Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Yvonne Taylor

GET UPDATES FROM Yvonne Taylor
 

Ethically Opposed to Veal? Then Dump Dairy

Posted: 24/02/2012 23:00

When I saw Rachel Wilson-Couch's piece about vegetarians who eat veal, I naturally assumed she was being alliteratively tongue-in-cheek. No one with a conscience would eat the bodies of calves who spend their short lives in misery. In fact, veal is often what prompts people to switch to a vegetarian diet. But Wilson-Couch is right to call the dairy industry - the reason why veal exists - into question.

Cows are individuals with distinct personalities. Some are bold and adventurous; others are shy and timid. Some are friendly and considerate; others are bossy and obstinate. Animal behaviourists have found that cows interact in socially complex ways, developing friendships over time and sometimes holding grudges against other cows who treat them badly. Cows have been known to go to extraordinary lengths to escape from abattoirs.

Cows are also protective and nurturing mothers. Yet in the dairy industry, whether she gives birth to a male or a female, the time a mother cow will get to bond with and care for her baby is measured in hours. Female calves, like their mothers, face a lifetime of forced pregnancies and babies lost to the milk industry, and males - referred to as 'by-products' - are either shot at birth or destined to become veal.

Make no mistake: both mother cows and their calves are emotionally traumatised as would be any parent and child when forcibly separated from one another. The mother cows bellow in desperation, and the calves wail inconsolably. They cry out for each other for days. Wide-eyed and terrified, the babies are desperate to suckle and will attempt to suckle people's fingers for comfort. What they get instead is a bottle of milk replacer.

Our most basic need as parents is to love, shelter, feed, nurture and protect our children from harm. And yet we ignore the very same innate need in animals. We are the only species to drink another species' milk and the only species to continue to consume milk beyond infancy. Human children have no nutritional requirement for cow's milk and grow up healthy and strong without it. Research suggests that cow's milk is linked to numerous common health problems (runny noses, allergies, ear infections, recurrent bronchitis, asthma, etc.) that often keep kids out of school and parents home from work.

There are really unpleasant and unhealthy substances in milk, including growth hormones, saturated fat and cholesterol. It's also acceptable under UK standards for milk to include pus. A safer and more natural choice for adults and children is to consume soya milk, almond milk or another plant-based alternative to cow's milk. Parents who want to keep their children healthy should look behind the dairy industry's well-financed marketing promotions.

World-renowned paediatrician Dr Benjamin Spock urged mothers to breastfeed. Dr Frank Oski, the former director of paediatrics at Johns Hopkins University in the US, said, "There's no reason to drink cow's milk at any time in your life. It was designed for calves, it was not designed for humans, and we should all stop drinking it today, this afternoon."

Milk and veal go hand in hand - one does not exist without the other. If the thought of animal suffering bothers you, remember: you don't have to support an industry that tears calves away from their mothers for milk or for veal.

Order your free vegan starter kit by visiting PETA.org.uk.

 
When I saw Rachel Wilson-Couch's piece about vegetarians who eat veal, I naturally assumed she was being alliteratively tongue-in-cheek. No one with a conscience would eat the bodies of calves who spe...
When I saw Rachel Wilson-Couch's piece about vegetarians who eat veal, I naturally assumed she was being alliteratively tongue-in-cheek. No one with a conscience would eat the bodies of calves who spe...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 89
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
19:07 on 07/03/2012
Thank you for this article. Please write more like it until people get the point...humanity needs it.
13:14 on 27/02/2012
Vegans live in a fantasy world in which...

...life can perpetuate without death...

...cute animals count more than ugly animals (specifically baby animals and mammals which resemble humans with two eyes, a nose, and a mouth)...

...big animals are more important than small animals (small conscious beings such as insects don't matter, big conscious beings like cows and whales do)...

... and growing vegetables is possible without animal husbandry...

It's like reading a pop-up book for a toddler.
03:22 on 27/02/2012
There's something I love about articles like this that's hard to figure out. It could be the preachy nature, the out of context "facts" like "...It's also acceptable under UK standards for milk to include pus..." (All your wonderfully vegan and vegetarian products are allowed x amount for faecal matter on them too, since you mention it) but I think the thing that takes the biscuit is the comments.

According to a few of the comments, especially replies to the few brave people that have mentioned their own choice of sticking to an omnivorous diet, I am, and I quote, uncaring, unfeeling, cruel, monstrous, etc and why? Because I choose to eat the same way my ancestors have done for hundreds of years. Why should my choice be any less respected than yours?

And before the cries of "But you're killing sentient animals!" starts, do you know that for every 100kg of usable protein, at least 25 times more sentient lives are ended in arable farming than compared with livestock farming but I guess since mice, spiders and snakes aren't as cute, they don't deserve as much of a backing as the poor ickle cows.

Standing up for what you believe in is wonderful, treating everyone that doesn't agree with your ideals, not so much. There are two books everyone should read before throwing stones at a certain group's dogma and they are:
03:24 on 27/02/2012
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Meat-benign-extravagance-Simon-Fairlie/dp/1856230554
and
http://lierrekeith.com/vegmyth.htm

Both look at the vegi/vegan vs omnivore debate with no bias or preconceived ideas and both eyes open to the environmental, ethical and health issues involved.
03:43 on 29/02/2012
I would give you respect as a person even if you are an omnivore but I do give credence to the person who is making an effort to reduce suffering.

Your argument about the grains is specious as best. Yes, some animals die their but with my cup of rice...an animal may have been hurt where it is for certain with your meat or milk an animal surely suffered.

Also, unless you don't eat any grains that argument falls flat.

The vegan diet does minimize suffering. Get over it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onlyThis
How do you free a bird from an empty cage?
22:17 on 26/02/2012
Almond milk is pretty good once you get used to it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sabelmouse
i love to tumble , ask me why .
14:25 on 27/02/2012
no almonds where i live. none at all. some hazels, but that's it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onlyThis
How do you free a bird from an empty cage?
17:43 on 27/02/2012
I don't know if you are kidding but they sell almond milk in stores, usually next to the soymilk.
14:58 on 26/02/2012
You say some nice things about cows, which I'm sure are true. How do you deal with the fact that they wouldn't exist if not for the fact that humans raise them for food. Would you argue that, because most animals are ultimately eaten by humans or other animals, it would be better if they didn't exist at all?
original joanie
liberal teacher
21:38 on 26/02/2012
Ignorance is bliss, Happy Brit.
03:45 on 29/02/2012
I guess that means should still be OK IF the only reason the slaves were allowed to breed was to become slaves. I mean they should be happy to be slaves for they wouldn't even be alive if it were not for slavery.

Is that what you are saying? Animals should be glad and happy to be in factory farms, endure the fear, terror of slaughterhouses because without someone like you eating them, they wouldn't be born anyways?
07:03 on 29/02/2012
Not really, the alternative for human slaves is freedom. The only alternative for dairy cows is not to exist at all.
photo
FaunaAndFlora
Daughter of Pan
06:43 on 26/02/2012
There is no such thing as a bold or adventurous cow or doe or ewe. After all, these species evolved as prey animals. That's why it's their nature to be cautious. And while these are social animals, to say they develop friendships in the sense that humans do is stretching things a bit.

As for cow and calf or doe and kid being traumatized when the calf or kid is removed, once again, this is stretching things a bit. I've been raising dairy goats for 29 years and my sister spent a few years raising dairy cows. A doe and kid, cow and calf or ewe and lamb learn how to recognize each other by the sounds of their moos and baas. Remove the kid or calf before the dam learns to recognize its voice and the doe or cow will not call for her offspring nor will she exhibit any signs of stress. And even if the kid or calf is left with it's dam for a few days, the doe or cow does not "bellow in desperation" when her offspring is removed. Once again, as prey animals these species evolved to only spend a brief amount of time calling for their offspring before they move on.

And by the way, I've never known a dairy farmer who shot their bull calves at birth. You do your cause no favors by spreading such nonsense.
03:46 on 29/02/2012
It's been documented on video, investigations, etc. Baby cows are often considered worthless on a dairy farm and shot or killed in some way, or given to veal.

MFA did such a video. A huge dumpster was filled with shot calves. It's the truth. Deal with it.
photo
FaunaAndFlora
Daughter of Pan
03:09 on 01/03/2012
Because someone made a Youtube video that makes it true? LOL! And MFA is such a credible source. They'd never manipulate their videos to create a false impression. Yeah, right.

Newborn calves that are too weak to survive on their own may be euthanized. Healthy calves are worth more if they're raised for veal or sold for "backyard" beef production.
06:19 on 26/02/2012
Going vegan can save the world and stops a lot of animal cruelty.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sabelmouse
i love to tumble , ask me why .
13:28 on 26/02/2012
Nice article. Thx
It is in the same line how 'some' people react if I say I' m vegan, the reaction is "but you wear leather shoes' or if I say boycott big oil, the reaction is 'but you still drive a car' or if I say stop climate change, the reaction is 'you went skiing with plenty of snow.
I really don't mind, because with time depletion of all resources will show the right solution.
While typing this short comment tens of thousands factory farm animals are killed and probably many mice.
23:19 on 25/02/2012
i know the cruelty of veal calves is terrible. they are only babies when they die true, . i love all animals. and yet i eat meat and enjoy it, why ? heres why.. when i go to a farm or a petting zoo i enjoy seeing the animals, chickens especially ( roosters are so pretty ) but if i were to walk into a supermarket and pickup a package of groundbeef saying '' i will not eat this poor cow '' the ground beef would not magicly turn back into a cow, that's proposterous . i might as well get my protein and sadly, enjoy it. IF however i did live on a farm the animals would be my pets and i would do my best to try and convince everyone on the property to spare their lives. the age old way or idea of a farmer approaching a pig with a feed bucket in one hand and an ax in another is a true shame. someone can enjoy porkchops and ribs to an insane degree till they get a pet potbelly pig.. ( i would like one someday .!! )
03:48 on 29/02/2012
But when you buy it you are giving them more money to do it again. You are PART of it. YOu are supporting it. YOu are continuing it.
21:53 on 25/02/2012
I am concerned about animal welfare and try to buy only grass fed beef and free range chickens & their eggs from my local farmers market. Cheeses from small family producers are not only better they are more likely produced with some level of animal welfare in mind. I don't think eating meat is wrong but I certainly respect vegetarians/vegans more than people who have no concern over how farm animals are treated. Read "The River Cottage Meat Book" if you are interested in eating meat, quality, and animal welfare. It is one of the best treatments of the subject I have come across.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
00:39 on 26/02/2012
all of the animal flesh and animal products you buy are the result of cruelty and exploitation.all of those animals go to a slaughterhouse.stop living in a fantasy.
01:21 on 26/02/2012
I have visited the farms where some of the meat & cheese I buy comes from. Me and my sister take my nephew to them on weekends. I saw no cruelty at these facilities. When at the farmers markets you can talk directly to the farmers or staff who work on these farms and ask them about how they raise the animals. The vast majority of meat consumed in the U.S. is to varying degrees treated cruelly as you say. There are however a growing number of producers who are concerned about the conditions their animals experience. Anyway I am not "Living in a fantasy". I have seen the conditions these family farmers raise their animals in and I am cool with it.
original joanie
liberal teacher
21:17 on 26/02/2012
Devout is right. Humane treatment on small and local farms is the best. Jude, you are also right: slaughter houses make all the good good go away.

I recently (several weeks ago) sent off a letter to Nimann(SP?) farms which advertises quality and humane care for their animals. I asked them what happens after the animals leave their "humane" farms. No answer yet. But it is an important piece to the puzzle. I've read many accounts of people who went to work for slaughter houses for relatively short times and never ate meat again. There must be a lesson in that.
photo
Talab
I tot i taw a putty tat
21:44 on 25/02/2012
Some of the worst practices come from factory farm situations .... the bigger the farm ... the poorer the practices regarding animals and plants ( with some exceptions ) .... the world needs to get back to small farms that operate on an ethical basis . In too many large businesses the "ethics" come from an accountant mentality looking to squeeze an extra dime out of everything
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
00:40 on 26/02/2012
it is ALL cruel,big farm or small farm.
original joanie
liberal teacher
21:13 on 26/02/2012
Yes, I agree. The closer the animal to the farmer and the consumer, the more care about the quality of life of that animal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Platt
19:41 on 25/02/2012
It's an interesting one, this. Obviously PETA would like us all to become vegetarian, but for the rest of us the question is this: at what point does it become acceptable for an animal to be eaten? Why is it "better" to consume an animal after it's existed for longer? So it can experience some of the controlled environment it's born into for slightly longer? So it can have experiences before we eat it?

Surely either all meat is OK to eat, or none of it is. Either it's morally wrong to kill animals, or they exist as sources of food and should be treated as such. I don't understand the shades of grey that people seem to have with veal.
01:30 on 26/02/2012
I recently read an article that said PETA killed 95% of the animals in their care?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Platt
01:35 on 26/02/2012
What does that have to do with anything?
original joanie
liberal teacher
21:04 on 26/02/2012
"I recently read..." How about some details? I recently read a blog post that said PETA killed 95%...

That doesn't make it true.
original joanie
liberal teacher
21:11 on 26/02/2012
I think there is a food chain that points to the fact we've always eaten meat and even each other occasionally. I guess that fits your post as well. But, must a civilized and educated society who now understands that we all (animals included) feel pain and have emotional attachments continue to slaughter in a primitive way? And can a civilized and educated people make informed choices about what they eat considering the nature of all animals and the conditions in which they live prior to slaughter? I guess I would suggest that your comment is sort of barbaric and suggests that we've learned nothing about the nature of things. We've taken steps to try to make peoples' lives better . . . why not animals?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Platt
00:21 on 27/02/2012
Well for starters we don't breed and raise humans specifically for the food or materials they produce.

It's just... I can respect people thinking keeping domestic animals for food and materials is cruel and immoral. I can also respect people who consider animals as a resource to be exploited. But to take an animal from its natural habitat, breed it beyond all recognition for thousands of years, place it in an unnatural environment and exploit it for what it can give you, and THEN say you care about its feelings and emotions? That loses me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
18:03 on 25/02/2012
A bit off topic, but menopausal women continue to dose themselves with Premarin, an estrogen replacement therapy made from the urine of pregnant mares (horses). In grotesque animal cruelty and complete disregard for nature, the mare is kept perpetually pregnant, confined, her urine extracted. What happens to the foals (baby horses)? Killed.
original joanie
liberal teacher
19:20 on 25/02/2012
We treat all animals cruelly. Estrogen replacement. I've been through menopause without it. We don't even treat other humans humanely so I guess "dumb animals" can expect it. BTW, pigs are also extreme victims of intense cruelty in mass food factories. Once big money is in the game, all shame goes out the window. That's what greed does.
photo
FaunaAndFlora
Daughter of Pan
06:05 on 26/02/2012
For what it's worth, feral (aka wild) mares are "kept perpetually pregnant". They come into heat six to eight weeks after foaling and will be bred by the stallion that runs with their herd. That is nature's way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
19:49 on 26/02/2012
Artificial insemination while captive in a stall for life cannot be considered nature's way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onlyThis
How do you free a bird from an empty cage?
22:22 on 26/02/2012
Toggenburg!!! We raised Togs when I was a kid. Great animals, funny as all get out
15:26 on 25/02/2012
Cow's milk is for baby cows, not baby humans.
01:32 on 26/02/2012
This is the most foolish statement I have ever read.
original joanie
liberal teacher
21:00 on 26/02/2012
No, yours is. We know what she meant. Your comment is a waste of time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blair C Johnson
This 2 politicalparty game of tag needs to end!
03:03 on 26/02/2012
CALF, not a baby COW. Calf, then depending on sex, Heifer, Steer, Cow, Bull. The difference between a Heifer and a Cow being that a Heifer has yet to have a Calf & a Steer not having the testis to be a Bull.
00:29 on 27/02/2012
I think you got my point but thanks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sabelmouse
i love to tumble , ask me why .
13:52 on 25/02/2012
the mothers do not call for their calves for days. 24 hours tops, if that much. i know. i have cow pasture behind my house and have to listen to this several times a year.
other than that; it's the quality of life ie lack of torture that interests me, not the longevity. pry animals don't live that long out in the wild btw. especially the youngens.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sabelmouse
i love to tumble , ask me why .
15:46 on 25/02/2012
*prey animals. must press keys harder !
concodtob
16 stone athlete and intellectual
13:39 on 25/02/2012
I eat meat because i love it,however i refuse to eat the meat of young animals which is morally wrong in my opinion.Welfare of animals needs to be much more stringent and organic and free-range meat and dairy produce has to be made more affordable.If the meat grown in labratories is designated as safe to eat,then i'll happily switch from regular meat.Meat in our diet is essential or at the very least fish.
original joanie
liberal teacher
19:15 on 25/02/2012
Fish feel pain and yet I love salmon. I think that's an intelligent comment. Some would argue that meat isn't really essential . . . but I tend to think otherwise myself. But I eat little of it and do not advocate the cruelty currently used in the process.
photo
FaunaAndFlora
Daughter of Pan
06:49 on 26/02/2012
Most meat comes from young animals. Hogs are usually butchered at around four to six months. Same with goats and lambs. For chickens and other birds, the butchering age is between six and twelve weeks.