDL. The Home Sec has a responsibility to foresee the likely consequences of her decision and although it's a harsh assessment I think she did 'facilitate' the EDL demo on Saurday.
01:37 PM on 09/04/2011
I was at the anti-EDL demo, though too late to hear the speeches. Great atmosphere, real sense of community and unity, people from all walks of life - including veteran gay rights campaigner Peter Thatchell with a banner reading "Gays and Muslims united against hate." Not a national politician in sight. They're happy to churn out press releases and identikit speeches, but when it comes to actual leadership they're NEVER THERE. And then they wonder why people are disengaging with mainstream politics.
08:43 PM on 09/06/2011
Is that the Peter Tatchell who was abused by radical muslims defending their Caliphate that useful idiots like you are not welcome in.

http://news.pinkpaper.com/NewsStory/6000/5/09/2011/peter-tatchell-suffered-homophobic-hostility-from-muslims-at-anti-edl-demo.aspx

Is that that the Mayor who is linked to IFE who want to replace democracy with sharia?Of course Jannissery Lambert talks about fake islamophobia. He didnt say much about the recent attacks on churchs, the teacher who was beaten for teaching muslim girls or the fascist activities in East London Mosque.

To paraphrase Bush the British should make no distinction between Islamist and their looney left enablers who assist them.

No surrender

Do some research on the religion of peace.