Party Conference Wrap - Flat.. Flat.. Cat

The Huffington Post UK     First Posted: 05/10/11 16:52   Updated: 05/10/11 19:28

I just got off the phone to a Conservative MP who hasn't bothered going to party conference this year. "So you just watched it on the TV instead, then?" I asked.

"I haven't seen a minute of it," they replied. "I've been catching up with constituency stuff. I'm not the only one, quite a few MPs haven't bothered going. I hate conference anyway. It's even more bitchy and nasty than Parliament."

Unfortunately that MP was slightly mistaken. Conservative conference wasn't particularly bitchy or nasty this year, just a process of gradual disintegration. At least it wasn't the flattest of the three.

That award goes to the Liberal Democrats, whose epic five-day conference drove journalists to the point of insanity. Not because of the endless procedural motions and lacklustre speeches by the likes of Cable and Clegg. There just wasn't anyone interesting to talk to. The Lib Dems no longer appear to have any young members, apart from those who work for an MP or who are among the lucky few to still have a council seat.

After six o'clock in the evening the slightly morose membership, most of whom, shall we say, are in the 'afternoon' of their lives, melted away to their hotels and hostels, leaving only MPs, lobbyists (more of those at Lib Dems than in previous years) and think-tank types to drink each other's wine.

We didn't learn much except that Vince Cable is very, very worried about the eurozone and the global economy, so much so that he couldn't find it in himself to include a single decent gag in his keynote speech.

The highlight of Lib Dem conference was arguably Tim Farron's speech, which briefly jump-started conference out of its collective catatonia. He told them the truth - as a party they're on the ropes, working in coalition with the Tories hurts like hell, and someday it'll all end in tears.

What's become clear as conference season's progressed is how far away we seem to be from that "divorce" Farron talks about. There seems to be a settled view in all three parties that this won't be the last round of conferences before the next election. Whereas last year coalition politics looked all shiny and fragile, 15 months in there's a consensus that it can work in the long-term and isn't constantly on the verge of shattering.

This is why Labour can sit back and keep on opposing absolutely everything for a while, despite having a disastrous conference crowned by one of the vaguest and uninspiring set-pieces by any party leader for some years. It wasn't just that journalists found it to be hollow, it was the delayed disappointment felt by the young activists which was telling. For them Ed Miliband's speech turned out to be like going out for a Chinese. They felt satisfied during and immediately after, but then after a couple of hours found themselves strangely unsatisfied and hungry. And then they got drunk.

One of the biggest highlights of the entire conference season was the sight of 200 Labour activists outside the Jury's Inn in Liverpool, political sobriety coming hand-in-hand with alcoholic inebriation. "It was shit, wasn't it?" said one to another at two o'clock in the morning. As the wee small hours dragged on, most of those left standing or staggering formed a similar view.

Meanwhile Ed Balls managed to deliver an impressive speech where he said he was very, very worried about the eurozone and the global economy and managed to attack George Osborne without sounding like a throwback from the 1970s.

For Labour it's now clear there are two types of person. Those who favour the constructive approach and want to pick their battles carefully (Yvette Cooper, Tristram Hunt), and those whose instinctive response to everything is robotically oppose, oppose, oppose (Emily Thornberry, John Healy).

We're told by Ed Miliband's people that there isn't to be any reshuffle in the next couple of days, but if there was one, the question would be how many of the revised shadow cabinet belonged to this latter group, and whether that's a good thing for a party which wants to win back power.

Exactly who they're supposed to be winning power back from is an interesting question for Dr David Starkey, who excited the eurosceptic wing of the Conservative party by declaring that the Tories were "in office, not in power". Whether that's true or not, the Tories did manage to show they weren't entirely in control of their own Cabinet members. May and Clarke between them managed to undermine the solid, if not slavish, support of Tory members by having mini spats involving cats.

The Tories had managed to get most of Fleet Street eating out of their hand by briefing a chosen few editors about the contents of the keynote speeches (including George Osborne confirming that council tax will be frozen, something he'd already pledged two years ago). Unfortunately the ministers themselves did the journalists' jobs for them by questioning one another, producing the only spat among senior politicians in the entire conference season.

Meanwhile George Osborne demonstrated how very, very worried about the economy and the eurozone he was by jetting off to Luxembourg halfway through his own party's conference. Because while everyone in the British politico-media complex has been dining out and getting drunk, more bits of the eurozone have been falling off as inept politicians across the Channel watch on, seemingly paralysed.

Then the wheels really began to fall off at the Tory conference. Spoon-feeding lines to lobby hacks backfired spectacularly on Wednesday morning, leading to the PM's speech being hastily revised, delivered by a man who clearly didn't get much sleep the night before, and leaving the nagging impression that this wasn't the speech that he wanted to deliver.

All in all, given Ed Miliband's poorly-received address to Labour, and the spats about cats and hasty re-writes of the PM's speech among the Tories, we're reluctantly having to hand this year's virtual party conference trophy to the Lib Dems. It might have been tedious, but they managed to go five days without any presentational fiascos.

RATE IT!   |  
VOTE
CURRENT TOP 5 PICK YOUR OWN TOP 5
USERS WHO VOTED
NEW! CREATE YOUR OWN SLIDESHOW
FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

I just got off the phone to a Conservative MP who hasn't bothered going to party conference this year. "So you just watched it on the TV instead, then?" I asked. "I haven't seen a minute of it," t...
I just got off the phone to a Conservative MP who hasn't bothered going to party conference this year. "So you just watched it on the TV instead, then?" I asked. "I haven't seen a minute of it," t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:53 on 06/10/2011
The party conference season is not quite over yet.
From the 20th - 23rd October in Inverness there is another Party Conference. The only majority administration in any of the constituent nations of the UK will be meeting to celebrate, cogitate and lay out its plans for future progress. Will we see any national media coverage of it? Don't hold your breath, we won't even get Scottish national coverage of the SNP conference. The media in our country/countries fail us regularly as they advance their own political ends, with the BBC being the worst offender by a country mile.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
08:44 on 06/10/2011
So what different this year to any other conference sessions, NOTHING, same old propaganda and we know what's best for YOU, I can tell all Polititions you don't know, otherwise we would not be in the dreadful mess we are in now.
20:47 on 05/10/2011
Why do they call these events "Conferences"? I think "Rallies" would be a better description.
18:46 on 05/10/2011
It's flat because no one has any ideas or even the balls to do something radical.
17:18 on 05/10/2011
Want to know why the Tory conference was such a washout?

Quite simply they have no power. The whole thing was 'we can't do anything because of European regulation and we're not going to do anything about that'.

The most powerful politician in Britain today is Angela Merkel. The fate of the Eurozone rests with her and our fate is dependent on the Eurozone (regardless of wether we are in the EU or not).

This pathetic line we take on Europe has marginalised us and made our own chancellor and PM an irrelevance. If we want any power over our own destiny we are going to have to reengage with Europe and show some leadership.
16:16 on 05/10/2011
Even though i'm not a tory, David Cameron easily made the best speech. His speech had everything. He reminded me a lot like Tony Blair at his best. Nick Clegg was a comfortable second, doing enough to keep his followers believing that he is their best, and only choice as leader. Ed Milliband was just too weak in too many areas i'm afraid. I think many top labour mp's know that they chose the wrong brother to be leader. John Prescott hit the nail on the head, when he said, There are too many top labour mp's not doing enough to justify their jobs! Labour in my opinion, need to start getting tougher with their policies, in order to challenge the coalition.
17:59 on 05/10/2011
Granted if I wanted to sell a dodgy motor I would get Dave to do it, but people are still debating the meat in Milliband's speech whilst Dave's was all fluff.
20:27 on 05/10/2011
Please get a different speech filter as you clearly do not know what makes a good speech. Maybe you are saying Ed Miliband speech was weak because the media pounced on him for the radical ideas in the speech.

Ed Miliband's approach was far more radical than anything mr fluffy(PM) had to offer. Taking on the media god(Rupert Murdoch), irresponsible upper and under class, destructive business practices etc....