Stephen Lawrence Murder: Judge Condemns 'Racist Thuggish' Gary Dobson And David Norris

Stephen Lawrence

First Posted: 04/01/12 13:48 GMT Updated: 04/01/12 13:49 GMT

It took less than 30 minutes for Stephen Lawrence's killers to be sentenced for their "terrible crime" at the Old Bailey today.

Mr Justice Treacy told Gary Dobson and David Norris that the murder of the black teenager in 1993 was "committed for no other reason than racial hatred."

He said: "The murder of Stephen Lawrence on the night of 22 April 1993 was a terrible and evil crime. Recently the Lord Chief Justice described it as a 'murder which scarred the conscience of the nation'.

"A totally innocent 18-year-old youth on the threshold of a promising life was brutally cut down in the street in front of eye witnesses by a racist thuggish gang.

"You were both members of that gang. I have no doubt at all that you fully subscribed to its views and attitudes.

"You did not know Stephen Lawrence or Duwayne Brooks. Neither of them had done anything to harm, threaten or offend you in any way, apart from being black and making their way peaceably to the bus-stop on their way home.

"At least one of your group was armed with a lethal knife that night. I am sure you were aware of that."

Mr Justice Treacy referred to the the Footscray tapes, the undercover surveillance videos made by the police in 1994 and which showed more than just racist tendencies amongst the gang.

"They reveal not only violent racist attitudes but also a casual and accepting attitude to the carrying and use of knives," he said. "They reveal a group acceptance of the use of knives to threaten or harm black people.

On the attack itself, the judge emphasised how it was driven by group loyalty.

"A racist taunt, followed by a group charge towards the two young black men, and then the swallowing up of Stephen Lawrence, surrounded and put to the ground by all of you, shows a deliberately concerted attack.

"A knife was used to stab him with blows aimed to vulnerable parts of the body: once when he was upright at the start of the attack; the second when he was on the ground whilst the rest of you were gathered round aiming blows or kicks to put him or keep him on the ground.

"The evidence does not prove so that I could be sure that either of you had a knife, but the person who used it did so with your knowledge and approval.

"The attack lasted in the region of 10 seconds and then the whole group moved off together as one making its escape. I take the view that, in the circumstances, it does not matter that the knife was not in your hands.

"The cohesive nature of the group tells its story. It is not as if, for example, one person unexpectedly did something that no one else expected or approved of. You, Dobson, repeatedly lied to keep Norris's name away from the police, a clear example of group loyalty.

"Stephen Lawrence is not the only victim of this crime. His family, (two parents, a brother and a sister), whose victim impact statements I have read, have been most grievously affected. So has his friend Duwayne Brooks. Of that I have no doubt.

"Neither of you has shown the slightest regret or remorse. Each of you has lied to the court. I do not punish you for that, but this is not a case where there is any mitigation available for contrition."

Turning to the length of sentence, Mr Justice Treacy told the pair he was restricted by law to pass a sentence that reflected their age at the time of the crime, which he acknowledged may not be to everyone's approval.

"It may be, therefore, that the resultant sentences are lower than some might expect, but the law as laid down by Parliament must be applied and I am constrained by it."

He added: "The gravity of this case is in my view of a different order from, for example, a murder committed by one individual upon another as a result of some sudden quarrel.

"There was a degree of general premeditation; it was a racist crime driven by hatred; it involved a gang of like-minded attackers; a lethal weapon was employed and known in advance to be carried; the victim was completely blameless and helpless.

"The high level of public interest in this case is at least in part a reflection of the abhorrence felt by right-thinking people at the nature of this crime. This, too, should be reflected in the sentence.

"In each case, and as a reflection of the fact that the offender was under 18 at the time, I must impose a sentence of Detention at Her Majesty's Pleasure. This form of sentence is, for practical purposes, the same as a life sentence passed on an adult."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

It took less than 30 minutes for Stephen Lawrence's killers to be sentenced for their "terrible crime" at the Old Bailey today. Mr Justice Treacy told Gary Dobson and David Norris that the murder o...
It took less than 30 minutes for Stephen Lawrence's killers to be sentenced for their "terrible crime" at the Old Bailey today. Mr Justice Treacy told Gary Dobson and David Norris that the murder o...
Filed by David Hobbs  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:40 AM on 01/06/2012
At last, a verdict & justice for the MURDER of an innocent "Stephen Lawrence". Why is it that the perpetrators have more rights than the victims?, this is seen across the UK. But I am afraid, these 2 guys will appeal, Its sad to say, a conviction on extremely little evidience & the overturn of the double jeopardy Law, not to mention all the media reports prior & a 30 minute result from a jury. Yes as a gang they maybe GUILTY but the person who used the knife, that DID infilct the wounds, causing DEATH & MURDER is he still free?, all the others will be held to account but will it be for the right reason?.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rockysparks
there's no law against being annoying.
05:30 PM on 01/04/2012
Stephen Lawrence would be 36 years old if he were alive today. The fact that it took nearly two decades for justice to be served against these thugs does not speak well for the British legal system. But at least now his family and frtiends may be able to have some closure.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TXconfidnz
Schpelling Bea Regect
01:58 PM on 01/04/2012
This incident happened in 1993 and these guys are just NOW getting sentenced? Why do the wheels of justice spin so slowly when it comes to hate crimes?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nigel Humphries
04:23 PM on 01/04/2012
Not quite. These men were tried and found not guilty. As a result of this crime and a landmark inquiry into the failings of the police and the handling of this case, many changes were made. Among them, measures were taken to overcome the "institutionalised racism" in the Metropolitan Police Service which were taken up by other government bodies. Also, the rules of "double jeopardy" were revised to allow a single retrial of an acquitted person when "new and compelling" evidence is produced. This allowed for the conviction of these two thugs.

I agree with you that the wheels of justice in these cases does spin slowly, but at least they appear to be turning in the right direction.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TXconfidnz
Schpelling Bea Regect
04:52 PM on 01/04/2012
Thanks for imparting the further history of this case.