Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Terry Sanderson

GET UPDATES FROM Terry Sanderson
 

Schools Are for Teaching, not Preaching - Unless the Church of England Gets Its Way

Posted: 23/03/2012 13:16

Church Schools of the Future, a 39-page report produced by Dr Priscilla Chadwick, for the Church of England says that it intends to expand the number of Church schools by at least 200 (on top of the 4,800 it already has) and intensify the religious input into lessons. The Chadwick report calls for a new "concordat" between the Church and the government that will "reinforce and enhance" the Church's influence throughout the education system.

The Church says that schools "stand at the centre of its mission" and that they enable "more direct engagement with children and their families than any other contact including Sunday worship".

It says that schools "must include a wholehearted commitment to putting faith and spiritual development at the heart of the curriculum and ensuring that the Christian ethos permeates the whole educational experience."

The report says that "religious education and collective worship should continue to make major contributions to the Church school's Christian ethos to allow pupils to engage seriously with and develop an understanding of the person and teachings of Jesus Christ."

Church schools, it says, should enable pupils "to flourish in their potential as a child of God," which would be "a sign and expression of the Kingdom that is at the heart of the Church's distinctive mission."

The report makes clear that the Church intends to use its schools as a platform to evangelise throughout the community. In effect, it intends to make state schools into evangelical bases to promote the Church's message to people who would otherwise never choose to have anything to do with it. It says: "New approaches are needed to ensure that the Church's mission is more widely known through schools and is fully understood."

The report says that partnership between the school and the local church will be strengthened, with a new intention to train clergy to ensure they can make maximum impact in schools. There is also a call to ensure teachers and heads are on board with the Christian message.

Talking to the Times Educational Supplement today, the Bishop of Oxford, John Pritchard, who chairs the CofE national board of education, said: "We need to point to the roots of our values, that they lie in our Christian faith, and that the life, death and new life of Jesus Christ is a touchstone for us. We want to mandate schools to be much clearer on their Christian identity."

But Revd Janina Ainsworth, the CofE's chief education officer, said there was "no contradiction" in promoting deeper study of Christianity even if schools took fewer religious children. She told the TES: "What we are particularly concerned about at the moment is the quality of teaching about Christianity. Every child is entitled to have that kind of profound engagement with Christianity and to learn more about Christianity than other religions because of its role in the history of the country."

Revd Ainsworth said that learning about Christianity would help children with their spiritual development and denied it was a way "to turn out good, church-going children".

But despite this attempt at reassurance, there is no doubt that the report reads like a threat rather than a promise. It seems to be far more about pushing church doctrine than about educating children. This is very much about producing the next generation of Anglicans by an increase in the volume of proselytising in schools where children are a captive audience.

And it is unlikely that they will be a willing audience. Church attendance by under 19 year olds has dropped by two thirds in the last 20 years. Christian Research predicts will fall by a further two thirds in the next 15 years. Little over 1% of the population attend an Anglican church on a normal Sunday - and they are ageing fast. These figures indicate that the Church of England should be having power taken away from it, rather than its demands for yet more power and privilege being acceded to.

Of course, this ambition to religionise a whole new generation fits very well with the ambitions of some members of the current government - notably Lady Warsi and the Communities Secretary Eric Pickles who have both recently spoken about putting Christianity at the centre of public life.

But is this a proper use of public money? Church of England schools are funded entirely by the taxpayer. The education budget is supposed to be about education, not religious indoctrination.

Schools are for teaching, not preaching. But if the Church of |England gets its way, the opposite will be the case.

 
FOLLOW UK POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 138
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:04 on 28/03/2012
I may well agree with you if secular or non-faith based education wasn’t completely failing our children on ethics/morals. It’s all very well for the middle class parents who spend a great deal of time nurturing their little darlings, but what about the rest of society? As the Riots, Communities and Victims Panel have just reported there’s a ‘forgotten generation’ in the country, they’re poorly parented and living in a moral vacuum. Forget the 3 Rs, the first thing a child should be taught is right from wrong, and if non-faith schools are unable to do that…
14:15 on 25/03/2012
This would be a step backwards. Church and state should remain separate.
21:30 on 25/03/2012
They aren't unless you're an American. England and the UK in general is an officially Christian country.
10:25 on 24/03/2012
"Schools are for teaching, not preaching..." Absolutely true. So, why were Labour reforms aimed so obviously at enforcing what's often called "politically correct" rubbish? They were aimed at destroying variety and making sure only staff who paid at least lip-service to loony Labour twaddle would bne employed.

National Secular Society? Is that the new name for state fascism?
14:15 on 24/03/2012
I'm sorry to disabuse you of (one of) your delusions sunshine, but secularism has nothing whatsoever to do Tory/Labour. You obviously have a big issue with Labour, but then so do many secularists. Just because those "nasty strident fundamentalist secularists" don't think you should have special privileges given to you for membership of your particular cult, does not mean that they think privileges should be given to members of other equally silly superstitions - quite the opposite in fact. Everyone should follow the same rules and laws, and be treated equally in the eyes of law, regardless of what they believe, or claim to.
20:28 on 24/03/2012
If that were true, it would be easier to arrange home-schooling and opt out of the indoctrination programmes used in schools.
10:00 on 24/03/2012
To read some of these comments, anyone would think England's secular education system has been a roaring success in recent years. It hasn't. It's just dragged down the curriculum and turned the schools into far worse indoctrination centres than when the Church had real influence. In the old days, once the morning assembly was over and the statutory one period a week of Religious Instruction, that was it - now pupils are regarded as fodder to be indoctrinated by the likes of Sanderson and those loonies who still make up the Labour Party.
09:08 on 24/03/2012
Looking at what Christianity has done to two or three commenters on here, I'd say we can't extract its malign influence from state education soon enough.
10:03 on 24/03/2012
Oh, it's already been extracted... Instead there is a generation of rights, rights, rights and overall illiteracy.
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
12:07 on 24/03/2012
Yes John, I've the feeling most of these clueless people would struggle with Y6 SATs papers big time!
02:05 on 24/03/2012
You are like the rest of the morons in the secular world. Kids at a Anglican school are not indoctrinated any more than kids are at university where they have to agree with the tutors to get a pass. These kids get taughtt about the Bible the same as they get taught about the other subjects and get taught Christian values which are a constant which is not the same for the secular world. Look at homosexuality, a criminal offence not that long ago and now it is not and they can marry and adopt. The secular world is sick and morally bankrupt. How many of these bankers and politicians who got us into the financial mess we are in now are Christian and how many are not. I would suggest that the majority are not.
photo
hearthammer
If left is right and right is wrong, decide!
08:37 on 24/03/2012
I would suggest that the majority of the bankers you mention would regard themselves as Christian.

And as for teaching the bible to the kids, why teach kids about rape, pillage, bestiality, murder and tribal warfare? Why not wait until they are old enough to take it in? Say, when they actually leave school?
21:13 on 25/03/2012
And I suppose the majority of Atheists are secret Muslims. The Bankers are Atheists with no morals. What they did is regarded as a sin by Christians.

The head of Enron said he was inspired by Richard Dawkins' 'The Selfish Gene'. Enron's financial crimes and exploitation came to an end when one of their board became a Born-Again Christian and repented, informing the authorities.

Obviously you already know that the Bible mentions the behaviour you speak of in order to condemn it. But kids don't need to know every single detail, they get taught the overall message of Christian values such as treating others the way you wish to be treated yourself.
23:18 on 23/03/2012
The French made schooling fully secular well over a century ago. Religious instruction is for churches not schoolteachers. Time we did the same. Taxpayer's money for schools that teach religious bigotry? That's what happened in Northern Ireland isn't it ? The result was 40 years of community strife,murder and hatred.

btw I love the way CofE schools have turned half the parents of Britain in lying hypocrites - so desperate to get their kids into these [often] whites-only middle class well funded high achieving schools they will even pretend they are religious and attend church for the first times in the lives.
02:08 on 24/03/2012
The church has not turned anyone into a lying hypocrite, they have done that all by themselves and if they pretend to be Christian then they have made themselves hypocrites and will answer to God.
photo
hearthammer
If left is right and right is wrong, decide!
08:38 on 24/03/2012
Ah, we have a pharisee amongst us!
09:40 on 24/03/2012
Yes, who would want to have their children attend a school like that- what with all the structure and achievement and such. The article tells us that "less than 1%" of the population attend Anglican church yet your view is that 1/2 the parents in Britain are prepared to pretend to get a place at a faith school. Now why is that?
photo
SecularAdvocate
Media Watcher
22:27 on 23/03/2012
It's always the children that the religious want a piece of isn't it?

One way or another.
21:17 on 25/03/2012
It's always the children that the secularists want a piece of isn't it?

There, fixed it for you.
photo
SecularAdvocate
Media Watcher
22:28 on 25/03/2012
Yes, we plan to teach them 2 + 2 = 4.

And you know where that leads.
photo
SecularAdvocate
Media Watcher
22:18 on 23/03/2012
It's always the children religions are really after isn't it?

They want to snip bits off them and indoctrinate them and teach them to be afraid.

And they might be the least of your problems if you're a child in a system cooked up by holy men.

By all means teach children about what all religions have on offer. But do not claim them for your church at the taxpayer's expense, any more than you would seek to indoctrinate them as capitalists or communists.
22:35 on 25/03/2012
'any more than you would seek to indoctrinate them as capitalists or communists.'

or Atheists...
21:38 on 23/03/2012
Why should the President of the "National Secular Society" be given a public forum like this?

Isn't this the kind of argument this bogus organisation usually uses against giving church leaders a forum?

No more propaganda, please, Terry!
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
22:58 on 23/03/2012
Why is this article 'propaganda', when the C of E's power grab for our school's, isn't?

I think you need to think this out again!

The 'NSS' is a better organisation than the now dead 'C of E' will ever be!

RIP, 'C ofE'
10:45 on 25/03/2012
mmartini54, you don't seem to know much about the history of education in Britain. Someone holding your views really ought to find out something about it.
21:19 on 25/03/2012
If the 'C of E' is dead then so is England. RIP England.

At least religions are based on actual ideas whereas countries are just territories carved out by religions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
19:06 on 23/03/2012
Although I'm an atheist, I'm all for diversity. Let people believe what they like as long as they do no harm. What bothers me is the way the Christian church is very obviously targeting government and education to extend its power base. I really hope people see it for what it is - a power grab.
02:11 on 24/03/2012
The Christian church does not have a power base.Spreading the word is not a power base and parents do not have the right to deny kids access to the teachings of Christ.
photo
hearthammer
If left is right and right is wrong, decide!
08:39 on 24/03/2012
Oh yes they do!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
13:47 on 24/03/2012
The Christian church is absolutely a power base. Just look at the Vatican - meddling with international affairs for centuries and growing rich on the strife it causes. Closer to home, the Anglican church has unelected representatives in the House of Lords and expects to be treated deferentially in every way. They interfere with politics, society and education yet very few people now share their religious views.

As for parents not having a right to decide if their kids are Christian, I quite agree. It should be entirely up to the children, once they reach a responsible age (18 I'd suggest).
10:10 on 24/03/2012
And I suppose the Labour Party-inspired platitudes that now pass as "truthspeak" in schools are okay, are they? The state education "system" is a mess - because of government interference in the past.

Frankly, if I had young kids now, I'd rather educate them properly at home if I had half a chance! At least they'd turn out basically literate..

"1984" and "Brave New World" should form part of the reading in the core curriculum.
18:47 on 23/03/2012
Terry would be better off addressing this question.

Why is it that his organisation founded in 1866( by a genuinely brave man Charles Bradlaugh) is reduced to this trumpet blowing in a vacuum by 2012 ?

This kind of mean-spirited, sloganeering instead of argument, humourless drivel is exactly why the NSS and the BHA and the high-pitched drone from Dawkins, Fry et al, cause people not particularly committed one way or another , to turn off in droves from their absolutist demands for education to conform exactly to what they believe and think.
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
22:59 on 23/03/2012
Oooh, matron we're soooo scared!
10:46 on 25/03/2012
Well put, Syd
18:29 on 23/03/2012
The National Secular Society is a fascist organization which is ramming Atheist Fundamentalism down our throats!
photo
SecularAdvocate
Media Watcher
22:00 on 23/03/2012
I think that statement is probably actionable.

Secularists are usually despised as being excessively liberal.

Do you have anything in the way of evidence to back that up?

And can you define atheist fundamentalism for us?
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
23:00 on 23/03/2012
Truth never offends, but YOU do!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
18:13 on 23/03/2012
The Anglican church is totally out of date. It's misogynistic, homophobic and frequently supports war.

No wonder hardly anybody wants to go to church.

This plan of theirs to brainwash a captive audience of impressionable children in schools is simply offensive.
10:48 on 25/03/2012
But state indoctrination is okay, is it? Don't replace one brainwashing system with another one!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
16:06 on 25/03/2012
You're not making sense. Can you please explain why you think not brainwashing kids with religion is brainwashing them with something else?
17:35 on 23/03/2012
I went to a Church of England school and had private (out of school) tuition in Bible reading and now I'm an aggressive militant atheist, so forcing religion down the throat of youngsters doesn't always work and they may end up rebelling like me.

Maybe it's time the NSS researched just how religious people are after leaving school?
18:47 on 23/03/2012
And some of us rebel against having Atheist Fundamentalism rammed down our throats as I did. Atheists are just as capable brainwashing. Children should be taught a broad spectrum of beliefs and ideas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Wagland
Resistance is fertile
19:03 on 23/03/2012
For your comparison to hold water, the NSS would need to be petitioning for all school children to be taught that God does not exist. That is not the case. They just don't want Christianity drummed into toddlers as the only acceptable way of life.

The report in question is arguing for Christian dogma to be "at the heart of the curriculum" and permeating "the whole educational experience." That's just not acceptable to normal, rational parents.
This comment has been removed.