Citizen's Arrest Numbers Falling In London As 'Fear Of Crime' Rises

Citizens Arrest

First Posted: 03/01/12 13:15 GMT Updated: 12/01/12 15:56 GMT

Almost 11,500 fewer citizen's arrests were made in London in 2010 than in 2002, figures have revealed, as experts point to a rise in "fear of crime".

The Metropolitan Police said that 14,047 citizen's arrests were made in 2002, but by 2010 that number had fallen to just 2,579.

The figures, released after a request by the Daily Telegraph under the Freedom of Information Act, also showed that the number is expected to fall below 2,000 in 2011.

By 2006 the number had fallen to 6,306, and as of July 2011 had dropped as low as 1,164.

'Citizen's arrest' was defined in the figures as somebody 'given into custody', meaning the police were handed control of a suspect by somebody who did not have the power of arrest, including members of the public, Police Community Support Officers (PCSOs) and private security forces.

Scotland Yard identified no specific causes for the decline, but the figures are surprising in part because PCSOs were introduced in 2002, and their presence might have been expected to increase the number of citizen arrests.

Commenting on the numbers, Jon Collins, deputy director of the Police Foundation, a policing think tank, said:

“These figures do not in themselves provide an explanation for the significant drop in the number of citizens arrests conducted in London, and without further research any speculation as to its causes is likely to be inconclusive.

"More research on what has caused the reduced number of citizens arrests would therefore be interesting and useful, as it is important for members of the public to feel confident in intervening to prevent a crime taking place or to apprehend an offender, where it is safe and appropriate."

"The public has an important role to play in tackling crime. However this goes much further than making citizens arrests. It is also important for the public to provide the police with the information and intelligence that is essential for successful policing.”

Reports cited changes in the law designed to more strictly define the boundaries of legal citizen's arrest as one possible cause for the decline.

In 2006 it was declared that intervention by the public was only allowed in serious cases. The law was also changed to ensure that an arrest could only be legally made if no police officers were available, and if the person making the arrest was sure it was necessary to prevent injury or serious damage to property.

The Crown Prosecution Service has also warned that the use of force in a citizen's arrest could be classed as illegal assault.

Cases of citizen's arrest gone awry are not hard to find: in 2008 a man who said he made a citizen arrest against a vandal smashing a shop window was accused of assault and arrested.

In a 2006 report by security company ADT and UCL it was revealed that British people were less likely than people in Western Europe to intervene in low-level crime.

Around 62% of Britons said they would not intervene in that online study, compared to 48% across Western Europe as a whole.

Ben Rogers, director of the Demos Centre For London, told the Huffington Post UK that the figures "had to be taken at face value" but suggested that changes in reporting practice might partly explain the fall. Even so, Rogers said, that would usually result in a sudden drop and not the "steady decline" seen over the past decade at a time when crime, and fear of crime, was falling on average.

Rogers wrote in a 2010 essay quoted the ADT report and argued that the declining presence of 'local authority figures' including park keepers, milkmen and postal workers was one possible cause of the decline.

He also said that narrow performance targets in those roles had made its workforce less willing to intervene, and added that social ties had loosened as a result of "greater diversity and churn" in local communities.

There has also been "a rise in the perception that the system is weighed against people who ‘take a stand’ and in favour of ‘offenders’, with the former too often subject to official criticism or prosecution", Rogers argued, as fear of crime has risen.

"We are, in short, more fearful than we were that any intervention could result in us, our families or communities being attacked or otherwise victimised," he said.

In America, at least, it appears citizen's arrest is alive and well: actress Lindsay Lohan apparently made one such arrest over the weekend after a man was caught trespassing in her home.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Almost 11,500 fewer citizen's arrests were made in London in 2010 than in 2002, figures have revealed, as experts point to a rise in "fear of crime". The Metropolitan Police said that 14,047 citize...
Almost 11,500 fewer citizen's arrests were made in London in 2010 than in 2002, figures have revealed, as experts point to a rise in "fear of crime". The Metropolitan Police said that 14,047 citize...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ideaville
I have sexdaily, I mean dyslexia, Danm!
12:12 AM on 01/04/2012
A couple of years back a young girl drove into my parked car and drove off, luckily my neighbour managed to tell her friend who she was dropping off after a night out, that she had been seen.
The following morning the girls friend admitted to me that it was her friend that had caused the damage although there was no contact from the driver. I finally got her number and asked for her insurance details, at which point she explained she was busy getting ready to go out but her mum would deal with it. After about a week of no progress, I phoned the girl at work explaining I was losing patience and was not happy about the damage to my car, only to have her tell me how bad the damage was to her newer car. I am not proud to admit that I reduced her to tears, although I did not shout and was certainly not abusive. Following the conversation, I got an angry phone call from her father threatening to "come round and sort me out", I explained that I would welcome his visit as long as he brought his insurance details. I gave the police a courtesy call to let them know that there was a possibility of the gentleman coming to harm at my address. As a result of me having threats made against me, I had to endure a patronising lecture from plod that I shouldn't have made the guy's daughter cry.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:27 AM on 01/05/2012
But she drove away from an accident, so why weren't the Police charging her with that? I find your story depressingly believable!
12:03 AM on 01/04/2012
I stopped a drunk driver many years ago by driving my car across his path, He got out, very beligerant, swore at me etc, then came at me as if to shove me away. I pushed him back, and he hit the back of his head on his car roof edge, but only gently.He slid slowly down his car, he wasnt knocked out, merely totally drunk and asleep.
No mobile phones then, so I dragged him off the road and laid him out on the grass verge where he would be safe, switched his car off, locked all the doors, and threw his car keys into a field.
No doubt these days I would be charged with false arrest, assault, stealing keys etc etc.
08:41 PM on 01/03/2012
People being charged with GBH or ABH when trying to stop a crime may be rare but plenty get charged with simple assault in trying to defend their families or property. If you want a recent example of why the public no longer want to get involved in citizen's arrests then look no further than the recent case of Andrew Pollock. He shoved a drunk and abusive man from a Glasgow commuter train, which was being held up because the drunk wouldn't show the guard his ticket. Pollock was reported to the Transport Police and has been charged with assault. The drunken man has not been charged with anything.
It seems the Home Office want it both ways: by all means intervene if you see a crime being committed. Then if the offender makes a complaint and the police decide that the force you used in intervening was unreasonable, then they'll fall over themselves to arrest you just to show how even-handed the law is and how the offender has the protection of it too. The very least you'll get is an afternoon in the police station, your DNA recorded and your good name on file.
Why would anybody bother taking the chance on detaining a criminal when the most he'll get is a community sentence he won't bother turning up for?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ideaville
I have sexdaily, I mean dyslexia, Danm!
11:39 PM on 01/03/2012
You have chosen an extremely poor example, where there is video footage to show a large adult bully take on a smaller teenager without warning. Andrew Pollock had absolutely no need to intervene, but was annoyed it the delay.
02:07 AM on 01/04/2012
The drunken man, Main, was 19 and adult enough to consume sufficient alcohol to make him abusive towards the train guard. As a student of something or other, we might expect him to have enough intelligence to understand why his behaviour in causing hundreds of passengers to be delayed was so objectionable. But he later morphs into this poor innocent lamb when sober, thrown off the train by an intractable guard and a passenger who had the nerve to be irritated at being held up on his journey home. I'd say it was a perfect example of how intervening as a member of the public can backfire badly. Had I been a passenger in that coach, delayed and having to listen to Main's ranting, I would have applauded Pollock's actions, not condemned them. I suspect that his critics are motivated more by the fact he works in an investment bank.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:29 AM on 01/04/2012
What the CPS and Police are doing is teaching the public not stand up to anyone that is breaking the law. If you do then the law will come down on you. An article elsewhere referred to the guy throw off as having a ticket which was for the journey to Edinburgh probably bought earlier in the day, not a ticket from Edinburgh. I am wonder if he will claim the injuries to his face was done in the scuffle. I also wonder who made the complaints about the 2 men. "British Transport Police have said they received complaints against two men." If it was me I would ask the Transport Police to present the people making the accusation so I can face my accusers. If they cannot produce anyone then I would sue the Police for false arrest. I hope Allan Pollock gets a not guilty or not Proven verdict if it goes to court.
07:28 PM on 01/03/2012
It seems obvious that things have got horribly awry somewhere. There a number of reasons for the decline - I'll not address the issue of an under resourced police force.
1) The fear of one actually being arrested oneself for having infringed a criminal's "human rights" or inadvertantly committing GBH in the process of the arrest.
2) The real fear of becoming a victim oneself. Add to this the increasingly likely non-conviction of the criminals, who now appear to have more "rights" than the victims and, Hey presto, you've a perfect storm.
There is no fear of the justice system anymore, because right from the 'off' large numbers of children are taught to respect the society in which they live.

Mike M - Mid Sussex
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:22 PM on 01/03/2012
It's hadly surprising that the public don't want to take the risk of getting involved anymore, as any contact they get nowadays with the police always turns into a negative experiance for them as the innocent party. If you try to report a crime you get the brush off, and get treated like the suspect not the victim with the police being deliberatly obstructive as hell to make the experiance as unpleasant as possible so you learn to stop reporting incidents and tell your neighbours not to bother as well. Why do the police do this? Simple to reduce crime figures !!!...you can either solve the crime or easier still make sure nobody reports it so it doesn't show up. Better still this looks like preventitive policing which is meant to mean the incident doesn't take place...not the current reality of the incident takes place but the public have given up reporting it through bitter past experiances of trying.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seaniebhoy
08:49 PM on 01/03/2012
The worst is when they flat our refuse to even exit their vehicles to even take a report. I had a drunk pass out on my front steps over the xmas week. Called the police - because I figured that if something unfortunate happened, it would be on me as it seems to be a persons right to pass out where they please - and the police - rolling down the window halfway - basically told me to wait till he comes around and ask him to leave. Then drove off without ever getting out of the car.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:45 AM on 01/04/2012
Sadly there is too much truth in this.
07:09 PM on 01/03/2012
"In 2006 it was declared that intervention by the public was only allowed in serious cases. The law was also changed to ensure that an arrest could only be legally made if no police officers were available, and if the person making the arrest was sure it was necessary to prevent injury or serious damage to property."

Are the Police Chiefs stupid or just dishonest? The above change in the law under New Labour is the reason why it has dropped massively in recent years.
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
06:55 PM on 01/03/2012
This article would be a lot more use if we could be informed of the number of convictions that resulted from citizens' arrests. Many have a go heroes have done a great service and then seen their efforts thwarted by criminal's rights! It's not just the fear of arrest or accusations; it's the fear of wasting your time!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seaniebhoy
06:48 PM on 01/03/2012
Sorry but how many times in the last few years have we seen the citizen who is stopping a crime end up being charged with a GBH or ABH? So for me, personally, it is a non-starter if the yob I stop from snatching a bag will end up suing me while I stand in the dock defending myself for "doing the right thing". Newspapers and officials can call you a hero....but the moment some solicitor gets involved they will all vanish while you are all on your lonesome.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:47 AM on 01/04/2012
No mate, take it to a Jury. 12 of your peers wouldn't convict you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seaniebhoy
04:50 PM on 01/04/2012
Doesn't mean there isn't any aggrivation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
majesticjkr
Always look on the bright side of life
06:15 PM on 01/03/2012
I would only do something if i saw someone being hurt, but anything els and its up to the cops to do what they get paid to do, protect your own family first of all, to many heros being killed for nothing,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stevesheff
12:42 AM on 01/04/2012
One reason for intervening is that the perpetrator will probably have a knife and you probably won't !!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michaelxx
06:10 PM on 01/03/2012
what a biased huff and puff this is
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michaelxx
06:02 PM on 01/03/2012
why should we intervene when a crime is taking place ..if we do we are subjected to lots of trauma associated..and the criminal gets the sympathy
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:49 AM on 01/04/2012
You should intervene because that's what you'd want someone to do if you were the victim. As a society we have to look out for each other.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michaelxx
10:03 AM on 01/04/2012
morally I agree with you........but this isnt about morals....read the papers and see how many helpful citizens are arrested for trying to help.
05:48 PM on 01/03/2012
Do Police advise making your hands into the shape of a gun and pointing it at the suspect when making a citizen's arrest? Seems to be working for the guy in the photo.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:55 PM on 01/03/2012
I don't know why anyone finds this surprising?
Every time someone defending their house is arrested the message goes out loud and clear "Don't try this at home".
Everytime someone intervenes against young hooligans and is injured or killed, the police pretty much say that it was their own fault for getting involved. "LEave it to the professionals"
Unfortunately, the police cannot control crime on their own and it is down to all of us to stand up to criminals. It's about time that they woke up to that fact.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seaniebhoy
06:52 PM on 01/03/2012
Like I say...how many times have we seen a lad stop some yob from thieving, only for himself to be charged for holding the criminal.
This comment has been removed.
04:12 PM on 01/03/2012
Too much risk of being charged by the police, then sued by the perp.
In short, no good deed goes unpunished.
05:02 PM on 01/03/2012
I agree
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seaniebhoy
06:53 PM on 01/03/2012
Absolutely...it would be the good deed that costs you everything.