Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Yvonne Ossei

GET UPDATES FROM Yvonne Ossei
 

Female Genital Mutilation: A Crime Against Women

Posted: 27/08/2012 00:00

A seven-year-old girl is screaming hysterically in a secluded room. She has just had her clitoris cut off, her vagina sewn together and the surrounding areas of her genitalia burnt with corrosives. Her legs have been tied together and for months she will not be able to walk. Furthermore she will have no choice but to urinate through her fleshy wounds. The physical pain and psychological trauma will haunt her until the day she dies, unless she bleeds to death first.

Although types of cutting may vary, this is the uncomfortable truth behind Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). Practicing communities believe that FGM preserves virginity until marriage, enhances male sexual pleasure, is part of custom or tradition and finally (false) belief that it a religious requirement. According to the World Health Organization, Female Genital Mutilation is practiced in 28 African countries, Israel, Iraqi Kurdistan, Oman, Yemen, and now occurs within migrant communities in the United Kingdom and America. It is estimated that as many as 100-150 million women around the world have been subjected to FGM.

During the two years that I spent researching and developing a play based on Female Genital Mutilation, I met a number of agencies that work in preventative capacities, including Project Azure (The Metropolitan Police Child Protection Unit), the NHS and Forward U.K. Aside from the physical violation, it became clear to me that Female Genital Mutilation was designed to destroy the spirit and self-worth of young girls before they developed into women.

At a young age, the girls are schooled into believing that they exist, purely for male gratification and that their bodies are just vessels to facilitate that pleasure. Some will never have been educated and some will also be forced into marriage under the age of 16. When they marry, the husbands decide how they will be re-opened. If he is 'kind' he will have her cut open, though most men from practicing communities feel as though it compromises their masculinity and prefer to force them open through penetrative sex. After they are impregnated a process of de-infibulation occurs when the genitalia is re-opened for childbirth. During the course of their lives, they can look forward to extensive problems during childbirth, menstrual difficulties, recurring infections and endless trauma.

Under all of these circumstances it is nigh-on impossible for women to reach their full potential and that is the real reason that they are subjected to Female Genital Mutilation. Denying them their basic human rights to bodily integrity is psychological manipulation. When those rights are taken away and handed over to men or the community, women can subsequently believe that they are insignificant members of society and become resigned to roles as second class citizens.

Female Genital Mutilation is a crime in the U.K and many other countries around the world, but despite this it is still widely practiced. The only way it can be stopped is by educating practicing communities about the disastrous effects that is has on women and children and ensuring that they are treated as autonomous human beings that have a right to their dignity and integrity.

Read More from Yvonne Ossei on http://musingsofyvonne.com

 

Follow Yvonne Ossei on Twitter: www.twitter.com/musingsofyvonne

FOLLOW UK LIFESTYLE
 
 
  • Comments
  • 72
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:12 AM on 09/24/2012
The effective eradication of FGM will begin with the broad acknowledgement that all forms of forced genital cutting (male/female, less/more extensive) imposed upon minors is abusive and unacceptable.

Our 'boy circumcision is good / girl circumcision is bad' approach in the West is sexist, hypocritical, culturally biased and is not based on the fundamental human rights of individuals to bodily integrity.

An alien visitor may not notice the subtle anatomical differences between still-developing sexual organs of young boys and girls being subjected to forced circumcision. I suspect what they would see, is terrified children in excruciating pain, blood, erogenous tissues as the primary focus of attention and adults exercising power over a weak and vulnerable person, while callously ignoring their desperate cries for mercy. They would hear the very same justifications in terms of culture, tradition, myths of improved hygiene & cleanliness and a desire to impose on others, the aesthetic preferences of those who were themselves cut as children.

The uncomfortable truth is; cultural bias is the biggest difference between male and female genital cutting. Let's aim to end the whole ghastly business!
01:47 AM on 09/25/2012
Let us work to end the practice, but also to end voyeuristic and lascivious sexual fantasies involving terrified children, blood, tissue and pitiable cries for mercy, however titillating these images may be to certain sensibilities. I have African friends, both male and female, who have been circumcised. They do not recount their experiences in the terms you describe. If you need such images to get your kicks, enjoy them in private but do not try to impose them on surrogates to make them more vivid for you. Are there such cases in real life, bereft of any context other than obscene culture of the torture chamber? Perhaps there are. However, I question the authority of such accounts because I invariably hear of them from those whose main qualification seems to be their desire to outdo everyone else in painting horrifying images involving the sexual parts of children. I made a similar complaint against another African friend, who was such an enthusiastic opponent of homosexuality he seemed unable to rid his mind of genitalia and the various ways they may be used. One might say it was a passion of his. Although he professed to be a Christian, it seemed to me there was little room for His image amongst the penises.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Hilary Burrage
04:08 PM on 09/27/2012
Well, there are easily-found real films of real children being subject to excruciating pain and fear, in the way you seem to claim people perceive as titillating. I'd want to think most of us just see these documentary proof of horrifying cruelty (whatever the 'motive') as just that; horrifying cruelty - and cruelty to boot which we will do everything humanly possible to STOP.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
iLdoRight
Encouraging The Rightest Rightness
12:47 AM on 09/04/2012
What religions have allowed this, which ones have not.
08:29 PM on 09/03/2012
It all adds to our wonderful multicultural society..
08:59 PM on 09/02/2012
No, it's a crime against humanity and all good human beings - not just women.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
s3dg
11:32 PM on 09/16/2012
no, why do feminists conflate what's good for them and what's good for the rest of society? female genital mutilation effects women, male genital mutilation effects men.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessjesskk
Benevolent Zombie Power
11:03 AM on 09/02/2012
All parents that subject their children to faith-based or tradition-based mutilations and mistreatments, physical or mental, should be arrested as criminal and jailed.
photo
ljmck
Stand Up, Show Up, Speak Up
12:24 AM on 09/02/2012
It's child abuse. And torture, mutilation, and sexual assault. Both parents (and everyone else involved) ought to be jailed first, then charged, tried, and given substantial sentences. Children should be permanently removed from these homes and parental assets seized to pay for their upbringing.

There is no reason to tolerate this brutal assault of innocent beings who cannot protect themselves. Its being a cultural tradition is no excuse. Stoning would not be tolerated. Polygamy is not tolerated. Neither should this be.
08:31 PM on 09/02/2012
Well said!
10:18 PM on 08/31/2012
Female Genital Mutilation can range from minor clitoris 'nicking" to the horror you describe. Even the AAP recommended the minor form until recently. However, standard male circumcision is still widely practiced and endorsed. All forms of genital mutilation need to be banned.
10:48 PM on 08/28/2012
I feel physically sick after reading this and I had to force myself to finish reading this article as it has disgusted me to the core. I have known about this and cannot imagine how any mother or a father can let this be done to their own flesh and blood.

Circumcision is bad enough, but this is just grotesque. This must stop and it must stop NOW ! Politicians around the world need to pressurise the countries involved and maybe reduce the aid to them as long as this goes on, because it must stop !!!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Hilary Burrage
05:19 PM on 08/28/2012
Horrendous, just so horrendous... and absolutely outrageous that this should still happen, even in the UK.

But it does still happen in Britain, and probably well over 20 thousand children are at risk here every year. That averages out at two children every hour. In Britain.

May I please urge all UK citizens and residents to sign the HM Govt e-petition to 'STOP FGM in the UK': http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/35313.

We must not wait any longer to ensure that this unspeakable practice becomes history.

Thanks, Hilary

PS There is also a Twitter feed which links to this e-petition: @NoFGM1 / #NoFGM
05:52 AM on 08/28/2012
This has nothing to do with religion. As for being a cultural practice it is only that that culture has been decided by men and sadly insecure men at that!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kella
03:00 PM on 08/28/2012
Agree That is the human animal acting. Able as a human to distort,to torture, to be self-serving, self-indulgent, vicious, etc. The notion that we have to respect certain things because they are cultural is so ridiculous.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stephen70
Please dont fan me as my next comment could leave
04:41 PM on 08/28/2012
Nothing to do with religion, name one atheist that carries this atrocity out.
05:01 PM on 08/28/2012
It is not to do with religion in the sense that religions do not demand it and in the sense that men run the "religions" which practice it. So it is about male power over women. FGS stop splitting hairs or do you just like to argue with the finer nuances of speech and conversation?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGillLondonUK
SCOTLAND IS NOT ENGLISH PROPERTY
08:35 PM on 08/27/2012
I am not going to disagree. Female Genital mutilation is a crime against women. However, its strange how male genital mutilation is considered socially acceptable. Should all forms of genital mutilation be considered crimes against humanity?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sven Storm
Edit your micro-biology.
01:26 PM on 09/02/2012
The practice should be discontinued. For males and females.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGillLondonUK
SCOTLAND IS NOT ENGLISH PROPERTY
03:14 PM on 09/02/2012
I agree, this from my point of view, falls into the same pro-choice argument as abortion, in that we ultimately own our own bodies
10:37 PM on 09/04/2012
Can I ask you to take a step back?

What I've written repeatedly on this topic is that FGM is a cultural problem, and cultural problems require cultural solutions. I've looked at countries that have tackled FGM with cultural solutions and found they've been effective in reducing the practice. In my experience, only solutions that correctly identify a problem work. Put another way: if they work, they've probably correctly identified the problem. Coercive measures can work, but that is due to the coercion. However, in those countries that I know of that have used punitive laws, FGM has not been reduced.

This is what I think: -

Those who are concerned about FGM should be grown up about it, accept that in some cultures it is an accepted practice, and should campaign for health and education programmes based on understanding and respect but, specifically, counter the cultural beliefs that foster the practice. The reason they should take this approach is it works. I don't want little girls to be cut so I like this approach.

On the other side, there are those who take an ideological position. They talk about oppression and human rights and, especially, they talk about their outrage. The more girls that are cut the better because then they can demonstrate just how terribly upset and distressed they are about it. You see, what matters is not the distress of the little girls being cut, but their distress. They want to have it properly acknowledged.
07:35 PM on 08/27/2012
FGM is a cultural practice, which, if it is going to be tackled, requires cultural solutions. In the west it is understood, interpreted and judged within a different idealogical and cultural context to the one in which it's practiced. Within the western context, it is judged barbaric. That's one approach to dealing with FGM. However, it is an approach that has the disadvantage that it requires the imposition of one set of cultural values over another. It's basically saying, "I don't give a damn about whatever it is that demands, justifies and sustains the practice within your tradition. I deem it barbaric and require you to understand it in the same terms. If you don't, that is because you don't understand your own culture and recognise its barbarism. Therefore, I'm going to explain it to you. However, because that would take time and trouble and I don't trust you to come the right understanding through persuasion, I'm going encourage you to see things in their proper terms by outlawing and punishing the practice as well." This approach has a very long and distinguished tradition. It's called, "Civilising the Natives". You see, no matter what they may think about themselves, they are too ignorant to come to the right conclusions. It is also well established that a certain amount of coercion and force is required in this civilising process. They are only natives, after all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stephen70
Please dont fan me as my next comment could leave
08:47 PM on 08/27/2012
Im not entirely sure of your point, either a society denies 50% of its individuals rights or it doesn't. If it doesn't then that society is not as good as one that legislates to try and achieve equality.
Mutilating children of any sex is wrong and where it is found it should be punished and not given understanding of legal privileged of any sort. Either children are our responsibility or our property, which is it to be ?
06:55 AM on 08/28/2012
Let me answer your question by asking one. Do you think our society is organised around treating children responsibly? A few months ago I visited Crete where I met a young woman who was a primary school teacher. She'd just returned home after working in the UK for a couple of years. She said we surely hate children in Britain because our families, society and culture are so uncongenial to them. She said a large proportion of the children she taught in the UK displayed mental health problems of varying degrees of severity. She said our children are unhappy, but it's a sacrifice we've been prepared to make on their behalf because we have other concerns and priorities. She said our sentimentality about children is a lie. In reality, we give little consideration to their needs. Instead, they must accommodate themselves to ours.

The societies you speak about don't consider themselves to be denying 50% of their individuals rights. They might look at our society and conclude that for all our rights and equality, we are a pretty unhealthy and dysfunctional lot. They might wonder what benefits are conferred by the rights we value so highly.

I don't approve of FGM and think it should be outlawed in this country, but it should be tackled amongst immigrants primarily through education. It should not be outlawed where it's practiced due to western pressure, as is the current situation. Instead, it should be treated as a health education issue.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stephen70
Please dont fan me as my next comment could leave
04:52 PM on 08/28/2012
I read Ayan Hirsi Ali,s Infidel, one of the most inspirational women of our age. She has lived under the practices of sharia, suffered FGM and her life is under constant threat for speaking out.
If you only read one book this year I suggest it is this one. My sentiments come from reading her work and not from a western perspective.
07:40 PM on 08/28/2012
However, she's made her life in the west. It's worth reading the review of 'Infidel' in the Economist which casts doubts on the reliability of some aspects of her account. It can be found here: -

http://www.economist.com/node/8663231?story_id=8663231

If you really are interested in FGM, there is an interesting paper on the practice in Kenya here:

http://www.carraguard.com/pdfs/frontiers/FR_FinalReports/Kenya_FGC.pdf

Contrast the approach being taken in Kenya, where it is not illegal, to Egypt, where it is illegal. I know it may seem anathema to suggest it may be relevant or helpful, but the Kenyan report also details the beliefs and attitudes of those who practice FGM.
07:13 PM on 08/27/2012
I remember reading a story about this at a young age, never forgotten it. How this practise can still be widespread in the UK? Ghastly!
photo
novelist2000
veritas non olet
05:37 AM on 08/28/2012
Indeed. I hear that here in Australia it also occurs, sometimes by travelling back to their countries of origin to have it there.

One way of making inroads is probably to punish the mothers, maybe with lifelong prison sentences. That'll be expensive initially, but may be a deterrent. Every time a girl or young woman presents at a clinic and the doctor notices it, he/she must be obliged to report it so the mother can be punished.

You could also have medical examinations when awarding people a visa and make them sign they will not engage in this practice. Should they be found to have breached this agreement, that is grounds to cancel the residential visa or even newly aquired citizenship. Trying to convince them is all very sweet, but the general consensus seems to be they leave their countries for a better one but then not acknowledge the parameters why that country is better.
09:24 PM on 09/02/2012
Why only punish the mothers? If they allow their children to be mutilated in this way the odds are that they have had the same abuse for all their lives and have in effect been brainwashed or beatten into allowing this horror.

By all means send the WHOLE FAMILY back to where-ever they came from or throw the whole extended family in jail to rot, but the men in the family are just as guilty if not more so!

I'll bet they would never accept the idea of having their son's "family jewels" mutilated to make things more comfortable for their future (mutilated) wives! Put THAT idea in their heads and watch those fathers squirm!
06:00 PM on 08/27/2012
"Despite this [being illegal] it is still widespread [In the UK].

Make it clear anyone who does this disgusting procedure in the UK will be treated with the full majesty of the law. Every effort should be made to stop it. Seems the police spend far too much time on the 'easy nicks' when there is seriously nasty stuff like gross physical and mental abuse of children for religious and cultural reasons going on behind closed doors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paul679
12:42 PM on 08/27/2012
There may be an excuse for ignorant, uneducated or bullied Africans and Muslims in their own countries, but there's none here.

Any parents in the U.K. who have FGM practised on their children need to be prosecuted. The PC brigade - re: ethnic communities - should be ignored for the naive fools they are.
02:16 PM on 08/27/2012
True, I don't think the PC brigade have helped with their answer to everything being:"well, it's their religion". They seem to think that in order to be moral they shouldn't interfere, but what we are talking about here is something very dangerous from a medical perspective, and clearly not aimed at integrating the young women they do this to, into this country. It's difficult to stop this practice in countries where it is a cultural norm, but clearly we should not be allowing it to happen here. I can't see how it is anything but permanent disfigurement, and should carry a hefty sentence - denying a woman here right to sexual pleasure that cannot be reversed. What it does need is courage to face the problem and not shy away for fear of being racist or disrespectful to other cultures.
08:03 PM on 08/29/2012
Just who are you suggesting the PC brigade are? Let me tell you that I know a thing or 2 about safeguarding children and no safeguarding agency concerned with the protection of children would turn a blind eye to such horrific abuse.