iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mimi Bekhechi

GET UPDATES FROM Mimi Bekhechi
 

Meat Is the Biggest Waste of Water

Posted: 17/04/2012 00:00

The regional hosepipe ban has become an annual event almost as regular as Easter itself. But while millions of Britons all over southern England will be understandably peeved over being unable to water gardens and hose down patios over the coming weeks, it is important and timely to remind ourselves of the vast amount of water that's squandered every year on animal agriculture.

Around 90% of the world's total managed water supply is used to grow food. Most of this is completely wasted by irrigating land used to grow crops for livestock rather than food for direct consumption by humans. A staggering one-third of the world's total cereal crop and more than 90% of the world's soya crop is used for animal feed. The water that it takes to grow all that, plus what it takes to clean away the filth of factory farms, transport trucks and abattoirs, means that the livestock industry is placing a serious strain on our water supply, and not surprisingly, most of the water comes from the countries that have the least.

These revelations have led to an influential UN report naming the livestock sector "one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global". The 2006 report, Livestock's Long Shadow, highlighted freshwater scarcity among the many environmental problems and called the livestock sector "a key player in increasing water use" and "probably the largest sectoral source of water pollution."

It takes, on average, 15,500 litres of water to produce one kilogram of beef. To put this in context, that is the equivalent of 50 baths of water to produce one steak - 15 times more water than is needed to produce one kilogram of wheat. To produce the diet of a typical meat-eater takes the equivalent of 5,000 litres of water per day - more than enough to water your garden and the gardens of all your neighbours as well.

The aforementioned report concludes that the meat industry "should be a major policy focus when dealing with problems of land degradation, climate change and air pollution, water shortage and water pollution, and loss of biodiversity". And others have gone further than that.

A leading authority on climate change, Lord Stern, told The Times, "Meat is a wasteful use of water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases. It puts enormous pressure on the world's resources". He indicated that he favoured significantly higher prices for meat and other foods that contribute to climate change and concluded that "[a] vegetarian diet is better".

Similarly, in 2008, John Anthony Allan, a professor at King's College London and the winner of the prestigious Stockholm Water Prize, urged people worldwide to go vegetarian because of the tremendous waste of water involved in eating animals.

The most logical way for us to conserve water, land and other resources - and reduce animal suffering - is to kick our meat habit. We can save more water by not eating meat for just a few days than we can by not showering for an entire year. By going vegan, we'll be able to clean our cars and clear our consciences.

 

Follow Mimi Bekhechi on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@Mimi_Bekhechi

FOLLOW MIAMI
The regional hosepipe ban has become an annual event almost as regular as Easter itself. But while millions of Britons all over southern England will be understandably peeved over being unable to wate...
The regional hosepipe ban has become an annual event almost as regular as Easter itself. But while millions of Britons all over southern England will be understandably peeved over being unable to wate...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 135
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark B Robertson
17:58 on 24/05/2012
In many areas of the world it is not possible to grow crops due to water shortages, however, it is possible to have livestock. 45% of the world productive land surface is savanna, rather a large number of people live on these lands. What does Mimi Behechi suggest is done with these people? Also irrigation is quite often a very inefficient way of using water, unless done using drip irrigation technology. Bad irrigation techniques lead to massive water losses in arid and semi-arid environments, and is driven by the demand from developed countries for lettuces in winter. If we went back to eating seasonal produce produced in Britain a lot less water would be wasted in the world.
I shall now go back to my Steak tartare.
13:01 on 22/04/2012
Roast beef for my tea, plop in my belly.
12:56 on 22/04/2012
Complete Tosh, utter mind numbing window licking nonsense.
01:25 on 23/04/2012
Wow, what an intelligent rebuttal. Do you actually have any facts to support this statement? No?
12:19 on 23/04/2012
Yep, biggest waste of water = millions of leaking taps and pipes, ta-da.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
18:05 on 18/04/2012
So let's just recap - the UN is advising that eating meat is more damaging to the environment than almost anything else we do. Worse than driving cars, worse than flying off on foreign holidays, worse than sitting in your underwear while you tap away on HuffPo with the heating on full blast.

It's also surely the easiest thing to fix? I gave up meat, it was simple, but it'd be much harder to give up my car or my central heating.

Apart from the water there is a big issue with pollution caused by farming for meat production.
14:30 on 18/04/2012
Love this piece. Also good to consider how our eating habits impact world hunger---it takes 16 lbs of grain to produce just one pound of meat. Why not just grow healthy grains to feed directly to hungry people, instead of to cows to fatten them up so wealthier nations can eat cholesterol and saturated animal fat laden meats?
03:33 on 18/04/2012
I tried veganism for four years and it is hard work. You must be constantly aware of everything that you eat to insure you have a balanced diet.To balance your diet sometimes requires you to eat humgous amounts of constantly bland things(ie beans). I learned that some things can be bland not matter what you do to them.
The end result of my four year experiment is that I finally realized why cattle have four stomachs, it is to process a vegan diet. Since i didn't have four stomach (even though the gas from my vegan diet sometimes made me feel like i did) I was finally forced to realize that I was not properly equiped to process the food of a vegan and with regret went back to allowing cows to do the primary processing of vegan foods for me. the results were I feel much better, no fainting spells and my vitamin and suppliment budget is 1/10 of what it was before.
My advice to anyone considering a vegan diet is to wait until you develope four stomachs so you can properly process it. Til then let the cows do the heavy work for you after all they have nothing better to do..
14:27 on 18/04/2012
I'm sorry you struggled. Most people (myself included, and I have been a vegan for more than 8 years now, and a vegetarian for 12) find they have more energy than they did before. As long as you eat a wide variety of foods (and that's a good recommendation for everyone) you will get all of the vitamins and nutrients you need to live a healthy life. Not to mention reducing your risk of heart disease, obesity, certain types of cancer, and stroke. I think this is one reason so many athletes are making the switch: http://www.peta.org/b/thepetafiles/archive/2011/05/24/peta-s-top-10-vegetarian-athletes.aspx

Also I should mention that if you just take out things you're eating that could be boring (at least if you were raised in a meat and potatoes family like mine)! But if you add things, mock meats and cheeses, food from around the world (Thai, Ethiopian, and Indian cuisines all have excellent veggie offerings) eating vegan can be the most exciting culinary experiment ever! Best of luck to you, I hope you'll consider giving it another go!
This comment has been removed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yorkshire common sense
Nah then!
22:15 on 17/04/2012
Local UK meat is sustainable. Deforisting large area of Brazil for cheap beef isn't.
As a species we cannot support the 7 billion people on the planet eating as much meat as we do in the west. However this is more to do with population size.
The article is a thinly disguised attack on meat eating because of ethics/animal welfare rather than pure concern for planets resources.
The two should not be mixed, though both have some validity. Scottish beef is lovely and involves some of scotlands abumdant fresh water.
Water is never used, surely you all studied the water cycle at school?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
17:33 on 18/04/2012
Yorkshire, sometimes what seems like common sense is ignorance of the facts.

What a lot of people in the UK don't realise is that even local British meat is usually fed on imported soya grown in former rainforest land. Here in the UK we are the 2nd largest importer in the world of soya, and much of it is genetically modified. The vast majority of it is used in animal feed. That means even if you buy local meat or Scottish beef, you are probably directly contributing to the rainforests being chopped down - to the tune of 16 kilos of imported soya for every kilo of British beef you buy. And obviously all that soya took vast amounts of water to be grown.

That's why local UK meat is most certainly not sustainable.
17:12 on 22/04/2012
While all that may be true, it also shows just how ridiculous it is to suggest that eliminating meat from one's diet will mean folks in Southeast England would be able to go back to watering the gardens.

Cutting back on that soy-fed beef would mean there's more fresh water available where the soy is grown. It won't do a thing about the water that's available in the UK.

Reducing one's meat consumption can do all kinds of good things for one's health and for the environment, but let's not mis-state things.
19:36 on 17/04/2012
what do we do with the animals when we stop eating them?
20:36 on 17/04/2012
They stop being massed produced and tortured until they are slaughtered. They don't procreate on their own in factory farming, they are inseminated over and over again, in the dairy industry in particular where females are made to produce until their bodies give out and the calves are taken away almost immediately so that the milk the mother cow produces for the calves can be used by humans instead. If humans weren't producing the animals they wouldn't be born to suffer and then die horrible deaths.
00:19 on 18/04/2012
Thats dead right,they wouldn't be born.No one is going to keep cows or pigs or sheep for fun or just to turn into furniture(World of leather).maybe a few could be kept in the zoo as endangered species.to think the world is going to turn vegie is just not on.
18:34 on 17/04/2012
This is a very informative article. It looks like going vegan really is the best thing that you can do for your own health, the animals, and the planet.
00:54 on 18/04/2012
I tried going vegetarian/ vegan for a decade and started losing my teeth and weight and health.I was only in my 30's; I am not kidding it was hell. I was not one of those 'junk food' vegetarians either, before it is asked.
I have bit-by-bit recovered in health over the last 5 years by including meat and fish back in my eating plan, so no food groups are left out.
Do not be fooled by these reports; it is part of the UN agenda for the 21st century to propagandise us all towards a certain direction ie veggie, save the planet, no private transport, rationing, etc..
It's all been discussed decades ago and think tanks are used to come up with answers and we are shaped ever so craftily by the information we receive...and we all go under the illusion that things are just happening in a random sort of way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
17:41 on 18/04/2012
abbdenn, do you work for the meat marketing board by any chance?

What you are saying doesn't make sense. There is a huge body of research that proves a vegetarian diet is considerably healthier than one including meat - and this research has been carried out by independent bodies including the WHO.

Vegetarians live on average five years longer than meat eaters.
01:28 on 23/04/2012
I highly doubt you were eating a balanced diet if your teeth were falling out. I have been totally vegetarian for well over a decade and vegan for several years and I'm in great shape.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clownzozo
Magician, Novelist and an Angry Old Git
18:22 on 17/04/2012
Your premise is completely false.

Growing cotton is by far the biggest waste of water, and bottling it for sale is the second.

Don't you do basic science?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
18:06 on 18/04/2012
I'm sure the UN have some fairly clever people doing research. They suggest you're wrong.
18:02 on 17/04/2012
Being vegan is not only better for our planet but also better for our health and the animals. Go vegan!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clownzozo
Magician, Novelist and an Angry Old Git
18:32 on 17/04/2012
According to the WWF, Agriculture is responsible for the water crisis, you vegas are putting us meat eaters at risk.
19:13 on 17/04/2012
If you actually READ the article, you would have learned:
"Around 90% of the world's total managed water supply is used to grow food. Most of this is completely wasted by irrigating land used to grow crops for livestock rather than food for direct consumption by humans. A staggering one-third of the world's total cereal crop and more than 90% of the world's soya crop is used for animal feed."
Sometimes actually knowing what you're talking about is the best argument. WWF is right - but alas it's still 'Clownzozo meat eaters that is putting us vegans at risk'.
01:29 on 23/04/2012
What is a vega, is that some kind of alien? Also if you had read the article you would know that 90% of the worlds soya crop is used for animal feed. Your argument makes no sense.
17:41 on 17/04/2012
It should be against the law to: treat farm animals (amongst others) they way they are; to waste this precious resource that so many have to go without and die; and to allow this kind of irreversible damage to our planet. Society is cutting off our noses despite our face when we eat, eat, eat only to be left fat without a healthy planet to live on.
17:23 on 17/04/2012
In this day in age, with so many alternatives, there is no justification for slaughtering billions of animals for the sake of appetite. Not only is meat production destructive to our environment and water supply, it is damaging to our health, and it causes billions of beings to suffer miserable lives and torturous deaths. For those in this thread that laugh at animal cruelty are tragic examples of human ignorance, arrogance, and extreme selfishness. I am ashamed that we are of the same species.
17:21 on 17/04/2012
When I see a vegan winning world championships, MVP in football (American and/or European) or any other major sport, I might, just might mind you, reconsider my position...naahhh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ppenguinator
Life's too imprtant to be taken seriously.
21:03 on 17/04/2012
How about doing some research for yourself?