Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mehdi Hasan

GET UPDATES FROM Mehdi Hasan
 

How Long Can the Ex-Boss of HSBC Survive as a Minister?

Posted: 18/07/2012 10:52

Place your bets, please. How long can Stephen Green survive as a minister?

"Stephen who?" I hear you cry. Stephen Green, or Baron Green of Hurstpierpoint, is a former chief executive and executive chairman of HSBC, and... wait for it... minister of state in the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. He was ennobled by David Cameron and appointed to government as a trade minister in January 2011; he was even asked to sit on the cabinet's committee on banking reform.

But in a sensational report released yesterday, a committee of US senators accused HSBC subsidiaries of facilitating a multi-billion-dollar money-laundering operation for "drug kingpins and rogue nations". Britain's biggest bank, it concluded, was "pervasively polluted for a long time".

So what is the former head of this "pervasively polluted" institution, linked to money-laundering, doing in government? Backbench Labour MP John Mann, who sits on the Treasury Select Committee, has called on Green to quit: "Someone whose bank has been assisting drug cartels and corrupt regimes should not be in charge of a government portfolio."

The Labour high command, however, has yet to endorse Mann's resignation call. "Stephen Green... now has serious questions to answer," is all shadow Treasury minister Chris Leslie would say.

Indeed. Here are a few: did Green have any inkling of what was going on inside HSBC's Mexico division? Did he see the warning from one bank executive there that HSBC was "rubber-stamping unacceptable risks"? Was he aware that Mexican drug lords were buying planes with money laundered through the bank's Cayman Islands accounts?

If he knew, he was complicit; if he didn't know, he was negligent. Remember: the period in which Green was in charge of HSBC (as chief executive from 2003 to 2006 and as executive chairman from 2006 to 2010) coincides with the 2004-2010 period in which US senators allege the offences occurred.

Green, however, has his defenders. "He's a good guy, people like him," says a source who has had dealings with him in the City. "He's not like Bob Diamond."

An ordained Anglican priest and the author of a book on ethical capitalism, the former HSBC chairman has been described as "the epitome of the sensible banker".

Maybe. But what HSBC's various subsidiaries are alleged to have been doing on his watch as chairman was far from "sensible". There is now talk of criminal proceedings, as well as a rumoured $1bn fine for the bank.

So far, the Tory peer and priest has the backing of the PM. A Downing Street spokesman told The Huffington Post this morning: "This is a matter for HSBC... it's not something we're going to give a running commentary on."

Really? Can a minister in government, responsible for sensitive trade and investment issues, just shrug off accusations of involvement in a global financial, and potentially criminal, scandal? How long can Downing Street's "we're not going to give a running commentary" line hold?

 

Follow Mehdi Hasan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mehdirhasan

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
Place your bets, please. How long can Stephen Green survive as a minister? "Stephen who?" I hear you cry. Stephen Green, or Baron Green of Hurstpierpoint, is a former chief executive and executive ch...
Place your bets, please. How long can Stephen Green survive as a minister? "Stephen who?" I hear you cry. Stephen Green, or Baron Green of Hurstpierpoint, is a former chief executive and executive ch...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGillLondonUK
DEMOCRACY DOES NOT EXIST.
10:29 on 19/07/2012
Andy Coulson the perjurer, Stephen Green the money launderer, Jeremy Hunt the liar...anyone else?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark B Robertson
19:59 on 18/07/2012
Who will go first Green because of running a dodgy bank, or Osborne for absolute incompetence. A sweepstake should at least be run on Huffpost.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGillLondonUK
DEMOCRACY DOES NOT EXIST.
10:31 on 19/07/2012
Why stop there, theres a whole cabinet of idiots. Maybe a list should be made (in alphabetical order of course). The rot is universal, the names are interchangeable
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark B Robertson
11:29 on 19/07/2012
Unfortunately, I agree with you.  The rot is systemic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
famullar
16:30 on 18/07/2012
I remember a story. When I go for buying a fish, the fishmongers tell me, 1 this one is fresh see the eyes are still red, buy it. 2 My wife just caught but this 3. This is from the Mediterranean water salt and sour but this. 4 please I need medicine for my son buy this. I go buy the crab.. A new Senate report is slamming Europe’s biggest bank HSBC, accusing it of allowing Mexican drug traffickers and possible financiers of militant groups to use its U.S. operations for illicit purposes. What’s more, the report claims U.S. regulators knew of the bank’s lax controls, and did nothing about it. The problem is wide that all are in the pot and the water get warmer they scream "help" the only help available is the coal seller and he want to make profit. Tell me how will he help? I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA SO far all have had a say. Who is doing anything? That is the crux of the modern economy and my small phrase THE FORGOTTEN ART OF LISTENING. I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gianni sermon
15:35 on 18/07/2012
There's no such a thing like ''sensible banker'' is a contradiction in terms.
14:25 on 18/07/2012
Mehdi!

This is the sentence of 2012!

''If he knew, he was complicit; if he didn't know, he was negligent. ''
14:55 on 18/07/2012
BUT......he's NOT going to resign because he needs to stay to put things right....and he's the best person to do that (says Mr Green)
18:24 on 18/07/2012
Excellent reply. This is one terrible government we have.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rg9rts
Carpe Diem! This aint rehearsal
13:47 on 18/07/2012
To be honest(LOL) I wouldn't want Chuck Schumer dragging my family jewels over the coals.~~(^..^)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Leary
So long and thanks for all the fish.
12:16 on 18/07/2012
He's a crook at worst, grossly incompetent at best. He should not be a minister at all. "An ordained Anglican priest and the author of a book on ethical capitalism..." Good grief...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richie2012
Your micro bio is empty.
11:45 on 18/07/2012
He no longer works there. Should Ed Balls resign from the Labour Party because he helped preside over a calamity in his previous role?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hugh Albert
Moderation in somethings
11:55 on 18/07/2012
He was in charge when this criminality was occurring, so he has to explain why he should not be held to be complicit. It is not enough to say that he has moved on when it is suggested that he was involved in a massive money laundering scheme. It would not be enough for Joe Public to say; it can't be enough for Lord Banker to say either!
19:35 on 18/07/2012
How did it come to Ed Balls,This government agreed with the messures in place at the time of the Labour party being in office,No need to deflect the blame on the previous government,just look at those in power now,rich are richer poor are poorer,Remploy are closing,oap,s are made to face even more cuts,unemployment in true figures are up,manufacturing output down,more companies going bankrupt and you blame this all on the Labour party,absolute twaddle.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richie2012
Your micro bio is empty.
20:29 on 18/07/2012
Oh but it's not that easy. It comes back to the government at the time because it is those who were in the government at the time (example Ed Balls) who are now trying to make political capital out of the situation. It doesn't really work though does it. Because nobody is blameless. But you would think Labour were looking at thenm now. It is only 2 years..... and they were in power for a long time before that! By the way the trend of the rich getting richer and poor getting poorer did not start under the current government. As for the current economic situation - this was indeed partially caused by Labour spending all the money. We need in no way shape or form - a bloated public sector. And where else did all the money go?! Hasn't made much difference to the NHS has it? Labour "there's no money left" - remember that note they left!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Wilson
Might as well laugh while you still can.
11:44 on 18/07/2012
If our government was truly sorry and wanted to fix this, we first of all would have heard many more people say "sorry." On top of that we would have swifter disclousure. As it stands we all know they know more than we currently do, and that by definition makes this a cover up. Sorry people don't carry on lying, we are being treated with contempt.
11:38 on 18/07/2012
How many more snouts in the trough ?
12:32 on 18/07/2012
Lots