Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Marc Hawker

GET UPDATES FROM Marc Hawker
 

Proud and Prejudiced: The Jihadist and the Hooligan

Posted: 27/02/2012 00:00

I've just fallen in love with England again. I never thought it would happen, but after filming two dangerous and notorious men from Luton over the past year, I'm glad I live here. Tonight Channel 4 screens the film I shot and directed: Proud and Prejudiced.

The two men are Tommy Robinson - the founder and leader of the English Defence League - and Sayful Islam - leader of a group of fundamentalist Muslims. Both are Luton born and bred. Tommy is the manager of a local tanning shop; Sayful was a tax inspector before he gave it up to bring Islam to the streets of Britain.

These guys are dangerous because of their ideas. Tommy believes he is fighting the creeping Islamification of his community (though he started out as only condemning Islamic Extremism) and Sayful wants democracy in the UK overthrown and replaced by Sharia Law.

Both know how to create media events: Sayful's troupe burnt poppies on remembrance day and Tommy closed down the City Of London as the EDL marched on Tower Hamlets with him dressed as a Rabbi (more of that later).

The reality of what they are doing has serious consequences. Communities feel deeply threatened and a wedge of separation is locking community against community. Imagine the police locking down your town centre and a thousand or so people turning up, most drunk, and shouting "scum, scum, scum", while Sayful and his guys are whipping up outrage by deliberately provoking people. "We just want to wake people up from their slumber," he says. Maybe. Both want England to be a mirror image of themselves.

We filmed the notorious leader of the EDL on a drunken night out in Luton Town centre before he disguised himself as a Rabbi to get through a cordon of thousands of police at the edge of Tower Hamlets. Tommy was on bail for head butting what he believed to be a National Front racist trying to usurp his leadership of the EDL. The bail conditions meant he couldn't give speeches at EDL demos, write emails on behalf of the EDL. He says they were political bail conditions, he has a point there.

He couldn't give his speech without being arrested, so he bought a £20 beard and hat and went in disguise, it was like something out if an Ealing comedy. When he jumped the stage and ripped off the Rabbi disguise, giving his speech, the police tried to rush in. He got away with us in tow, escaping finally on a double decker bus with a bus ticket costing £2:20. Only in England, only in England. Funny as this might have been, the population of Tower hamlets felt under threat that day and the anger and hatred meted out by the EDL was palpable.

A month later, Sayful's group was banned by Theresa May. The group has been banned a number of times and they just re-appear under a different name.

But this time the authorities got serious. With May banning Muslims Against Crusades, a group called the United Umah (undoubtedly the same people) declared a static demonstration outside the American Embassy in London. About 30 people turned up. I was told that a policeman warned them not to mention America. One of them started talking about drone bombing. How civilians were being killed. How America thinks it can just take out anyone in the world at anytime. The police, heavily outnumbering the protestors moved in and arrested them all. Now they are on bail. If charged they could face prosecution with 10 years maximum sentence. Are these guys terrorists? I don't think so. Their Jihad is a Jihad of words. Their anger at UK foreign policy is understandable, in my view.

What I've learnt from filming Tommy and Sayful is that we should not suppress them. That serves nothing; it just puts a pressure cooker on things that, as Tommy Robinson says, "one day will just blow up". Democracy is messy. It's expensive - policing these people is costing millions. Maybe we just have to put up with a whole bunch of stuff that is annoying, distasteful (maybe), offensive (definitely). That's Democracy. That's freedom.

I'm glad Britain is, in the end, tolerant and this needs to be protected. By all means confront words with words, ideas with ideas, but I don't think we can solve anything by banning, restricting or arresting these people. There needs to be a debate going on properly in government about the feelings that are so acute in the film. It's a debate that's not happening.

Too hot? Maybe so. But if its not debated, and seen to be debated, it will just get hotter methinks.

Proud and Prejudiced is showing tonight on Channel 4 at 10 am. It will be on 4OD soon after.

 
FOLLOW UK ENTERTAINMENT
 
 
  • Comments
  • 51
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:02 AM on 03/29/2012
"Maybe we just have to put up with a whole bunch of stuff that is annoying, distasteful (maybe), offensive (definitely). That's Democracy. That's freedom." - both groups rely on the principal of free speach, yes you have the right to say whatever you want but this comes with the responsibilty not to say things which are offensive or provocative.

"By all means confront words with words, ideas with ideas" - the last time I tired this with members of the EDL I barley got away without being beaten.
04:49 AM on 03/10/2012
None of these people are British or have british interests at heart..it's for their own personal satisfaction. This is England, if anyone wants sharia law , and i mean anybody not just muslims, then they should go to a country which lives under sharia law. The true british people are the ones who sit at home and watch there bile on the news, the ones who work hard to support there family, the one's who are accepting of people based on whom they are not what color or religion they are,the ones who get on with live without moaning or b*tching. The idiots from EDL represent a very small part of british people same how the extremist islamics only represents a very small part of muslims. I will not judge any man or woman by color , preferences , beliefs or religion but by their character and their actions
04:10 AM on 03/10/2012
The EDL are portrayed as racists yet at the Pub they all drink regularly in was mixed races, this is no suprise to me at all, most British people have coloured friends and they all seem to get on well, but in defence of the Muslims you must understand that the ones who are moderates and agree with being more Multicultured cant speak out as much as they would like to, this was the case in Northern Ireland when the "Troubles" were on, its a very difficult situation for many Muslims at this time as they havent intergrated say as much as the Indians, Chinese and Africans have, i think if they lowered their barriers a lot more good things could happen,unfortunately that hasnt happened, and the other nations who have intergrated must wonder whats stopping them, personally i think intergation has to take place in some form or they will be isolated altogether, thats the way things seem to be heading.
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Reyhana Patel
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wakyracir
My spaniel is watching you
06:02 AM on 02/29/2012
The government has to man up and expel religious extremists who threaten the peace of this country, regardless of European courts, before it's too late.
photo
MsBubblyBlonde
Sassy,brassy,kiss my assy.
02:31 PM on 02/28/2012
Don't you find that class also has a lot to do with racial tolerance? In your leafy suburbs where the Indian consultant and his wife mix with other middle to upper class people, there is little.... if any resentment towards different races.However would Tony Blair have continued flooding Britain with his foreign friends IF they had been living in his area and using his childrens schools. I doubt it very much.
Go to the lower class areas where immigration has flooded communities and that is where this problem started.You cannot force people to accept outsiders,especially when the minority has more rights than the majority.
01:15 PM on 02/28/2012
Will this get through the ' comment screen ' ? Who knows ? I'll send it anyway. In my opinion the prog makers did an excellent job.That is if we assume that the job was to portray TR and SI as ' two sides of the same extremist coin ' . ( BTW - Nice touch having the mumsey useful idiot from the Council talking of ' a weeing contest '. ) Certainly the MSM ( as would be expected ) have fallen into line but , to my surprise , the blog reaction has been similar. But there's the rub ; since when has saying ' I don't like a religion that hangs gay people ' been morally equivalent to flying airliners into skyscrapers ? Since when has saying ' suppressing women is a bad thing ' been the same as blowing up a commuter train. Or ' how can you base a religion of the word of a murdering paedophile ' compare with raking schools with AK47 fire . However as C4 has clearly embarked on the path marked out for them by muslem leaders ( that of trying to portray the situation as being all about the question of balance ) I suppose we can expect more of the same in the months to come
07:49 AM on 02/28/2012
In today's democratic society one cannot stand for anything but pluralism; the doctrine of live and let live. This involves both tolerance of actions within the private sphere and a separation of church/morality and state.

This appears to be part of the EDL's message (though the group's members appear to have hijacked it for other ill-conceived means). Tommy states he would allow people of all faiths to observe whichever religion they choose privately and peacefully, does not wish to encode his own morality (or christian morality) in law.

It appears that in the case of extremist islamic groups, however, the aim is not peaceful pluralism; as Sayful states, there will not be harmony until there is Islamic dominance and until Sharia law has replaced UK law. This implies an unwillingness to work within the system to implement change via reform. More importantly his is an ideology which requires that everyone think and behave as he does, obeying the moral code which Islam requires. This is not an ideology of tolerance. This is fascism.

This does not mean he should not be allowed a platform. So long as he does not incite harm, he can take the stand and try convince me of the virtues of Islam or Sharia law converting as many as he can though reason (and where reason runs thin, through scripture), but not through force.

Suppression of such speech will only feed extremist action, forcing hatred to manifest itself in non-verbal expression.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
09:41 AM on 02/28/2012
A very educated post - I'll be your first fan.

My one reservation would be that the EDL's stated mission may differ somewhat from the aims of its members, most of whom are every bit as intolerant and fascistic as their Islamic counterparts.
Fakestinian
If you think your sword is too short,take a pace f
07:55 PM on 02/28/2012
More lies ! How many members of the EDL do you know ?
Given the FACT that the ranks of the EDL are open to all colours,races,gender(trans),faiths sexual preference and political beliefs could you tell us in exactly what way the EDL is fascist ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Galician
Keep calm and carry on
02:12 PM on 03/05/2012
once more Paul... I completely agree with you!
photo
MsBubblyBlonde
Sassy,brassy,kiss my assy.
09:56 AM on 02/28/2012
I think you will find most people are very tolerant of people having their own opinions.What has really riled people like me is NOT the different nationalities that have flooded Britain but the way th ewhite tax payer, has been treated. We work to fill the pot and to see foreign scroungers here emptying the pot is extremely frustrating.
Councils and Government have given the immigrants the upper hand by bending over backwards to please them.Regardless of our customs,traditions or beliefs ...to have them steam rollered to make way for the customs of others is wrong.We don't have to adapt to their ways, if they want to live here they should adopt our ways.English shouls be learned. NO funded interpreter's,wasting precious resources.
Allow people to express their concerns and get a Government that actually values the great British worker.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
07:40 PM on 03/01/2012
Immigrants on the whole are much less likely to claim benefits than native Brits (6.2%, as opposed to 10.9%).

I appreciate there are some (well-publicised) exceptions, but please don't tar them all with the one brush.
11:26 AM on 03/04/2012
Spot on.
photo
MsBubblyBlonde
Sassy,brassy,kiss my assy.
05:53 AM on 02/28/2012
Laughable....huff post have stopped comments on this subject because they cannot deal with the backlash.
05:52 AM on 02/28/2012
con'td This situation has been arrived at by successive governments for one reason only, cheap labour. With the recession ready to bite much of this underclass will riot and society will reap what it has sown. Many of my family died in two world wars fighting for King, Church and Family and I do believe if they could be brought back to life they would wonder what they died for. The biggest casualty being freedom of speech. When you get situations like Queens Hospital in Romford not being allowed to put up a picture of a Church of England for fear of causing offence can you wonder why indigenous whites are becoming hostile? Equality is a fair goal but how can you achieve that when the perception of white people is that they are being second bested and discriminated against?
08:45 PM on 02/27/2012
Quote,

"The two men are Tommy Robinson and Sayful Islam. Both are Luton born and bred."

Sayful Islam is NOT Luton "bred", and to suggest he is offends me and the English people.
Fakestinian
If you think your sword is too short,take a pace f
08:33 PM on 02/27/2012
I see that you are still deleting non abusive salient posts,hows the whole freedom of speech working out for HuffPuff.

You get in a Huff and our posts are gone in a Puff !
05:56 PM on 02/27/2012
Mr. Hawker's opinion that both of these groups are all talk and that this is democracy in action is sadly misguided, as anyone who has studied history knows. Britain must end immigration from Islamic countries immediately to end both extremist threats.
05:18 PM on 02/27/2012
Ideaville sees growing Islamisation as biggest threat to the UK. In my view any extreme "religious" view is dangerous. Islam should not in and of itself be a threat to us in the UK - i say this as a Christian too!! - if it is practiced with tolerance and acceptance of the alternative faiths - or none - of others. Sadly a more intolerant hardline Wahabi form of Sunni Islam - Saudi funded! - is increasingly being introduced and taught in the UK.
Our own misguided USA 'poodle' orientated foreign policies are not helping us either.
01:57 PM on 02/28/2012
Oh how I hate those "our foreign policies" are too blame. Do we blame them for all the trouble they cause all over the world? By that reasoning we should be taking down Sudan for murdering hundreds of thousands of Christian Africans in the south of the country. I wish someone would make a point of these atrocities every time one of these Islamic nutcases uses the "foreign policy" excuse. And, believe me, that is all it is - an excuse to obscure the bigger picture.
08:29 PM on 02/28/2012
LeilaS. I was not per se blaming our foreign policies, merely trying to point out that as long as we're 'joined at the hip' to US policies, then we'll get tarred with the same brush as them.
I could also point you to many of the world's trouble spots and indicate a path to them back either to our own (UK) or some others' darker colonial pasts' too.
As to a 'bigger picture' this is all to often so obscured as to be all but indecipherable..