When I saw Rachel Wilson-Couch's piece about vegetarians who eat veal, I naturally assumed she was being alliteratively tongue-in-cheek. No one with a conscience would eat the bodies of calves who spend their short lives in misery. In fact, veal is often what prompts people to switch to a vegetarian diet. But Wilson-Couch is right to call the dairy industry - the reason why veal exists - into question.
Cows are individuals with distinct personalities. Some are bold and adventurous; others are shy and timid. Some are friendly and considerate; others are bossy and obstinate. Animal behaviourists have found that cows interact in socially complex ways, developing friendships over time and sometimes holding grudges against other cows who treat them badly. Cows have been known to go to extraordinary lengths to escape from abattoirs.
Cows are also protective and nurturing mothers. Yet in the dairy industry, whether she gives birth to a male or a female, the time a mother cow will get to bond with and care for her baby is measured in hours. Female calves, like their mothers, face a lifetime of forced pregnancies and babies lost to the milk industry, and males - referred to as 'by-products' - are either shot at birth or destined to become veal.
Make no mistake: both mother cows and their calves are emotionally traumatised as would be any parent and child when forcibly separated from one another. The mother cows bellow in desperation, and the calves wail inconsolably. They cry out for each other for days. Wide-eyed and terrified, the babies are desperate to suckle and will attempt to suckle people's fingers for comfort. What they get instead is a bottle of milk replacer.
Our most basic need as parents is to love, shelter, feed, nurture and protect our children from harm. And yet we ignore the very same innate need in animals. We are the only species to drink another species' milk and the only species to continue to consume milk beyond infancy. Human children have no nutritional requirement for cow's milk and grow up healthy and strong without it. Research suggests that cow's milk is linked to numerous common health problems (runny noses, allergies, ear infections, recurrent bronchitis, asthma, etc.) that often keep kids out of school and parents home from work.
There are really unpleasant and unhealthy substances in milk, including growth hormones, saturated fat and cholesterol. It's also acceptable under UK standards for milk to include pus. A safer and more natural choice for adults and children is to consume soya milk, almond milk or another plant-based alternative to cow's milk. Parents who want to keep their children healthy should look behind the dairy industry's well-financed marketing promotions.
World-renowned paediatrician Dr Benjamin Spock urged mothers to breastfeed. Dr Frank Oski, the former director of paediatrics at Johns Hopkins University in the US, said, "There's no reason to drink cow's milk at any time in your life. It was designed for calves, it was not designed for humans, and we should all stop drinking it today, this afternoon."
Milk and veal go hand in hand - one does not exist without the other. If the thought of animal suffering bothers you, remember: you don't have to support an industry that tears calves away from their mothers for milk or for veal.
Order your free vegan starter kit by visiting PETA.org.uk.
Rachel Wilson-Couch: Why Vegetarians Would Buy Veal
...life can perpetuate without death...
...cute animals count more than ugly animals (specifically baby animals and mammals which resemble humans with two eyes, a nose, and a mouth)...
...big animals are more important than small animals (small conscious beings such as insects don't matter, big conscious beings like cows and whales do)...
... and growing vegetables is possible without animal husbandry...
It's like reading a pop-up book for a toddler.
According to a few of the comments, especially replies to the few brave people that have mentioned their own choice of sticking to an omnivorous diet, I am, and I quote, uncaring, unfeeling, cruel, monstrous, etc and why? Because I choose to eat the same way my ancestors have done for hundreds of years. Why should my choice be any less respected than yours?
And before the cries of "But you're killing sentient animals!" starts, do you know that for every 100kg of usable protein, at least 25 times more sentient lives are ended in arable farming than compared with livestock farming but I guess since mice, spiders and snakes aren't as cute, they don't deserve as much of a backing as the poor ickle cows.
Standing up for what you believe in is wonderful, treating everyone that doesn't agree with your ideals, not so much. There are two books everyone should read before throwing stones at a certain group's dogma and they are:
and
http://lierrekeith.com/vegmyth.htm
Both look at the vegi/vegan vs omnivore debate with no bias or preconceived ideas and both eyes open to the environmental, ethical and health issues involved.
Your argument about the grains is specious as best. Yes, some animals die their but with my cup of rice...an animal may have been hurt where it is for certain with your meat or milk an animal surely suffered.
Also, unless you don't eat any grains that argument falls flat.
The vegan diet does minimize suffering. Get over it.
Is that what you are saying? Animals should be glad and happy to be in factory farms, endure the fear, terror of slaughterhouses because without someone like you eating them, they wouldn't be born anyways?
As for cow and calf or doe and kid being traumatized when the calf or kid is removed, once again, this is stretching things a bit. I've been raising dairy goats for 29 years and my sister spent a few years raising dairy cows. A doe and kid, cow and calf or ewe and lamb learn how to recognize each other by the sounds of their moos and baas. Remove the kid or calf before the dam learns to recognize its voice and the doe or cow will not call for her offspring nor will she exhibit any signs of stress. And even if the kid or calf is left with it's dam for a few days, the doe or cow does not "bellow in desperation" when her offspring is removed. Once again, as prey animals these species evolved to only spend a brief amount of time calling for their offspring before they move on.
And by the way, I've never known a dairy farmer who shot their bull calves at birth. You do your cause no favors by spreading such nonsense.
MFA did such a video. A huge dumpster was filled with shot calves. It's the truth. Deal with it.
Newborn calves that are too weak to survive on their own may be euthanized. Healthy calves are worth more if they're raised for veal or sold for "backyard" beef production.
http://theconversation.edu.au/ordering-the-vegetarian-meal-theres-more-animal-blood-on-your-hands-4659
It is in the same line how 'some' people react if I say I' m vegan, the reaction is "but you wear leather shoes' or if I say boycott big oil, the reaction is 'but you still drive a car' or if I say stop climate change, the reaction is 'you went skiing with plenty of snow.
I really don't mind, because with time depletion of all resources will show the right solution.
While typing this short comment tens of thousands factory farm animals are killed and probably many mice.
I recently (several weeks ago) sent off a letter to Nimann(SP?) farms which advertises quality and humane care for their animals. I asked them what happens after the animals leave their "humane" farms. No answer yet. But it is an important piece to the puzzle. I've read many accounts of people who went to work for slaughter houses for relatively short times and never ate meat again. There must be a lesson in that.
Surely either all meat is OK to eat, or none of it is. Either it's morally wrong to kill animals, or they exist as sources of food and should be treated as such. I don't understand the shades of grey that people seem to have with veal.
That doesn't make it true.
It's just... I can respect people thinking keeping domestic animals for food and materials is cruel and immoral. I can also respect people who consider animals as a resource to be exploited. But to take an animal from its natural habitat, breed it beyond all recognition for thousands of years, place it in an unnatural environment and exploit it for what it can give you, and THEN say you care about its feelings and emotions? That loses me.
other than that; it's the quality of life ie lack of torture that interests me, not the longevity. pry animals don't live that long out in the wild btw. especially the youngens.