Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist Call To Limit Abortion Counselling

Abortion Counselling

First Posted: 23/11/11 06:34 GMT Updated: 23/11/11 06:34 GMT   PA

A Royal College has explicitly said women who are sure they want an abortion should "not be subjected to compulsory counselling".

In revised guidelines on abortion, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) said counselling should be available for those who want it, but should not be mandatory.

The guideline also supports the safety of taking pills at home to induce an abortion.

This is illegal in the UK and was the subject of a High Court challenge by British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) earlier this year.

On counselling, the RCOG guidance says: "Women who are certain of their decision to have an abortion should not be subjected to compulsory counselling.

"Pathways to additional support, including counselling and social services, should be available."

It follows a row in September over the issue of counselling, with Tory backbencher Nadine Dorries and Labour's Frank Field losing a Commons vote on the issue.

They wanted to prevent non-statutory abortion providers such as Marie Stopes and BPAS from offering counselling.

Ms Dorries said that, because they receive money for carrying out terminations, the organisations have a vested interest.

The old RCOG guidelines say professionals "must be sensitive to the different stages of decision-making that individual women have reached, and must be able to provide the degree of support and counselling required by each individual."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

A Royal College has explicitly said women who are sure they want an abortion should "not be subjected to compulsory counselling". In revised guidelines on abortion, the Royal College of Obstetricia...
A Royal College has explicitly said women who are sure they want an abortion should "not be subjected to compulsory counselling". In revised guidelines on abortion, the Royal College of Obstetricia...
Around the Web:

Abortion

Filed by Dina Rickman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Mcilroy
12:57 PM on 11/24/2011
An abortion is non-reversable, surely it makes sense to have some counselling, if only to be informed of the possible complications - physical and emotional - that may be experienced afterwards. I don't think anyone is suggesting an exam afterwards where you have to get the right answers to be permitted to continue so why are some people so strongly against the counselling, unless they have an ulterior motive?
12:33 AM on 11/27/2011
Or is it possible that some people strongly in favour of the counsellin­g have an ulterior motive?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Mcilroy
10:18 AM on 11/27/2011
It's likely that no-one is totally objective in any discussion about abortion but having known two women who have had abortions only to have serious regrets in later years I can only support the call for compulsory counselling as it might have helped them -I'm not saying that it would have stopped them for going through the abortions but it might have helped them know that their decision was correct.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ResearchGirl
11:41 AM on 11/23/2011
Nadine Dorries has been pushing an Amercian-authored anti-abortion agenda for at least the last six years: American-authored, applying to BPAS and Marie Stopes the same lie about financial motivation the US evangelicals apply to Planned Parenthood. There is no evidence at all for her allegations.

Good for the RCO for standing up for women's capacity for independent decisions and moral agency, and for refusing to dignify a malicious right-wing attack on an key part of our health care provision.