When the bones of the king were discovered in a car park in Leicester, the East Midlands wasted no time in smartening itself up ready for tourists to pour in. And pour in they certainly did: a temporary exhibition outside the Guildhall attracted over 4,000 visitors in its first weekend, some of whom travelled from as far as the States and Canada to queue in the sleet and snow.
The skeleton, which is in pretty good shape considering that until last August it lay beneath a layer of concrete, will be put on display to the general public until being eventually laid to rest at Leicester Cathedral, and a permanent museum will be opened where visitors can see him with their own eyes.
This means big things for the usually quiet city of Leicester. Speaking as a resident myself, I can say we are unused to this spotlight - after all, our living exports such as the saintly Gary Linekar and the well-behaved Kasabian have done little to prepare us for our latest much-maligned royal celebrity. But we're an interesting, highly multicultural city and, like many Midlands folk, I'd like other people to know it (I remember during my Freshers' Week a DJ asked students to cheer if they were from the North or the South. Myself and my friend from Leamington Spa felt pretty left out.) Clearly, Leicester needs to milk Richard for all he's worth.
Unfortunately, Richard III doesn't lend himself easily to gift shop merchandise. Usually, heritage designs make highly-collectable tea towel prints (see here), but I can hardly imagine my gran drying the dishes on Richard III's reconstructed face. Nor kids playing with Richard III action figures for that matter. So we'd better think of something else.
Well, we can certainly expect copies of Shakespeare's The Tragedy of King Richard III to fly off the shelves. The play paints a dark picture of the king as a cripple who is 'determined to prove a villain' as he makes his bloodthirsty ascension to the throne.
On top of this, his story has extra cool factor thanks to popular shows like Game of Thrones and Faintheart. In fact, at Leicester University's re-enactment of the 1485 Battle of Bosworth Field, some of the actors were asked to don their chainmail again for the TV screen!
And really, it's a cool story. The battle is steeped in treason (some of Richard's closest 'supporters' deserted him), superstition (a blind beggar had the premonition that Richard's head would strike the bridge over the River Soar as he returned) and bravery (Richard rode into battle wearing his crown, ignoring the advice of those who warned him that it made him an easy target). The body of the defeated king was thrown over a horse and carried over the bridge to Leicester where it remained until 2012.
And then there's the royal name. According to James Macfarlane of Babynames.co.uk, "We often see names rise as fall due to media attention and this discovery could well be what pushes Richard back into the top 100 names after falling out of favour a couple of years ago." Give it a few years and Dick could make a comeback!
Finally, let's not forget about Greyfriar's car park, which for hundreds of years was the unassuming gravestone of an English monarch. Personally I like David Mitchell's idea of turning the site into a Richard III themepark, whereas the king would probably turn in his grave. (Sorry.)
P.S. Tey's R3 mystery was voted the greatest mystery of all time by the British Crime Writers' Association, so there's some corroboration for my opinion of it.
Is any ceremony planned for the reinterment?
See here >>> http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/Richard-III-sing-king-Leicester-cathedral-choir/story-18190638-detail/story.html#axzz2MlCh3AAA
The double meaning of the use of the word "determined" is fascinating! Shakespeare's primary sources were all Tudor-era histories, like Holinshed, who used Thomas More's *History of Richard III*. Four different (unfinished) versions of More's History were found in his papers at his death. It seems More got most of his information from Archbishop Morton, who is believed to have fed slanderous material about Richard to More, who was only about two years old when Richard died in 1485.The problem is that the Shakespearean RIII is a charismatic figure who enfolds us, makes us co-conspirators with him. I like to think he derives the charismatic quality from the real Richard, even though in his overweening ambition Shakespearean Richard is the opposite of the real Richard. Richard seems to have been content to govern in the North of England on behalf of his brother, Edward IV, until Edward's sudden death in 1483, which placed Richard in a difficult position as Protector of the young King Edward V. Realizing that it is impossible to eradicate the image from Shakespeare, I would be content if people can learn to distinguish the literary creation from the real figure of the man - who is much more intriguing, in my prejudiced view. :-)
However, I do not think the carpark should be turned into a stupid and tacky typically English theme park! It is the skeleton of Richard III that was found: not the living person! Lets not get too carried away: it is a pile of bones, the person is no longer present.
Although Richard's bones should be laid to rest in peace with dignity, the carpark should be fully escavated and if nothing is found then it should be covered over again and a model of the old priory made for the museum. The corner where he was found is holy ground and should be reconsecrated so as a small monument and plaque can be put on the spot he was found and chained off to keep cars out, with a few spaces for disabled workers.
This is an exciting find, and one that's very good for raising the profile of human archæology and palæopathology.
And yes, there is, if not an action figure (it doesn't move), a plastic toy knight on horseback of him which came out a few years ago.