"February 11 was the culmination of the Arab revolution. On February 12, the counterrevolution began." This is how two Middle East experts - the Palestinian Oxford don, Hussein Agha, and the Washington political scientist, Robert Malley - are summing up the situation in the latest edition of the New York Review of Books. The spontaneous uprising of the discontented in Cairo appears to have swept away the dictator seemingly effortlessly but the old structures of army, police and secret service are still in place and threaten to continue an only marginally relaxed, autocratic regime with the help of the multifaceted Muslim Brotherhood. Even in Libya, where the dictator will fall, the rebels cannot be seen as true democrats and power struggles lie ahead.
There may be tendencies in Iraq, Bahrain and most of all Saudi Arabia to relax the rigid regime. Thus Saudi Arabia gave women the right to vote for the first time. However, all these reforms do not constitute fundamental transformation.
A rancorous ruler fights for his survival in Yemen. In Syria the counter-revolution is at full blast. The brutality of the Assad clan has reached a gruesome climax. Two eyewitnesses of the massacres in Daraa and Homs told me about excesses the likes of which have not been seen since the most terrible phases of the Nazi era. Thus the young and old in the torture chambers are shown around the mortuary first and forced to look at tortured and mutilated victims as a warning example. The myth of the young, modern presidential couple that is willing to reform, which is disseminated by Western media agencies and American fashion magazines, is a bizarre lie because Bashar Assad and his brother Maher are personally responsible for the brutal oppression of any kind of freedom movements in this dark dictatorship.
The free world is slowly beginning to deal seriously with the Syrian problem. Now that the United States' military is involved in Afghanistan, Iraq and, at the sidelines, in Libya, the White House is reluctant to also get involved in Syria. Turkey, which is seeking to play the hegemon in the Middle East, sees itself as protector of her Syrian neighbour. However, in spite of a strong showing in Damascus, the Turkish leaders have so far managed to avoid endorsement of heavy sanctions, let alone military intervention, against Assad's tyranny.
Israel is keeping out of the situation and does not want to get directly involved in internal Arab conflicts. Israel's arch enemy resides in Teheran. Assad's overthrow would automatically destroy Iran's influence in Syria and the long-suffering Lebanon. A regime change in Syria could trigger a dangerous religious civil war between Sunnis and Shiites and spread to the neighbouring Iraq.
Considering the unsolved problem of the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians also means that the democratic world, the Atlantic alliance and the European Union are faced with a highly dangerous political crisis added to the contractions of a sick world economy.
the eve of World War II, the"arabist" "Jack Philby, the father of British double agent Kim, worked with OSS icon Bill Donovan and shifted the power center of Saudi Aramco from London to New York creating a political opening for France, which had the Syrian and Lebanese mandates to propose it would organize and guarantee an independent Alawite nation inside Turkey. The full blown war and some diplomatic blundering ended that. Israel, Zionism and Palestinian nationhood are tangential side-issues in this discussion.
The better question to be asking in another attempt to resolve the Syrian "problem" is that if one dissembles the bargain made between the modern Alawite minority,(often regarded by others in Islam the way most Christians regard the Mormons- a new group that is not part of the tradition) and the fundamentalists in Iran, one learns what is required for the solution. Building the political will to make it happen though requires more than Tweetstream diplomacy. Understanding the scale, the closeness of the problem in the territory itself is important too. The distance between the US bases in southern Turkey and the Syrian border is about the same as driving from London to Oxford.
Pictures are still coming out of the county. Why not turn them into montage posters and display them on billboards across each nation? Together with the contact details of the regime and other institutions, to write in and complain. Or maybe even go there as a human sacrifice, if necessary.
"Israel is keeping out of the situation and does not want to get directly involved in internal Arab conflicts."
Apart from using Palestinians as punch bags. While a partisan America plays referee.
Regional 'arch-enemies' have varied over the years, but have had in common support for the Palestinians when they were 'arch-enemies'. The current one, Iran, also has the possibility of developing a nuclear weapon thus threatening Israel's monopoly of this weapon of mass destruction.
You have it on good authority - Lord Weidenfeld of Chelsea, Chairman of the Ben Gurion University of the Negev (1996–2004), Governor of Tel Aviv University, Governor of the Weizmann Institute.
With such credentials, who could doubt it?
Excuse me. I have to go throw up now.
Like the Mossad and CIA are "keeping out of the situation"?
Here's some clues sir:
(1) Iran could never survive any Israeli retaliation to any major attack
(2) Israel could never hope to conquer or occupy Iran
(3) Iran and Israel share no common border, the have, in short, nothing to do battle over.
That's the problem with nobility, inbreeding renders them a bit slow on the uptake.
The reality is that they cannot be true democrats as that would require the consent of the majority and the majority will not consent to their own poverty. These are poor countries (apart from their oil sectors) with high birth rates. Poor third world countries that have made the transition to first world democracies (Korea, Taiwan, Singapore) did so under authoritarian rulers who were only nominally democratic.
Any real democrat would dump the title.