Nick Clegg Says Royal Yacht Not Top Of Priority List

Nick Cleg

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 16/01/12 11:18 GMT Updated: 16/01/12 15:27 GMT

David Cameron and Nick Clegg both poured cold-water on Michael Gove's plan to give the Queen a yacht to celebrate the diamond jubilee on Monday.

In a letter to cabinet colleagues obtained by the Guardian, Michael Gove had suggested the government buy the Queen a yacht to celebrate the royal jubilee - at an estimated cost of £60m.

Gove said the Royals should be granted a new yacht - "in spite, and perhaps because of the austere times" - as a way of lifting the nation's spirits.

"My suggestion would be a gift from the nation to her majesty; thinking about David Willetts's excellent suggestion of a royal yacht, and something tangible to commemorate this momentous occasion."

Speaking to journalists after a speech on the economy, the deputy prime minister joked it was a case of "the haves and the have yachts" .

But he said although the diamond jubilee was a "wonderful occasion" he was unsure if it was a good use of public money. "I suspect most people in the country would think, given that there’s very little money around, that this probably wouldn’t be top of their list of priorities for the use of scarce public resources."

Later on Monday morning a Number 10 spokesman said David Cameron believed it would not be "appropriate" to spend public money on a new boat for the Monarchy.

Speaking in the Commons on Monday afternoon Gove insisted that while he supported the idea of a yacht he was not suggesting public funding should be provided for one.

The royal yacht Britannia, which served the Queen for 44 years, was decommissioned by the Labour government in 1997.

Labour Party deputy chairman Tom Watson said Gove was "out of touch" at a time of spending cuts. "We're all looking forward to the diamond jubilee. The significance of the occasion should be celebrated across the country," he said.

"When school budgets are being slashed, parents will be wondering how Gove came even to suggest this idea. This is not the time to spend £60 million on a yacht."

The subject of the yacht was raised in the Commons last year when MPs debated the budget for the Monarchy. Tory MP and staunch royalist Jacob Rees-Mogg asked: "Is there any chance that for the diamond jubilee we will get the yacht back?"

While Edward Leigh, the former chairman of the public accounts committee that scrutinises public spending said "stingy" Labour's decision to scrap the Britannia was a "tragedy".

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

David Cameron and Nick Clegg both poured cold-water on Michael Gove's plan to give the Queen a yacht to celebrate the diamond jubilee on Monday. In a letter to cabinet colleagues obtained by the G...
David Cameron and Nick Clegg both poured cold-water on Michael Gove's plan to give the Queen a yacht to celebrate the diamond jubilee on Monday. In a letter to cabinet colleagues obtained by the G...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 448
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Compassionnotreligion
Be awed & humbled by nature & empathy -not Juju.
09:10 PM on 01/17/2012
"Gove said the Royals should be granted a new yacht - "in spite, and perhaps because of the austere times" - as a way of lifting the nation's spirits"

Yes, nothing lifts my spirits more than leaving pensioners without healthcare, but giving the world's richest woman a 60m pressie. Aw bless - gawd save her maj (tugging at forelock).

Seriously though, I have nothing against (most) of the 'royals' (magic DNA brigade) as people themselves, but the institution needs to GO NOW...and fox slaughtering tory toffs with it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacksdad41
Quant Je Puis
09:47 PM on 01/17/2012
Firstly @compassionnotreligion - HM the Queen is not even in the top 10 of wealthy women. secondly, the yacht would be paid for, maintained and crewed with private money. The yacht, if built, would be 75% (of the vessel) be used for taking young people around the world for periods of 3 months at a time, 25% would contain state rooms for the Queen. It would also be used for diplomatic visits on trade missions. Buckingham Palace made the following statement "HM the Queen has requested no such vessel and has no intention of either commissioning or requiring such".
Why do you feel the need to tug your forelock - bowing and curtsyseying in the Queens presence is no longer accepted as necessary.
HM the Queen recieves £7.9M from the civil list but gives back, voluntarily via the Crown estates >£200M per year in income tax and pays council tax on all her non state properties. So when you talk about "the institution" and going now - who is it that contributes more and is more worthy regardless of Birthright - HM the Queen or narrow minded ill informed lefty tree huggers such as you??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Compassionnotreligion
Be awed & humbled by nature & empathy -not Juju.
08:55 AM on 01/18/2012
a/ Let's say she's the 11th richest woman - does that make it ANY better?

b/ If it would be paid for by private money, good luck to them - but- our govenment does not and SHOULD not be making such statements/getting involved.

c/"bowing and curtseying is no longer accepted as necessary" - you're obviously impressed by the scraps thrown down. This is the tip of the iceberg and respect should be earned - not a birthright.

d/Royalists say the Royals are good value because they gave up the income from the Crown Estate in return for money from the Civil List (the 66p) and the Crown Estate now generates four times as much as they get. However the other part of the deal was that the monarch would no longer pay directly for the running of government, which now costs the country something like half a trillion. How about real transparency about this kind of back-scratching?

e/ Whether I'm lefty or a tree-hugger is an assumption on your part - but assumptions are what comes from a servile mind because you'd rather stick to what has always been, just because it has always been. This is hardly ever, if ever, a rational reason.
07:38 PM on 01/17/2012
misscomm

The monarchy is undoubtedly the nation’s biggest international ambassador and makes the nation the envy of the world. That is an undeniable fact whether you like the monarchy or not.

The suggestion that a new yatch be provided for the royals to mark and celebrate the diamond jubilee is, in principle, very plausible, and a charming way of showing appreciation for the monarchy’s long ambassadorial service to the nation, however it is funded. £60Million is a tiny price to pay for such remarkable service, and some might say, “who better than the public should pay for it?” ! Afterall, it is perfectly arguable that the government who decommissioned the monarchy’s former yatch, the Britannia, should take full responsibility for the re-provision.

However, given that this has come at a time of spending cuts, it is quite understandable that it is being suggested by some quarters that funding sources other than the public purse should be sought to meet the full cost of a new yatch.

In that regard, there should be no shortage of willing private businesses to contribute towards the purchase. Miss Commonwealth would be pleased to contribute and undertake the campaign for sponsorship of the purchase by the private sector. Also, other members of the public who support the idea would be pleased to add their contributions to the sponsorship porfolio. Furthermore, Miss Commonwealth would like to extend the sponsorship campaign to the rich ones among the member-states of the Commonwealth Union.
05:37 PM on 01/17/2012
Why not send the good ole USA the bill? We pay for every other lame brained idea around the World and this idea sounds as good as most others.
04:25 PM on 01/17/2012
Yep, And I bet he's a have yacht.
03:47 PM on 01/17/2012
let her have it if is made in uk
01:37 PM on 01/17/2012
Michael Gove trying to secure a Knighthood!
11:50 AM on 01/17/2012
I think it's an excellent idea, that doesn't need to be paid for by the public purse. At the time of the decommissioning of Britannia there was a lot of talk about the UK's yachting community funding a project to save the yacht. People were more than willing, it was feasible but the yacht was scrapped anyway for spiteful, political reasons. Why not revive the idea - a 'whipround' amongst those of us who enjoy sailing and value the idea of a Royal Yacht as the great institution that it is.
10:08 AM on 01/17/2012
Mr Clegg you one one of the haves ! me im one of the have not,s along with a lot more of the country!
08:56 AM on 01/17/2012
You're going to pay for a new yacht one way or the other. That is how things go. Just be honest about it. There isn't a thing you can do about it.

So just be honest about it.
08:02 AM on 01/17/2012
The cost of building a yacht for the Queen is one thing but has anyone considered the cost of running and maintaining it? During the time the Britannia was the Royal Yacht, it cost the UK tax payer £millions per year in maintenance and running costs..........could we afford a new one? I somehow doubt it but that doesn't mean that the Queen shouldn't be given some kind of recognition for her diamond jubilee.
photo
Spanky McFarlane
ILLEGITIMUS NON CARBORUNDUM.
01:51 AM on 01/17/2012
I think this should be handled through Diplomatic channels & perhaps 'the hat' could be passed through out the Commonwealth of Nations on this one?
The idea has merit in that it would leave an endearing legacy for a fine woman who certainly has left us one.

Call it a 'one off' or what ever, but I'm sure Canadians would willingly kick in & appreciate the chance to support their Queen in this manor, rather than giving her her yet another broach encrusted with our diamonds, gold etc.

The 'austerity angle' could be solved by kicking the doors open to Commonwealth & rather than a problem it could be come a unifying force.

When all you have are lemons- make lemonade.
12:06 AM on 01/17/2012
For the Queen's absolute dedication to Britain for so many years, who, in my opinion, hasn't put a foot wrong, surely she deserves the recognition she would love !
I don't think it fair to ask the general tax payers to subscribe to the cost of a Royal Yacht, but what about those more well off and the rich contributing to a fund, maybe headed by Mr Willetts, in a voluntary manner. I, as an ex serviceman am prepared to give £100+ from my naval pension. I bet there are many other ex servicemen who think the same !
Why not convert one of the RN ships that this goverment 'Throw away' (or sell for a song) ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:11 PM on 01/17/2012
Aners,

Where are your priorities?

So you can afford to give £100 from your pension? Perhaps you may consider giving elsewhere, for example, to another pensioner to help with heating bills? Where is the greater hardship? With HM through lack of a yacht, or the freezing pensioner?
01:38 PM on 01/17/2012
I agree, there are many in need out there.
11:46 PM on 01/16/2012
Nice idea this "all things to all interests" Royal Yacht but poor timing when you think the country is going through the worst economic crisis it has faced since the 1930s. The brains behind this idea might better lend a hand to fixing the economy first, then we might be more amenable to such national indulgences.
photo
BlueGorilla
I Prefer Civilisation To Conservativsm
11:24 PM on 01/16/2012
This state of affairs is so depressing ..so utterly dismal..Britain is a nation struggling at the hands of opportunistic radical right wing zealots,benefit cuts are biting,cancer sufferers are being harangued and Mr Gove has the arrogance to suggest a gift to the uber rich, state funded ,monarch that is paid for by the huddled masses ..This is a low period in British history where some amongst the monarchy and their fawning, foppish political lap dogs are so confident of the lack of any immediate threat to the existence of the monarchy,that they occasionally act in ways less guarded than once they might have done...for instance in the period just after Diana Spencer's death,when a shadow was cast over the monarchy . Another case of this arrogance was when Liz Windsor and co excluded any former Labour Prime Minister from that wedding in 2011.The message is clear in these relatively less guarded times and it is that neither the masses nor those representatives of what the aristos anachronistically and laughably perceive as the left are invited to this party .In truth Brown and Blair were about as threatening to the status quo as the Tatler magazine..and though we can't ignore the possibility that the royals were very angry about the fox hunting ban ,this hardly made Brown and Blair Bolsheviks .Cameron is onboard with Gove when it comes to preserving undeserved wealth of course.. he is just more P R savvy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacksdad41
Quant Je Puis
12:18 AM on 01/17/2012
So many words that say so little
photo
BlueGorilla
I Prefer Civilisation To Conservativsm
12:53 AM on 01/17/2012
I wish I could reply that you used so few words yet said so much..but I can't and you didn't.
photo
SecularAdvocate
Media Watcher
10:59 PM on 01/16/2012
If it's meant to be a gift from the nation let there be a collection for it which is voluntary. Then all those whose spirits will soar at the the thought of the Queen having a new yacht can contribute, and all those of us who aren't quite so keen can opt out. But let's hope they are all prepared to make their donation a direct debit arrangement. Crew (Royal Navy of course), maintenance, fuel and additional security don't come cheap.

Obviously at this time it's important to re-state the values that made Britain the class-conscious, "I know my place" society that we are so proud of today, with its great leaders from all the public schools, and all the oiks poverty-stricken and jobless as a result of the feckless risk-taking and unfathomable greed of the elite.

What could be a more perfect expression of our core beliefs in this time of economic hardship than to give those at the very top of the social pyramid even more luxury, based on who their parents were?