Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Philip White

GET UPDATES FROM Philip White
 

Winston Churchill's Short-Lived VE Day Victory, and His Memorable Comeback

Posted: 08/05/2012 00:00

May 8, 1945. London. Winston Churchill stands alongside King George VI and other members of the Royal Family on a Buckingham Palace balcony, waving to a crowd of thousands who've gathered to celebrate with him the fall of Germany, and victory in Europe.

For Churchill, this was the defining moment of his career, a career that had once seemed, even to him, to be quickly fading away, as he shouted his clarion call about the Nazi menace from the fringe of the Conservative Party in the mid to late 1930s. Having put himself there with his lamentable, pro-Empire denial of India's independence and his monarchist knee-jerk reaction of supporting Edward VIII during the abdication crisis, (not to mention his relentless criticism of Stanley Baldwin and Neville Chamberlain's appeasement), Churchill must have thought many times that he would never rise to the position he had once felt fated for: Prime Minister, in England's darkest hour.

And yet, when the shadow fell as the Wermacht marched unchecked and unchallenged across Europe, it fell to Churchill to rally his ill-prepared nation, to woo FDR for weapons (until Pearl Harbor propelled the United States into the war) and to stare down Hitler as the future of Europe and, arguably, global democracy hung by the finest of threads.

Almost five years to the day after he assumed the highest office in the land (May 10, 1940), Churchill now savoured the victory over his mortal foe. He had promised "Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat" in his first speech as Prime Minister and had contributed all he had in the course of a seemingly endless string of long days and nights, through inspiring ups (such as winning the air war in the Battle of Britain and cracking the German U-boat code) and spirit-sapping downs (the fall of Singapore, the capitulation of France).

After his palace appointment and addressing the nation from the Cabinet Room at 10 Downing Street, Churchill spoke to a rapturous crowd from a balcony outside the Ministry of Health. Afterwards, they showed their appreciated with a rendition of For He's a Jolly Good Fellow.

With such an endorsement ringing in his ears, it's easy to see why Churchill thought he would handily defeat Labour leader Clement Attlee in the General Election that soon followed. And yet, on July 26, the day of the results, he knew something was very wrong: "...just before dawn I woke suddenly with a sharp stab of almost physical pain. A hitherto subconscious conviction that we were beaten broke forth and dominated my mind." And so it proved. And not just beaten, but routed: Labour won 393 seats, giving them a majority of 183 in the Commons.

There were many reasons for this result, which seems as shocking to us in retrospect as it must have been to the crestfallen Churchill. These included Labour's forward-looking campaign platform (which focused on Britain's postwar needs while the Conservatives relied on Churchill's reputation), the country's need to psychologically move on from the war with a different leader, and Churchill's own missteps during the campaign - not least his calamitous claim in a radio broadcast that Attlee would set up a "Gestapo" style of government if elected.

For several weeks after the election disaster, Churchill thought he was finished as a politician. It's easy to see why. He was now in his early 70s, and his energy was sapped by the strains of wartime leadership. Many would have contented themselves with a post-war victory lap a retirement well funded by the lucrative advance and royalties for war memoirs.

But for Churchill, this was unthinkable. Though he did receive many honours and set to work on his wartime recollections (as brilliantly described by David Reynolds in his book In Command of History), he soon turned his attention to something more vital: alerting the world to the growing dominance of Soviet Russia and the need for continued unity among the English-speaking peoples.

Though he aired his fears about expansionist Communism to President Harry Truman in a memo and, later, to the Commons, it was not until late 1945 that Churchill found a platform from which to get through to the understandably war weary British and American people, who still thought of Joseph Stalin as their ally - good 'ol 'Uncle Joe'. Or rather, the platform found Churchill, by way of a letter from Franc "Bullet" McCluer, the president of tiny Westminster College in Fulton, Missouri. McCluer invited Churchill to speak in America's heartland and had some help in convincing the former Prime Minister to come - a postscript from Harry Truman offering to introduce Churchill if he accepted.

And so, in March 1946, Churchill and Truman travelled by rail and road from Washington D.C. to the small Missouri town where Churchill delivered 'The Sinews of Peace' address, now better known as the 'Iron Curtain speech.' This did not start the Cold War, but did define its challenges and the need for solidarity across the Anglosphere (encapsulated in Churchill's call for a 'special relationship; between Britain and the US). Though derided at the time as an 'imperialist', a 'warmonger' and 'an old Tory' (interesting, the same slights he had endured when warning about Hitler in the 1930s), Churchill knew the significance of what he said, calling it "the most important speech of my career."

The lessons here? Triumph may be sweet, but it can be short lived. Defeat may be painful, but its sting is temporary. And true leadership, though sometimes defined by victories in arms, is often best expressed by words spoken boldly, in defiance of unpopularity, and from noble intent. The politicos of today would do well to heed Churchill's example - that of a man who often tilted at windmills, but who, when it came to the great dangers of his time - knew the truth, and was willing to risk all in telling it.

 
 
 

Follow Philip White on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PhilipWhiteBook

FOLLOW UK POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rtx47
03:32 AM on 05/09/2012
The "Iron Curtain" speech led to the "Cold War." And what did that lead us to?

About five decades of dividing the world into "us against them"; an arms race not only in USA and Europe but across Asia, Africa and South and Central American; and conflicts (with its civilian and military dead and wounded) the most important of which was South Korea and Vietnam, not to mention the many Middle East conflicts.

Across the world every "country is communist if not a member of NATO and SEATO", and US Presidents up to Ronald Reagan and their Secretary of State starting with Dulles Brothers (Head of CIA and Secretary of State) were and are considered heroes of American Cold War strategy.

Yet, the same principle (aka commie under every bed) applied in America by Senator Joe McCarthy was and still condemned. How Ironic and Intellectual.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Philip White
03:41 PM on 05/09/2012
To say that this speech led to the Cold War is a flawed reading of history. Churchill articulated the divisions Stalin had made a reality, and his concern that Communism was expansionist was not some imperialist illusion, but one of the very tenets of Marx's Communist Manifesto and Stalin's belief set. Veteran US diplomat George Kennan outlined many of the principles Churchill enunciated at Fulton in his "Long Telegram" from Moscow, sent in February 1946. Kennan was the leading American authority on the USSR, and his missive resonated accordingly in Washington.

Let's not forget that many in the US and Britain at this time considered Communism to be some harmless experiment with a new form of government. Churchill was right to shatter this illusion - Stalin and his cronies sending up to 30 million to their deaths (mass purges, the famines caused by collectivization) was not harmless. Churchill was correct to also remind us of why we must defend the principles of democracy which we too often take for granted and which those in what he called "the Soviet sphere" were denied.

Blaming Churchill for starting the Cold War is like blaming Britain for finally fulfilling its commitment to Poland and declaring war on Germany - indefensible. He told hard truths that needed to be told, and ones that we would do well to mind today, as countries such as Iran, North Korea and Syria continue to deny their citizens basic democratic rights.
04:29 PM on 05/09/2012
predicting something isnt the same as causing it
01:54 AM on 05/09/2012
There was also a belief that the Tories would not offer what essentially British men and women believed they had been fighting for. There was no desire to return to a pre-war Britain, and many who came out of France at Dunkirk, like my father, blamed the Tories for the debacle that led up to the evacuation.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Philip White
03:45 PM on 05/09/2012
Well said, Trenchfoot. Certainly, many blamed Chamberlain and his appeasers for not arresting Hitler's rise, too. This is one of the points that Peter Hennessy makes in his excellent book, Never Again: http://www.amazon.com/NEVER-AGAIN-1945-1951-Peter-Hennessy/dp/0679433635/ref=la_B001HPUDX6_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1336574621&sr=1-5
12:21 AM on 05/09/2012
Thanks a lot for a bunch of good tips. I look forward to reading more on the topic in the future. Keep up the good work! This blog is going to be great resource. Love reading it.
http://ememusic.biz/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
A radical leftist with a JS Woodsworth avatar.
03:25 AM on 05/08/2012
Removing Churchill in 1945 was the most sensible decision British voters ever made. Clement Attlee's Labour government did far more in six years (national health program, Indian independence etc.) than Tony Blair's New Labour did in thirteen.
12:48 AM on 05/08/2012
Churchill could not let the Empire go which meant French got back Indo-China and North Africa, the Dutch the East Indies. His obstinacy - that same obstinacy which had saved the country and which had been for eighteen months the bulwark of western civilization led to several useless wars and millions of deaths.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
A radical leftist with a JS Woodsworth avatar.
11:33 PM on 05/07/2012
The Soviet empire was largely on the defensive after 1945. (China's communist revolution was misinterpreted as Soviet expansion.)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacksdad41
Quant Je Puis
12:01 AM on 05/08/2012
Good point @fearless, thanks for the imput - something else to read up on ;-)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacksdad41
Quant Je Puis
10:35 PM on 05/07/2012
This is one book I shall be certainly be buying @Phillip - the brief intro was excellent. Thanks to the Huff for giving me advance warning of your blog. I hope the book goes well for you - it must have taken some research. Kind regards to you and yours ;-)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Philip White
03:42 PM on 05/09/2012
Thanks jacksdad41. I look forward to your comments after you've read it and appreciate your kind words