Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Planet Ivy

GET UPDATES FROM Planet Ivy
 

Spike Lee's Views on Django Unchained Are as Hypocritical as the Man Himself

Posted: 08/01/2013 00:00

by Brogan Morris

Some use Twitter to share points of interest. Some want to chat with friends. Others, however, just want to spout ill-researched mind-guffs and goad Quentin Tarantino, and, last week, Spike Lee had this to say via his account: "American slavery was not a Sergio Leone Spaghetti Western. It was a holocaust. My ancestors are slaves. Stolen from Africa. I will honor them."

The aforementioned tweet is, of course, Lee writing in reference to Tarantino's latest, Django Unchained, his uber-violent Western tale of an ex-slave that's starting to divide opinion amongst those who've seen it. The argument at the moment stands two-fold: does Tarantino's comedic, action-orientated approach to a touchy subject dishonour America's former enslaved? Or does it justifiably render the topic of slavery more palatable, therefore bringing it into wider discussion?

Unfortunately, I've yet to see Django Unchained, so I can't make a judgement either way, rendering this entire article almost meaningless. What's interesting, though, is how Spike Lee didn't bother to see the film either; more interesting still is that he doesn't even plan to. In all fairness, Lee started off honourably, telling Vibe TV "I can't speak on [Django Unchained] 'cause I'm not gonna see it". He then immediately changed his mind and literally spoke on it, adding that Django Unchained is "disrespectful to my ancestors". I assume watching the two-minute trailer swung it for him.

Spike Lee is no stranger to getting all up in Quentin Tarantino's business. He's berated Tarantino before for his use of the word 'nigger' in Jackie Brown, asking the question "What does he want to be made - an honorary black man?" as though skin colour is some kind of gentleman's club. When Jackie Brown star Samuel L. Jackson defended Tarantino, Lee called Jackson "a house Negro", Negro being an insulting word you can't say, but one which Spike Lee can, presumably because he's Spike Lee and you aren't. With Tarantino returning with a slavery-themed homage to blaxploitation movies, it was only a matter of time before Lee emerged from his lair to pitch in with an opinion no-one asked for. Tarantino has already offered a perceptive, fair statement in response, but who cares, hardly anyone's talking about that.

Spike Lee's accusations of racism have often come with mind-blowing double standards. He's always been a staunch defender of black rights, both through his movies and his mouth, while at the same time making conspiratorial, unnervingly-offensive references to a "white media" and a Hollywood 'run by Jews'. A couple of goodies aside (25th Hour and Inside Man, for instance), Lee's movies have also been known to carry worryingly racist undertones. It might be idealistic and naive to think that, some day, everyone will simply be referred to as 'human beings', but continually marking a distinction between 'black' and 'white' - as Lee likes to do - only serves to keep racism alive and deepen any existing racial divides. In fact, Lee is so reductive in his views on race and so detrimental to black culture that, if there really was a Fellowship for the Honorary Black Man, Lee's proposed candidacy would probably never be accepted. Tragically, Tarantino would likely be ahead of him in eligibility.

Like Spike Lee, I've yet to watch Django Unchained, but if he can comment on a movie without even seeing it, then so can I. For example, I haven't seen any of Lee's work from the past seven years, but going on his previous, I'll assume it's all been awful. Quentin Tarantino, on the other hand, is currently receiving arguably his warmest critical praise since Pulp Fiction in 1994. What's more, where Quentin Tarantino continues to provide intelligent, level-headed discourse on film, Spike Lee just keeps the candle for racial segregation burning, broadcasting woefully biased and stereotypical views to an audience of millions. Racism is (obviously) a terrible thing, but a man abusing a significant position within the film industry to promote division is even worse, and it won't be a terrible day when Spike Lee disappears from the movie world altogether.

 

Follow Planet Ivy on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@planet_ivy

FOLLOW UK ENTERTAINMENT
by Brogan Morris Some use Twitter to share points of interest. Some want to chat with friends. Others, however, just want to spout ill-researched mind-guffs and goad Quentin Tarantino, and, last wee...
by Brogan Morris Some use Twitter to share points of interest. Some want to chat with friends. Others, however, just want to spout ill-researched mind-guffs and goad Quentin Tarantino, and, last wee...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 71
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:08 PM on 02/16/2013
I've watched Django and I don't think it portrayed the slavery flippantly or as an embellishment to a western narrative- I thought it was portrayed as deeply shocking and utterly dehumanizing- the way the 'slaves' were pitted against each other in fights like cockerels; the way that they were treated as property to abuse and dispose of; the way in which the slave population on a plantation were terrorised in preserving the status quo. At two certain points I had to take a break because it was very hard to watch but this was the reality of slavery. Yes it's also got a good narrative, what's wrong with that? Schindler's List had a good storyline but was still also very insightful into the experience of Jews under Nazi rule. Tarantino is a very bright man and has made a very good film.
10:52 AM on 02/07/2013
Well at least Quentin Tarantino had the balls to make a film about it. As the man said himself, "This is PG-13 compared to what happened in real life".
06:17 AM on 01/27/2013
This article is horrible. Although I think Spike Lee is terribly wrong not to want to at least see the film (I did and thought it was well done and yes, I'm African American), the author of this article completely missed the mark about Spike Lee's films (and I'm not a fan of most of them, but I respect his unique method of story-telling). I think this author suffers from unintelligent bias based on lack of experience and limited historical knowledge or, for that matter, current events. Read your own paper to get a glimpse of attempted intelligent discourse on the topic of race before you comment on a matter that you obviously no little about.
09:01 AM on 01/14/2013
Whatever else Spike Lee may or may not be - one thing is for sure: he is an infinitely more talented individual than Planet Ivy.
02:20 AM on 01/28/2013
Haha I like this one
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Free Plaxico
08:20 PM on 01/13/2013
Saw Django in Brooklyn audience was 98% African American and at the end of the movie everybody was clapping. Spike Lee has no idea what he is talking about, QT if Jewish people didn't get all up in arms about Inglorious Bastards there is no need to guys like Spike Lee to get on their Soap Box. I mean QT even had Django blow his charachter up. Go see this movie before saying things like it insults my ancesters because it doesn't.
06:48 PM on 01/25/2013
PREACH!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Leary
So long and thanks for all the fish.
03:10 PM on 01/13/2013
Virtually every western ever made is set against a background of racism and genocide. Was the plight of native Americans any less tragic than those of African slaves? History is history and should be able to stand as a background to any story someone chooses to tell... unless a film-maker is trying to change it for some nefarious or propagandist purpose, leave it alone...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
01:19 PM on 01/13/2013
"Stolen from Africa."

As said multiple times: everyone has ancestors that do not come from where we are... for how long will someone be defined by what ancestors he never met, who had very different lives and very different views of life?

In the history of humanity, ALL humans have had slaves and victims in their family. During the middle ages in Europe shall we remind everyone that 99% of the population were under the rule of the kings? that Egyptians and middle eastern populations had slaves?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
u s of england
power to the sheeple
04:43 AM on 01/13/2013
Spike Lee is one of those fools who think only white people can be racist. The sad thing is, the media and government encourage it.
10:47 PM on 01/12/2013
Spike Lee stinks as a filmaker. Her never heard of subtlety or nuance. He just bludgeons you over the head with his obvious opinions and biases.
02:06 AM on 01/11/2013
Would like to say that I'm black, have seen Django Unchained and really enjoyed it. However I found some of your comments puzzling and ill informed to the point of being offensive. "A couple of goodies aside, Lee's movies have also been known to carry worryingly racist undertones." Firstly in case you hadn't noticed Spike Lee makes films about racism, some of it overt some of covert, how you can do this with out portraying racism overtly or covertly I don't know. So maybe that's why your picking up some racist undertones.(?)
Secondly for you a white guy to tell me or anyone for that matter about how much damage Spike Lee a director who has worked for over 20 years on films that tell the black american story from various perspectives, has done to our cultue, is an amazing joke and I really think you should ask yourself if you are qualified to say that? Please do tell me why you think you think you are qualified to say that if you do btw! I would also like to add that if you think that someone with an issue concerning race like Spike Lee has in this case should instead of airing them and encouraging dialogue on the topic, keep there opinions to themselves(presumably because you don't agree with them) then you really know nothing about race relations and how bridges are built between cultures and you yourself sound like a bigot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
01:21 PM on 01/13/2013
the problem is not Spike lee's opinions but the way he expresses his opinions, with zero subtlety and zero perspective. He is a OK filmmaker with no subtelty... his career has been sort of a M. Night Shyamalan from 2010...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
battleofalma
11:09 AM on 01/14/2013
The thing is, Spike Lee is Hollywood’s resident black director, and he did come up making films about racism and black identity, like John Singleton. But Lee seems to wade into race debates with more anger than reason; his “plantation” remark about Clint Eastwood, undermined the fact that he had a point about the lack of black characters in the Iwo Jima film.
Now his dismissal of a film he hasn’t even bothered to watch as racist, just seems like left over bitterness at QT from the N word arguments. It’s like he doesn’t feel QT is allowed to make films about black people.
Fact is, QT is still making good films (bit hit and miss) but Spike Lee hasn’t really made anything good since Inside Man, which was good but not great. He’s done QT a favour though, I know I was pretty ambivalent about DU, but now I want to watch it just to see if it IS racist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Simon Stylites
Dreamer, reader, writer, fool.
02:44 PM on 01/09/2013
This has nothing to do with Django Unchained (which I have seen) or black men.

It's just a second rate director taking a cheap shot at a much better director.

My ancestors - on the one side - worked in the coal mines - on the other side - fried in the ovens at Auschwitz; but this doesn't make me either an expert on the history of toasted Jewish coal miners or - and more to the point - a better film director than Quentin Tarantino (seen or unseen).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sister h
05:21 PM on 01/09/2013
It sounds like you are comparing yourself to Spike Lee and saying that neither of you has any authority on either black men or Jews in the Holocaust, respectively. This ignores the fact that Spike Lee has a M.A. in Fine Arts from NYU and an extensive filmography addressing issues of race in society as well as within the black community. He also has a life long and current status as a black man in the U.S. I hope that Spike Lee will eventually see the film and join the discussion, as he is uniquely qualified to discuss the film and its content.
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sven Storm
Edit your micro-biology.
11:07 AM on 01/09/2013
No one can be justified by skin colour.
This comment has been removed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sister h
08:44 AM on 01/09/2013
The author says, "In fact, Lee is so reductive in his views on race and so detrimental to black culture that, if there really was a Fellowship for the Honorary Black Man, Lee's proposed candidacy would probably never be accepted. Tragically, Tarantino would likely be ahead of him in eligibility."

This is bizarre. The author appears to be saying that Tarentino is a better honorary black man than Spike Lee. Does he think that Tarentino might also be up for honorary Asian or honorary woman, too?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sister h
08:00 AM on 01/09/2013
It's interesting to me that folks who gasped and moaned at Mooky (in Do the Right Thing) throwing the trash can at Sal's window in anger at the police murder of Radio Rahim now may be cheering and laughing at the Jamie Foxx character blowing away white characters in Django Unchained. It's possible that it may be easier for some folks to stomach when it's a fictitious, individualized, super black man blowing away the historical racists than when it's a fictitious black character that represents actual rage at contemporary foes of people of color.

Spike Lee, who is a great, African American film maker, artfully and entertainingly raised very relevant issues of race to a mass audience at a time when this was not done. Those among us who are basking in the "post-racial America" might be shocked that with Do the Right Thing he was accused of making a movie that would make blacks riot in the streets. The colorblind among us might be equally stunned. As a person of color I have great respect for Spike Lee's contributions and accomplishments, and sympathy for his annoyance at Tarentino's white privilege. I hope that at some point he will see the movie and join the discussion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
u s of england
power to the sheeple
04:40 AM on 01/13/2013
"African American"

Now there's a term that annoys me.

Why are there no...

European Americans or Asian Americans or South American Americans or Oceanic Americans?

Black Americans need to look no further then themselves to find most of their problems. The past is past, move on.
12:15 PM on 01/13/2013
wow!
12:52 PM on 01/13/2013
The fact you believe there are no such things as Asian Americans and Pacific Asian Americans (and, apparently, latinos) suggests you shouldn't profess annoyance at terms you haven't understood or tell others to ignore cultural history without even comprehending America's current culture.
12:20 AM on 01/09/2013
I have a lot of respect for Spike Lee's work as a director . Particularly for the films "Do the Right Thing," his epic "Malcolm X," and his documentary on hurricane Katrina "When the Levies Broke" (the version without his commentary). Which are films worth seeing.

However, I disagree with virtually all his opinions on society. Given box office results one could ask the question outside of the free added publicity the film is getting because Spike Lee has spoken out against it do Spike Lee's opinions matter?

On the subject of Spike Lee's comments on the film. I can say that I did get a chance to see Django Unchained, having spent my Christmas holidays with my family in North America, . I will also say that my ancestors were slaves in the deep South.

Spike Lee’s idea of honouring his ancestors would be correct if Quentin Tarentino exhibited a romanticised view of slavery. I believe we honour' our fore bearers by remembering them. Furthermore just like remembering the fallen veterans of world war past wars, there is an honour or respect in telling history and the brutality which occurred.

However, Quentin Tarentino's depiction of slavery is not the romanticised one of "Gone with with the Wind" or "Showboat." He shows some of the grizzly brutality of slavery while not making the violence nature of slavery the focus of his film.

I am a Tarentino fan and I thought this was one of Tarentino’s better films.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sister h
08:12 AM on 01/09/2013
The criticisms of Tarentino's depiction of slavery that I've heard are that, whereas slave rebellions and attempts to escape occurred throughout the antebellum South, Django is depicted as the one and only guy who is willing to do anything rather than the collective, community efforts of slaves to help each other. Another criticism is that the Samuel Jackson character is the real insult to history, that "house Negoes" can be held complicit in the institution of slavery. Another is the fact that Tarentino apparently ignores the pivotal role of strong black women in resistance and escapes. Read up on Harriet Tubman (not the child's version) for more info on one story, at least.

I heard these criticisms during a round table of African American scholars and media experts who expressed the hope that people will have their interest stoked by this movie and find out more complete and truthful histories.
09:17 AM on 01/09/2013
Anyone who is looking for historical accuracy will be disappointed with Django Unchained. The film is first and foremost entertainment. Quentin does sacrifice historical fact for dramatic impact.

Academically speaking, you could criticise the lack of depth of some of the characters in the film, however, practically the movie is already almost three hours long!