China finally became a predominantly urban country last year, but just barely - 51% of its population resided in urban areas in 2011. This may seem unimpressive, but the continued migration of China's population is fuelling the rise of massive cities that are transforming the country's still-developing urban landscape.
China's new consumer class will increasingly be concentrated in these megalopolises, defined as cities or city clusters with a population over 10 million, or more than half the population of Florida. The scale, and more importantly the number, of megalopolises that will emerge by 2020 is reshaping the context of China's urban growth story as the country's restless and ambitious are drawn to increasingly larger urban agglomerations. The short timeframe over which the population boom is taking place - in sharp contrast to stagnating population growth at the national level - is straining their capacity to accommodate the new residents. Their development should be the main stories to watch.
The rise of the Chinese megalopolis presents clear opportunities - each of the 13 that will emerge by 2020 represents a potential market the size of a small country. The bulk of China's new consuming class will be found in these areas, as most of them will see the majority of their populations attain middle-class status by the end of the decade, defined as Rmb30,000 (roughly US$5,000) a year by the Economist Intelligence Unit. At the same time, the cities themselves will require huge outlays into their healthcare, educational, and public service sectors like waste management to support their continued expansion. As the government signals increasing openness to private-sector involvement in these areas, investment is pouring in. At the same time, the spread of economic development to inland China offers labourers more employment opportunities, putting pressure on wages, which continue to grow at double-digit rates. Rising wages are pushing up overall income levels, which in turn underpins surging levels of private consumption.
But the successful development of these megalopolises hinges on progress in several key policy areas. First, reform of the restrictive household registration system (known as the hukou system) is needed to provide more residents in these urban areas with access to education and healthcare. Under the current system, most new migrants are denied access to public services in their new host cities, which reduces their spending power as they must save more for health and schooling needs. Second, tax reform is needed to wean local governments off land sales as a main source of revenue, as this is a driver of social unrest and a finite and non-recurring revenue source. And careful planning is needed to manage the energy, water, and transport needs of such large urban areas. The environmental costs of mismanagement will be great.
To be sure, most observers are weary of hearing stories about China's enormity and growth. And few can blame them. In recent weeks, speculation over its imminent hard landing has reached fever pitch. The second quarter GDP growth rate, scheduled for release later this week, will likely flame the fears that China's long-term growth is unsustainable. Such alarm is premature, however, as this quarter's growth figure will reflect more the delayed effectiveness of the government's latest policy loosening than inevitable economic decline. In the long term, the country's overall economic development relies on the transition from an investment-led economy to a consumption-led one. Such success is inextricably tied to the pace and shape of China's urban development.
More information on the rise of the Chinese megalopolises can be found in the EIU report 'Supersized cities: China's 13 megalopolises' available to download for free at www.eiu.com/megalopolis
China's growth is slowing, raising risks for world economy
Report: China bishop, named by Rome, held in his seminary
Oil slips lower below $86 on slowing China trade
China seeks closer defense ties with Australia
Global stocks wary on China trade, Europe talks
China Southern Proift May Slump on Weak Travel Demand
China Stocks: Air China, Poly Real Estate Group, Gemdale, ZTE
Migration reform is probably needed everywhere, both from a moral standpoint, where you are born shouldn't matter, and an economic, Europe, America, and China alike don't benefit from a huge underclass unable to spend. Europe has traditionally been poor at integrating their migrant workers, USA and Canada better. China may have the best chance, if they take it.
Illegal migration into the European Union is not liked by the vast majority of legal residents, including the vast majority of non-white legal residents. The result is a heavy push to the right for many political parties and the rise of hard right xenophobic parties. How do you counter the argument that equal social rights encourages illegal migration?
The real story across the world is the flight from the countryside into the cities and the suburbs. This gives the cities opportunities and challenges, while the newcomers can provide vitality and cheap labour, migration in every form is disruptive change. Even with economic and moral arguments for that change, it is a question how much disruption the city engines and citizens can take at a given moment. On current form the Chinese seems to have a far greater capacity for that than the Europeans, and it may show in higher economic growth in China. That comes at a personal cost, among migrants and citizens alike, which may show in the health statistics.
Dismantling the hukou system in China (where you are defined by where you are born, particularly if that area is urban or rural), which is grossly unfair and uneconomic, would have consequences analogous to legalising illegal migrants in Europe, only that the Chinese migrants are a larger part of the Chinese economy.