Dear Mr Branson,
I have watched you speak on various television shows about your views on drugs and have read the blog where you cite Portugal as a positive example of how successful decriminalisation could be if applied worldwide. I won't go into dissecting the evidence you and the Global Commission cite to support your point of view (there's enough of that around already), because mine is not a rebuttal, but an appeal to dig deeper, and perhaps to put your words into concrete actions that could make a positive impact on many lives.
As someone who has worked for over a decade closely with people fighting addiction in order to regain their lives, to beat the odds society has given them by overcoming myriad personal challenges, I felt your remarks were based more on a political ideology than firsthand knowledge of the problem.
Your flippant remarks about "75% of your children's generation smoking cannabis" simply saddened me. Mr Branson, not everyone has the social and economic safety net that you and your friends have. Many more fragile and vulnerable people are listening to your remarks and will fall through the cracks. Wouldn't your considerable wealth and visibility be better spent advocating for real and sustainable rehabilitation programs or funding community-based prevention projects for marginalised youth, instead of sending a message that legitimises an unhealthy lifestyle and does nothing to improve the lives of those suffering from addiction?
I have no doubt you believe what you are saying about drugs and I can agree that prison is no place for an addict. People suffering from addiction deserve the best help they can get. They deserve the support necessary to live lives just as valuable and fulfilling as your or mine. They need real, long-lasting and sustainable support through education, life skills training, and counselling, so they can become active and contributing members of society. Removing accountability for their actions will not help. Of the thousands of former users I have worked with and come to love, I can guarantee that facing the negative consequences of their actions, even those that involved the criminal justice system, very often provided a wake up call, the "push" that was needed to turn their lives around.
Mr Branson, let me ask you a few questions: How many desperate mothers of addicts have you listened to? How many times have you taken an addict into your home and nursed him back to health, taking the time to understand him? Have you met with many who have lost all their money and possessions while a family member struggled through years of drug abuse? Have you spoken with any recovered addicts to better understand the dynamics which brought them to use drugs and the key to helping them find a better life?
I know you are a busy man, but I would like to invite you to come visit the center where I work. It is called San Patrignano, in Italy. I am sure you know that our country has some of the most progressive policies in Europe when it comes to providing alternatives to prison in cases of drug related crime. Many of the 1,000 plus residents who are getting help here would otherwise be in prison. Our services are provided free of charge and we are not funded by the taxpayers but by private donors and earnings from our social enterprises. Perhaps your opinions on drug policy are unchangeable, but I urge you to get the complete picture before getting on the proverbial soapbox again, as there are many lives in the balance. Our doors are open to you.
Follow Monica Luppi on Twitter: www.twitter.com/monicalups
Rupert Wolfe-Murray: Can Cannabis Drive You Crazy?
Simon Napier-Bell: Drugs - Legal and Illegal but All Rather Stimulating
Alan McGee: In Favour of Drugs
Dave Clements: The Drugs Policy Don't Work
BBC News - Sir Richard Branson urges change to drugs law
BBC News - Richard Branson drugs policy advice to David Cameron
Sir Richard Branson: drug takers should not be locked up - Telegraph
Video: Sir Richard Branson: 'war on drugs has failed' - Telegraph
Richard Branson doesn't want to see drugs sold in supermarkets ...
Using the "war on drugs" mentality is an effort to force people to do something against their will. Behavioral modification upon an unwilling subject sent by a court is not treatment and does not work. Force + treatment = a well trained animal that behaves, but wants to bite his trainers.
Prohibition does not work, and I suggest that the system you are using to help them does not work either.
Lets draw a line between the rehab system we have today (forced by the courts) and replace it with helpful methods that do not resemble brainwashing and a funded Governmental attempt at making people behave.
Richard Branson is correct.
The paradigm of "treatment" in America and the rest of the world must change if you truly wish to be effective in helping another human being. Make sure it is really help and not a form of Big Brother exercising control over an unwilling population. During the era of alcohol prohibition the problem was no one really wanted alcohol to go away. I think we have reached that stage with marijuana. People don't smoke because they want to break laws. Nor will laws stop them from doing so if they choose to. It's called freedom of choice.
Should we criminalise the activities of hundreds of thousands of people, making it less safe by making the only point of sale criminals, because a tiny minority of people have realised that getting sent to jail is bad so they should seek help for their addiction?
It seems to me you have been rendered myopic by your proximity to the main losers in the drug wars and while I applaud your empathy and activities in helping people I feel your comments are overly emotional and ultimately harmful.
The criminalisation of drug use during the last century has instead resulted (like the badly thought-through prohibition of alcohol in the US) in a dramatic increase in users and a phenomenol increase in crime necessary to feed drug habits. Your support system would work as well (indeed much better) in a world in which addiction was treated as a medical problem ratgher than a criminal one.
There are complex underlying factors that lead to and feed addiction, that need to be addressed in a continuum of care that brings about real recovery. On this we agree.
By mentioning the criminal justice system, I was referring also to excellent and effective drug court programs like HOPE in Hawaii which have had real results - these projects do not remove accountability but do not exacerbate the problem by putting people in jail and throwing away the key.
I agree with Branson, but rest assured he will not be successful. Many people have tried over the decades to wrestle these billions from organised crime - but it cannot be done. You just can't deprive organised crime of their revenues. If he pushes too hard he will have an accident, in a tunnel, in a helicopter, on the water. It could be a fire or corrupt medical treatment. It will be so important to shut him up that death in his entourage will not matter. If it has to be done through doctors, then they will soon be dead, too.
You should also not forget that the Secret Services have often conducted their affairs with drug money, because they wanted to keep things away from parliaments and the public. It would castrate the Secret Services if drugs were suddenly legal; they'd have no dough for one and the possibility to make people obedient through drugs would also disappear.
Among the primary recommendations of the Commission report are "Offer health and treatment services to those in need. Ensure that a variety of treatment modalities are available" and "Invest in activities that can both prevent young people from taking drugs in the first place and also prevent those who do use drugs from developing more serious problems."
The entire thrust of the report is to focus on efforts that reduce the health harms associated with drugs, as well as the harms associated with policy, by reorienting resources to proven public health interventions rather than failed punitive enforcement approaches. Theres nothing in that core message that disagrees with what you are saying. We all want the same thing - a safer, healthier society.
Spare a thought too for the thousands who are being killed and tortured daily in Latin America, where I live and work, in the cause of supply to the insatiable demand for illegal drugs, tritely described as "recreational," in the U.S. and Europe. Drug income is deligitimising whole states in our region by the corruption of their judiciaries, law enforcment agencies and executives. There will come a point soon when we say "enough". We will make it legal and those regions of the world who want it can have as much as they want. We are wasting no more lives on those who, from their own choice, elect to use the cursed stuff.
Do you work in the field of development or with campesinos? You live in L.A. but do not say how you formed your opinion...
By the way, more people have died from caffeine overdose in the last 10 years than during the last 5000 years of cannabis use.