Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Emma Hutton

GET UPDATES FROM Emma Hutton
 

It's Time to Put Respect for Human Rights at the Heart of the NHS

Posted: 08/02/2013 10:19

The serious failures to uphold basic human rights at Stafford Hospital are well-documented and are back in the news with this week's publication of Sir Robert Francis QC's public inquiry report.

The Mid Staffordshire scandal revealed far too many stark and distressing incidents of indignity, lack of basic respect and physical harm - people left lying in soiled sheets, people suffering from dehydration and malnutrition, people being left undressed in view of other people and, worst of all, the hundreds of people thought to have died unnecessarily as a result of neglect. Just one example from the initial inquiry is enough to make us all shudder at the thought of what could have happened to anyone of us, or our families:

"The door was wide open. There were people walking past. Mum was in bed with the cot sides up and she hadn't got a stitch of clothing on. I mean, she would have been horrified. She was completely naked and if I said covered in faeces, she was. It was everywhere. It was in her hair, her eyes, her nails, her hands and on all the cot side, so she had obviously been trying to lift her herself up or move about, because the bed was covered and it was literally everywhere and it was dried. It would have been there a long time, it wasn't new."

The Francis Report raises many questions about the future of the NHS. We rightly want to know how we can prevent further shocking failures of care and we want people to be held to account if things do go wrong.

Our network of national charities represents the interests of millions of people from all walks of life, up and down the UK. As we debate the Francis recommendations, we believe that questions about how to organise, regulate and deliver our healthcare all flow from a fundamental question - how can we protect and uphold every single person's human rights, every single time they use the NHS?

Thankfully, the Human Rights Act means that hospitals, health authorities and NHS regulators already have a legal duty to act in ways that protect our human rights - including our rights to life, to privacy, to freedom from cruelty and degrading treatment and our right not to be discriminated against. This is an important safety net. For example, more than 100 people affected by the failures at Stafford Hospital have been able to use the Human Rights Act to seek justice for what happened to them.

But much more can and should be done to make respecting human rights part of the DNA of the NHS.

Human rights principles - dignity, respect, fairness, equality and autonomy - should be the minimum standards for NHS care that Francis recommends. They should be a lodestar for everyone involved in caring for and treating patients - from doctors, auxiliary staff and nurses, to psychologists and physiotherapists, to regulators and the people who commission NHS services, to senior managers and chief executives of health authorities, to the Health Secretary.

These are simple and straightforward values. In many ways, they are about simple common sense. Putting them at the heart of healthcare means everyone, at all levels of the system, asking "How would I want to be treated in this situation? How would I want my mum or my brother or my child to be treated?"

One example of this common sense, human rights-based approach is the Dignity for All project run by University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust. According to the Commission on Dignity in Care for Older People (an initiative by Age UK, the Local Government Association and the NHS Confederation), this project brought about small changes that have made a big difference to how patients are treated, including a Behind Closed Doors campaign to make sure that people can choose to use the toilet in private wherever possible.

Other examples include Macmillan Cancer Support's work to develop a human rights framework for cancer care in England and the Dignity in Care campaign, which has already built a network of over 40,000 "dignity champions" - individuals and organisations working to make dignity a reality for people using care services.

So, while there is much to do, there is also much to build on. Like our long-standing commitment to human rights, the NHS is a precious British asset and a source of national pride. As we digest the Francis Report over the coming weeks and months, let's make sure our human rights take their rightful place at the heart of our future NHS.

 

Follow Emma Hutton on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@EDFEmma

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
The serious failures to uphold basic human rights at Stafford Hospital are well-documented and are back in the news with this week's publication of Sir Robert Francis QC's public inquiry report. Th...
The serious failures to uphold basic human rights at Stafford Hospital are well-documented and are back in the news with this week's publication of Sir Robert Francis QC's public inquiry report. Th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
lastpost
see biography
04:21 PM on 02/08/2013
“at the Heart of the NHS”
An interviewee on a regional programme, provided a withering observation. Following attempts to divine the problem’s cause, though submissions to all levels. She concluded it was a culture of bullying. Thus anyone who might have flagged up the situation before harm occurred, was effectively neutralised. Luckily this unsustainable strategy has not permeated the entire country. Otherwise institutional collapse might well result.

“We rightly want to know how we can prevent further shocking failures of care”
By removing those who don’t care, from positions of power?

“we want people to be held to account if things do go wrong“.
Better get parliament to enshrine the process of whistleblowing in law. Would the country be in the mess it is now, if the rot had been treated at source? Where once there were molehills of mayhem, there are now mountain ranges. For the want of the facts being publicly known and addressed, we progressed to the present disorder.

“to seek justice”
surely entails the creation of a society immune from tyranny of any kind. Where is the punishment for perpetrators, in place of victimisation of victims? Isn’t the motto for good health in every sector of existence, prevention is better/cheaper than cure?

"How would I want to be treated “
Do right by others. Unless you want that maltreatment to come back, and bite the hand that dispenses it. How many more second/second chances, before they are out on their ear?
02:58 PM on 02/08/2013
Whilst agreeing with the author, the most pressing problem with the NHS is underfunding on frontline staff. Yes, there are too many non-productive managers, but nursing staff have too many patients to look after and insufficient time to give personal care. Consider this: spending per head in the UK in 2010 was $3,503, compared to $4,691 in France, $4,668 in Germany, $5,222 in Canada, $4,775 in Australia, and $4,242 in Irealnd (source: World Bank). These differences are significant. The UK simply is spending less on health than other broadly-comparable countries. This government has demanded CUTS of £20 billion from the NHS, so the standard of care can only get worse. The answer is a properly defined, adequate, and enforced staff to patient ratio. That means spending more, not less. This country cannot expect health professionals to deliver satisfactory healthcare that we deserve if we are not prepared to pay for it. Replacing Trident: £20 billion. Maintaining health spending: £20 billion. Which do we prefer?
photo
vividrick
I came, I saw...I had a cup of tea!
02:04 PM on 02/08/2013
I fear this weeks news would play into the hands of private healthcare advocates. Like when the Republicans in America who are against 'Obamacare' latched onto Tory Daniel Hannan's anti-NHS comments, briefly becoming the GOP's poster-boy for being against any such healthcare reform.

But why did the imcompitent Jeremy Hunt announce an immediate investigation into the five hospitals with higher than average mortality rates? You'd think such investigations should be ongoing done-deals, not when it's too late for the families of the deceased. Too much red tape again hindering a lot of progress it seems, also the heroic whistleblowers are once again being bullied, shouted down, or shown the door...it's through such brave ones we get news like this, and they need to be protected as well as empowered & taken seriously.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Fowler
I try....I really do!
12:42 PM on 02/08/2013
Whilst a hospital feels it has a vital need for a £70,000 a year "Media Manager" whilst at the same time sacking front line staff and cutting the wages and increasing the burden on those that are left; whilst Government demands that NHS Hospitals be "profitable"; we, the patients, have simply become an inconvenience to them, and thus in the end, irrelevant.