Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mette Poynton

GET UPDATES FROM Mette Poynton
 

Consider Yourself in Lance Armstrong's Shoes, Then Get Off Your High Horse!

Posted: 19/01/2013 09:48

I just watched Oprah Winfrey's much publicized interview with Lance Armstrong. I have not followed Lance Armstrong's fall from grace religiously, so before I watched it, all I really knew, was that he had won the Tour de France seven times, and that he late last year had been stripped of his titles because of doping allegations that he fiercely denied.

I watched the interview because I was curious. What could this man say to excuse his behavior? Not as much with regards to the doping, more with regards to his sudden change from denying to admitting to the allegations. I wasn't as interested in the allegations that he had used performance enhancing drugs, because hasn't doping in cycling just been the worst kept secret for years?

During the interview, I thought Lance Armstrong seemed honest and sorry. There were questions he wasn't truly able to answer, but in most instances of this, the reason was that he didn't want to implicate others who had also done wrong. This, I thought was rather decent of him. Did he also seem to have been a "Jerk", like he himself put it, and a bully? Sure. Did he seem like he would have rather not gotten caught? Yes he did, but he was honest about that, something I found to be rather brave.

Before I go on, let me make it absolutely clear: In no way do I condone doping, the use of performance enhancers or making use of any unfair advantages in sports, politics, business or life... for Lance Armstrong or anybody else. That is not what this piece is about. I believe we should all strive to be the best and most decent people we can be and be the best role models for others we can be. But we are ALL flawed and this is what we should remember when we jump on to our high horses and pass judgment on others.

Because try to put yourself in Lance Armstrong's shoes, live the life he has lived under the same circumstances, and then say that you would not, at any point, have been weak like he was. You can't. You may not have been as weak as he was, you may not have made the same choices in life that he did, but we are ALL flawed and weak at times, so in his shoes, you would have most likely made some wrong turns as well.

Put yourself in the shoes of Martha Stewart, Jude Law, Hugh Grant, Amy Winehouse, Charlie Sheen, Tiger Woods, Robert Downey Junior, Katie Price... the list of public personas and celebrities who at one time or another have fallen from grace, or made more or less questionable life decisions, is looong. And for all of us mere mortals who do not live privileged lives, it is the easiest thing in the world to get on a high horse and judge them, but what does that make all those who judge? Would they never do anything wrong? Have they never? Of course they have!

To all of those who judge from the comfort of their own armchairs or Twitter accounts, think back to the times you did something you shouldn't have, to the times when you were weak and gave in to temptation, pressure, responsibilities or otherwise and GET OFF YOUR HIGH HORSE! Judging those who do wrong publicly, does not make your own mistakes in life smaller or less important. You may not be a celebrity bike rider, a multi millionaire or a cancer survivor in charge of a significant charity, but your own mistakes in life affect the lives of your children, your family or your friends. Spend some time being a better person in your own life, less time judging celebrities for being human and making mistakes.

People like Lance Armstrong and others who break the law or the rules should absolutely be punished. By the law and governing bodies, not by their fellow flawed human beings who, given the same set of circumstances, would no doubt make mistakes as well.

 

Follow Mette Poynton on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MettePoynton

FOLLOW UK SPORT
I just watched Oprah Winfrey's much publicized interview with Lance Armstrong. I have not followed Lance Armstrong's fall from grace religiously, so before I watched it, all I really knew, was that he...
I just watched Oprah Winfrey's much publicized interview with Lance Armstrong. I have not followed Lance Armstrong's fall from grace religiously, so before I watched it, all I really knew, was that he...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
17:43 on 05/03/2013
None of us are perfect, but very few of us set out to systematically lie, decieve and defraud.
12:07 on 25/01/2013
Your attempt to lump Armstrong together with the likes of Law and Grant is disingenuous.

Neither of those two mentioned had anything like the the detrimental effect on others that Armstrong has. What 'responsibilities' do you think he 'gave in to' that he cheated and lied and destroyed people for?
If you had ANY knowledge of how and what he did you wouldn't blog such nonsense.

Personal accountability? Not in your world.
00:41 on 25/01/2013
I think that he came out of the interviews very poorly, he was not genuine at all and after denying everything for years was left no further recourse but to 'fess up like a cornered rat.

Those cyclists who could have perhaps beaten Armstrong in a fair fight have had do go on and do something far less glamorous having put in no less effort to be the best.

The fact that the author says, we cannot judge as we would do the same in his position is laughable. NOT everyone doped in those tours, it's just that the vast majority of clean cyclists could not compete in light of others cheating. They won nothing after saying what Lance could never say, NO!

The irony of this story is cancer survivors are often seen as 'brave' and 'fighters' and I strongly disagree with these labels. Cancer scares the crap out of you but you cannot have a flight or fight response as there is simply nowhere to run.

What stood him out as an anomaly is that he survived cancer and here he was kicking butt against 'healthy' athletes. The irony comes from the fact that in the one instance where he could have chosen to fight and be brave he simply chose not to. Instead he ran, he ran straight to the EPO cupboard.

Disclosure: About six years ago I had cancer, exactly the same type as that suffered by Armstrong as well as a relapse two years later.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
13:14 on 24/01/2013
We shall bear witness to how Lance will right the wrongs that he has done. Just coming out on an interview with Oprah is not going to cut it. Sure, we can fall from grace from time to time and even have done some stupid things. But, it is what we do after - how do we regain trust, work at earning back credibility and etc. Those will reveal the most.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mette Poynton
13:47 on 24/01/2013
I agree completely!
00:54 on 25/01/2013
I agree we can all make a mistake once, we all have those little indiscretions that come from a moment of weakness. But to consistently do this over many, many years with no disregard for your team mates or those who were legitimately trying to win is not a whimsically stupid thing.

The ego on this guy must just be massive. You win one tour (no guilt) then decide maybe two will be enough, three, four? No, you keep doing it SEVEN times, manipulating people, consciously lying and evading the authorities for nearly a decade.

This is not a small blip from an impeccable character, this IS his character. Hell, he only confessed until it became so ridiculous it was impossible not to keep lying.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank Bevan
06:08 on 22/01/2013
You means we shouldnt judge people like lance because all non media persons would do the same as lance if they were in his shoes,Just like jimmy saville we shouldnt judge him to harshly because we would all do teh same kinda thing as he did.

What you trying to do is make all crimes fit 1 punishment --isnt going to work,because it means that 1 kiss would be the same as a rape.

Armstrong didnt just do it 7 times in the Tour de farce --he did it over 100s of races over years 100s of people knew,billions on betting scams alone.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mette Poynton
09:38 on 22/01/2013
Hi Frank,

Thank You for reading my blog post and for your comments.

That's not what I'm saying at all... I'm saying we shouldn't judge because we DON'T KNOW what WE would do if we walked in his shoes.

And I'm not saying that all crime fits one punishment... I think perhaps you have misread or misunderstood the piece.

Kind regards, Mette
08:28 on 21/01/2013
The fact that Lance Armstrong cheated is not the problem, the fact that he lied for years, sued folks who were telling the truth and destroyed their lives is the problem and the reason why Lance Armstrong's estate should go to repair these people's lives. There is more to come, the foundation will come under pressure next.
12:29 on 20/01/2013
So Poynon is saying that every adult, would take drugs to enhance their cycling or sports ability ?
Surely, the commentator is not saying that! or that she would ? I take medication for asthma,I have to just to breath properly. it has side effects like all medication. Why would anyone think like Poynton?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mette Poynton
14:37 on 20/01/2013
Hi Mark, Thank You for taking the time to read my post. I do, however, think you've missed the point of the piece entirely as I, of course, don't think that at all. Kind regards, Mette.
16:44 on 20/01/2013
Unfortunately, and maybe expectedly, The Post removed the other comments which put my comments into perspective. The point was not missed - commentators like yourself, and the celeb-following masses, allow for celebs like those mentioned, to evade punishment, and indeed help to perpetuate those unacceptable behaviours. Were there effective systems in place to deal with these cheats, the common people wouldn't have to publically judge.
12:21 on 20/01/2013
I can understand why there are no pending comments - they are so provocative = the post removes them - shame they dont remove some of the silly commentators
12:10 on 20/01/2013
This article shows why celebs get away with dishonesty and unacceptable behaviour - After an adult confesses ( with overwhelming evidence) that he has cheated, some rather naive commentator calls him honest and sincere. What planet does this person live on. It is a damage limitation, and money protecting exercise with the con using the media to persuade people, that actually he's an okay guy. As for the list of muppets - they have shown that that lies do pay - no suprising with the like of Poynton behind them , going there there it will be all okay. When cons have paid a proper price, and in this case a length jail sentence and hefty fine, will I say - now the slates clean. Don't judge us all Poynton by your standards.