Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Justin Forsyth

GET UPDATES FROM Justin Forsyth
 

Aid Under Attack

Posted: 25/09/2012 17:37

Something really momentous happened last week. Something that the whole world should be celebrating. We found out that there had been the biggest fall in history in the numbers of children dying from easily preventable diseases or from simply not having enough decent food to eat. Put simply, there are millions more kids alive today thanks to the success of international aid.

This is the reason why the Prime Minister deserves huge credit for being unequivocal in promising to stick to his commitments to help poorer countries. But just when we are making this dramatic progress and there is the chance to be the generation that ensures no child dies from diarrhoea, pneumonia, malaria or hunger, and that every child has the chance to go to school - aid has come under unprecedented attack.

Recent newspaper coverage would suggest that British aid is being frittered away; squandered on undeserving countries and wasted. It is right that tough questions should be asked about how Britain gets value for its money, and it is spent in ways which help the poorest most.

However, we cannot let all the progress that has been made and the potential that could be achieved be drowned out by claims that aid is ineffective, unnecessary or wasted. Because the bigger picture is that aid works. Aid that costs just a penny in every pound.

In the past decade more than 50million children have been able to go to school as a result of debt cancellation and increased aid. Most recently Britain helped to feed 3.5million people caught up in the East Africa Food Crisis. And our aid will vaccinate one child every two seconds, immunising 80million children in all, saving 1.4million lives over the next five years. This is the hidden story of success - that British aid transforms the lives of millions of the world's poorest people.

My visit to one of the refugee camps in Syria recently bought home how vital British aid is. The children I met told me about their horrific experiences, some who were tortured, others who had seen their loved ones shot and killed. All had had to flee Syria leaving everything behind. But they were safe, had been give the basic essentials and were receiving help to overcome what they had seen. All thanks to British aid.

Aid is not only morally right but it is in our interests too. By supporting developing economies such as China we create opportunities to trade, helping create jobs here in the UK. UK aid also helps protect our security - preventing fragile states becoming havens for terrorists. Giving aid to poorer countries helps creates jobs within them helping end poverty so that people can afford to feed their families and no longer need be dependent on aid.

Giving aid is part of our DNA. For 82 years the vast majority of British people have supported the UK's policy to help those countries in greater need and felt it the right thing to do. It has helped make the UK the global leader that we are today.

A recent poll found that 55% of British people think we should keep our promises to increase the level of overseas aid, a commitment mirrored by the coalition government. Just 27% say we should cut it.

It is tough at home, but we cannot balance the books on the backs of the world's poorest, ignoring the needs of those in greater need than ourselves. As the Prime Minister said: "To those who say we can't afford to act: I say we can't afford to wait."

 
FOLLOW UK POLITICS
Something really momentous happened last week. Something that the whole world should be celebrating. We found out that there had been the biggest fall in history in the numbers of children dying from...
Something really momentous happened last week. Something that the whole world should be celebrating. We found out that there had been the biggest fall in history in the numbers of children dying from...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:39 PM on 09/27/2012
President Yoweri Museveni of Uganda, one of Britain's most favoured recipients of foreign aid, bought a £30 million private jet, six Russian fighter jets at twice the market rate and without full consent of his parliament. The sum involved was nearly half a billion pounds - three times the annual spending on Uganda's health service and about the same mount as we plan to give them in aid over the next five years!

Almost £2 billion has disappeared from Afghanistan since 2007, some to Gulf tax havens, with the family and associates of President Hamid Karzai linked to a £90 million Dubai property empire. Much of this cash is from aid donations, with £25 million disappearing from one donation to a hospital. Despite this, Britain is to increase aid to afghanistan by 40%.

Cameron intends to increase aid to 0.7% of GDP, despite the UN stating the amount required was 0.44%. Time to stop this waste and invest the money saved here!
12:10 AM on 09/27/2012
The dicator bonus is making lots of rich corrupt people even richer.

The poor? No they do not see it, often it makes them poorer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
humphry
The Voynich Manuscripts.
10:28 PM on 09/26/2012
The worlds human population is exploding scientist tell us, and soon there will not be enough land to sustain and feed us, and add in climate change where more and more crops are failing, they predict a world food shortage in the near future...Surly we should be looking to reduce the population in those countries where the land cannot support them, instead of encouraging them to have more and more children.........
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
humphry
The Voynich Manuscripts.
09:53 PM on 09/26/2012
Here we go again with quoting polls to support a cause, we all know that polls depend on when and where they are taken, and how the question is asked...Forgive me but when people start to quote polls i get a tad suspicious.....I dont see much evidence of overseas aid support on here, and i for one agree with them.......
09:05 PM on 09/26/2012
AID doesn't appear to have done anything anywhere I've been and thats the majority of the third world countries on numerous occasions throughout my life, at 57 I've even been involved in the transportation of hundreds of tons of charitable donations only to watch the majority pilfered in port after port by dockers. From food and clothing to machinery and timber/building materials it all gets stolen till very little remains for its chosen destination. The ones who benefit most from charity are the likes of Justin here, Justin went to work for Oxfam, straight out of Oxford uni, the same place those who want to give this nations wealth away, whether filling banksters coffers or pleading for donations its more about feathering their own nests than it is about charity. The time is here to refuse the antics of these shysters, they operate solely to benefit themselves at the populations expense, I used to swallow the charity pleas, not any more, I've come to realize theres enough in this country struggling to survive and will never again donate anything destined overseas and especially not while lining the pockets of those among us who think they're part of the elite. Justin, if you can afford it then get donating out of your own pocket but lets call a halt to using our hard workers taxes for furthering you and your pals while those you try to convince here endure a nightmare not of their making, ALL AID MUST CEASE.
08:56 PM on 09/26/2012
If I want to give money to the worlds poor I will send money to oxfam. Funny how this rich toff is very generous with our money. Im sorry i dont want any of my tax money going overseas, no matter what Cameron thinks most of us want aid stopped.
08:28 PM on 09/26/2012
Most of these charities are self-serving.
Look at all the decades Oxfam and the rest have been operating and guess what?
There are still people living in slums in Rio, South Africa, India and everywhere else around the world.
Those slums and awful living conditions were there 100 years ago and nothing has changed.
Progress?
What progress?
06:21 PM on 09/26/2012
We are being told we have to find another 16 billion pounds of cuts.Why are we giving 170 billion away in aid when at the same time we need the money ourselves? But then i don't have a university education so can't quite grasp the logic involved in the situation.Maybe you have to be rich to make sense of it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
humphry
The Voynich Manuscripts.
09:57 PM on 09/26/2012
The rich pledge the aid, but the plebs have to pay for it..but what the hell, it make the rich feel good, and look good in the eyes of the world.....
05:52 PM on 09/26/2012
If money was the answer, the millions we've thrown at this problem for over half a century would have solved the problem of starving children years ago.
Unfortunately there are people in these deprived countries helping themselves to any money or even goods that we send.

The aid does NOT reach the people who need it and we are now in a position where we need all the money we can save in order to fix our economy.
If our own welfare budgets are being cut and children are turning up at school not having been fed, perhaps Save The Children could spare some time for them.

I know that the plight of our kids is nowhere near that of African and Asian children in poor countries but we are not solving the problems of those children we're just lining the pckets of murderous warlords.
Have you ever noticed that when the pictures of the refugee camps are being shown in Somalia etc. there appears to be no men around. Why ? because they're out fighting each other with weapons and ammunition paid for by the warlords out of foreign aid.

If we want to perpetuate these evil wars then we should keep sending the money but let's not kid ourselves that we are helping children there.
05:52 PM on 09/26/2012
When the writer of this article named Justin Forsyth has this single short sentence at the end of a paragraph which states, "Aid that just costs a penny in every pound", I do believe his subconscious is telling him that for every pound squeezed out of the British taxpayer, only 1 penny reaches those in real need.

The other 99 pence or 99% ends up in the Swiss Bank Accounts of the big-oggers both national and local.
08:29 PM on 09/26/2012
Equivalates to £300 per family every year.
Cheap?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
humphry
The Voynich Manuscripts.
09:59 PM on 09/26/2012
the latest figure is £400 per family per year.
05:46 PM on 09/26/2012
Whatever role Britain will take in the future either in respect of Europe or within the globe, I do think we should avoid trying to be the World's Prize Mug.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nathan0316
TrueBlueTory Age quod agis
01:25 PM on 09/26/2012
Oh, if only it were so!

Unfortunately most of our aid doesn't go where it's needed. Most of it gets poured into the pockets of corrupt local warlords (or government ministers, same thing), spent on the armed forces of these bankrupt nations or simply squandered on wine women and song.

Also, if we have been giving them aid for so long (82 years is a figure I've heard) why are they still in such dire straits? Our charity doesn't seem to be making much difference, does it? So a few more children survive past the age of 5, they're still growing up in dirt poor conditions where poverty is a way of life, perhaps we need to change our way of doing things to force them into changing theirs!

The definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result. Isn't that exactly what we're doing by simply keep giving these countries aid?
08:31 PM on 09/26/2012
Just what I said.
Why are those slums in Rio, Calcutta or the South African townships STILL there decades on?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nathan0316
TrueBlueTory Age quod agis
09:54 PM on 09/26/2012
Honestly? Because that's where what little aid that gets through is distributed!
We're part of the problem, not the solution. We should pull our troops and our aid out of everywhere there's a war and refuse to help in any way until the fighting stops.
Harsh, yes. Will it cause suffering? Probably, but if it gets them to stop battling each other it'll ease it in the long run.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Fowler
I try....I really do!
12:49 PM on 09/26/2012
I agree that for decades, the people of this nation have been supporting aid; From Blue Peter and Band Aid to Pudsey, we give. And of course, no one wants children to die for lack of a few pence worth of aid.

But what world do they then grow up in?

In countries, where sadly, children are made to work from 5 years old; where females are simply "used" for marraige and breeding machines that add to local environmental pressures on the land and water supplies. For the millions saved, how many will simply enter the same cycle of large families, little or no education and a future of drudgery and simply "surviving"?

National governments where the aid (seemingly) always goes, should be made to use the funds for long term, post "aid" planning where real information, support, education and sustainable farming etc can be as vital as the few pence on a child is given to keep them alive; they must also be given a future for them to live in!
12:44 PM on 09/26/2012
This article was written by someone wearing rose-tinted spectacles. Whilst I am all for continuing with aid to poor countries, the obsession with throwing money at the problem is not the solution and, indeed, can exacerbate the problem reasons the countries are so poor.

David Cameron is walking on water if he thinks that every pound we donate goes to honourable causes - indeed if 1% actually reaches the target it would be a miracle.

having worked for aid agencies in a number of countries, I saw the money laundering and bribes that soaked up our money and it turned my stomach to see our people accepting these practices and the fact that large portions of the aid went to buy arms and luxuries for an already affluent minority.

Get the management of the aid policed properly and we will not have to keep increasing the amounts we donate - equally some of that money could then be used to help our own under-priviledged.

Problem is; you don't get a Nobel Peace Prize for helping your own poor and needy.
12:18 PM on 09/26/2012
Actually Justin, like the saying goes "follow the money".
Aid is fine if the money we give ends up as aid.
More often than not, it doesn't.
It ends up as weapons, as food for rebel armies, in the hands of the unscrupulous.
Until these issues can be resolved, it should be stopped.
If you feel so strongly about it, you go and follow the money, see what happens to a few random sums on their journey to the needy.

I think you will get a wake up call.
01:39 PM on 09/26/2012
Genuine question- where can I read about these cases where aid ends up for more nefarious purposes? Where is the data?
03:49 PM on 09/26/2012
Well, I'm not paid to do that, so I suggest you start where I did.
Amnesty International have some data, send them a lovely email.