Universities Still Failing Poor Students, Access Report Shows

University Students Oxford

First Posted: 29/09/11 10:13 Updated: 28/11/11 10:12

PA -- Nearly one in four universities and colleges failed to meet their own targets to recruit more poor students last year, a new report shows.

In total, 44 institutions, including 23 universities, five of which are elite universities, did not meet the goals they set themselves in 2009/10.

The figures are included in the Office for Fair Access's (OFFA) fourth monitoring report, which looks at how much money universities and colleges are spending, and how well they are doing at attracting and supporting candidates from poorer backgrounds.

It shows that overall, English universities and colleges received £1.57 billion in additional fee income in 2009/10. This is additional fee income gained from tuition fees charged above the basic rate of £1,285. The maximum fee in 2009/10 was £3,225.

OFFA's report shows that a quarter of this extra income (25.1%) - £394.7 million - was spent on recruiting and supporting poorer candidates, with £355.7 million going on bursaries and scholarships. In return for charging above the basic fee rate, institutions must submit access agreements to OFFA setting out how they plan to help poorer students.

Liam Burns, president of the National Union of Students, said: "The haphazard formation of student support in universities means that those universities with the best record of recruiting those from non-traditional backgrounds have the least money available to spend per student.

"Universities with poorer access records misleadingly claim success because they have more funds available to a very small pool of students."

The union claimed that its own analysis of official figures shows that around £55 million less will be spent on scholarships and bursaries by 2015/16 compared with 2009/10.

Universities minister David Willetts said that universities could take into account pupils' school backgrounds when offering places if it improved access.

"Universities have always been able to look at potential," he told the BBC. "Provided they are fair and evidence-based and transparent - in other words, it is not some kind of eccentric attempt to fight class war - provided they have got rigorous evidence for the basis of what they are doing, then yes they can do that."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK UNIVERSITIES & EDUCATION

PA -- Nearly one in four universities and colleges failed to meet their own targets to recruit more poor students last year, a new report shows. In total, 44 institutions, including 23 universities...
PA -- Nearly one in four universities and colleges failed to meet their own targets to recruit more poor students last year, a new report shows. In total, 44 institutions, including 23 universities...
Filed by Jacqueline Head  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AKL1985
Fueled by biscuits..
05:34 on 30/09/2011
with pell grants only 5500 per year, no wonder. it's sad that students have to take on $20,000 plus in debt just to get an education. Many of the poor students can't find someone to qualify as co-signers in the loans, so they can't get the money they need to finance. The system is definitely not geared to giving poor students a chance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Haselden
An Enemy of Rupert Murdoch, since 1984.
22:32 on 29/09/2011
Universities are about making money, these days. I was fortunate that when I went, it was free & I got the universal grant. Then it was based on academic ability. For the past few years the university I work at has been more geared towards attracting foreign students , since it makes more money from than from local students with state school background like me. This is wrong in so many ways.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
13:28 on 29/09/2011
The Regulator says they will impose fines on Universities next year if they do not help poorer students, Why not this year?.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Haselden
An Enemy of Rupert Murdoch, since 1984.
22:27 on 29/09/2011
Probably because the new tuition fees are unleashed next year, so numbers from poorer students will be expected to drop radically.