Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Steve McKevitt

GET UPDATES FROM Steve McKevitt
 

We've Got Everything We Want - So Why Are We So Bloody Miserable?

Posted: 30/06/2012 00:00

We are living through a time of endless choice and unlimited convenience. Whether we're deciding on cars, mobile phones, holidays or simply which sandwich to have for lunch, the range of available options can be genuinely overwhelming.

Yet with so much effort dedicated to giving us what we want, and enjoying unprecedented levels of income, entertainment, and calories as 21st century Britons, we don't appear any happier for it.

Let me put that more strongly. Categorically, we are not happy. In the UK, levels of dissatisfaction with modern life were soaring even before the credit crunch of 2008. Two thirds of 15 to 40-year-olds, enjoying the highest living standards since records began, felt depressed or unhappy during these so-called 'best years of their lives'.

When asked, fewer than half the British population agreed with the statement 'most people are satisfied with their lives'.

One reason is that while modern life is not rubbish, it is very expensive, requiring us to earn a lot of money to pay for it.

In return for having Everything Now, we have to work harder and longer. According to the TUC, UK employees work some of the longest hours in Europe, so it's no surprise that unhappiness at work is often cited as a major cause of this broader discontent.

There is a widespread feeling that the work-life balance is out of sync. 70% of workers claim that their job takes up 'too much time and emotional energy'. Around 65% feel stressed at work, with parents much more likely to be affected by this than childless couples.

We are earning more than ever before, it's true, but access to consumer credit means that saving up for something has become anathema; instead we buy now and pay later.

We may not be living beyond our means, but we are living ahead of them; our incomes never seeming to keep pace with things we are required to spend them on. In 2010 consumer debt in the UK stood at an eye-watering £56,000 per household; a total of £1.5 trillion.

This is undoubtedly a compelling argument - that our unhappiness is a result of the amount of time we are forced to work to pay for the privilege of having it all. But, importantly, it is not the whole story.

Working long hours is a symptom, not the cause of our unhappiness. Contrary as it sounds, it is the Everything Now culture through the very process of giving us what we want, that is the primary source of our dissatisfaction.

To succeed in a wants-focused, rather than needs-focused economy, companies and brands actually have to ensure that we are permanently in a dissatisfied state, from which the purchase of their goods and services will provide temporary, palliative relief.

The impact of this can most clearly be seen where it matters most: in British family life. In 2011 a report published by Unicef placed the well-being of UK children at the bottom of a league table of developed countries.

The report tried to explain Britain's position itself by suggesting that, as a nation, we have got our priorities wrong, replacing quality time with playrooms crammed with expensive playthings.

It revealed: "All children interviewed said that material goods did not make them happy, but materialism in the UK seems to be just as much of a problem for parents as children... Parents in the UK often feel compelled to purchase consumer goods which are often neither wanted nor treasured."

I started school in 1971. I was only 10 when punk happened, much too young to comprehend the movement's anger, but I definitely related to its ennui.

My abiding childhood memory is being bored. Not unhappy necessarily - I knew no better - but definitely bored. Access to all the things I loved - football, music, films, books, TV - was effectively rationed.

Football rarely featured on TV; the music I longed to hear was never played on the radio and hard to buy in the shops; movies took several years to move from cinema to television screens - TV itself was little more than a couple of channels.

To the 15-year-old me, living through this dull fug, 2012 would have seemed like an amazing place.

And what would have got him most excited of all would be that thing called 'The Internet' delivering immediate and unfettered access to millions of books, newspapers and magazines; thousands of movies and TV shows and almost the entire canon of recorded music.

Everything Now, in fact.

What kids want is attention, what they get instead is materialism.

Everything Now culture gears us towards providing the latter, but in doing so deprives us of the means to giving the former: we might well have the money, but we certainly don't have the time.

Perhaps an even more straightforward conclusion is that our children are unhappy because we are.

Parents who work all hours to increase family income are naturally going to be too exhausted or too busy to give their children the attention they need and deserve, feeling guilty and attempting to compensate materially is an understandable response.

Arguably, it only exacerbates the problem.

Everything Now culture is an expensive, but effective commercial cycle that is geared to satisfying wants: it can do nothing to address the needs of family life or personal wellbeing.

In that context, the amount of time and effort going into convincing us we are unhappy is truly remarkable.

Consumers are hit with around 3,000 messages a day, almost all of which will be trying to persuade them that their lives will be materially improved if they buy this product or upgrade to that service.

Everything Now makes us feel like we are in control of our lives, but the decisions we make are far from independent.

We are permanently dissatisfied, always wanting something we haven't got and constantly nudged, cajoled, persuaded, coaxed and induced towards an ultimately ephemeral solution, whereupon the whole, unfulfilling process can begin again.

Is this really what we want?

Steve McKevitt is author of Everything Now published by Route Publishing, priced £8.99.

 
 
 

Follow Steve McKevitt on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@StevenMcKevitt

FOLLOW UK LIFESTYLE
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
jf12
Esta vez saldré como las otras y me escaparé.
03:02 PM on 07/02/2012
I can't get no ____ (fill in the blank).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:17 PM on 07/01/2012
Access to the essentials isn't plentiful. It's pointless having luxury items if the basics aren't either available or aren't secure.

Access to quality housing isn't sufficient thanks to sustained, mass immigration because there are millions more people to house with a finite asset and secondly, pricing of this asset has skyrocketed.

Access to employment is also low for many and if that isn't enough, the people suffering such deprivation are stigmatized as lazy, stupid and spoiled. Whilst people from overseas are stereotyped with contrary properties and consequently, given preferential treatment.

Those who do have access to employment are often expected to move around the country like cattle being shipped off to the cheapest abattoir. This abuses a person's social needs by interfering with quality friendships and family. Low incomes in more localized jobs have a similar impact on social life.

Access to healthcare is limited or unavailable. Despite already having the worlds most economically efficient healthcare system, we have the Tories wanting to euphemistically 'increase efficiency' which really means 'sell it off to the highest bidder' or 'lowest bidder' if they're cozy with someone in influence.

We have a lot to be miserable about.
07:59 PM on 06/30/2012
What have you done with my comment HUFF
07:31 PM on 06/30/2012
We are greedy by nature but it is true people are so misrable now BUT the gap between the haves and have nots is getting wider and will only get worse under this government as making work pay by taking more off the poor knowing there isnt the jobs to be had is just plane cruel.
02:35 PM on 06/30/2012
This is what obsession with materialism and consumerism does.

I like China's more "spiritual" approach to life as an example. In a way I do hope China become the next superpower and hope such influence spreads, the world needs it.
12:25 PM on 06/30/2012
I too was starting school just a couple of years before Steve and I look back on those time with a lot of fondness. My time was spent watching one of the three channels on the TV or playing outsdide either in the road or the woods next door where we made camps and climbed trees etc. Bikes were a big part of fun then too, everyone had one and we all used them to destruction in some cases! Indoors all we has was one TV and a couple of radios. The greatest present I got as music lover was a cassette recorder which I used to tape the top 30 with every week. When I actually got a record player I was over the moon! I could buy singles of my favourites music!. The wonder seems to have gone out of life now and very little actually excites people anymore. Music,films and tv are all on tap and knowledge can be gained of anything in seconds. The poorest people really feel it now because the gap is huge between the poor and the not poor now. Just look at the Olympics where the tickets were £1000 each! and I saw one person quoted as saying they only knew they had tickets because £3000 had gone from their bank account! Poor people could only dream about being able to afford such luxuries.
10:28 AM on 06/30/2012
People have been conned into thinking that the only thing that matters is money and material possessions. It's sad when this seems to be the only way people can find self respect. I'd say materialism also leads to a dubious sense of values.

You get self respect by helping others. You get peace from honesty and reflection. You can find contentment from loving and being loved,and you can get happiness from a spring day,if you have eyes that see.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nanaama
09:04 AM on 06/30/2012
The British never get tired of reminding everybody about working the longest hours in Europe. Maybe on paper, and only on paper. Two Germans will do more work than six British workers, and in half the time too. In the UK people are not expected to show proof of being sick if they stay away from work for at least 5 days (on paper, they often stay longer without proof of being sick) And many have a thousand excuses for not showing up for work at all eg. unexpected snowfall, rain, storm, child not feeling well( no proof needed ) etc, etc.Few people like to work hard, and a lot of time is spent having tea, or just sitting around chatting.At the end of the day they all say what a hard day the have had, and how tired and overworked they are.For over 30years I have worked in both the UK and Europe.
10:32 AM on 06/30/2012
I think there are certainly a lot of workaholics out there who use work as away of avoiding their own personal problems,especially when it comes to things like love,friends,family and a social life. Balance is the key.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nanaama
11:27 AM on 06/30/2012
Sure, if you don't work hard you automatically have more friends, love and happiness. Perhaps not working at all, (benefits, anyone?) makes people happiest of all. Then you might just have enough time to moan and groan about everything else
04:26 PM on 06/30/2012
Historically in the 60's and for more than a decade after that, our German cousins would live to work and the British would work to live but that was at a time when foreigh workers were frowned upon. As a Brit, it was necessary to work even harder to prove ones worth whilst at home in England it was strikes, strikes and more strikes. More recent experiences of Germany indicate a diluted efficiency of their past, but they still have an Industry whereas ours is long gone. Make purchases from Lidl or Aldi and much of the merchantise will be made in Germany and carry a 3 year warranty. Not the same for UK or Chinese produce. It says it all really.
01:02 AM on 06/30/2012
Well done Steve Mckevitt for a well structured, accurate and informative article! I was born in the mid forties, we did not have a television until 1958. Before that, we all listened to the radio and then discussed the programme when it had finished, we all played cards and board games on winter evenings, or sat around the piano and sang, both my mother, father,and grandfather could play well, (they only lived 4 doors away). Friends of my family would call round bringing with them, guitars, banjos, swanee whistles and harmonicas and we would have a great time. I listened to the new skiffle and rock music on my crystal set in my bedroom, complete with fading in and out! During the warmer months I played, with friends, climbing trees, making dens, camping out, cooking our own food on camp fires, and riding our bikes and exploring the local roads and lanes. Admittedly there was much less traffic in those days and what traffic there was, never seemed to be in any great rush! These pursuits continued long after the arrival of a TV in our house, because the pattern had already been set! later we went to coffee bars and listened to juke boxes and danced! I can categorically state never once do I recall being bored, and the only time I felt unhappy was when I was punished by my parents, but that never lasted for long!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:26 AM on 06/30/2012
"To succeed in a wants-focused, rather than needs-focused economy, companies and brands actually have to ensure that we are permanently in a dissatisfied state, from which the purchase of their goods and services will provide temporary, palliative relief."

Exactly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Miserable Swine
09:29 AM on 06/30/2012
Keep shifting the aspiration goalposts so that the good little consumer-drones never reach their `destination`. If these companies didn`t keep pushing their goods, they`d go out of business or someone would `beat them to it.` Ironically, these companies are needed to keep people in work, and keep buying these goods. I`m sure Karl Marx would have something to say about that (not that I`m a fan of his, by the way).