The young royals are a delight to behold - such good ambassadors for the United Kingdom with their gleaming white smiles, perfect posture and impeccably tailored clothes. But, like a horror film in which the beguiling love interest strips off his mask to reveal an alien monster's face beneath, the young royal's beauty is apparently only skin deep, and more's the pity.
It has come out, despite the Palace's "no comment", that William and Harry have been busy indulging in their usual sadistic pastime: killing animals for the sheer fun of it.
Fresh from blowing birds out of the sky at Sandringham at Christmas, the young Princes spent last weekend on a 'secret' killing spree in Spain. It was not their first visit. At a New Year's getaway in 2005, they and their party apparently slaughtered 740 partridges in a single day as well as numerous other animals, including wild boar and deer at the Finca La Garganta estate.
This time, they celebrated Harry's getting his helicopter license by stripping boar, deer and birds of their 'license' to live and breathe. Not only did they shoot the animals but they also harassed them first, courtesy of dozens of beaters employed by their host, the Duke of Westminster, to make sure the 'game' came to them. No exertion necessary.
It was hoped that the embarrassing incidents and misdeeds of older royals would be forgotten with the coming of age of William and Harry and with William's marriage to Kate. It was easy to imagine that they would relegate the image of the Queen wringing a bird's neck and the whole world of bag numbers and bloodied fox brushes to the history books to nestle alongside Henry VIII's arrogant decapitation of his wives.
After all, these young men are in a unique position to show that they are aware of advances in our understanding of animals' emotions and interests. But their choice is to ignore animal intelligence and relationships and continue to treat them as royal families have done for millennia: as nothing more than living targets to destroy at whim.
With the world and the world's knowledge at their fingertips and afforded boundless opportunities for amusement, how detestable and disappointing that the Princes choose to get their kicks by killing other individuals who ask for nothing out of life but to live it unmolested - a disappointment made even more bitter by the unfulfilled promise of the ambassadors they could have been, had they chosen to emulate their mother's gentle nature.
What a shame that behind the good looks and tousled locks, these handsome young men are apparently cold-hearted, calculating, unimaginative and mean.
The animals whose lives are so callously snuffed out like so many Windsor Chapel candles have precisely the same capacity to feel pain and to suffer as the Queen's corgis. All leave family members or mates behind when they are killed, and none is exempt from grief.
Blood sports have no place in an ethically developed society. That is why polls repeatedly show that the vast majority of Britons oppose such gratuitous violence. These days, we expect those with firearms to use them to protect the innocent, not to destroy the helpless - much less to derive pleasure from it.
We want more from the young royals than a photo opportunity. If they can't step up to become enlightened, respectful and compassionate role models, then they should simply step down.
Courtney Stodden puts her animal magnetism to work as she slips into a ...
Olivia Munn Bears It All for PETA
Bryan Honored By PETA Big Names At Indy Event
PETA India begins CME workshops across India to eliminate use of animals in ...
Kate Middleton and Prince William set to run Sport Relief 2012 mile
That’s a 97% rate of killing. If the animals transferred to kill shelters were themselves killed or displaced other animals who were then killed to take in the ones from PETA, the death toll could be as high as 99% (2,009 of the 2,029 animals they impounded). Only 1% were adopted into homes. While the No Kill movement is having unparalleled success and with No Kill communities now dotting the American landscape—in California, Nevada, Michigan, Kentucky, New York, Texas, Virginia, and elsewhere—PETA continues to be little more than a slaughterhouse.
enjoying your kills
there are a lot
nicer ways to
get your thrills
shame on you
both
When there's no reason to kill, it's not much of a point. Sorry.
Not worth my time to even comment except that it appears you are an extremist in your views thus unbending. I respect your view as misguided as I feel it is. I also would not recommend using the "hunting facts" link as a blanket response for your anti hunting views as it is not completely accurate for all areas/regions of North America. It shows your ignorance and reduces the credibility of your defense.
Bob
Having fun while shooting your dinner (and some for the freezer, and friends and family, and perhaps the less well off)? Isn't that a bit like saying the people that catch tuna with a pole and line in the Maldives shouldn't enjoy themselves while they do it?
Does your country have a TV chef that shoots his own dinner, slaughters his own animals, and launched campaigns for sustainable fishing and an end to battery cages?
With PETA's resources, you've probably already got free range eggs to be the most bought in US supermarkets, convinced the canned tuna industry (and supermarkets) to switch to pole and line only, and got McDonalds to only use sustainably-sourced fish. If not, why are you moaning about some people in a foreign country who are less squeamish about killing their own food?
Instead of whinging about something happening in a foreign country, US lobby groups (including the MPAA and RIAA) should stick to trying to get things done in their own country.
How exactly is it going over there? Are you able to say you've outlawed battery cages and stopped mega dairies from being created?
DEFRA may have gone against the RSPCA and public opinion when it came to a total ban on circus animals, but have you even managed to get public opinion on your side over there?
I don't know about gun laws - and defence of property - in America, but if a human is disturbing your trashcans, can you shout "leave my bins alone or I'll shoot"? You'd probably get upset over an urban fox being killed, but if it was intelligent it would have heeded the warning.
Your organisation also believes silk worms shouldn't be boiled, they should be allowed to mature and fly away. How many silk worms commit suicide or choose not to reproduce because there isn't enough mulberry leaves to go around if the whole species were allowed to reproduce?
Firearms to protect the innocent? Before commenting on what Britons think, perhaps you should find out if the majority of us believe all police officers should carry tasers, or if we think people in the prone position should be beaten or pepper sprayed, or if security guards should be allowed to kill students through asphyxiation.