Brown 'Shocked' By Hacking Claims, News International Ask For More Evidence

Gordon Brown Blagging

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 11/07/11 19:11 BST Updated: 10/09/11 11:12 BST

Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown has said that he is 'shocked' by claims that his phone was hacked and his personal information obtained illegally by investigators working for several News International newspapers.

A spokesperson for Brown said: "Gordon Brown has now been informed of the scale of intrusion into his family's life. The family has been shocked by the level of criminality and the unethical means by which personal details have been obtained. The matter is in police hands."

Gordon Brown's wife Sarah took to Twitter to respond to the claims, which she said were "hurtful" if true.

News International have responded to the claims, made in The Guardian and other newspapers, that Brown had his phone hacked and details stolen by investigators working for News International newspapers.

Documents and an audio recording of a private investigator suggested that so-called "blagging" techniques were used to gain access to Brown's personal information, including his son's private medical records.

Rupert Murdoch's embattled company has asked that all information relating to the allegations be passed to them so that they can further investigate the claims.

News International said: "We note the allegations made today concerning the reporting of matters relating to Gordon Brown. So that we can investigate these matters further, we ask that all information concerning these allegations is provided to us."

According to The Guardian, journalists at News International targeted the former prime minister by attempting to hack his phone, gain access to his family's medical and legal information and obtain his bank account details.

The Guardian also alleged that there is evidence money was paid to a police officer to trawl for information on Brown through police databases.

Audio of one investigator working for the Sunday Times newspaper has been released in which a man attempts to gain details of the then-chancellor's property transactions.

In another report it is claimed that Brown's tax paperwork was taken from his accountant and passed to a newspaper. Yet another article claims that reporters used illicit practices to obtain proof that his son was suffering from Cystic Fibrosis, a story that was broken by The Sun in 2006.

Other Labour politicians thought to have been targeted by News International investigators include former prime minister Tony Blair, his media chief Alastair Campbell, deputy prime minister John Prescott and Peter Mandelson.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown has said that he is 'shocked' by claims that his phone was hacked and his personal information obtained illegally by investigators working for several News Internati...
Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown has said that he is 'shocked' by claims that his phone was hacked and his personal information obtained illegally by investigators working for several News Internati...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 65
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
10:12 AM on 07/12/2011
Why did the Sun feel the need to print this story without permission?

Cystic Fibrosis can be a devastating condition, especially in a very young child where the parents often do not know how long their child will live.

The Sun COULD have gone to the Brown Family and said "We have heard your son has CF and we would love to do a story about this to highlight the condition - are you up for it?" And Brown would have the right to say no.

But no, they just go for the story anyway and if it upset GB and his family, well "what do we care?"

There are two issues here. One is how information is gathered, but the other is what information is printed. And the latter can be wrong even if the first is conducted completely legally.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Josh Steinhauer
Ex-Patriot, Europe
10:10 AM on 07/12/2011
This whole thing is no different than WikiLeaks. People say there was nothing wrong with Wiki posting classified Government and State Department reports so why is posting the personal information on the Royal Family and the British Government wrong? Why would it be wrong to post personal information and emails about the US President and the US Congressional members if it was ok to post classified USG and DOS documents?
The simple truth is everyone wants to know way more information that they really need and frankly have no right or need to know it. They simply want it for the sake of having it. But in the end this information provides vital information to people who may want to cause someone harm.

So before you flame away on my post, ask yourself this. How would you feel is someone was tracking electronically all of your personal information…or watching your family members as they go to work, school and to the store? It’s about privacy and the government and individual people should be afforded that privacy even if it means the public does not know everything.
07:31 AM on 07/12/2011
Didn't Mr Brown pledge in the house a couple weeks ago that the law re. printed info be more lenient so that "traditional" media could fight online head-on?
07:48 AM on 07/12/2011
Or that might have been David Cameron ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MSMSucksCom
Sadly, my bio fits in this space.
07:07 AM on 07/12/2011
So police officers assigned to protect the Royal Family sold information, including cell phone numbers and e-mail addresses.

This is the kind of information that terrorists could have used.

Anyone involved in this committed acts of treason, at the minimum. These people, regardless of position or wealth, need to be prosecuted and sent to prison for a long, long time.

If law enforcement sold this kind of information to Murdoch, this begs the question who else did they sell the information to. I would consider the security of the Royal Family and govt. officials compromised and beef up security until the extent of the Murdochs' and law enforcement's treasonous acts are known.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MSMSucksCom
Sadly, my bio fits in this space.
06:59 AM on 07/12/2011
I don't get it, why is News International asking for evidence so IT can investigate the allegations.

Uh huh, sounds to me like News International is simply wanting to find out who knows how much, so it can prepare a defense on those claims where there is evidence and deny accusations where they find the accuser does not have evidence to support the claims.

By asking for information it is also pretending that this is all news to them.

The Murdochs and cohorts don't need anyone to supply them with information. Since they are the ones who committed the crimes they know full well what they did and to whom.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madisonlike60
opinion will not belie the truth
07:05 AM on 07/12/2011
Historically, we know it doesn't work for criminals to investigate themselves.
I hope the police and Scotland Yard presses hard, and doesn't let up until the truth is revealed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
catz1515
06:52 AM on 07/12/2011
wouldn't be one bit surprised if we discovered that Fox News hacked Obamas phone but didn't find anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madisonlike60
opinion will not belie the truth
06:47 AM on 07/12/2011
Why won't any American media outlets run this story?

http://www.politicususa.com/en/murdoch-america-911-victims-hack
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ponderus
Enriched with lanolin.
05:12 AM on 07/12/2011
Put them out of business.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MancRat
09:22 AM on 07/12/2011
Makes you wonder whether the Proceeds Of Crime Act couldn't be invoked here.
01:37 AM on 07/12/2011
If bugging the Queen and PM had been the work of foreign country - China or Russia say - reaction would be based on an assessment that the perpetrators were a threat to national security without a shadow of a doubt.

On that basis alone Murdoch and co should be doing time.

And that's not counting the charges of corrupting a nation's political system, police force (and possibly even judiciary?) Murdoch's parasitic empire should be evicted ENTIRELY from the UK. Your country is best placed to do it. And with hope the US and Australia can then remove the Murdoch cancer in their own systems. These opportunities present themselves only once in a generation. The Arabs have had their spring - now it's our turn.

And there should be - simply in terms of 'good state housekeeping' - an investigation into what uses other countries, perhaps hostile to UK interests, made use of the information provided by the wide-scale phone-tapping of the entire British political class (including that not published) and were otherwise involved. I could think of no better front for a foreign intelligence agency than working for the Murdoch press as an (ahem) 'reporter'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
willmc4
01:50 AM on 07/12/2011
Exactly true! Pitch them out now without anymore ado.
01:54 AM on 07/12/2011
If bugging the Queen and PM had been the work of foreign country - China or Russia say - reaction would be based on an assessment that the perpetrato­rs were a threat to national security without a shadow of a doubt.

Murdock and his criminal organizations should be treated as *terrorists*, as that is what they are - terrorist swear no loyalty to a state.

Seize their assets and jail all the suspected parties until formal charges are drawn up, that's how we deal with all the *other* terrorists is it not?.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:00 AM on 07/12/2011
Exactly right!! Fanned for that!
01:29 AM on 07/12/2011
Hey Rebekah, if Rupert offers to take you on a yacht trip to the Canary Islands, just say no, baby!
photo
Z-Liberator
Republicans are scared men of narrow vision,
01:47 AM on 07/12/2011
She already to that trip with Rup and his son
01:03 AM on 07/12/2011
The whole Murdock organization seems like it is corrupt.

Was all this condoned and authorized at the highest levels?

What did Murdock know and when did he know it?

Why has this been allowed to go on for so long? Has there been a HUGE cover up?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:04 AM on 07/12/2011
The public wasn't outraged until a Guardian reporter obsessed with the hacking story from 2005, broke the Mille Dowler story. It took a child murder victim and her family before the public became outraged. Before that, they just wanted their titillating gossip and hacking was considered a minor inconvenience for deserving celebs.
photo
UKLib
The so-called 'free' market is nothing but a lie.
11:29 PM on 07/11/2011
Hacking phones, stealing medical information.. blagging.. This all begs the question; what other criminal activities has Murdoch's clan been up to?
12:23 AM on 07/12/2011
this is all bad but putting Brown's son purloined medical information in the newspaper...

how the heck can anybody justify that kind of intrusion.
photo
UKLib
The so-called 'free' market is nothing but a lie.
11:28 PM on 07/11/2011
Finally Murdoch's criminal empire is being ground to the dust! He's history!
11:26 PM on 07/11/2011
This makes Ashtons allegations at the weekend, trying to point the finger at Miliband and his advisor look a bit silly.

It would seem that the whole of Murdoch's news fleet was making attacks on Labour politicians,whom they claimed to be supporting!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:44 PM on 07/11/2011
What is happening now is only the start! The news today is that other NI newspapers have broken the law. What about the Mirror, Mail, Express etc. as well as the celebrity gossip magazines ? I would be not be surprised if they have done their share of hacking! I think the 'popular' press will be very different in a year or so's time!