Occupy London: Eviction Process Gets High Court Date

Occupy London

First Posted: 18/11/11 20:24 GMT Updated: 18/11/11 20:34 GMT   PA

A bid to remove anti-capitalist protesters who have been camped outside St Paul's Cathedral for a month is set to reach the High Court on Wednesday.

The City of London Corporation served an eviction notice on the activists which gave them until 6pm on Thursday to leave.

They were warned that they faced High Court action if they failed to quit their tents.

But demonstrators, who tore down the notices as soon as they were posted, vowed they would stay and said they were prepared to fight a potentially lengthy legal battle.

The corporation, the local authority which runs the Square Mile, has expressed concern over "worrying trends" at the camp, including late-night drinking, and said companies near the cathedral had complained about losing business.

Some of the tents are pitched on the footpath next to the shops surrounding the cathedral, with the remainder in the churchyard itself.

The notice said: "If any tents and other structures remain after 6pm on Thursday 17 November 2011, proceedings for possession and injunctions will be issued in the High Court of Justice without further notice.

"If granted, this would mean that you would be ordered by the High Court to remove the tents and any failure to do so could be a contempt of court."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

A bid to remove anti-capitalist protesters who have been camped outside St Paul's Cathedral for a month is set to reach the High Court on Wednesday. The City of London Corporation served an evictio...
A bid to remove anti-capitalist protesters who have been camped outside St Paul's Cathedral for a month is set to reach the High Court on Wednesday. The City of London Corporation served an evictio...
Filed by Paul Vale  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheGreatRenewal
We're living a Great Renewal
04:54 PM on 11/19/2011
Sorry ... The Occupy Movements are NOT anti-capitalist. They are for a balance in our economy.

You know we throw words around as though they mean one thing and everyone agrees to the meaning. Capitalism takes many, many forms. The type of capitalism put into place in the mid1980s through policies, laws, institutions, organizations, language and behaviors of The Great Global Restructuring is based on unlimited extraction of resources, the unlimited destruction of our environment, the unlimited profits for shareholders and unlimited consumerism.

This is the type of capitalism the Occupy Movement is trying to address .. the misuse of our humanity, all species, The Commons and our planet.

We need a form of capitalism that renews, regenerates, revitalizes, regrows, redesigns, re-enlivens our planet first so we have an environment to live in. Then we have to develop a form of capitalism that actually serves the planet, species and people.
05:11 PM on 11/19/2011
I agree with you, TheGreatRenewal. The 'anti-capitalist protestors' label is both facile and inaccurate. I urge anyone covering these events for the Huffington Post to avoid banal clichés and consider using a more measured term: for example, "the Occupy Movement", "the Occupy campaign" or "those taking a stand against greed and corruption".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
12:18 AM on 11/19/2011
Who's paying the legal costs?
12:45 AM on 11/19/2011
The barrister and other legal representatives are acting 'pro bono publico', Mickey, which means their professional work is "undertaken voluntarily and without payment", as explained by John Cooper QC in the video clip linked earlier.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
06:21 PM on 11/20/2011
Good, I'd hate to think my money was being used on another lost cause! They'd be better off targeting the real cause of the problem: central bankers creating a sea of cheap money which was lent to the unlendable and government regulators who were not up to the job of regulating the greedy bankers.
09:16 PM on 11/18/2011
Readers of this article will easily spot the absence of any comment from the campers. A short video is available here - http://vimeo.com/32316863 - which covers the thoughts of the barrister acting, pro bono, on behalf of Occupy LSX. The legal team headed by John Cooper QC will “make sure the interests of our clients are fearlessly defended.”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
10:51 PM on 11/18/2011
Thank you and faved, JMarcusMoore!  Nice to see the barristers are taking up the cause.  I rather hope they win on HR grounds, but a win is a win.  GOOD LUCK TO OCCUPY LONDON PROTESTERS!!
12:00 AM on 11/19/2011
And thank you, floodberg. Many Occupiers - myself included - trust due legal process to grant us a fair hearing.

We certainly expect our case to be judged with greater respect and balance than that afforded by the media. Most reporters seek only controversy, are at a loss that the movement has no official spokespersons and seem pretty hacked off that no seats are reserved for them near the front.

On the joys of washing up in the kitchen tent: http://marcusmoore.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/occupying-the-mind-5/