Last week, the Daily Mail reported that McDonald's in America has responded to a segment in Jamie Oliver's Food Revolution by removing an ingredient called "finely textured lean beef trimmings" from its burgers.
This luxurious-sounding product is in fact another form of 'reclaimed meat', where meat processors try to get every last bit of meat from an animal's carcass.
In the segment, Oliver shows a group of parents and children a cow and explains the value of each of the different sections of its body. Then, he says that some parts of the animal were previously regarded as being fit for nothing but dog food, basically because there was so much fat and so little meat. However, a company in the US - Beef Products - has found a way of grabbing that meat. First, the leftover parts are spun in a centrifuge to separate the meat from the fat. The result looks - from what I can tell from the clip - a bit like regular mince. Then, to ensure the product is safe to eat, it is treated with ammonium hydroxide.
What Oliver called 'pink slime' is then added to burgers and other meat products. However, no more than 15% of the finished product can be these 'beef trimmings' and they must be labelled. However, he said in outrage, the ammonium hydroxide does not need to be labelled. No one had suggested that this product is uniquely dangerous - it appears to be safe to eat. Unless you were prepared to eat your burgers rare - and I've never seen McDonald's dish up rare beef - then any bugs not killed off by the ammonium hydroxide should be killed off by cooking.
Yet Oliver bigs up the 'yuk factor' in this process, which he freely admits he is pretty much completely ignorant about. So in this clip, he says: "this is how I imagine the process to be..." before demonstrating that he hasn't got a clue. Particularly irritating is his suggestion that the meat is treated with the kind of ammonia you might use for household cleaning and the implication that children are being fed powerful chemicals that might poison them.
In fact, getting every last bit of meat off a carcass is a good thing, given the cost of rearing a cow. The fact that this is done with a centrifuge rather than by a man with a knife only means the process is more efficient now. Butchers and meat processors are proud of the fact that they use everything but the moo. Little or nothing goes to waste - which is a good thing.
Treatment with ammonium hydroxide is a sensible precaution and was declared safe decades ago. Ammonium hydroxide occurs naturally in the body as part of the process of metabolising protein. It is quickly converted into urea in the liver. In large quantities, it would be poisonous, but in small quantities it is harmless. As a report for the US Food and Drug Administration noted in 1974: "Ammonia and the ammonium ion are integral components of normal metabolic processes and play an essential role in the physiology of man.... There is no evidence in the available information on... ammonium hydroxide... that demonstrates, or suggests reasonable grounds to suspect, a hazard to the public when [it is] used at levels that are now current or that might reasonably be expected in the future."
Jamie Oliver thinks this is all bad because it shows a lack of 'respect' for food and consumers. But if using this kind of product can make foods like burgers cheaper and ensure there is as little waste as possible, why not? Foods like burgers and sausages are all about taking less palatable but perfectly nutritious parts of animals and making them palatable.
If Oliver wants to say that burgers should only be made from the 'finest cuts' of an animal, that's a matter of taste - literally. But when he scaremongers about perfectly safe food on national television, that's pretty slimy.
Now that I know what it comes from and how it's processed I have lost my appetite for burgers. What is revolting is that previously I didn't know how it was processed and where it came from or what its nutritional value was so I happily ate the junk.
What pisses me off is that they can get away with calling it something appetizing "lean beef trimmings", when it isn't. Pink slime may not be fair either but it's allot closer to what it really is. But then that is the American way.
Thank you Jamie Oliver for the education,
you are the man.
Viva La Revolucion!
This is a list of all the stuff the USDA WILL allow in the foods we consume.
Read it and decide what you want to eat.
I'm eating the grass in my backyard tonight.
that was over 35 years ago.
Here is a list of items that USDA WILL allow in the foods we consume.
Read it and decide what you want to eat tonight.
http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OPPDE/rdad/FSISDirectives/7120.1.pdf
Food is once again becoming, once again, something of a "class issue". There is a huge divide on the subject here, that is not generally discussed, our pveople simply "vote with their wallets". The informed, who can afford it, do their grocery shopping at new stores that cater to their wants & needs, and the uniformed, or those who cant afford it, continue to buy what the rest of us consider "unhealthy corporate glop". A recent popular TV show here had a rich girl asking her poor friend if she had any "Poor people chips" left. "Chips, being what I think are called "Crisps" in England. The point being that even potato chips are divided among class/economic lines.
One thing I want to stress; Until Jamie Oliver put that pink slime info out there on American TV, virtually NO AMERICANS knew about it! Why? Because under the bush administration the law passed under the radar, AND by law, the addition of that pink slime stuff need not be disclosed. And as you can imagine, no one selling meat disclosed that!
So, once again, a big thanks to Mr. Oliver.
Thanks to him, enough of us walked away from the product, and the places that served it up to force the big chains to discontinue its use.
I cant believe that the author sees nothing wrong with these practices. The notion that one buys what they think is 100% ground beef/hamburger, and that it is adulterated with 15% of something not fit for human consumption is mind boggling.
I urge Britans to do what we have in the US, and that is to walk away from these products until they are once again fit to eat.
Once again, THANKS, Mr. Kennedy. Keep up the good work.
You’re welcome to your chemical MRM. I'll stick to decent well managed food thanks.
But isn't reclaimed meat how bse entered the food chain?
Forget organic for a minute and just go to a home farm that raises pastured beef for their own family. They still use antibiotics, and fatten with corn, blah, blah, blah. Their cows, however, aren't standing in their own feces for weeks on end. Sick from a diet of all grain and whatever else is fed to the cows because it's even cheaper than corn. Ranchers who grow their meat can easily eat snout to tail and do so without much worry. Feed lot cattle cannot be used in this manner.
Is Jamie a goof and over the top? Yup. Is he exaggerating to make a point, at times to the detriment of the argument, you bet. Is he right despite the info-mercial antics? Yup.
What bothers me is the dishonesty. If yu have a valid point, make it without resorting to stuff you make up.
And from an actual safety and human health perspective why is this worse than pastuerizing almonds or gas-flushing cut vegtables? I don't know, and I'll bet Jamie doesn't either.
I suspect most of those people started out horrified that meat comes from an actual cow vs a plastic package.
Overcooked beef isn't fit to eat. A well done hamburger is a sign of societal decline.
I see LOADS of emotionalism in the comments here-and few facts. Remarkable.
As for McDonald's, say what you will about their use of "pink slime", or the use of bone meal in their "meat" patties. They have done wonders for the cleanliness of America's slaughter houses. To be a McDonald's approved supplier, you must implement a series of best practices, and checks and balances to avoid meat contamination, and undue animal suffering.
When I make a burger at home, I add salt, and go for a fatty meat many times, but who adds sugar? And for that matter, why is there is sugar on the french fries?! It's because it adds a "unique" flavor, and it makes some come back for more.
I'm still not going to eat there though :-)