by Brogan Morris
Some use Twitter to share points of interest. Some want to chat with friends. Others, however, just want to spout ill-researched mind-guffs and goad Quentin Tarantino, and, last week, Spike Lee had this to say via his account: "American slavery was not a Sergio Leone Spaghetti Western. It was a holocaust. My ancestors are slaves. Stolen from Africa. I will honor them."
The aforementioned tweet is, of course, Lee writing in reference to Tarantino's latest, Django Unchained, his uber-violent Western tale of an ex-slave that's starting to divide opinion amongst those who've seen it. The argument at the moment stands two-fold: does Tarantino's comedic, action-orientated approach to a touchy subject dishonour America's former enslaved? Or does it justifiably render the topic of slavery more palatable, therefore bringing it into wider discussion?
Unfortunately, I've yet to see Django Unchained, so I can't make a judgement either way, rendering this entire article almost meaningless. What's interesting, though, is how Spike Lee didn't bother to see the film either; more interesting still is that he doesn't even plan to. In all fairness, Lee started off honourably, telling Vibe TV "I can't speak on [Django Unchained] 'cause I'm not gonna see it". He then immediately changed his mind and literally spoke on it, adding that Django Unchained is "disrespectful to my ancestors". I assume watching the two-minute trailer swung it for him.
Spike Lee is no stranger to getting all up in Quentin Tarantino's business. He's berated Tarantino before for his use of the word 'nigger' in Jackie Brown, asking the question "What does he want to be made - an honorary black man?" as though skin colour is some kind of gentleman's club. When Jackie Brown star Samuel L. Jackson defended Tarantino, Lee called Jackson "a house Negro", Negro being an insulting word you can't say, but one which Spike Lee can, presumably because he's Spike Lee and you aren't. With Tarantino returning with a slavery-themed homage to blaxploitation movies, it was only a matter of time before Lee emerged from his lair to pitch in with an opinion no-one asked for. Tarantino has already offered a perceptive, fair statement in response, but who cares, hardly anyone's talking about that.
Spike Lee's accusations of racism have often come with mind-blowing double standards. He's always been a staunch defender of black rights, both through his movies and his mouth, while at the same time making conspiratorial, unnervingly-offensive references to a "white media" and a Hollywood 'run by Jews'. A couple of goodies aside (25th Hour and Inside Man, for instance), Lee's movies have also been known to carry worryingly racist undertones. It might be idealistic and naive to think that, some day, everyone will simply be referred to as 'human beings', but continually marking a distinction between 'black' and 'white' - as Lee likes to do - only serves to keep racism alive and deepen any existing racial divides. In fact, Lee is so reductive in his views on race and so detrimental to black culture that, if there really was a Fellowship for the Honorary Black Man, Lee's proposed candidacy would probably never be accepted. Tragically, Tarantino would likely be ahead of him in eligibility.
Like Spike Lee, I've yet to watch Django Unchained, but if he can comment on a movie without even seeing it, then so can I. For example, I haven't seen any of Lee's work from the past seven years, but going on his previous, I'll assume it's all been awful. Quentin Tarantino, on the other hand, is currently receiving arguably his warmest critical praise since Pulp Fiction in 1994. What's more, where Quentin Tarantino continues to provide intelligent, level-headed discourse on film, Spike Lee just keeps the candle for racial segregation burning, broadcasting woefully biased and stereotypical views to an audience of millions. Racism is (obviously) a terrible thing, but a man abusing a significant position within the film industry to promote division is even worse, and it won't be a terrible day when Spike Lee disappears from the movie world altogether.
Follow Planet Ivy on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@planet_ivy
Leonce Gaiter: It's Absurd to Associate Django Unchained With Black Culture
Spike Lee - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Spike Lee (SpikeLee) on Twitter
Spike Lee Biography - Facts, Birthday, Life Story - Biography.com
Spike Lee boycotts Quentin Tarantino's 'Django Unchained': 'Slavery ...
News: Spike Lee Needs To Stop Whining, Says 50 Cent [Audio]
Why Spike Lee should see 'Django Unchained'
Spike Lee Goes After 'Django Unchained'
'Training Day' director defends Quentin Tarantino's 'Django Unchained,' calls ...
As said multiple times: everyone has ancestors that do not come from where we are... for how long will someone be defined by what ancestors he never met, who had very different lives and very different views of life?
In the history of humanity, ALL humans have had slaves and victims in their family. During the middle ages in Europe shall we remind everyone that 99% of the population were under the rule of the kings? that Egyptians and middle eastern populations had slaves?
Secondly for you a white guy to tell me or anyone for that matter about how much damage Spike Lee a director who has worked for over 20 years on films that tell the black american story from various perspectives, has done to our cultue, is an amazing joke and I really think you should ask yourself if you are qualified to say that? Please do tell me why you think you think you are qualified to say that if you do btw! I would also like to add that if you think that someone with an issue concerning race like Spike Lee has in this case should instead of airing them and encouraging dialogue on the topic, keep there opinions to themselves(presumably because you don't agree with them) then you really know nothing about race relations and how bridges are built between cultures and you yourself sound like a bigot.
Now his dismissal of a film he hasn’t even bothered to watch as racist, just seems like left over bitterness at QT from the N word arguments. It’s like he doesn’t feel QT is allowed to make films about black people.
Fact is, QT is still making good films (bit hit and miss) but Spike Lee hasn’t really made anything good since Inside Man, which was good but not great. He’s done QT a favour though, I know I was pretty ambivalent about DU, but now I want to watch it just to see if it IS racist.
It's just a second rate director taking a cheap shot at a much better director.
My ancestors - on the one side - worked in the coal mines - on the other side - fried in the ovens at Auschwitz; but this doesn't make me either an expert on the history of toasted Jewish coal miners or - and more to the point - a better film director than Quentin Tarantino (seen or unseen).
This is bizarre. The author appears to be saying that Tarentino is a better honorary black man than Spike Lee. Does he think that Tarentino might also be up for honorary Asian or honorary woman, too?
Spike Lee, who is a great, African American film maker, artfully and entertainingly raised very relevant issues of race to a mass audience at a time when this was not done. Those among us who are basking in the "post-racial America" might be shocked that with Do the Right Thing he was accused of making a movie that would make blacks riot in the streets. The colorblind among us might be equally stunned. As a person of color I have great respect for Spike Lee's contributions and accomplishments, and sympathy for his annoyance at Tarentino's white privilege. I hope that at some point he will see the movie and join the discussion.
Now there's a term that annoys me.
Why are there no...
European Americans or Asian Americans or South American Americans or Oceanic Americans?
Black Americans need to look no further then themselves to find most of their problems. The past is past, move on.
However, I disagree with virtually all his opinions on society. Given box office results one could ask the question outside of the free added publicity the film is getting because Spike Lee has spoken out against it do Spike Lee's opinions matter?
On the subject of Spike Lee's comments on the film. I can say that I did get a chance to see Django Unchained, having spent my Christmas holidays with my family in North America, . I will also say that my ancestors were slaves in the deep South.
Spike Lee’s idea of honouring his ancestors would be correct if Quentin Tarentino exhibited a romanticised view of slavery. I believe we honour' our fore bearers by remembering them. Furthermore just like remembering the fallen veterans of world war past wars, there is an honour or respect in telling history and the brutality which occurred.
However, Quentin Tarentino's depiction of slavery is not the romanticised one of "Gone with with the Wind" or "Showboat." He shows some of the grizzly brutality of slavery while not making the violence nature of slavery the focus of his film.
I am a Tarentino fan and I thought this was one of Tarentino’s better films.
I heard these criticisms during a round table of African American scholars and media experts who expressed the hope that people will have their interest stoked by this movie and find out more complete and truthful histories.
Academically speaking, you could criticise the lack of depth of some of the characters in the film, however, practically the movie is already almost three hours long!