Dr Raj Persaud
:Sir David Nicholson Resigns but if Many Bad Apples Remain, The NHS Might Be Rotten to the Core
Xenios Thrasyvoulou
:Is It Easier Than Ever to Start a Business?
Dame Mary Marsh
:What Are the Social Sector's Skills and Leadership Needs?
Maria Sowter
:Why Is Preserving Biodiversity Important?
Oliver Urquhart-Irvine
:Globalising History and Culture - Why Britain's Cultural Institutions Should Embrace Their Ties Abroad
There has been huge domestic and international interest in our decision to sell a much loved Henry Moore sculpture, 'Old Flo', that our borough bought many years ago - it wasn't donated to us as press reports have erroneously claimed.
We are not the first authority to explore raising much needed revenue at a time of austerity from selling works of art. Last year Bolton Council put up 30 five works of art to be sold, including works by Millais, Picasso and Hutchison. Back in 2006, Bury Council raised £1.4 million by selling LS Lowry's A Riverbank.
If only there was as much national media interest in the fact that we are being forced to make £100million cuts by 2015, as there has been over the proposed sale of this sculpture to mitigate the effect of some of those cuts.
I understand the strong feelings that the proposed sale of this iconic and popular sculpture arouses. But with more cuts to come my priority is to protect front line services and that entails having to make some tough decisions.
According to a recent online poll by a local east end newspaper, 55% of people strongly support our decision to put the sculpture up for sale. Only 18% supported it being placed in Victoria Park. It has been less widely reported that the sculpture has been on loan to the Yorkshire Sculpture Park for the past 15 years, and that not surprisngly few Tower Hamlets residents have been able to afford to go and view it.
We have obviously looked at various options including bringing the sculpture back and placing it is a public place, but the costs of insurance and the risk of vandalism and theft are too big and too serious.
Every penny raised from an auction of the sculpture will be ring-fenced to benefit the borough as a whole; being used to support heritage projects, services for young people, community safety programmes and affordable housing. Over the past two years, my administration has managed to preserve free home-care in Tower Hamlets, instituted a living wage, reinstated the Education Maintenance Allowance for our young people, and built the highest number of affordable homes for rent in the country.
I believe that we are making the right decision, but in circumstances that we would not have chosen. It may interest some of our critics that the minister responsible for exerting extra pressure on authorities such as mine to realise the value of our assets is one Eric Pickles, although I can't help but notice that the local government minister has been keeping fairly quiet of late on this issue.
Henry Moore - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sculpture and Drawings by Henry Moore | Tate
London mayor opposes sale of Henry Moore sculpture
Henry Moore and the councils itching to turn over their assets
Art sell off call after cash strapped council puts £20m Henry Moore statue up ...
Henry Moore sculpture decision raises fears for public art
Death descends on London as a chilling precedent is set – the week in art
If you are worried about vandelism, why dont you loan it to the tate or wakefield?
Instead, you want to sell it to some private collector. Go to a museum and you might see that they are wonderful things.
Keep the statue public.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/andrewgilligan/100112318/lutfur-rahman-all-his-controversies-in-one-place/
As for the Moore, you are well rid of it. That entire period of art is overrated.
The problem here is the message this sends out. Tower Hamlets may not be, as Mr Rahman says, the first authority to sell off the family silver. But this case seems special, and so newsworthy, because Henry Moore sold his work with strings attached: it was to be on permanent open-air display for the enjoyment of people living in a deprived area. Which great artist is going to follow Moore's excellent example, knowing that a local authority might act as Tower Hamlets have done?
Of all residents for now and in the future. Forgive me but why should we accept the decision of a here today gone tomorrow politician rather than obide by the wishes of an artist who has made such a wonderful contribution to the people of tower hamlets.
You say that you needed to sell this sculpture to raise money.
However, your council gives millions and millions of pounds to mosques, in particular the East London Mosque, which has a controversial history of hosting hate preachers, including the Al Qaeda recruiter Anwar Al Awlaki. It also gives money to various institutions and projects linked to the Islamic Forum Europe. Both these institutions are connected to Jamaat-e-Islami, and in particular Mueen Uddin, who is facing a trial in Bangladesh for the mass murder of Bangladeshi patriots.
The Islamic Forum Europe was a major backer of your campaign to become mayor.
You could cut the grants to these hate pushing organisations, if you wanted to save money.
However Ted Jeory thinks you won't because, to put it bluntly, you need the money to consolidate your vote.
Millions and millions? Just thinking something is true doesn't make it so. Your other arguments may be true,but I doubt Tower Hamlets is responsible for financial help to Hate Preachers,which is what you infer.