Something really momentous happened last week. Something that the whole world should be celebrating. We found out that there had been the biggest fall in history in the numbers of children dying from easily preventable diseases or from simply not having enough decent food to eat. Put simply, there are millions more kids alive today thanks to the success of international aid.
This is the reason why the Prime Minister deserves huge credit for being unequivocal in promising to stick to his commitments to help poorer countries. But just when we are making this dramatic progress and there is the chance to be the generation that ensures no child dies from diarrhoea, pneumonia, malaria or hunger, and that every child has the chance to go to school - aid has come under unprecedented attack.
Recent newspaper coverage would suggest that British aid is being frittered away; squandered on undeserving countries and wasted. It is right that tough questions should be asked about how Britain gets value for its money, and it is spent in ways which help the poorest most.
However, we cannot let all the progress that has been made and the potential that could be achieved be drowned out by claims that aid is ineffective, unnecessary or wasted. Because the bigger picture is that aid works. Aid that costs just a penny in every pound.
In the past decade more than 50million children have been able to go to school as a result of debt cancellation and increased aid. Most recently Britain helped to feed 3.5million people caught up in the East Africa Food Crisis. And our aid will vaccinate one child every two seconds, immunising 80million children in all, saving 1.4million lives over the next five years. This is the hidden story of success - that British aid transforms the lives of millions of the world's poorest people.
My visit to one of the refugee camps in Syria recently bought home how vital British aid is. The children I met told me about their horrific experiences, some who were tortured, others who had seen their loved ones shot and killed. All had had to flee Syria leaving everything behind. But they were safe, had been give the basic essentials and were receiving help to overcome what they had seen. All thanks to British aid.
Aid is not only morally right but it is in our interests too. By supporting developing economies such as China we create opportunities to trade, helping create jobs here in the UK. UK aid also helps protect our security - preventing fragile states becoming havens for terrorists. Giving aid to poorer countries helps creates jobs within them helping end poverty so that people can afford to feed their families and no longer need be dependent on aid.
Giving aid is part of our DNA. For 82 years the vast majority of British people have supported the UK's policy to help those countries in greater need and felt it the right thing to do. It has helped make the UK the global leader that we are today.
A recent poll found that 55% of British people think we should keep our promises to increase the level of overseas aid, a commitment mirrored by the coalition government. Just 27% say we should cut it.
It is tough at home, but we cannot balance the books on the backs of the world's poorest, ignoring the needs of those in greater need than ourselves. As the Prime Minister said: "To those who say we can't afford to act: I say we can't afford to wait."
DFID - UK aid from the Department for International Development ...
BBC News - David Cameron reaffirms UK aid pledge at United Nations
Why is so much UK aid money still going to companies based in ...
UK blocks £16m aid to Rwanda | World news | The Guardian
David Cameron reaffirms UK aid pledge at United Nations
UK aid under scrutiny, snapshots of city life, and Malawi's battle against hunger
Faces Change At DfiD, but Does Aid to Africa Really Matter Any More?
Almost £2 billion has disappeared from Afghanistan since 2007, some to Gulf tax havens, with the family and associates of President Hamid Karzai linked to a £90 million Dubai property empire. Much of this cash is from aid donations, with £25 million disappearing from one donation to a hospital. Despite this, Britain is to increase aid to afghanistan by 40%.
Cameron intends to increase aid to 0.7% of GDP, despite the UN stating the amount required was 0.44%. Time to stop this waste and invest the money saved here!
The poor? No they do not see it, often it makes them poorer.
Look at all the decades Oxfam and the rest have been operating and guess what?
There are still people living in slums in Rio, South Africa, India and everywhere else around the world.
Those slums and awful living conditions were there 100 years ago and nothing has changed.
Progress?
What progress?
Unfortunately there are people in these deprived countries helping themselves to any money or even goods that we send.
The aid does NOT reach the people who need it and we are now in a position where we need all the money we can save in order to fix our economy.
If our own welfare budgets are being cut and children are turning up at school not having been fed, perhaps Save The Children could spare some time for them.
I know that the plight of our kids is nowhere near that of African and Asian children in poor countries but we are not solving the problems of those children we're just lining the pckets of murderous warlords.
Have you ever noticed that when the pictures of the refugee camps are being shown in Somalia etc. there appears to be no men around. Why ? because they're out fighting each other with weapons and ammunition paid for by the warlords out of foreign aid.
If we want to perpetuate these evil wars then we should keep sending the money but let's not kid ourselves that we are helping children there.
The other 99 pence or 99% ends up in the Swiss Bank Accounts of the big-oggers both national and local.
Cheap?
Unfortunately most of our aid doesn't go where it's needed. Most of it gets poured into the pockets of corrupt local warlords (or government ministers, same thing), spent on the armed forces of these bankrupt nations or simply squandered on wine women and song.
Also, if we have been giving them aid for so long (82 years is a figure I've heard) why are they still in such dire straits? Our charity doesn't seem to be making much difference, does it? So a few more children survive past the age of 5, they're still growing up in dirt poor conditions where poverty is a way of life, perhaps we need to change our way of doing things to force them into changing theirs!
The definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result. Isn't that exactly what we're doing by simply keep giving these countries aid?
Why are those slums in Rio, Calcutta or the South African townships STILL there decades on?
We're part of the problem, not the solution. We should pull our troops and our aid out of everywhere there's a war and refuse to help in any way until the fighting stops.
Harsh, yes. Will it cause suffering? Probably, but if it gets them to stop battling each other it'll ease it in the long run.
But what world do they then grow up in?
In countries, where sadly, children are made to work from 5 years old; where females are simply "used" for marraige and breeding machines that add to local environmental pressures on the land and water supplies. For the millions saved, how many will simply enter the same cycle of large families, little or no education and a future of drudgery and simply "surviving"?
National governments where the aid (seemingly) always goes, should be made to use the funds for long term, post "aid" planning where real information, support, education and sustainable farming etc can be as vital as the few pence on a child is given to keep them alive; they must also be given a future for them to live in!
David Cameron is walking on water if he thinks that every pound we donate goes to honourable causes - indeed if 1% actually reaches the target it would be a miracle.
having worked for aid agencies in a number of countries, I saw the money laundering and bribes that soaked up our money and it turned my stomach to see our people accepting these practices and the fact that large portions of the aid went to buy arms and luxuries for an already affluent minority.
Get the management of the aid policed properly and we will not have to keep increasing the amounts we donate - equally some of that money could then be used to help our own under-priviledged.
Problem is; you don't get a Nobel Peace Prize for helping your own poor and needy.
Aid is fine if the money we give ends up as aid.
More often than not, it doesn't.
It ends up as weapons, as food for rebel armies, in the hands of the unscrupulous.
Until these issues can be resolved, it should be stopped.
If you feel so strongly about it, you go and follow the money, see what happens to a few random sums on their journey to the needy.
I think you will get a wake up call.
Amnesty International have some data, send them a lovely email.