Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Eliot Pollak

GET UPDATES FROM Eliot Pollak
 

Arsenal, Everton and Spurs Have Only Themselves to Blame for Their Decline

Posted: 29/08/2011 00:00

Fairly confusing, this rebel business. In one place, you're the darling of the free world. In another, you're feral scum, symbolising everything that's wrong with British youth. One man's rebel is another man's pain in the arse. Murky waters indeed.

The real problem with rebels of course, is that you never quite know where they will stop. By their very nature, boundaries offer little deterrence. Break one rule, might as well break another. Which brings us to the dominant theme of the opening weeks of Premier League season 2011/12.

21 years ago, the rebellious nature of England's five biggest football clubs changed our national game forever. The chairmen of Spurs, Arsenal and Everton, Liverpool and Manchester United held secret meetings with television executives, aimed at splintering from the Football League and creating a self-perpetuating, embedded elite.

Unsurprisingly, the move didn't go down too well at FA HQ. So controversial were these clandestine meetings, that the-then Spurs chairman Irving Scholar often had to use pseudonyms to book his hotel meeting rooms.

Fast-forward to the present day. No top-flight clubs have had a more traumatic August than three of that original gang of five - Arsenal, Tottenham and Everton. Arsenal have lost two of their best players, and have made their worst start to a league season for over 40 years. Spurs are yet to spend a penny, and also face losing their most acclaimed asset. As for Everton, it has been so long since they've spent any money, their cash supply is still in shillings.

It isn't just a bad week or two either - the mood swilling around all three is that this is very much the end of an era; for Arsenal of being title contenders, for Spurs of being Champions League contenders, and at Everton, of challenging for any European place at all.

Reflecting back on the aforementioned events of the early 90s, these clubs have to a large extent, been hoisted by their own petard. All of a sudden, football became a cash cow, the playing field started to resemble the Underhill slope, and the world's best players came to graze greedily. At first, all went swimmingly. Big clubs had never generated more wealth, had never filled their grounds so frequently, and even if trophies weren't drenching Goodison and White Hart Lane every season, all seemed well in the world. Who cares if 80 clubs were being cut adrift, never having any chance to win a thing - the good times were back.

But twenty years on, the story has played out in full. The rich still got richer, and some more got left behind. Independence and deregulation suited Spurs, Everton and Arsenal back then. In the days of Sheikhs and oligarchs, it no longer does.

That's the thing with rebels - no limits. And now they are the ones left behind. It was Bowie who wrote, "Rebel Rebel, How could they know?" Maybe Messrs Dean, Scholar and Carter weren't to know it would all end this way. One thing is for sure however. By the time of the next rebellion, the inevitable European Super League, it is unlikely that the current chairmen of Arsenal, Tottenham or Everton need worry too much about pseudonyms. They won't be in the room.


Elsewhere...
Whilst packing up their laptop chargers and wiping guacamole from their chins last Saturday afternoon, Arsenal fans managed to vocalise their full-time thoughts succinctly. "Spend some ****ing money," was the cry.

I recall sitting in the North Bank back in early 1995, a bleak 1-1 home draw with Alan Ball's Southampton. Arsenal's season was fizzling out under George Graham, lying 11th in the league having been dumped out of both domestic cups the previous week, and with only the ugly sister of European trophies, the Cup Winners Cup to win (for those who don't remember , it was the trophy that invented Thursday night football.)

Following mild jeers at the final whistle the chant rang around Highbury, "Georgie, get your chequebook out." All of which suggests that not only do some things never change, but also that football fans have become far coarser over the last decade.

Graham did get his cheque book out. Glenn Helder arrived for £2.3m a fortnight later, and not even the man himself, apparently later clinically diagnosed with, "a Narcissistic personality disorder," would have spent too much subsequent time watching video reruns of his matches in an Arsenal shirt.

So money isn't always the answer. Not for George Graham back then. Not for Leeds United a decade ago, and perhaps not now for Arsene Wenger. Squillaci, Koscielny, Chamakh - the Gunners don't need more where they came from. Arsenal fans should shut up and let Arsene do what he does best.

Just before I go...
A wonderful piece in this month's When Saturday Comes discusses an often overlooked football phenomena - the age we choose our team. Most fans make the choice between the ages of 5-8, not perhaps a period where we are at our most intellectually picky.

Yet this choice is something that affects us through life - imagine choosing a spouse or a place to live at that age. Wouldn't we all benefit from an amnesty offered to us all at around 21, whereby we could swap clubs with impunity? No sneers. No snootiness. Just a second chance to give yourself a better life. Thoughts?

 

Follow Eliot Pollak on Twitter: www.twitter.com/epollak

 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Winthorpe
Need a fourth for squash
03:07 AM on 08/31/2011
Remind me of Arsenal's plan to build a team this year? They have been shocking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mediumal57
Moderate Extremist
07:44 AM on 08/30/2011
Your analysis though, is incomplete Eliot.

I agree that the rot set in twenty odd years ago with the disgraceful, and to my mind treacherous break-up of the old Football League, which was led in part by the gang of five as you highlight. But also with the collusion of many other clubs, including mine - Aston Villa. It was the twenty original founders of the English Premier League, along with as then lower league clubs like Newcastle Utd, who were then vying to get promoted into it, who acquiesced in this disgraceful and commercially selfish destruction of football as I and many other traditionalists would wish had not happened.

From that fateful decision many others have flowed to create the monster that is sadly devouring the game. Money (the root of all the problems) has corrupted the sport and ruined it as a competitive spectacle (domestically at least). Never again (unless some sugar-daddy has a fit of largesse) will we see a club like say Nott'm Forest lift a European trophy, let alone the English top league's title. The real battle these days has in effect been shifted beyond these shores and become a contest between a few of Europe's lucky elite, who have rigged it, so that their domestic leagues are in effect just a means to an end. The bloody Champion's League is where football is at nowadays. And if you are not in that competition - you are a nobody. Sad, very sad.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:36 PM on 08/29/2011
Arsenal are more likely to join the Billionaires club than disappear up their own fundament. Look where they're based, one of the posher parts of North London,and they're about the 3rd most popular club after ManU & Liverpool, so making money is a genuine option. They have always made peanuts from merchandising and that is what Kroenke is trying to address. Get it right and we're back at the top table, but to do that we'll need to invest in a good team.

If we can't do it 'the right way', through football related activity like ManU, then enter Usmanov and his billions.

Seaniebhoy, if Everton don't have the infrastructure who's fault is that? Ultmately it's your Board's. We had no rich backers and a small ground, but we've spent millions on a new ground. It's hurt performances on the pitch, but we thought it had to be done (As it happens, looks like it won't be enough, but at least we had a plan). Everton have been paralysed by indecision and I genuinely fear that it may be too late now. There isn't a huge amount of growth left in football, unless the clubs get their own TV rights, but even then you have been 'out of the limelight' for so long that it might not make much difference.
So in summary, the prem has been good for football. The introduction of billionaire owners may be less so, but ony because we haven't got one:-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seaniebhoy
05:27 PM on 08/30/2011
I'm a Celtic supporter, but have an affection for the blues...that being said...
Everton will never get a mega rich owner that the likes of City or PSG have now, and even the "normal wealthy" investor will balk at Everton because of the ground. We had planning permission to move to Kirby but with the neighbors in red the supporters went mad. At the moment Moyes has come out and said that the situation with the bank is so horrid that any proceeds from the sale of his players like Jagielka will end up entirely in the banks hands. I'm not suggesting that it is anyones fault, but every club now has to face the truth that in the modern premiership the only way a club will break even is to build massive stadiums and hope to fill them up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:21 PM on 08/30/2011
I fear that you're right mate, which is a shame. Personally I think Moyes has done an amazing job, but how long can you keep beating the odds?

I don't think a 60,000 seater stadium is enough any more, it was before Chelsea and Man City happened. That was what 6 years ago? Now we have one and we can't compete, so where do we go?

I think we can all agree that the FRair play rules will be ineffective, so I guess we're 2nd string till Putin targets Abramovich or there's an Arab Spring in the UAE.

Think you and Rangers will ever join the prem mate?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seaniebhoy
06:02 PM on 08/29/2011
I think you are being quite unfair to Everton. By far the smallest ground of the clubs you listed, it is also cramped in between several houses and tower blocks and has no real capacity for expansion. Because of its age, keeping it up to standard safety codes is about as expensive as a players wage, and the only option available is a move out of Liverpool and away from the fan base.
01:08 PM on 08/29/2011
I ended up being a Blackburn Rovers fan (well I am from the town originally). 11th in the league sounds like heaven at the moment I'd have George Graham at Rovers today if I could!