Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rupert Sutton

GET UPDATES FROM Rupert Sutton
 

Jihadist Videos on University Facebook Page Demonstrate the Threat of Radicalisation

Posted: 20/04/2012 00:00

In March this year, it was reported that a number of students and lecturers had come out in criticism of the Prevent counter-terrorism strategy, arguing that it was "open to discriminatory interpretations" and that it unfairly singled out the risk of Islamist extremism as a threat.

Over the last month however, research by Student Rights has uncovered a number of disturbing videos that have been shared on the Facebook page of the Islamic Society at the University of Westminster which demonstrate the danger posed by such extremists.

Posted by an account claiming to be based in Somalia which uses the war flag of the militant group Al-Shabaab as its profile picture, and called 'The Names of Aweys' in reference to the Somali jihadist Hassan Dahir Aweys, these videos glorify violence and encourage support for terrorism.

The damaging effect that this can have was demonstrated all too well in the case of Roshonara Choudhry, the King's College London student who told police interviewers after she attempted to assassinate Stephen Timms MP that she drew her inspiration from sermons and lectures that she had watched on the internet, as well as video of the 'resistance' in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Of those posted, it is a video called 'What is the least we can do for the Mujahideen', posted on 5 April, which is the most serious. It features a slide show of photographs showing insurgent fighters posing with weapons, and a voiceover by Abdul Rahman Saleem, who was convicted of inciting racial hatred in 2007 after he was filmed shouting "UK, USA, 7/7 on its way. UK you will pay, Bin Laden is on his way" at a march against the publications of cartoons of Muhammad.

In the video he can be heard saying that Muslims should "Ask Allah to remove those Kuffar from our lands, ask Allah to let their blood run on the streets of Fallujah, let their blood run in the mountains of Afghanistan, let the Mujahideen kill them and destroy them one after the other". He also states that they should pray that Coalition soldiers "women become widows, like our women become widows" and "their children become orphans, like our children become orphans".

He also tells listeners that "There is nobody like them today, the Mujahideen. When we speak about them, when we hear about them, we walk with our heads up high" and that "we should make dua [pray] for them, that's the least that we can do, for those who can't go and fight. And know that if you don't go and fight you're not going to be following the shahada [expression of faith]".

In another video posted called 'Is the Ummah living in the new Gold Rush', a voiceover by the Al-Qaeda affiliated cleric Anwar Al-Awlaki states that that "we just need to realise it, realise how much ajira [life after death] is out there waiting for us if we just go and do something" and that "you can't even imagine how much ajira is out there to be handed out...we don't want to be waiting on the sidelines when all this is happening. People are going and making millions and you're sitting at home doing nothing".

This is accompanied by another slideshow of insurgent pictures, including Chechen militant Shamil Baseyev and the Palestinian Abdullah Azzam, seen by many as one of the most influential jihadist figures of the 20th Century.

As well as these two videos, this poster has also shared footage of a German insurgent in Afghanistan saying that "If the Arabian peninsula, the blessed land of Muhammad, continues to be occupied by the polytheists and apostates then it is upon us to expel them".

There is not just one profile posting these videos though, as other individuals have also shared extremist material, frequently involving Anwar Al-Awlaki, a known terrorist recruiter and ideologue who was killed in a drone strike in Yemen last year. These have included video of his lectures and sermons, as well as a deeply creepy tribute video which received six 'likes' and a comment saying "very inspirational brother...may Allah grant him jannatul firdous [highest level of paradise]. I recommend everyone to watch his talk the battle of hearts and minds".

This encouragement to watch more extreme videos, such as 'The Battle of Hearts and Minds', which states that "the fundamentalists and extremists, whom they [the West] despise, are not only going to win in Afghanistan and Iraq, but they will continue their march, until they drag your people, the Jews, out of the Holy Land and plant their black banners on the roof tops of Jerusalem", is a clear example of radicalisation at work.

These videos have been removed by the Islamic Society since Student Rights first wrote about them on 16 April but the issue cannot be hidden that easily. They can be interpreted as glorifying violent terrorist groups in Afghanistan and Iraq, and in their implication that participation in such activity is a religious duty, attempt to recruit young men and women in the most insidious way. Given that Roshonara Choudhry is now behind bars after falling prey to such encouragement, these videos must raise further questions about the risks of other students being radicalised on campus.

 

Follow Rupert Sutton on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Student_Rights

FOLLOW UK STUDENTS
In March this year, it was reported that a number of students and lecturers had come out in criticism of the Prevent counter-terrorism strategy, arguing that it was "open to discriminatory interpretat...
In March this year, it was reported that a number of students and lecturers had come out in criticism of the Prevent counter-terrorism strategy, arguing that it was "open to discriminatory interpretat...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:17 AM on 04/24/2012
Problem with this argument is that it's not that simple. After all, Rupert Sutton has posted a link to the videos. I doubt very much that he is involved in radicalisation, so we must assume that he's confident that his readers here can look at them critically. I think he's made the right choice, as we need to have an adult, critical response to this issue.
But then, why is it different for the visitors to the University of Westminster Islamic Society Facebook page? Is it that they are already suspect because they are members of a student Islamic group? The problem here is that you can't argue it's dangerous for one group of adults and then share it with another group.
I'm not suggesting that these videos are harmless. Far from it. But, in a democracy we're only going to defeat Islamic militancy by confronting it head-on and exposing the idiocy of the arguments, not by trying to supress its empty propaganda.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Rupert Sutton
05:38 PM on 04/26/2012
This is a good point, but I think the difference here is the context that the videos are shared in. Whereas here I have pointed out the danger and brutality of these videos, when they were posted in the Islamic Society they were shared as examples of individuals fulfilling their religious duties who should be looked up to.

This was in an environment in which students are deeply religious themselves, and which has often showed anti-Western and anti-Israeli sentiment. Taken on their own the videos are merely unpleasant, but when put in this environment they become dangerous tools which can radicalise individuals to the point where they will commit violence i.e. Roshonara Choudhry
11:29 PM on 04/27/2012
I accept that your motivations were very different to those of the Islamic society. But the nature of the Internet is that it is an uncontrolled environment. This is not a password-protected secure intranet. So if you genuinely think this is a risk, then you need to think much harder about your own operational security.

I don't disagree that the videso can be dangerous, but you yourself have identified the crucial risk factors: an environment of anti-Western and anti-Israeli rhetoric. That is what needs to be tackled, vigourously and at source. How many university "humanist" societies are you aware of that are willing to debate Islam publicly? Or university professors ready to tackle homophobia and sexism coming from religious groups? That's the real problem.
lastpost
see biography
12:43 PM on 04/20/2012
"Head Researcher"
Ironic. But that’s all it takes.

"these videos glorify violence and encourage support for terrorism."
To what eventual end?

"inspiration from sermons and lectures that she had watched"
without taking the precaution of comparing that rendition of reality to other available sources?

"Muslims should "Ask Allah to remove those Kuffa"
and if he decides he isn’t bound to their bidding, act against his decision?

"pray that Coalition soldiers "women become widows, like our women become widows"
Devising a cogent solution to an unjust situation, would seem to be through the application of intellect.

"if you don't go and fight you're not going to be following the shahada [expression of faith]".
Surely the expression of true faith would be to petition Allah. Then accept his will as revealed by his subsequent intervention or absence thereof.

"Anwar Al-Awlaki states that that "we just need to realise"
that truth will prove itself no matter what the challenge presented. Only untruth need fear testing will reveal it false.

"you're sitting at home doing nothing".
On the contrary. Thinking is the path to a peaceful way to improve things.

"may Allah grant him"
a mind, and some quiet time to use it.

"I recommend everyone to watch his talk"
but please don’t pose questions.

"the Jews"
are in breech of a decades old United Nations directive.

"the risks of other students being"
exposed to questions and thinking. Isn’t that the way to enlightenment?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
10:54 PM on 04/19/2012
I think eventually there's going to be a brand-new set of internet laws, and online user agreements associated with being enrolled at at a given institution of higher learning. As for religious radicalism in all its various shapes, hues, and permutations? As various countries become more web-savvy, rallying for revolution in the name of (preferred Deity___________) is going to become a lot less popular activity. Concrete doesn't cost THAT much, and if you've got your head crammed up there sideways because of some religious propaganda that you got exposed to online or IRL, The Government is going to let you cool your heels in your little concrete cubicle for as many years as it takes you to extract it. There's some basic facts of life, some of the more faith-based intellectual set haven't yet quite grasped them, and they try and rally and organize, and they'll try and use public settings like college campuses as places to propagate their propaganda. And, for all we really know, they're government employees set to that task for a specific purpose. If/when I ever go to college, I just want to study the given subject matter in an adult, semi-professional setting, with the end outcome that I may actually become more learned, hence employable. That's my only reason for ever wanting to attend, I don't want to be exposed to a bunch of B.S. by agitators of whatever stripe.