Dear Nick Clegg,
Like most parents, I'm sure you love your child fervently, and want only the best for them. Like most parents, you like to think that the decisions you make are in your child's best interests, now and in the future. And like most parents who delegate the care of their children to paid strangers, you choose to ignore several decades of psychology and neuroscience, which show quite clearly that the loving and nurturing environment and secure attachment experience provided by a mother cannot be replicated by a childcare worker of any quality.
Of course, like most parents, you're quite sure your choice is the right one, and this wouldn't necessarily matter quite so much, if you were 'like most parents'. But you're not: you're the deputy prime minister.
You recently announced your plans for childcare to be made the coalition government's highest priority social policy, with a massive expansion in nursery places and the recruitment of 65000 new childcare workers. You shared your vision for 'teaching' children as young as two and preparing them for educational success, and, while you were at it, you pledged to take on those with the "sepia-tinted 1950s" view that mothers should not work.
I'm one of those women. I look after my children full time, and don't plan to return to work until the youngest has started school. Far from being a 1950s housewife (to me this implies little skill or ambition beyond bakery), I've studied at post-graduate level, and prior to becoming a mother, I practiced as a therapist, working with both adults and children who had experienced abuse. This gave me a lot of 'hands on' experience of the devastating impact this can have; a lifetime of difficulties such as addiction, self harm, the inability to sustain any meaningful relationships, and unbearable emotional pain.
Of course, this is the extreme end of a very long spectrum. Towards the other end, I met many of those people we might call the 'Walking Wounded', who live their lives fairly successfully, and don't suffer any major mental health problems. But placed in a situation like therapy, in which they are invited to explore their deepest feelings, they will reveal all manner of childhood experiences that they wish had unfolded differently. A Walking Wounded person might cry a river of tears over the fact that their father went away for three days without explanation when they were six, or that their mother's hugs were always slightly brittle and reluctant.
Every choice we make, big and small, accidental or with firm purpose, makes an impact on our children's rapidly developing psychology. We might like to tell ourselves that small children don't remember much, and that therefore what happens to them doesn't really matter, as long as they are fed and warm. This is not the case. Babies are not pot plants, just sitting there growing as long as they get milk and a bit of sunlight. They are subtle and complex human beings, whose brains are developing at an alarming rate. Their experiences are forming the bedrock of their entire future emotional existence. Perhaps most crucially of all, they are learning about the meaning of relationship from the people who care for them; how to love, and be loved.
Mothers today often do not feel valued in their role, and a world which takes your view that they can be easily replaced by relatively low waged nursery workers only serves to reinforce this. Interestingly, I don't feel particularly undervalued, and I put this down to my former job. As a therapist, I spent a lot of time playing, painting, reading stories, or just sitting quietly and attentively watching another person create. Of course it never occurred to me to worry that my work was not of value - I was being paid! As a mother now, my daily activity with my children is not so far removed from my former working life. I play, I witness, I create safe boundaries, I hold the space, and I help other people make sense of difficult emotions. My work as a therapist taught me first hand the enormous value of 'just being there'.
Your policy plans imply that a child will develop in much the same way whether they spend their days with a mother or a paid worker, and that perhaps a child might even be better off in a nursery, where they can be 'educated'. To see child development in this way is utterly ill-informed, and cannot be forgiven in a leading policy maker. Get your team of advisors to put you together a folder Nick. You are powerful. You may not remember the first years of your life, but I can assure you, they shape who you are every second of every day. Please help to create policy that acknowledges the vital importance of this early experience, and that puts love and nurture for small children - not 'education' - at its centre. And that values the work of a mother, not as faded and sepia tinted, but vibrant, sharp and fresh; a modern and newly informed reworking of an old classic.
Follow Milli Hill on Twitter: www.twitter.com/themulesmouth
Wendy Wason: Healthy Happy Mum
Jai Breitnauer: Working Mums Are Deluded
Jai Breitnauer: Is Motherhood in Decline?
Rebecca Myers: Is Feminism for the Middle Classes?
Lib Dems to scrap free childcare pledge as Clegg admits voters ...
Nick Clegg announces overhaul of 'Edwardian' childcare rules ...
Nick Clegg & Susan Kramer: Childcare & Young Families - The ...
BBC NEWS | UK | UK Politics | Clegg: Childcare needs more men
Nick Clegg And Iain Duncan Smith Announce Childcare For 80000 ...
In 1957 I was placed in a hospital when I was six weeks old. I had gastroenteritis and spent two months separated from my mother. All my life I have suffered from major insecurity. It has affected every aspect of my life. I know now after years of counselling that I have never really got over this initial separation. In the early 50’s Jimmy Robertson and John Bowlby were responsible for changing the way babies were cared for in English hospitals. Parents were encouraged to stay with their babies while they were in hospital. Sadly the message didn’t get to Ireland till the early 60’s.
Milli is spot on in stating that babies are subtle and complex human beings, whose brains are developing at an alarming rate. Their experiences are forming the bedrock of their entire future emotional existence. Society needs to wake up to that fact. The psychological facts have been around for a long time and they are now well backed up by hard scientific data.
JimJackman
Dublin
Former President, NationalParentsCouncil (Repof Ireland)
In other words, I will dismiss any argument which seems to assume that there is a magic line where full time childcare goes from being a bad idea to a great one overnight.
Feminism and it's implications for motherhood are a real hotbed of discussion right now. I have been in a bit of hot water with a few feminists over this post! Today, one of them commented to me, that at nursery, her children get better food than she can make, better facilities, better entertainment, better education, better stimulation, and that she is a better mother for not having to spend all her time with them! I feel sad that we have somehow arrived at a place where a mother feels that someone else can look after and nurture her children better than she can! I don't feel this way of thinking is woman centred, or child centred for that matter!
Your last sentence was cut off, but I'm glad you did not feel attacked. If anyone was meant to be attacked by the article, it was Nick Clegg and other leading policy makers who refuse to acknowledge the importance of the early years of life and who undermine the work of mothers (and other carers, as you point out) when they imply that they are so easily and cheaply replaceable.
In resume, I do agree with you that nothing replace the love and care of a mother. However, she needs to be able to keep active and not bored and most of all, they should be a recognition and support for these mothers. The benefit of the children should not mean a life sacrifice of mothers. http://clarinettesblog.wordpress.com/2011/11/30/abusive-institutions-or-abuse-of-institutions/
http://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/1459467-This-has-made-me-so-angry-working-mums-we-are-the-devils-work
Clegg has been misled by that crazy Gove and his rightist Christian colleagues that if they can get infants at two sitting in rows and complying then they can overcome the problems of mass non-compliance in the school system.
In your dreams Gove. If you deliver this idiocy, things will get worse and worse. You will create little monsters who hate teachers. You do not have a clue, do you? It is ideology all the way Gove, isn't it?
Your visions of premodern subordination of working-class children is going to end in your tears and your utter failure.
--------------------------------------------------
You are assuming rather a lot here. Average mothers with childcare do not read findings of neuroscientists. And psychology is not held in high esteem because of the preponderance of reports of trivial research.
This really is not the case, several studies, including one of the most recent, largest scale and long term studies, carried out by University College London on over 19,000 children, that shows that the ideal scenario for children is to have both parents working. Girls in particular fare better with working mothers than stay at home ones. (summarised in link below)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2011/jul/22/working-mothers-no-harm-children
However, the whole debate is somewhat ridiculous. People make their childrearing choices based on their own preferences, economic and social circumstances and what they feel is right for their family, and not on the basis of studies. People's choices should be valued.
It is also a shame that this debate always comes down to 'mothers' and the choices they make too, whereas fathers' choices are usually guilt free.
I'd like to find out more about that study. Ideal to have both parents working....from what age?
I totally agree that people's choices should be valued, but I do think it is worth looking always at the cultural backdrop that infoms our choices - sometimes we think we are free when in fact we are restricted by all kinds of - social, familial, cultural, political - baggage and expectations.
No, I will never be as good as their own mum's, but I am there. We don't all have the privalige of being able to afford to stop at home to be with our children, just count your self fortunate that you can.