Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Wight

GET UPDATES FROM John Wight
 

Queen's Jubilee Celebrations and the Spectre of 1917

Posted: 06/06/2012 00:00

The Queen's Diamond Jubilee celebrations are thankfully behind us, but in their wake they have left a mark of shame at the sheer amount of public money involved not only in paying for this event, but in propping up the Monarchy year after year, an institution as ludicrous as it is pernicious in the 21st century.

The pomp, pageantry and sycophancy on display over the Jubilee weekend was truly sickening to behold - not only in its hypocrisy but also in its disconnect from reality. For at a time when the vast experiment in human despair which the government has the cheek to describe as an economic policy is doling out misery to millions across the country, here we were being served up a festival of unearned privilege, obscene wealth, and servile obeisance to a relic of feudalism that no amount of clapped-out pop stars, tired celebrities, and assorted establishment stooges could even hope to mitigate.

But just when you thought things could not get worse than being forced to sit through hours of blanket media coverage of the event came the revelation that thirty unemployed jobseekers were press ganged into working as stewards without pay for the private security contractor hired to provide security at the Jubilee, along with another fifty who were on apprentice wages of £2.80 per hour, and were made to sleep overnight in tents under London Bridge. The kind of society in which such blatant disregard for human dignity and the poor can be deemed acceptable is one that Charles Dickens would recognise.

Indeed, such naked hatred of the poor and unemployed is now endemic in today's Britain, a result of a class war unleashed by the Tories and their Lib Dem cohorts in order to shift the blame for the ongoing recession from the rich who caused it to the poor and ordinary working people who did not. It also reminds us why the trade union movement exists and why it is imperative that working people do not allow themselves to be divided between public and private sector and employed and unemployed, exactly as this government with the help of its supporters in the media have exerted itself in trying to do since coming to power.

We are fast approaching the stage where the lack of sympathy for the plight of the poor in today's Britain is redolent of Tsarist Russia in the early 20th century. Then, as now, you had a hopelessly detached and unsympathetic tiny elite living lives of decadent luxury even as increasing numbers of their fellow citizens found themselves mired in crippling poverty and despair. But the key lesson from Tsarist Russia is that the poor will only take so much before they decide to rise up and do something about it, as they did in 1917 when the Russian Revolution exploded in the faces of the Russian aristocracy. It is a lesson which the elite of any era in any country ignores at its peril.

The spectre of 1917 hasn't gone away. If anything it slowly but surely looms larger across Europe as social and economic injustice becomes increasingly entrenched.

 

Follow John Wight on Twitter: www.twitter.com/johnwight1

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 112
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
04:38 PM on 06/10/2012
Yes, Charles Dickens passionately wanted a caring, just and less class driven society, so do I- but what does that have to do with the Queen? Have a president instead, if you want, but the only person noone would argue about is probably Rolf Harris! What about Major, Blair or Lord Sugar, just to concentrate the mind? And what about cost? Would a President have no expenses? Yes, we could do it on a shoestring like Ireland- no thank you!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edgar H
Keep the Press free!
05:08 PM on 06/09/2012
It must be nice to have an outlook Homer Sipson would be proud of having. It's the fault of the Queen, of the Tories and Lib Dems. 'Doh! The unions will lead us in a glorious revolution and we will live in the promised land feasting on milk and honey.

A two year old could tell the writer the truth of the Russian revolution, it got rid of oneTsar and replaced him with the greedier and more ruthless Tsars of the Communist Central Committee.
07:18 AM on 06/14/2012
The problem with the majority of wealthy people is that they are short sighted , if you have wealth you don't deprive others of it to breaking point . The reference to the Russian revolution is exactly that point , not the unfortunate outcome, which is not relevent, Russia is now once again supposed to be democratic but now controlled by a different kind of Tsar, as we all are now and they are called bankers.
Fractional reserve banking is our problem, the repeal of the Glass steagall act that caused the global financial crissis, google " Money masters" "The 13 Bankers " or positive money and education is available. The Queen, Lib dems , Tories , maybe relics from the past but just a distraction, unions , groups of united workers to protect their rights. Looking at minimum wage and the Uk having been a low wage economy i don't really see workers do much more than work and try to work. Not too many working class people earning million dollar salaries.
photo
Marknfl123456
Feet don't fail me now.
01:55 AM on 06/08/2012
Oh my. Poor writer needs to do his research. He has the Queen's expense to the nation all wrong. I am thinking he wrote such nonsense just to gain attention.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NJP1
04:57 PM on 06/07/2012
if this clown wants a republic, then I must assume that he wants a president to go with it
he should look around the world, then write another load of drivel to tell us which country can offer the best presidential model for us to aspire to
the core nations of the commonwealth, Canada, Australia and New Zealand are free to dump HM any time they want and go their own way, but they don't
Canada in particular must look across the border at the electioneering insanity and say--thanks, but no thanks
07:29 AM on 06/14/2012
I think you will find Australia and New Zealand will dump the monarchy many feel quite strongly about it here. In all fairness the worship of random people who do dress ups and call themselves royal is a strange concept.Its about 50/50 in oz, in Whitlams term in office it nearly happened, but the Royals make the media money , so they have the worlds biggest marketing machine and those who need hero worship buy the ticket as they do for Beckham, Gary Glitter and others.

My sister is a baroness but we all laugh at how the public idolise us, as i am sure Windsors do, behind close .doors. If your neighbours told you they were queens and wanted you to wave flags at them and you were to pay for all their jollies , would you oblige. I had a mate who was a queen , when we out for dinner , he never paid , always wanted a free lunch, they are all the same.
07:18 AM on 06/07/2012
To the author of this sorry article, it is not the early twentieth century and therefore NOT the monarchy nor the aristocracy that holds power in Britain. There is a new sort of class to blame - the class of the business elite. You can do away with the monarchy if you'd like, but it won't make a difference to the poor I can assure you!
12:09 AM on 06/07/2012
I'd like to know your definition of "poor". Free education, free healthcare and community services, benefits galore...we live in a country where no-one suffers real poverty but where some people have a lot more than others. That is no different to any republic or so-called communist state.
You're quite right about a small percentage of the greedy rich but you fail to mention the greedy and lazy spongers at the other end of the scale.
You are also right that if the monarchy gets out of touch with its people, there will be an "uprising", not a bloody revolution but a gradual disappearance. But this is the whole point; the Queen is very much in touch with her subjects/citizens; she probably meets a greater diversity than anyone else in this country and, indeed, the Commonwealth. As the events of this last weekend has shown, she is adored by the vast majority of the population, most of whom are very happy to fund her. Don't kid yourself a President would come any cheaper.
Anyway, you want jobs to be created and more public sector spending. You just had four days of it. Better spent here than invested (and lost) overseas. There is more decency and compassion in our Queen than all the world's presidents put together.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dombeyandson
09:24 AM on 06/09/2012
Er - free education, free healthcare and community services and benefits galore?? What do you think your taxes and national insurance pay for. You are as deluded as the idiot who wrote the article to which you protest about; he has his facts wrong too. You are also obsessed with the greedy scrounger syndrome as though you are a paragon of virtue - he who is without sin cast the first stone - you cannot avoid it in a welfare society as no man is an island or are you one of the me first brigade especially when the ship goes down - keep the scroungers out of the lifeboats??
09:40 AM on 06/09/2012
The "poor" won't pay tax and NI so - yes its free. I'm not obsessed with greedy scroungers; they exist so I mentioned them. As for your suggestion that everyone in a welfare state is a scrounger to some degree, I suggest you get out and meet a broader spectrum of society.
07:35 AM on 06/14/2012
The Queen is intouch with her subjcts , can you hear yourself , yes the palace is full of average people popping in for a beer. i have a mate who is on the royal protection squad he says they are on another planet. My father worked for a national daily and the D notices also said otherwise, all stuff people like you never see, you sound like a tape recording of a sky news report, you hav ecertainly bought the ticket , i suppose if you have not much going on in your life , hero wordship and fantasy is a good replacement for reality.
10:30 PM on 06/06/2012
Who gives this fool permission to post on behalf of the HP? Utter ribald tripe. Get him off and have some one on who spends less time reading a thesaurus and more time learning facts.
10:19 PM on 06/06/2012
Naked hatred of the poor as opposed to the continuous drive by the left to make them dependant on the state (ie the Left)? How else would you describe a tripling of people claiming disability under labour or the removal of the 10p income tax rate, a move that hurt the working poor more than anyone else? It is in the lefts' vested interest to keep the poor poor because the left then have an almost captive audience. At least the right have to make enough people better off to get their support.
09:22 PM on 06/06/2012
The taxpayers only paid for the security so what's your problem.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
09:10 PM on 06/06/2012
Scott Walker must be taking his cue from these people.
07:31 PM on 06/06/2012
Tzarist Russia was not a Constitutional Monarchy. And they were living in a feudal system, not in a capitalist democracy.

But I see your point about the jubilee--it was rather of very poor taste to display such extravaganza, and a poor timing too. It is in this ill advised pompousness that Britain reminded me this weekend of Russia, not from the Tzarist period, but rather from the communist era, when such pompous parades to the glory of their leader (who, like the queen stayed on the job for decades) were very frequent and very disturbing. A little more taste, modesty and common sense should have prevailed this week-end, but they didn't. That's what irks most people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deluk
disgusted.
11:27 PM on 06/06/2012
There was actually very little "pomposity", Britain isn't France, the USA or North Korea.
11:34 PM on 06/06/2012
Oh, I watched it. It was very pompous. I haven't seen anything else like it since before the wall came down.

And your equation of France and the US to North Korea is way off, obviously you have no idea what you're talking about.
07:17 PM on 06/06/2012
If you knew anything, apart from how to be melodramatic, you would know that the Queen has nothing to do with politics. She is our head of state but, and this is so important it seems impossible you don't understand, she is a figure head. The public anger isn't directed at the Queen, it's directed at the politicians, the bankers and the financiers, those who can make changes but don't. I don't disagree a revolution is coming, i just think you're pointing your ire in the wrong direction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paul679
07:14 PM on 06/06/2012
What a nasty, spiteful, childish article. And full of untrue rubbish too. A top American magazine (Time or Newsweek) worked out that the whole cost of the Jubilee celebrations was offset by x8 more revenue coming in through tourism, etc. I would trust them before a prejudiced "writer" like you.
08:04 AM on 06/07/2012
So you would trust a "top American magazine" for your information????? Lol. You go for it sonny!.
Pfffftttt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paul679
12:24 PM on 06/07/2012
Sorry pal, anyone who needs to use the childish "Lol" in a message has no gravitas. Get back to The Dandy.
jhNY
Mercy.
06:40 PM on 06/06/2012
New frontiers of sycophancy were regularly crossed, sometimes several in a single minute, in the coverage breathlessly provided to us here in the US by Piers Morgan and crew.

Hope it was more fun in the flesh.
07:16 PM on 06/06/2012
Piers Morgan is someone I can't take anymore. He needs to go away.
10:06 PM on 06/06/2012
Were they meeting Nelson Mandela?
jhNY
Mercy.
11:36 PM on 06/06/2012
No. They were pretending Lord nelson hasn't been dead for two centuries.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacksdad41
Quant Je Puis
12:51 AM on 06/07/2012
No - we gave him the benefit of the doubt on one visit but as a convicted terrorist and murderer we had to let him go. No doubt you could find a place for him on gitmo - no charges needed of course
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marignymitch
E pluribus unum percent
06:29 PM on 06/06/2012
You are absolutely correct. Unseemly. But with the benefit of being silly.