Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ingrid Newkirk

GET UPDATES FROM Ingrid Newkirk
 

A Royal Disappointment: William and Harry's 'Secret' Hunting Trip

Posted: 19/01/2012 23:00

The young royals are a delight to behold - such good ambassadors for the United Kingdom with their gleaming white smiles, perfect posture and impeccably tailored clothes. But, like a horror film in which the beguiling love interest strips off his mask to reveal an alien monster's face beneath, the young royal's beauty is apparently only skin deep, and more's the pity.

It has come out, despite the Palace's "no comment", that William and Harry have been busy indulging in their usual sadistic pastime: killing animals for the sheer fun of it.

Fresh from blowing birds out of the sky at Sandringham at Christmas, the young Princes spent last weekend on a 'secret' killing spree in Spain. It was not their first visit. At a New Year's getaway in 2005, they and their party apparently slaughtered 740 partridges in a single day as well as numerous other animals, including wild boar and deer at the Finca La Garganta estate.

This time, they celebrated Harry's getting his helicopter license by stripping boar, deer and birds of their 'license' to live and breathe. Not only did they shoot the animals but they also harassed them first, courtesy of dozens of beaters employed by their host, the Duke of Westminster, to make sure the 'game' came to them. No exertion necessary.

It was hoped that the embarrassing incidents and misdeeds of older royals would be forgotten with the coming of age of William and Harry and with William's marriage to Kate. It was easy to imagine that they would relegate the image of the Queen wringing a bird's neck and the whole world of bag numbers and bloodied fox brushes to the history books to nestle alongside Henry VIII's arrogant decapitation of his wives.

After all, these young men are in a unique position to show that they are aware of advances in our understanding of animals' emotions and interests. But their choice is to ignore animal intelligence and relationships and continue to treat them as royal families have done for millennia: as nothing more than living targets to destroy at whim.

With the world and the world's knowledge at their fingertips and afforded boundless opportunities for amusement, how detestable and disappointing that the Princes choose to get their kicks by killing other individuals who ask for nothing out of life but to live it unmolested - a disappointment made even more bitter by the unfulfilled promise of the ambassadors they could have been, had they chosen to emulate their mother's gentle nature.

What a shame that behind the good looks and tousled locks, these handsome young men are apparently cold-hearted, calculating, unimaginative and mean.

The animals whose lives are so callously snuffed out like so many Windsor Chapel candles have precisely the same capacity to feel pain and to suffer as the Queen's corgis. All leave family members or mates behind when they are killed, and none is exempt from grief.

Blood sports have no place in an ethically developed society. That is why polls repeatedly show that the vast majority of Britons oppose such gratuitous violence. These days, we expect those with firearms to use them to protect the innocent, not to destroy the helpless - much less to derive pleasure from it.

We want more from the young royals than a photo opportunity. If they can't step up to become enlightened, respectful and compassionate role models, then they should simply step down.

 
The young royals are a delight to behold - such good ambassadors for the United Kingdom with their gleaming white smiles, perfect posture and impeccably tailored clothes. But, like a horror film in wh...
The young royals are a delight to behold - such good ambassadors for the United Kingdom with their gleaming white smiles, perfect posture and impeccably tailored clothes. But, like a horror film in wh...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 503
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bestuvall
07:11 PM on 02/23/2012
The numbers are in. In 2011, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) impounded 760 dogs. They killed 713 of them. Only 19 were adopted. An additional 36 of them were transferred to kill “shelters” where their fates and the fates of those animals they displaced are unknown. In 2011, they impounded 1,211 cats. 1,198 were put to death. A paltry 5 of them were adopted and another 8 were transferred to kill “shelters” where their fates and the fates of those animals they displaced are unknown. They also took in 58 other companion animals, including rabbits. 54 were put to death. Only 4 were adopted. All told, 2,029 companion animals were impounded. 1,965 were put to death. Only 28 were placed in homes.

That’s a 97% rate of killing. If the animals transferred to kill shelters were themselves killed or displaced other animals who were then killed to take in the ones from PETA, the death toll could be as high as 99% (2,009 of the 2,029 animals they impounded). Only 1% were adopted into homes. While the No Kill movement is having unparalleled success and with No Kill communities now dotting the American landscape—in California, Nevada, Michigan, Kentucky, New York, Texas, Virginia, and elsewhere—PETA continues to be little more than a slaughterhouse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen lyons kalmenson
i poem/paint, sometimes, i ain't
10:44 PM on 02/17/2012
harry and wills
enjoying your kills
there are a lot
nicer ways to
get your thrills
shame on you
both
09:33 PM on 01/24/2012
It's sad when people with so many privileges in life can't find anything better to do than destroy it. When you have so much, why not spend the weekend feeding the needy at a soup kitchen instead? Hold a charity benefit? Read to school children? Or if you want to really indulge yourself, go for a hike, go rockclimbing, skiing, etc...there are so many ways to enjoy the great outdoors that don't involve killing the inhabitants!
07:51 PM on 01/27/2012
Did you or do you do these things?
09:13 PM on 01/23/2012
They blasted the birds out of the sky. Let them have those birds stuffed down their throats. Feathers and all. If you hunt it then have the decency to eat it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruisersmom
09:00 PM on 01/23/2012
A lot of people who say that these animals have it better than the animals raised on factory farms are missing an important point. The princes aren't hunting for food. They're not like my dad who hunts for deer and fishes for tuna an salmon for us to eat over the next year. They're just hunting for the fun of being outdoors and shooting something.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:21 PM on 02/07/2012
no one needs animals for food period,it is just a preference,nothing more.there is no real justification.http://www.eatright.org/about/content.aspx?id=8357 It is the position of the American Dietetic Association that appropriately planned vegetarian diets, including total vegetarian or vegan diets, are healthful, nutritionally adequate, and may provide health benefits in the prevention and treatment of certain diseases. Well-planned vegetarian diets are appropriate for individuals during all stages of the life cycle, including pregnancy, lactation, infancy, childhood, and adolescence, and for athletes
jhNY
Mercy.
07:19 PM on 01/23/2012
Royals through the ages in every culture have hunted; it's one of the only things royals, fewer than ever before, do today that requires more than showing up where you're expected and exhibiting good posture. Without the exertion of hunting, they'd be more than statuesque; they'd be statuary.
photo
oregonian68
McCarthy was right.
07:16 PM on 01/23/2012
Bill Clinton took pot shots at critters too. It is, however, more humane than buying meat at the supermarket because A HUNTED ANIMAL AT LEAST LIVED FREE FOR A WHILE AND DIDN'T GET TERRORIZED BEFORE DEATH.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruisersmom
08:58 PM on 01/23/2012
They're not eating the animals. They're just killing them. You're missing that important point.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
08:14 PM on 01/28/2012
Your essential point is that killing something isn't so bad as torturing it, then killing it.

When there's no reason to kill, it's not much of a point. Sorry.
photo
oregonian68
McCarthy was right.
10:27 PM on 01/28/2012
It was a general comment re: hunting.
07:02 PM on 01/23/2012
Excessive hunting is wrong, also is hunting animals raised for such a purpose. I am a hunter and most hunters would agree. Also many hunters are environmentalists, although many would say "how is that possible"? It's because we are stewards of our environment and we take care to keep it pristine because we are keenly aware of the results of any other approach.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:25 PM on 02/07/2012
there is no excuse ever for hunting and hunters are not conservationists.that is just a phony excuse to hunt.hunters have messed up the ecosystem and the best thing to do would be to stop hunting forever.hunting is terrorism and murder.. http://www.idausa.org/facts/hunting.html
10:46 PM on 02/07/2012
Hey Jude, [i couldn't resist]
Not worth my time to even comment except that it appears you are an extremist in your views thus unbending. I respect your view as misguided as I feel it is. I also would not recommend using the "hunting facts" link as a blanket response for your anti hunting views as it is not completely accurate for all areas/regions of North America. It shows your ignorance and reduces the credibility of your defense.
Bob
10:27 AM on 01/23/2012
Anyone else that chief Royal hunter Prince Philip is also President Emeritus of the World Wild Life Fund and has been since it's inception in 1961 ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jessica Ann Stallings
Alternative designer. Screw the norm.
04:05 AM on 01/23/2012
Ingrid, I loathe and despise you. And your organization. Please don't ever come back to Eugene.
06:34 PM on 01/23/2012
Why do you despise PETA? Just curious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jessica Ann Stallings
Alternative designer. Screw the norm.
10:43 PM on 01/23/2012
Did you know that the US government has them listed as a terrorist organization? Did you know that there is PROOF that PETA employees have murdered thousands of adoptable animals in Virginia alone? This woman herself has said that if the key to finding a cure for HIV/AIDS was in lower primates, then PETA would condemn it. They attack people wearing fur or leather, vandalize shops and restaurants. They put on large and offensive public spectacles, and pass out flyers at schools that tell them that their mothers are murderers. To top it off, I highly doubt Newkirk even has PROOF that the princes went on a killing spree. I have 6 cats of my own, and 3 "fosters"--and this woman's views on animal rights make me want to throttle her. Which is why I don't want her to come back to my neck of the woods; because I probably would give her a taste of her own medicine.
photo
oregonian68
McCarthy was right.
07:31 PM on 01/23/2012
How many birds? Hundreds? If it were a few for a meal, I'd have no problem with that. I don't know about their dad, but I do know he is an environmentalist. There is a difference between ethical and unethical hunting, and hunters should be the first ones to make that distinction. Hunting for food is more honorable than buying steak in the market.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jessica Ann Stallings
Alternative designer. Screw the norm.
10:45 PM on 01/23/2012
And if this is such a huge deal, then why have I only seen Newkirk writing on it? You would think it would pop up on BBC's royal news tickers if this were true.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jessica Ann Stallings
Alternative designer. Screw the norm.
09:08 AM on 01/28/2012
Ingrid Newkirk is the only one saying that they killed just to kill. As the Queen is also an avid hunter--and lived frugally during the Depression and WW2--I imagine wasting perfectly good meat would disappoint Grandma, and when you're second and third in line for the throne, you mustn't upset the Queen.
02:54 AM on 01/23/2012
Do you believe in universal health care? Human rights? Woman's right to choose? Hate crime legislation? I only ask because all PETA members presumably believe humans should be treated ethically too, and not worse than dogs.

Having fun while shooting your dinner (and some for the freezer, and friends and family, and perhaps the less well off)? Isn't that a bit like saying the people that catch tuna with a pole and line in the Maldives shouldn't enjoy themselves while they do it?

Does your country have a TV chef that shoots his own dinner, slaughters his own animals, and launched campaigns for sustainable fishing and an end to battery cages?

With PETA's resources, you've probably already got free range eggs to be the most bought in US supermarkets, convinced the canned tuna industry (and supermarkets) to switch to pole and line only, and got McDonalds to only use sustainably-sourced fish. If not, why are you moaning about some people in a foreign country who are less squeamish about killing their own food?
06:31 PM on 01/23/2012
It wasn't for food. They did it for fun.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:39 PM on 02/07/2012
all of the killing that you listed is almost as cruel as any other cruelty.there is no such thing as humane exploitation and slaughter.that is an oxymoron.
02:52 AM on 01/23/2012
PETA?

Instead of whinging about something happening in a foreign country, US lobby groups (including the MPAA and RIAA) should stick to trying to get things done in their own country.

How exactly is it going over there? Are you able to say you've outlawed battery cages and stopped mega dairies from being created?

DEFRA may have gone against the RSPCA and public opinion when it came to a total ban on circus animals, but have you even managed to get public opinion on your side over there?

I don't know about gun laws - and defence of property - in America, but if a human is disturbing your trashcans, can you shout "leave my bins alone or I'll shoot"? You'd probably get upset over an urban fox being killed, but if it was intelligent it would have heeded the warning.

Your organisation also believes silk worms shouldn't be boiled, they should be allowed to mature and fly away. How many silk worms commit suicide or choose not to reproduce because there isn't enough mulberry leaves to go around if the whole species were allowed to reproduce?

Firearms to protect the innocent? Before commenting on what Britons think, perhaps you should find out if the majority of us believe all police officers should carry tasers, or if we think people in the prone position should be beaten or pepper sprayed, or if security guards should be allowed to kill students through asphyxiation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jessica Ann Stallings
Alternative designer. Screw the norm.
04:07 AM on 01/23/2012
If shooting a deer and eating its meat is wrong, then I don't ever want to be right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
08:18 PM on 01/28/2012
Personally, I think it's wrong if you have access to vegetarian food.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yikesits
01:32 AM on 01/23/2012
Typical Brit "reporting".... Personal bias abounds..... Blah
This comment has been removed.
09:23 PM on 01/22/2012
I love shooting, good to see that the Royal Princes are having a fun time.
12:52 AM on 01/23/2012
Clay pigeons could replace those sentient birds and animals during those "fun times" you love. Live and let live.