Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Nehad Ismail

GET UPDATES FROM Nehad Ismail
 

Shame on China and Russia for Supporting the Butchers of Syria

Posted: 15/09/11 08:04 BST

Two Headlines in the Huffington Post World News Section caught my attention on the 14th September and prompted me to write this piece. One was "Russia Keeps Up Support for Assad Regime" and the second was "Syrian Troops Snatch Wounded from Hospitals".
China and Russia are playing a dangerous game by backing the tyrannical regime of Syria. It escaped the notice of these two world giants that Bashar al Assad's regime is waging a brutal war against his own people. Since mid March nearly 3000 people have been killed. Thousands have been detained, beaten and tortured to death. Hundreds of injured were snatched from their hospital beds to be murdered by the much feared security thugs also known as Shabbiha. Children were murdered and their bodies were mutilated. Many of the crimes have been documented on film. The regime is saying to the Syrian people, "we have ruled you with an iron fist for more than 40 years, and we want to carry on ruling you, and if you don't like it, we kill you". This is precisely what is happening in Syria. Russia and China have decided to back Bashar al Assad against the people.

China and Russia have made a terrible mistake some months ago when they backed the murderous Gaddafi's regime in Libya. They dithered and vacillated and decided to defend the Gaddafi's regime because of oil interests and the sale of military hardware. Eventually the international community decided enough was enough. UN Security Council Resolution 1973 was passed, the NATO air-strikes helped to topple the Gaddafi regime. The international community stood by the Libyan people and supported the National Transitional Council.

Belatedly China and Russia had to eat their humble pie and accept the inevitability of the fall of their long time criminal friend Muammar Gaddafi. Understandably the Libyan people are still furious with the Chinese and the Russians. The Arab Street has been disillusioned. For the first time ever the Russian flag has been burnt by crowds in the Syria city of Houran on 9th September.

I have no doubt in my mind that the new Libya will not look favourably at China and Russia when it comes to new contracts for exploration, production of oil and gas or for major re-construction projects. The Libyans have realized who their real friends are. Libya is immensely rich. It has vast hydrocarbon deposits and ample opportunities for mega projects. China and Russia will be the losers. They backed the wrong horse and lost.

You will be forgiven if you think that China and Russia have learnt their lesson. No, they have not. They are repeating the same catastrophic errors with Syria. The Syrian regime is going to fall sooner or later. It has lost the support of its people and most of the Arab Street. China and Russia have decided to stand against the Arab Spring Tsunami and stop the clock. What China and Russia are telling the Syrian people and the Arab world is this: "Look we are friends with Bashar al Assad and we only accept his version of the situation and we support him even if he exterminates the entire Syrian population". This is a double blow coming from China and Russia as they have both managed to alienate 20 million Syrian people and 250 million Arab people not counting the one billion Muslims throughout the world. China is one of the largest investors in Syria and Russia has a naval base near Tartous on the Mediterranean. These interests can be safeguarded by a future democratic regime if the Chinese and Russians show some compassion towards the Syrian people.

China and Russia must recognize that silence is not an option. When the world stood silent in the 1940s Adolf Hitler exterminated 6 million Jews and started World War II that resulted in the death of 11 million Russian soldiers and around 7 million Russian civilians. Can the world turn a blind eye to the atrocities committed by a murderous thuggish regime just because of a few miserable business contracts or military facilities? I urge Hu Jinato the Chinese President and his Foreign Minister Yang Jechi to reconsider and think of the long term damage to China in the region. Equally Dmitry Anatolyenvich Medvedev, the Russian President, his Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and the Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov must think again and refrain from blocking a future UN Security Council Resolution calling for the protection of the Syrian people.

For many decades the accepted wisdom had been that Western powers are propping up dictatorial regimes in the Middle East. This may have been so, but when the people rose up against the ruling dictators in Egypt, Tunisia Libya and Syria the West have taken the honourable stance by standing with the people. The American President Barack Obama, the British Prime Minister David Cameron and the French President Nicolas Sarkozy have taken the lead in supporting the Arab spring. Despite having extensive investments and economic interests in the Region, they have taken the higher moral ground in favour of human dignity, liberty and freedom. Barack Obama went further when he called on the President of Syria to step down. I recognize that neither China or Russia are champions of democracy and human rights, but PR common sense demands that they take into account the world's public opinion and their own image in the eyes of Arabs and Muslims everywhere.

My guess is that in the weeks or months to come China and Russia will recognize their own folly and will eat another humble pie and reflect on the historical missed opportunities to stand with the people against the dictators.

 

Follow Nehad Ismail on Twitter: www.twitter.com/nehadismail

 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:13 AM on 09/17/2011
I like to thank Huanhu Zhu and Znayka for taking the trouble to comment. I would like to make it clear first that the criticism is directed at the Foreign Policy of the Chinese and Russian governments and not at the great Chinese and Rusian nations. The point is neither the government of China, nor that of Russia are known for their democratic and respect of human rights credentials, period. If the article was praising the Chinese and Russian governments, it would have been a great fantastic article.
02:46 PM on 09/17/2011
Nehad, what point are you trying to make by saying that our governments are bad? We told you why we, as nations, do not support regime change or rebel-organised revolutions. We share our governments' view on such things. The Russian people learned from painful experience what they lead to. China avoided the same scenario and is rapidly developing, giving its people a real chance for a bright future. Now tell us why we are wrong in not supporting violence and chaos in other nations' lands.
History shows that when people genuinely want a revolution, they get it, regardless of other countries' opinions. Iran wanted to change its regime and so it did without any outside help. If Arabs want revolutions, let them do what they want, and we will recognise their new governments once they are in power. But we will NOT support any rebel groups. Have some pride, sort your problems out by yourselves and leave us alone.
04:20 PM on 09/17/2011
Znayka thanks. It would just be nice if China and Russia do not block a UN Security Council Resolution calling for the protection of civilians in Syria. Obviously we cannot agree and I leave it a that.
08:22 AM on 09/17/2011
Nehad, you look like someone who is hoping that regime change in his own country will give him a nice job serving the Americans and lots of money to spend on himself and his extended family. Does Misha Khodorkovsky's example seem attractive to you?

Russia will never support regime change. If you, Arabs, wish to fight among yourselves, that's your business, not ours. We will only recognise incumbent governments and nobody else. This way, we won't be responsible when your rebels kill off half the country advancing "democracy".
08:22 AM on 09/17/2011
I'm Russian and I live in China. The reason we refuse to support puppet governments and forceful regime change is that we know that this has little or nothing to do with the people's wishes. We know how well Western governments and "democracy lovers" can lie. 80% of the population of the Soviet Union voted against its dissolution, yet our country was still broken up with this being presented to the whole world as the people's decision. The chaos that soon ensued was terrible. Many people died in civil wars or as a result of violent crime and poverty. Our natural and industrial resources were looted and sold for peanuts to Western companies. Our people lost so much that it will take decades to rebuild the country.

Now we know that, in the minds of the USA, UK and some others, "democracy" equals neo-liberalism. Freedom wasn't meant for the people, only for corporations. Only politicians who favoured the West and not the Russian people were accepted by "the international community".
02:04 AM on 09/17/2011
I sincerely suggest you to read the "New Cambridge modern history" before you tried to write some naive essays like this. If Oil business instead of history is your major in college, you should start learning instead of commenting. I am from China but I am surprised that so many westerners are brainwashed by their governments.
04:07 PM on 09/30/2011
It is also unfortunate that you use the term 'westerners' collectively. If you consider yourself an enlightened individual I would have thought that you would have overcome out-dated cold war concepts as these. Evidently, your own government clings on to the cold war mindset and makes sure to nurture you in it. I sincerely suggest you look a bit deeper into your own country's foreign policies with Gaddafi's Libya and Assad's Syria, or even Burma's junta before making naive claims about your government's self claimed 'non-interventionist' policy. Perhaps it is die hard government loyalists such as yourself who are 'brainwashed' .
07:02 PM on 09/30/2011
The word westerner is just like mid-east, it's not precise but a commonly used word for a long time. By the way, I was not even saying that the foreign policy of China is flawless and I am a die hard loyalist to Chinese government, if you would read my previous comment without your prejudice. My point is in current political and economic order, the diplomatic motivation of those big countries is still for their own interests as same as in the past 500 years. By that U.S., U.K, France, Russia or China, no one can claim they are innocent. It's the reason I called these article naive because it is only blaming China and Russia.
07:40 PM on 09/16/2011
Good evening. There are different points of view on what happens in Libya and Syria. Here in Russia many people think that Kaddafi's "war crimes" were greatly exaggerated or even fictional. Sounds strange? But what proofs do we have? Only claims of western media& al-Jazeera ( independent or not? and what a coincedence - both West and Arabs would like Kaddafi to leave for geopolitical, not for human right's reasons ), western leaders and their puppet rebels.
It's strange, when one side of the conflict imposes their "truth". But this is a part of the information war.
What else we are supposed to take as proofs? Low-quality, shaking phone-videos, where nothing can be seen and only a voice in the back tells us that theese are corageous fighters for democracy escaping a blody dictator.
But what I've seen in the web is the Green Square with dozens of thousands people carrying green flags of Kaddafi. (there were also some russian flags, not burned, you know). Where are theese people now? Are they allowed to speak? Or the "civilized" world will pretend they never existed?
Amnesty International cannot confirm most of what had been put into Kaddafi's guiltiness.
And who are theese "rebels"? their vocabulary consists of two words: "Allakhu Akhbar!" This says all. And theese people are now allowed to speak fo all Libyans... So, if you want to know if we are sorry - yes! we are all sorry for Libyans, but who are their butchers?
08:49 PM on 09/16/2011
To the Beholder Thanks for the comment. There is overwhelming evidence of crimes committed by the Gaddafi's regime against his people. You need an entire book to describe them. The International Crirminal Court has a complete dossier with sufficient proof to convict him. As for Syria the situation is even worse.
11:52 AM on 09/16/2011
How exactly does China support Syria or Libya?

Silence IS an option, actually. What happens in those parts of the world has nothing to do with China. For that matter, what does it have to do with NATO or the US? Are you the world police? China has no intention of interfering with their affairs regardless of how awful they are. If China picked and chose who to support, then it would not be true non-interventionism.
12:08 PM on 09/16/2011
Thanks xiazhang
China as a permanent member of the Security Council uses the veto to frustrate the passing of any resolution that can provide the UN with authority to protect the civilians in Syria. China can abstain or vote for a resolution but so far Russa and China declared they will vote against.
03:47 PM on 09/30/2011
Is this why China supports a military dictatorship in Burma?
04:08 PM on 09/30/2011
Thanks insurrection. China has played a double role. On the one hand it supported the liberation movements in Africa and the Middle East in the past, but now it supports the dictators of Burma as you say, also the dictator, of Sudan Omar al Bashir and the Syrian dictator Bashar al Assad. Until recently it supported Muammar Gaddafi of Libya and it changed course in the last minute when it became clear that the Libyan old regime was doomed.
11:20 AM on 09/16/2011
History of democracy

Countries in which armed forces of USA had hostility after WW2

Korea 1950-1953 (Korean War)
Dominican Republic 1965
Laos 1964-1973 (Laotian Civil war)
Vietnam 1961-1973 (Vietnam War)
Cambodia 1969-1973 (Cambodian Civil War)
Lebanon 1982-1984 (Multinational Force in Lebanon)
Grenada 1983 (Invasion of Grenada)
Libya 1986 (Bombing of Libya)
Panama 1989-1990 (United States Invasion of Panama)
Iraq, Kuwait 1991 (Gulf War)
Somali 1992-1994 (United Nation Operation in Somalia II)
Bosnia 1995 (NATO bombing campaign in Bosnia and Herzegovina)
Sudan 1998
Afghanistan 1998
Yugoslavia (Kosovo) 1999 (NATO bombing in Yugoslavia)
Afghanistan 2001-present (War in Afghanistan)
Iraq 2003-2010 (Iraq War)
Libya 2011 (Operation Odyssey Dawn)

SHAME SHAME SHAME!!!
09:13 AM on 09/16/2011
Can you show me example,for the last ten years, in what country, after US-NATO agression situation become better? And why so good US not interested in protection of human rights in Liberia,Somali and e.t.c?
05:15 AM on 09/16/2011
Looks like a schoolchild essay...
How old is the author?
07:14 AM on 09/16/2011
Thanks Sergey Kenunen for your opinion. Sorry the article did not rise up to the high standards you expect. It is a conversational style easy to read piece. Supporters of China and Russia will not like it.
I would just say that my articles in the HUFFPOST have been re-published or re-linked to dozens of websites. This article was linked to Associated Press News Reports and also AFP. Even Obama and USA website carried the article. The UK Defence Forum republished some of the articles. If you google the subject you will see what I mean. This essay should be really in the World News Section to get the attention it deserves. In answer to your question about my age, I am over half a century old.
11:21 AM on 09/16/2011
Mr thinks murder Libyans NATO troops well. Russia and China did not support al-Gaddafi and the Libyan people. The author did not know this? Shame on China, Russia, unsupported Libyan people against teroristami Alkaidy and NATO. If the bombing of Syria russike allow it to be a betrayal of the people of Syria. Yes, really embarrassing for Russia because it is not blocked a resolution in 1973 and allowed to kill Libyans. You lived to 50 years and do not mind amassed!