I've had the privilege of commanding the Scotland Yard's Serious and Organised Crime branch and saw clearly how illicit trade in cigarettes and tobacco goes beyond what some might term mere 'petty criminality'. My former colleagues in Northern Ireland and other international law enforcement agencies identified the proceeds of smuggling as an important source of terrorist funding.
I'm concerned about some of the counterproductive measures being proposed by the government, aimed at reducing smoking, with the potential to make the current criminality of illicit and counterfeit cigarettes much worse.
Government measures to reduce smoking - such as high taxes on cigarettes - have been a boon to such groups. They realise some smokers struggle to pay high-street prices, so smuggled cigarettes are sold up and down the country by touts, in council estates and car boot markets and, in some cases, by knowing shop owners who are willing buyers. Often, the sellers are protected by men of violence who threaten and intimidate trading standards and local officials. I've seen with my own eyes containers full of counterfeit cigarettes coming into this country, and I'm not talking about contraband cigarettes, the real thing just illegally imported.
But a large amount of the products sold on the black-market is not genuine. These cigarettes are cheap lookalike brands or complete fakes. Some have been shown to contain arsenic, asbestos, rat poison and other substances not fit for consumption. I'm not an advocate of smoking, but I think it's really important that consumers know what is in the products they buy, and that includes cigarettes.
It would be disastrous if the government, by introducing plain-packaging legislation, removes the simplest mechanism for the ordinary consumer to tell whether their cigarettes are counterfeit or not.
The links between organised crime, the funding of terrorism and illegal cigarette imports has been known for a long time. Drug dogs are rarely trained to scent cigarettes at borders, and the price to pay for being caught illegally importing cigarettes is not as high as class-A drugs. Studies from organisations such as Interpol and the FBI have confirmed the link between the funding of terror and cigarette smuggling. The US Bureau for Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives put the combined income for Irish Republican groups at $100 million in a five-year period to 2004: and this was before the increased current high-street cigarette prices.
It would be easy to say dealing with this situation is one that just requires increased law enforcement, monitoring and intelligence operations, and that there is no connection between a potential increase in smuggling and the government's plans for plain packaging of cigarettes. But this is not the case.
First, plain packaging will be easier to counterfeit than branded packs. Once you've forged one packet with the name of the product on it, you've forged them all. Secondly, if it is easier to fake the packet, then it will be encouragement for organised crime groups to produce more and more fake tobacco to contain within them. If there is a natural barrier put on the numbers of cigarettes you can fake, because of the multiple number of brands in the marketplace that need to be counterfeited, then there is no limit put upon smugglers and organised crime groups if the carton - and content - are the same.
There's also the fact that other countries will continue to see production of legitimate, branded cigarettes. It has long been claimed by some that there is a connection between the brands on cigarette packaging and youth smoking. If this connection is proved to be correct, if the only branded cigarettes in the UK become illegal imports, then instead of the government's plans protecting children they will be driving them into the hands of organised crime to buy the branded products they desire.
The government has the chance to wind back on its rhetoric and reconsider these plans before any policy is introduced with unintended and damaging consequences. This is, after all, only a consultation - not a certain plan to introduce such a policy.
I think it's really important that before there are any major changes to the law that the public are aware of just what a serious conduit counterfeit cigarettes are for serious and organised crime, and how plain packaging is simply going to make it easier for these groups to operate.
Rupert Myers: Tobacco 'Blanding': Australian Government Combats Smoking
Government policies are not devised in order to actually change things for the better, but simply to give the APPEARANCE of changing things for the better in the minds of tabloid editors and their readers.
What we should be trying to organise is a unique number for every packet, so we can trace the origin of illegally imported stuff.
But that is not the subject of this interesting and important article (which you have presumably either not read, or not understood); so I will not clutter up its comment area with any more irrelevant ramblings.
They could sell cigarettes in luminous orange and people will buy them from smugglers. If they buy smuggled ciggies and they get poisoned, that's their problem. I wouldn't buy knock off perfume from a car boot, let alone something to suck into my lungs.
Roy Ram is quite correct in his assumptions. I would say the article covers most of the bases! Plain packets will not reduce sales, whilst making the genuine very difficult to identify from the counterfeit. It will increase profits for the manufacturers (Printing is not cheap)!
I know seven individuals who sell imported cigarettes and they make a nice profit from it, and who can blame them?
You are quite correct, it is a lazy acceptance of crime, I hold my hand up to that! But I take the view that individuals pay tax on their earnings at source, then pay tax on virtually everything they buy with what is left! Alcohol, tobacco and road fuel are actually taxed twice, i.e. imposed duty plus VAT! So the consumer is pay three amount of tax on these items!
I think that is just pure greed on the part of government, who have no imagination on how to fairly share the tax burden, or are too incompetent or lazy to investigate potential new avenues.
Added to that, they are wasteful of taxpayers money and are not adverse to little scams themselves!
There is not sufficient space here to even scratch the surface of government incompetence and greed!
A nice profit justifies anything.
"Tobacco smuggling has strong links with terrorist and paramilitary organisations, organised crime syndicates and insurgencies. The enormous profits to be made by evading tobacco duties make smuggling an attractive option for unscrupulous criminal interests. The Taliban, al-Qaeda, Hezbollah and the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) are involved in smuggling cigarettes as is the Columbian FARC.10 Both the Provisional IRA11 and the splinter group the Real IRA12 have been linked with tobacco smuggling as a way of raising money to fund their activities. Chinese Triads are central to the traffic to the UK of counterfeit cigarettes produced in highly sophisticated factories in the Far East."
http://www.ashscotland.org.uk/media/4058/Illicit_tobacco_July_2011_update.pdf