Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Collier

GET UPDATES FROM John Collier
 

It's Not Acceptable That We Have a Million Young People Without Work in the UK

Posted: 07/06/2012 00:00

Tough times equals exploitation, so goes the theory. Are apprenticeships really a boost to young people's prospects and a good way for firms to spot talent, or just an opportunity to find cheap labour for unwanted jobs?

The sheer number of training and recruitment schemes out there means they all share some of this mixed reputation. But apprenticeships can be different, and different in ways which are critical to kick-starting business growth and as a genuine solution to social problems. Ongoing public understanding and support for apprenticeships and apprentices is important if they're to match their obvious potential.

For decades employers have talked negatively about what the UK education system delivers in terms of work-ready recruits. They then go on to talk about what really works best for them, the 'Grow Your Own' approach. It's never been the job of schools and universities solely to train young people for work, they have a much broader role and agenda in a society. But apprenticeships make the Grow Your Own philosophy a reality. Young people joining firms don't have to unlearn or re-learn, but can apply their learning as they go along and are moulded by their organisation.

Apprenticeships also involve a structured framework for that business sector, which means skills are all employer-led and so naturally meet specific demands. 80% of employers in a recent independent survey said they recognised that bringing in apprentices had led to productivity improvements. Getting tasks completed, drawing on the enthusiasm of recruits who are always learning, means businesses are less likely to get bogged down in the detail. More experienced staff can focus on the areas of innovation and new business development which are important for economic growth.

What matters for everyone involved in apprenticeships is that meaningful jobs are created, no stop-gaps, no superficial roles or just a temporary place to park our NEETs (not in education, employment or training). That involves finding the right fit for both sides. It sounds simple, but too often the basics aren't right, and that's the role of an organisation like Exemplas, providing a bespoke programme of screening and training. Candidates need to have the appropriate skills, have the right behaviours and attitudes from the start - and someone needs to be able to make this assessment. If the whole person package isn't right then more work needs to be done to get them there. There needs to be understanding of the actual business needs. What needs to be created is a basis for 'stickability' for people in jobs and so they stay in work and carry on up the skills escalator. It's estimated that apprentices will earn an additional £100k in salary over their career compared with their peers.

It's not acceptable that we have a million young people without work or sense of direction in the UK. Apprenticeships are a genuine and practical route to provide 16-18 year olds with the kind of structured employment and regular salary which builds self-esteem and a sense of recognition of their individual value. They can at least see where they're going and could end up. They also learn something which everyone in work could also benefit from, that school and college is just a preliminary, and training and re-training happens throughout a working life.

John Collier, Chief Executive, Exemplas, www.exemplas.com, apprenticeships@exemplas.com

 
FOLLOW UK POLITICS
Tough times equals exploitation, so goes the theory. Are apprenticeships really a boost to young people's prospects and a good way for firms to spot talent, or just an opportunity to find cheap labour...
Tough times equals exploitation, so goes the theory. Are apprenticeships really a boost to young people's prospects and a good way for firms to spot talent, or just an opportunity to find cheap labour...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Wilson
What's the story mourning Tories?
12:30 PM on 06/10/2012
No one can mock a proper apprenticeship or internship. I think most just got furious at the idea of ones for areas like retail and fastfood. Both take practice, and to become very good at your job may take quite some time, but the notion you need an apprenticeship for jobs most peope learn in a day to a week is insulting and is only about cheap labour. I've trained many people up for shop work, and 15 year olds pick it up in 2 to 3, 3 hour shifts.
10:12 AM on 06/10/2012
i believe that all businesses that employ immigrants to work in UK should be taxed a greater amount than if they employed a british citizen. this would counteract the benefits to the business and encourage them to invest in UK people. a company like carillion ships in workers for domestic work in UK hospitals etc for profit not to improve care or standards, contracts to build UK trams sent to spain to support their economy, shelves for Birmingham City Council library being sourced from france we should manufacture 70% of our needs and outsource the rest not the other way around. employers do not want these apprentices as they can now get a so called fully qualified experienced person at the cost of an apprentice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edgar H
Keep the Press free!
03:35 PM on 06/09/2012
Years ago, if you wanted to become a painter and decorator, carpenter, plumber, mechanic or engineer etc, you did an apprenticeship with a local firm, now they get someone in from Eastern Europe. Employers decided that cheap labour was good labour and that to dumb down jobs was better than training or having skilled staff.

Now we are led to believe that its the fault of everyone except industry for turning the country into a desert. Nurses from the Philipines, engineers from India, even curry chefs, these fine people now send their money out of the country and don't spend it in the UK. Sad to think of the profits being lost isn't it
09:55 AM on 06/07/2012
I feel, in terms of 'stop gap' work, that there is a similar situation with work experience and internships. As an aspiring fashion/lifestyle features writer I am always looking for placements and opportunities to learn in industry, in the hope that when I finish my degree I will have made enough contacts to find paid work. However, many publications and websites have new rules which say they cannot take an intern on for longer than two weeks unless they pay them. And, obviously, it is easier not to pay them so they simply take on new interns every couple of weeks.
Before, or so I've been told, one could intern say for three to six months, prove their worth, and be offered work. Now I flit between places, working two weeks here and four weeks there, with barely enough time to make crucial contacts.
I recently finished a two week placement at a national paper. The deputy fashion editor told me she wished I could stay for longer, and write more, but she simply wasn't allowed to keep me.
I understand that I need the experience, and I am prepared to work for free for now while I am studying - I have two weekend/evening jobs which help. But once I finish, I really will need work quickly. I just hope I've made enough good impressions in my allotted two weeks.
09:50 AM on 06/07/2012
Apprenticeships excellent. Ref. comment below: Immigrant labour is used often when there are not enough suitable UK nationals applying, see agriculture or catering for example. Two ideas to help. Firstly the Y10 school work experience should stress the "soft" skills needed by employers, punctuality, courtesy, personal appearance etc. Second a financial carrot might help. I suggest nil employers' NI for a fixed period, just for new young starters. Of course the apprentices have skills advantages and that should be encouraged too.
09:28 AM on 06/07/2012
More faux outrage about youth unemployment. When Labour were in government, youth unemployment was at an all time high because employers preferred 'off the shelf' migrant labour, rather than train Britain's youth unemployed. Traitors, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown took the easy option whilst dumbing down education and concealing unemployment in New Deal youth training schemes/incapacity benefits. Instead of fixing the roof when the sun shone, Labour flooded the country with immigrants, driving down wages and stoking a property boom. New Labour were the architects of this mess and as long as Britain has open borders with the EU, the problem won't go away.
12:22 PM on 06/07/2012
In a nutshell - According to the Lib/Lab/Con 'Youth Unemployment' is a price well worth paying.