Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Helen Charman

GET UPDATES FROM Helen Charman
 

Naked as We Came: What Lena Dunham's Nudity Says About Us

Posted: 21/01/2013 00:00

Lena Dunham has once again become the focus of media attention this week for something that should be entirely unremarkable: for having the body of an average female human, and for exposing said body on screen in her Emmy award-winning HBO show, Girls. Dunham appears naked in the new series of the show she writes and stars in in a variety of ways, and not all of them in a sexual context (she appears in one memorable scene in the nude, eating cake. We've all been there) and the reaction amongst the show's American audience has been, on the whole, one of disgust and a sense of something distasteful and embarrassing; that Dunham is causing a scene by refusing to be ashamed of her body, or avoid nudity apart from a carefully prescribed, semi-pornographic context. Dunham's nudity is strange in that it is entirely different from almost any other type of nakedness we are routinely exposed to.

The anodyne inoffensiveness caused by 'normal' nudity in other shows, and by other actresses, stems from the total desensitisation that has occurred in the censorship of anything but the ideal female body, which in turn is a body designed to cause the minimal offence possible: it is a body with all quirks, all overtly personal aspects removed. The effect of the consistent exposure of slim, large-breasted, toned women in the media has been well-documented with regards to its impact on the self-esteem of women, but in this case the problem is more that the 'perfect' body is one stripped of the peculiar intimacy that, by rights, comes naturally with nudity. We are unfamiliar with seeing a 'real' body represented on screen, and the intimacy that it creates is startling, and challenging, and the challenge makes us uncomfortable, and discomfort leads us all too often to the kneejerk reaction of criticism and of disgust.

Our attitude towards nakedness is bizarre, and hugely regressive. The actress Eva Mendes, who has appeared nude on screen several times, has said "we seem okay with violence, but nudity we race to criticise and censor", and this is particularly apparent at the moment with the release of Quentin Tarantino's latest film, Django Unchained. Tarantino has generated almost as much public scrutiny as Dunham for the heavy violence in his films, but in Tarantino's case there is at least an acknowledgement of the fact that he uses extreme violence as a means of artistic expression, something that has become a trademark of his work. We make no such allowances for nudity, however, despite it being something that, after all, should surely be classed as less dangerous and harmful to potential impressionable viewers than systematic decapitation, no matter how amazing the soundtrack.

The naked body is humanity at its most vulnerable and its most truthful, and it should be celebrated not only for its potential to be beautiful but also its potential to be funny, and awkward, and sad, and old, because this in turn is all that we are, and can be. Instead, we condone it only when it is wheeled out and painted in tired one-dimensional shades of sexy, for titillation purposes only, and we react viciously (Howard Stern said that Dunham's nudity "kinda feels like rape", a misnomer that is a whole other ocean of fish in itself) to the suggestion that we look at it afresh and celebrate it for what it really is.

Lena Dunham is an award-winning, talented writer and actress, and this is the first thing we should be talking about her for. Her approach to nudity is a secondary concern, but it is ground-breaking (although arguably breaking ground we should have left behind several centuries ago) and should be serving to shake us from the stupor of the blandification of over-sexualisation, particularly in a year that has already seen Beyonce spend a double page spread in GQ magazine defining feminism by the baffling admission that she owns a copy of every photograph ever taken of herself (and keeps them! In her house!) and Esquire magazine has run a feature that gives Scheherazade a run for her money by describing Megan Fox's figure in approximately one thousand and one different ways. Lena Dunham's bottom, then, in all its normal, average, fantastic glory, should be heralded as a turning point in our attitudes towards nudity: a herald of a happier, healthier, naked-er time to come.

 

Follow Helen Charman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/helen_charman

FOLLOW UK STUDENTS
Lena Dunham has once again become the focus of media attention this week for something that should be entirely unremarkable: for having the body of an average female human, and for exposing said body ...
Lena Dunham has once again become the focus of media attention this week for something that should be entirely unremarkable: for having the body of an average female human, and for exposing said body ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:06 AM on 02/15/2013
I take no issue with dunham's average body and face. What I take issue with is the gratuitous amount of sex and nudity in this program. I am not offended by it whatsoever but it makes for a rubbish twenty minutes of reputedly sophisticated storytelling when all we get is the writer/director/lead actress getting her breasts out, playing ping pong with her breasts out, exposing her breasts to the public, showing us her pubic region as she faints in the hot shower for 20 seconds of screen time etc. etc. etc.

Their are low-budget Italian soft-porn films with more suttle screenplays. Her little breakdown/ existential crisis at the end is just laughable in light of the shallow and tedious 18 minutes that proceeds it.
I am from the UK and 'Girls' has started to get a lot of press. I have watched the first four or so (not easy to remember) episodes of series 2 and it is largely tripe. You can make an argument for 'Sex and (in?) the City' being more a more sensitive and genuine program. That says it all. Bleh.
02:11 AM on 02/15/2013
Do not crucify me for not being able to spell 'subtle'. The point still stands even though I'm drunk.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:17 PM on 01/21/2013
I think there was a simple incident in "entourage", in which a female actor appeared with, gasp, pubic hair. Immature men went ballistic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:32 PM on 01/21/2013
Good point about the difference in tolerances between violence and nudity, particularly in movies, especially from the USA.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Helen Charman
06:57 PM on 01/21/2013
Hi, I'm sorry if you think the vocabulary I've used is alienating! Obviously this wasn't my intention at all; thanks for your feedback. As it's a blog post/comment style piece rather than a news article, though, I hope it's forgiveable.
08:47 PM on 01/21/2013
Not at all- like I say, I expect and welcome feedback on my articles too! Good luck! X
01:15 PM on 01/21/2013
Helen, I am a student journalist like you and by no means do I 'know it all'. I like what you have to say here, but I think you have to be wary that your vocabulary, whilst sophisticated, can be alienating to the average reader. I study English at a top university and I had to look up a couple of words in this article, which jars from the reading of the piece.
02:06 PM on 01/21/2013
I am dyslexic and didn't have a problem with this piece. After seeing your comment, I went back and re-read it, because I know if I understand a word by its context, I might "skip" a word and not worry about its full meaning. The only word here I found I didn't know was "anodyne", which I then looked up. Being dyslexic, I consider myself below average reader. But again, due to my dyslexia, I've learned to understand the sentence as a whole, rather than just a word of it. The 'average reader' might miss a shade of nuance, but they still get the message.
02:26 PM on 01/21/2013
Each to their own, of course. I'm a wannabe journalist myself and one of the things I have always been told is to never use a difficult word when an easily understood one will do the same job. I'm not trying to be pedantic as such, I just feel like we prospective journos should help each other out when we can. (I expect and value criticism on my own work!)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
04:13 PM on 01/21/2013
Phew - thats a relief that even student journalist are having trouble with her way of expressing herself !!!!
12:35 PM on 01/21/2013
Awed by such talent and guts, I Googled her parents. Seeing dad's art- the connection to sexual freedom is apparent. It's a credit to her strong self esteem that she's less representational. I so appreciate the real body. And, I appreciate the sqeamishness of "been there", it allows me to self loathe a little less.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
10:29 AM on 01/21/2013
" The anodyne inoffensiveness caused by 'normal' nudity in other shows, and by other actresses, stems from the total desensitisation that has occurred in the censorship of anything but the ideal female body, which in turn is a body designed to cause the minimal offence possible: it is a body with all quirks, all overtly personal aspects removed "
Help ! Does anyone know what the author is saying here ? Please !
02:14 PM on 01/21/2013
I read it as: we've seen so many 'perfect' bodies in other shows, we have become numb to it, it's become invisable almost, perhaps doll like in it's perfect repetition, and so nonoffensive, where it's even getting by censorship. So, Lena Dunham's body, being very much not perfect, is actually seen, and we are horrified.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justinjuice
04:12 PM on 01/21/2013
Well thank you for providing the english translation. Is that how all english students at Cambridge College talk ?
Must say I havent become densitised by the sight of nude bodies on tv shows, havent even seen that many. Is it only on Girly shows that these perfect nude bodies are appearing ?
Sorry for all the questions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ian Rennie
It irritates people that I'm a librarian :)
07:47 AM on 01/21/2013
"What Lena Dunham's Nudity Says About Us"

hmm... not very much? at all? If anything?
01:09 AM on 01/21/2013
Nudity is so old hat--who cares. It is an immature society, and MEDIA, that makes a big deal about the nothing fact of naked bodies and epidermis exposure. WHO CARES! It is all so boring...
01:06 AM on 01/21/2013
Nudity is so old hat and boring who cares anymore. So we all have an epidermis? Big deal. The media always goes GAGA over a little flesh. Such an immature culture we live in! It is all so BORING...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:07 AM on 01/21/2013
while I cant speak for all men....I will say there appears to alot of magazine covers and movies that apparently seem to think us guys want women who look boney.

its my notion that most men would kick kristen stewart out of bed for sophia vargas.
I think only fashion designers put forth this idea of perfection being super thin. and I'm not even sure those people even are attracted to women.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:19 PM on 01/21/2013
But lets not fall into slandering women for being skinny either. Some people just are naturally thin.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:06 AM on 01/22/2013
yeah your right. but I was just saying that cause it really does seem that our culture worships and pushes the thin girl frame over women who are curvy and made to feel fat.