Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Patrick Garratt

GET UPDATES FROM Patrick Garratt

Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito: Two Names that Prove Capital Punishment has no Place in Humane Society

Posted: 05/10/11 01:00 BST

The Italian murder case that has gripped media in the UK, US and Italy for nearly half a decade took an incredible turn this week as Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, found guilty alongside Rudy Guede of killing Briton Meredith Kercher in 2007, had their convictions overturned.

While the surreal scenes in and around the Perugia courthouse after the appeal decision resembled something out of a TV legal drama, replete with crowds hurling insults at lawyers and the stunned defendants being led through packs of suited men by the police, the chaotic case highlights again that miscarriages of justice do happen in the west, and that the lobby pressing for the resurrection of capital punishment in European nations should be held at bay.

Political blogger Paul Staines, who goes by the moniker of Guido Fawkes, recently came out of the closet as a keen supporter of the resurrection of hanging in the UK, and said he would "put all the resources at his command into a campaign for a vote on the restoration of capital punishment for child and cop killers," following the launch of the British government's e-petition site.

He said that public opinion supported hanging as a deterrent for murder, citing a YouGov poll that found 50 percent of those questioned would reinstate it.

Tory MP Philip Davies said of the campaign: "It's something where once again the public are a long way ahead of the politicians. I'd go further and restore it for all murderers."

Knox and Sollecito's total acquittal in the Kercher case is evidence that people that harbour these views are, very literally, dangerous. Italy banned capital punishment in 1948, but had it been in place for murder in the present day, the end result of what has now been decided as an error of Italian justice may have been far more morbid.

Miscarriages of justice at the highest level are not restricted to Italy; of course it happens in Britain. A recent example is that of Stefan Kiszko, a Ukranian tax clerk, convicted of murdering the 11 year-old Lesley Molseed in 1975. He spent 16 years in prison before being completely exonerated of the crime, being released in 1992 only to die a year later.

Britain effectively outlawed hanging for murder in 1969. Law in both Italy and the UK contained instances where capital means could theoretically be used until much later; the last vestiges of capital punishment weren't abolished in the UK until 1998, and death by firing squad was a technical possibility in Italy until 2008. Both countries revoked these laws to come into line with the European Convention on Human Rights.

That societies with mature legal institutions should adopt a stance that protects individuals from state murder by miscarriages of justice is correct. Whatever your views on the Kercher murder, there is no question that the evidence against Knox and Sollecito was, under scrutiny, flawed. As such, they should never have been convicted, let alone shot or hanged.

Knox's lawyer, Carlo Vella Vedova, told the BBC after the decision: "In this case there is no winner." Meredith Kercher is still dead. Rudy Guede is still in prison for the killing. The entire affair is still revolting.

But at least the cases against Knox and Sollecito were proven shoddy and overturned, and the pair weren't wrongly executed in the meantime: hopefully that's something the likes of Paul Staines can remind themselves of the next time they claim taking human life should be a matter for the courts to decide.

 

Follow Patrick Garratt on Twitter: www.twitter.com/patlike

The Italian murder case that has gripped media in the UK, US and Italy for nearly half a decade took an incredible turn this week as Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, found guilty alongside Rudy Gue...
The Italian murder case that has gripped media in the UK, US and Italy for nearly half a decade took an incredible turn this week as Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, found guilty alongside Rudy Gue...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Derek Lantin
Writer.
02:08 PM on 10/08/2011
Sir

I think it is probably true that there is a major disconnect between MPs and the public on the issue of the death penalty.

Most MPs would probably oppose it, because they are scared of the political consequences.

Most members of the public would probably support it, because they are scared for their own safety.

I would suggest that the members of the public, as usual, probably know better than the MPs.

Sincerely, Derek Lantin. http://dereklantin.booksabuzz.com
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Patrick Garratt
02:34 PM on 10/06/2011
daj - I don't think I once mentioned the US anywhere in the post.
01:53 AM on 10/06/2011
What an ill-informed, pointless, and just silly article. Miss Knox and Mr Solicito were neither charged with nor tried for any offense that would constitute a capital offense in any US state. In Miss Knox's home state, for example, the death penalty is available upon conviction of murder only where one of 13 aggravating factors is present - none of those factors, such as murdering more than one person, is present in the Perugia murder case. It is simply irrelevant and highly misleading to argue, as the author does, that a mistaken conviction for a murder of this type would ever result in an execution. It would not, in the United States. The Supreme Court outlawed such a result nearly 40 years ago in Furman v Georgia, and that decision still stands and refutes that argument of the author of this article.
03:24 PM on 10/05/2011
Thanks I agree fully out with Mr. Garratt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NokomisMichelle
I write about what others try to forget. Formerly
03:06 PM on 10/05/2011
Of course I lean toward the support of assisted suicide for terminal patients as well. I just don't feel that staying clinically alive is necessarily the most "humane" or "moral" argument here. I find that society puts WAY too much emphasis on staying alive and not enough on quality of life. Does even the WORST person in the world deserve to be holed up like a rat for the rest of their life? I do not believe so. However, my sympathy with your argument primarily comes from my observation that the justice system is broken, skewed by money to the point of being biased. That rises my concern that too many people are on death row just because they couldn't afford a thorough enough defense and that is not something I take lightly. My belief in the the forced termination of a human life weighs entirely on that person REALLY being guilty. If they are not, or if our system is functioning out of balance the way it has been so often over the last few decades and they have not been given the same opportunity for defense as others who could afford more services, I feel that we don't have any choice but to terminate the death penalty until we get our system working more thoroughly again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NokomisMichelle
I write about what others try to forget. Formerly
03:06 PM on 10/05/2011
Hi Patrick and thank you for this article because it's made me think. I have always been a supporter of the death penalty (a US citizen) but understand your sentiment completely. The problem is that applying the death penalty to people who are really guilty never weighs in with much concern. For many I'm sure it's the eye for an eye sentiment but also the practical mix of paying $50,000 dollars a years (a price most of us can't afford for our children's college education) in combined tax dollars to support the life of a person that is nothing but a detriment and threat to society. From my personal perspective the concern is a little deeper. I have personal experience with the US prison system ( a loved one was incarcerated for 2 1/2 years) and let me tell you, prison SUCKS. It's a horrible way to have to live and that was in a minimum security facility. To convict someone for life is to me more inhuman then to give them a death sentence. Even the most horrid killer deserves a better option then rotting for years on end. If you believe, hands down, that taking life is just wrong, then I respect and understand your argument and don't wish to try to sway you. But believing that the life long torment of an individual is the right way to go just isn't something that I feel is much better.
photo
AlanDente
Noses: made to hold glasses
09:29 PM on 10/05/2011
With the number of years convicts often rot on death row in the US, the cost is often higher to kill them (in total(. In addition, it's less humane (I would say) to keep someone living for years, sometimes decades, with the constant threat of death hanging over them, than to keep them living knowing they will never leave jail.

Besides- isn't your argument an argument for improving jail conditions and rehabilitation rather than an argument for the death penalty?

Finally, isn't there an argument that says that cheapening life and making state-sponsored killing normal has to have some kind of effect on the psyche of individuals within such a society? And it's not as though the death penalty actually decreases incidence of crime anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NokomisMichelle
I write about what others try to forget. Formerly
11:12 PM on 10/05/2011
There is no question that I am arguing for improving jail conditions and rehabilitation, but my argument stands as it is. I believe the only thing wrong with the death penalty is the broken system that would enact it because if the system is broken then the death penalty is potentially victimizing a number of innocent people.

It is in no way a comfort to a person to know they will never leave their cell. Especially in maximum security prisons where prisons are allowed only about an hour a day out side their actual cell. If the death penalty is to be carried out then it should be done so quickly, not years later. It's the death sentence or life in prison, not both.

The psyche of the individuals in a society is what creates it laws, or allows its laws to be created not vice versa. We create our own societies. And no, I do not believe that killing is the ultimate evil IN CASES OF SELF DEFENSE. And that is EXACTLY what the society is enacting when it decides to kill a convicted felon, SELF DEFENSE, or more specifically societal defense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NokomisMichelle
I write about what others try to forget. Formerly
11:12 PM on 10/05/2011
If someone were staring me down with a gun and some how I found a way to turn the tables and shoot them instead and they subsequently died from the injury I would not be in any way inhuman or immoral for my behavior, nor would I then be a threat to my society or my society's psyche. When a community decides that it will put a prisoner to death it is because that individual has made choices so heinous that they've threatened the life and well being of their communities. It is nothing more then self defense shared publicly. And yes, I do believe that is okay.

What I've said I will restate, the process must be a clean and fair one that proves the crimes of the individual as being so offensive. If this process is dirty and biased to the point of it being dysfunctional, which I believe our system is coming to, then the death penalty must be put on hold until we can fix our system. That is what I said, because that is what I meant.
01:51 PM on 10/05/2011
I see we have the liberal moderator in place again today, these boxes are supposedly for comments, whether they are in agreement with your views or not, hang guilty murderers, simples.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wisdomteeth
free thinking is better than paying for it
06:09 PM on 10/05/2011
I think just the name of 'Sick' or 'Sickandsimple' would be more appropriate.
10:10 PM on 10/05/2011
Note, I said guilty, if theres any doubt not one innocent would hang, lets hope a crime like this befalls one of your offspring we'll see then how liberal your views are, justice is an eye for an eye, not a slap on the wrist, open prisons with all amenities, lets have justice for those who suffer at the hands of child molesters, rapists and murderers, they're the ones who are sick my friend, with no available cure, termination is the answer.
photo
AlanDente
Noses: made to hold glasses
09:30 PM on 10/05/2011
What about the innocent non-murders that inevitably get hanged? Are they just collateral damage?
10:14 PM on 10/05/2011
and tell me O wise one, how many innocents have we hanged to date, in the stone age it was very possible, with modern forensics, DNA, etc its highly unlikely, anyone taking a life intentionally doesn't deserve to have one, incarcerated or not.
06:08 AM on 10/05/2011
Excellent article.

After ranting on HP about how the American judiciary could do with listening to the teaching of the Catholic Church (they religion the majority of them profess), it is a welcome sight to see an article touching upon something David Protess writes about on HP here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-protess/texas-to-condemned-man-ex_b_994272.html

Biblical extremists need to be dragged into line in the US and the worlds largest religion needs to get active and help in that effort. Pope John Paul II spent a lifetime condemning the DP in the US and around the world and given the power of religion in US politics let's hope American Catholics start speaking out and joining the voice of all those who condemn this barbarism, whether they have a religion or none at all.

It's depraved, medieval, and the sign of political and judicial immaturity.

More power to your elbow, sir!
http://todayfreedom.blogspot.com/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MarxEngelsLeninTrotsky
Einstein: Socialism is the way forward.
02:46 AM on 10/05/2011
A nation that has Capital Punishment, State Murder, is sick and depraved. You cant have a law saying killing someone is wrong then you go and kill them as punishment. Hypocrites.
06:11 AM on 10/05/2011
It's the product of American protestant Biblical Errancy - the idea that life is only sacred in the womb and not once you're born and commit a crime.

Funny how these people back the DP on "Biblical" lines but don't also then follow all the other Old Testament teachings and laws!
http://todayfreedom.blogspot.com/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dtrobert
01:26 PM on 10/05/2011
Actually you don't even have to commit a crime for the Bibliolaters to drop you like a stone. Unless being born poor is now to be considered a crime.