Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tom Kambouris

GET UPDATES FROM Tom Kambouris
 

Terrence Malick Needs an Intervention

Posted: 17/02/2012 00:00

I just watched The Tree of Life, starring Brad Pitt and Sean Penn, with Terrence Malick directing.

The first warning should have been the opening ethereal voiceovers whispering about the mystery of Life; and that you literally cannot count to five without being blitzed with a new camera angle. It's all good, though, because just around the corner we get Brad Pitt and Sean Penn vying for alpha actor, right?

Wrong. What happens next is a 20 minute montage that, in an attempt to explain the beauty of living evolution, is destroying my desire to breathe oxygen.

I suffer through another hour and a half of space shots and Jurassic Park intertwined with preaching from the heavens. In 139 minutes not one word of dialogue passes between Brad Pitt and Sean Penn.

Penn comes off the worst. The only direction he appears to have gotten from Malick was, "Act confused and out of place."

Why the hell is The Tree of Life up for three Oscars? What grip does Malick have on the Academy? I decide to dig into this. My mission: watch Malick's four other movies and piece together an explanation.

Badlands (1973 - 94 minutes)

It's the first minute of Badlands and I'm already sucked in. Young Martin Sheen is a little androgynous stud. He is James Dean's twin - every bit as captivating. And Sissy Spacek; my god was she really that funky looking? Let's just say it, Spacek was the first actress to cash in on albino-alien-cute.

Malick's gift is capturing offbeat moments and interesting dialogue. I get what all of the fuss was about. He wrote, directed and produced Badlands by his 30th birthday. And Hollywood had its next shooting comet.

I am, however, flagging one 30 second nature scene as Malick's first pull on the crack pipe of self-indulgence.

Days of Heaven (1978 - 94 minutes)

Sam Shepard, Brooke Adams and Richard Gere are the leads. Malick's script is a Midwest precursor to Robert Redford, Demi Moore and Woody Harrelson in Indecent Proposal; with more hopelessness and no boob job.

No one in this cast comes close to Sheen and Spacek in Badlands. Without standout acting, we get Badlands-Lite with a six minute montage of fire and locusts.

Days of Heaven receives Academy nominations for Cinematography, Costume Design and Original Score. It wins for Cinematography and Malick takes Best Director at the 1979 Cannes Film Festival. This endorsement is baffling and troublesome. Malick has upgraded his glass pipe of pretentiousness into a three-foot party bong.

The Thin Red Line (1998 - 170 minutes)

The cast is outrageous: Nick Nolte, Woody Harrelson, Sean Penn, John Cusack, John Travolta, John C. Reilly, Jared Leto, Adrian Brody and George Clooney.

In spite of the black holes in the plot, I like The Thin Red Line. It´s a guy film with two kickass war scenes.

But to review, Malick takes one of the best groups of actors ever assembled, abandons the screenplay and films miles of footage. The five hour long first cut is unwatchable. The final version is a narrative mess with gaping continuity problems and more weird voiceovers.

Hollywood continues its destructive fixation by gifting seven Oscar nominations including an unconscionable nod for Best Film Editing. And Malick just dumped a kilo of pure Peruvian self-righteousness onto his coffee table.

The New World (2005 - 135 minutes)
Starring Colin Farrell, Christopher Plummer and Christian Bale.

The same opening music, mishmash of nature shots and stupid elitist voiceovers. What comes to mind is, "I hate this f**king shit."

Because, it is true. Malick makes you want to punch your nose bone into your brain. He is getting worse!

The official time is 41:22 when I say, "F**k it, I'm done." I haven't seen Christian Bale and don't care.

Conclusion

Through two of his four earlier movies, Malick has shown exactly one talent. He draws out subtle emotions and interplay between top actors. In The Tree of Life he pisses on that talent with endless MTV slice and dice cutaways. Once again the industry turns a blind eye and hands Malick three Oscar nominations and countless film critics' awards.

Why is everyone n*thugging on this guy?

Here's my hypothesis: Terrence Malick is living off of the performances he pulled from Sheen and Spacek in Badlands. Some of the best actors on earth desperately want to have a Badlands awards season. They are willing to risk being in a Malick crime scene to get it. He is also receiving shelter from Hollywood snoberatti who don't have the guts to stand up and call bullshit on his chloroform montages.

Terrence Malick needs an intervention. Hollywood, can you please challenge his pretentiousness. Convince him to remove the voiceovers and stock footage from the Discovery Channel. Assure him that his genius comes from working with an amazing cast and a linear script. He is an addict that needs tough love, not more nominations.

 

Follow Tom Kambouris on Twitter: www.twitter.com/doingemersons

I just watched The Tree of Life, starring Brad Pitt and Sean Penn, with Terrence Malick directing. The first warning should have been the opening ethereal voiceovers whispering about the mystery of...
I just watched The Tree of Life, starring Brad Pitt and Sean Penn, with Terrence Malick directing. The first warning should have been the opening ethereal voiceovers whispering about the mystery of...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:59 PM on 02/27/2012
I could not agree more with the Tree of Life commentary. After 45 minutes I found myself fast forwarding to scenes that involved people and was shocked with how little actual acting took place in this movie. By some stroke of luck or perhaps spiritual intervention our cable box broke down when I paused the movie! What a relief!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Kambouris
07:16 AM on 02/28/2012
What I am getting from your post is that The Tree of Life broke your cable box. After I watched it, my acne flared up and I think my wife´s back has been dodgy ever since.

This is now not funny anymore. Possessions are breaking and people are getting injured. Let´s closely monitor this situation. If you find any other anomolies that you hadn´t heard of, let me know. I am now considering heading up an action committee.....

Thanks for the support, brother.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mooklyn
My micro-bio is full of stars!
02:26 AM on 02/24/2012
If you mostly speak blockbusters, rom-coms, and horror, you will not understand Malick. People looking for the Hollywood story arc will be disappointed. That's totally cool because there are more movies than we'll ever get to see, so let's watch what we like. But for me, I 'get' his message, and I dig it.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Kambouris
10:56 AM on 02/24/2012
Mooklyn Midge,

I'm a tough fit. Bonding with my 14 year old son is the reason I see blockbusters. With rom-coms, I need more com than rom, and horror is nearly out. Besides the first Saw and Hostel, I've boycotted everything except for hor-coms, like Zombieland, Shaun of the Dead and like half a Scream.

I definitely got Malick's message. That wasn't the problem. Him clubbing me like a seal for 2.5 hours to smash the point home was.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DonaldD
Huffington Post Blogger, Author, Father's Touch
10:03 AM on 02/22/2012
Loved this commentary. I'm with you. Here is my take on Tree of Life:
Tree of Life 140 minutes of yours you won’t get back
It’s a daunting task to even attempt to describe Terrance Malick’s film The Tree of Life.

A group of us who attended a recent screening met for coffee after and tried to figure out this version of the origin of time for what felt like an eternity.

Much like the movie itself, for it felt like it went on for an eternity, too. That’s nothing. I hear the director’s cut is 15 hours.

A week and half later, I’m still trying to figure this all out.

I have read that a London spiritual director found this film helped him realize that life is good. I’m glad someone did.

Because I know my group spent two hours and 20 minutes feeling that life is bad. One hundred and 40 minutes that we’ll never get back.....

I sat there watching this movie the day after Amy Winehouse died. My only thought was, well, at least this is one movie Amy won’t have to sit through. Read my full column here: http://www.lfpress.com/comment/2011/08/05/18516906.html
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Kambouris
11:38 AM on 02/22/2012
Double D!

Has anyone ever mistaken you for Steve Nash. You two are scary-similar. Thanks for the ups.

I'll take a look at your post soon.

See you on the flip-side.
02:32 PM on 02/21/2012
He needs an intervention, but Hollywood not know for interventions- but commercializing and exploiting bubble pops- e.g. MJ, Brittney, Whitney. Maybe just maybe they could stop paying him any amount above minimum wage for what he does- I'm sure some hard working guy that flips burgers could be just as profound- imagine.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Kambouris
05:39 PM on 02/21/2012
Hi Rena,

You mean like in Good Will Hunting where Will is a janitor and a genius?

I like it. But it doesn't always hold up. The janitor at my work has gums for teeth. He keeps slapping my rear-end and yelling Suuuuueeeeyyy! I'm fifty-fifty on calling him profound ;-)
06:06 AM on 02/20/2012
While I have not seen Tree of Life I am aware of Terrence Malick and how Hollywood/The Academy will offer false praise or coddle certain movies that have a high profile cast or director. It doesn't take a degree in film philosophy to recognize when a movie fails to allow a talented cast to shine through and draw you in right away. With art, there will always be artists who enjoy taking risks and often those risks play out in a polarizing manner. Malick is clearly a talented guy, everyone agrees with that thought. I feel Tom did a real nice job of analyzing the lead cast members in each of Malick's movies and tying that into the movie's overall success....or not. The suggestion that this piece is below Huntington Post standards because it comes across as "nonsensical" falls flat in my mind. I enjoyed the humor, made me think about the days of long ago. College.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Kambouris
11:07 AM on 02/20/2012
Hey Ibis,

Thanks for the ups. As far as the humour reminding you of college - me too! Endless shenanigans for 4 years. But now my wife reminds me that being a 46 year old jackhole is not a good look. Our 14 year old teenager loves it! Woop!
10:15 PM on 02/17/2012
Tom,

To say I agree with you on TToL, is an understatement. What the H was that movie about? Indeed, I was one of the many who absolutely HAD to turn it off before getting half-way through it. Until I read your piece here, I was convinced that I was a complete dolt for not being able to *get* the meaning of life out of this movie. Several months ago, at an attempt to become enlightened, I read another critic´s review. I couldn´t make it through that either! Must one have a PhD to watch, enjoy, be moved by a movie? Your intelligent review here evoked far more from me than the movie ever could have. Thanks for expressing so well what I have wanted to for months about this rotten tomato!
10:54 AM on 02/18/2012
Hey Patti,

I feel your pain. You don´t need a PhD to be honest with how a film affects you. Just a brain and some guts. Which you have in spades, girl!
09:36 PM on 02/17/2012
Hi Tom,

I am going to bite the bullet and be the first person to whole heartedly agree with your blog about TToL.This coming from one who has often sung the praise of Malick's genius. I have seen ALL of Malick's films and am therefore well informed. I do not need to be preached to, or a nature film telling me about life. Sublety was what made Badlands so real and powerful. Please Terrance go back to your original movie making and give us another TRUE OSCAR WORTHY film.
11:00 AM on 02/18/2012
Hey Scrummy,

That´s what I´m saying! I, too, loved Badlands. But that was 40 years ago.

Malick has been reading his press clippings and receiving free mantlepiece ornaments for so long he´s forgotten what got him there.

I know he´s got a masterpiece in him. Right now, though, his head is too far up his large intestine to see daylight. Hope springs eternal.....
03:42 PM on 02/17/2012
I tried to watch Tree of Life (at-home screening), but could not get past the first 30 minutes. I tried fast-forwarding the dvd, but it didn't appear anything interesting was ever going to happen, so I gave up. I haven't seen Malick's other films (and don't want to), so I can't speak to those. But, in my opinion, Tom nailed it in his description. The only emotion evoked out of me was annoyance that I had just lost half an hour that I would never get back.
07:17 PM on 02/17/2012
Finally Kim!

I was wondering when the calvery was going to show up..... Thanks for your thoughts and support!

What I would say is check out Badlands. Malick is at his very best. You will love Martin Sheen and Sissy Spacek. Sheen still says this was one of the highlights of his career.

Here´s Sheen and Spacek 40 years ago: (http://www.imdb.com/media/rm1828303616/tt0069762)
08:02 AM on 02/17/2012
Tom Kambouris,

As a viewer/reader of this site, I have the right like every other viewer/reader to express my opinion. Therefore, I am posting this comment, for you left me with no other choice but to say something regarding your article, Tom, which is nonsensical from top to bottom and most importantly it is superfluous.

Your article is clearly indicating that you have no knowledge of film philosophy, and it left me thinking with myself, why "Huffington Post" is even giving you the opportunity to write. I am aware that everyone is entitled to their opinion, yet at times opinions should be locked in mind. Since you have expressed your, let me reiterate, nonsensical opinion, that's why you are reading my opinion.

I believe this post should be deleted immediately before "Huffington Post's" reputation falls down like your words on the ground.
09:28 AM on 02/17/2012
Rohan Mohmand,

Wow, I'm feeling some hostility. So, let's see, you liked TToL and believe that, because I thought it was an awful bore, I do not know what I am talking about? That the gist of it?

Here's how I gauge films. I pay out money and two hours of my life to watch something that provokes an emotion out of me. Whether that is anger, enchantment, delight, laughter, revulsion or amazement at stunts or effects, it doesn't really matter if it is done well.

The problem I had with TToL was its pedestrian style. I don't like people preaching life lessons to me for 3 heavy-handed hours. If Malick was more subtle and clever he may have had a chance with me. He comes across as a boring know-it-all. I would venture to guess that if a first time director's name were attached instead of Malick's, this film would have been tarred, feathered and run out of town.

Let's remember that this film was booed at Cannes Film Festival. And that people all over the States were walking out of movie theaters halfway through. Let me repeat that. People scheduled time out of their busy schedules, drove to a theatre and forked over hard earned money in tight times and decided their lives would be better off by cutting their losses and walking out.

I admire those people for being smarter and braver than I was.
04:10 PM on 02/17/2012
Tom Kambouris,

Like I said, everyone is entiled to their opinion and you are, too. But, what we should consider here is a film in original format; we have tremendous amount of films that are not original and most of the film-makers out there, Tom don't dare to touch originality, so what they to is to repeat themselves. I am thankful that we have autuers like Christopher Nolan, Ridley Scott, M.Night Shyamalan, Terrence Malick, for they dare to deal with original concepts and most of these concepts come from their minds and their films are considered artisitc. Why? - Because they are not only film-makers, they are writers as well.

'The Tree of Life' was booed at Cannes, I am aware, and I was surprised, but you forgot to mention that the film is Palme d'Or winner. But, it seems like you rather enjoy a film like 'Ghost Rider' which I think is nothing but waste of time and money.

I am not saying that you don't have the right to dislike 'The Tree of Life,' I am just saying that Mr. Malick does not need intervention or anything else. He's perfectly fine as a film-maker, and as a visionary. There are film-makers like Christopher Nolan, David Fincher that adore the work of Malick.

Thank you
This comment has been removed.