Abortion Is 14 Times Safer Than Giving Birth, Claims Study

Abortion Safer Childbirth

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 24/01/2012 12:42 Updated: 24/01/2012 12:42

Having a legal abortion is up to 14 times safer than giving birth, a controversial new study claims.

American researchers from the Columbia University Medical Center in New York, suggest that women are more likely to die during or after childbirth than from complications of an abortion.

Researchers came to this conclusion after studying data from a leading sexual and reproductive health research centre, the Guttmacher Institute, on live births, pregnancy and abortion-related deaths.

The group of researchers discovered that between 1998 and 2005, one woman died during childbirth for every 11,000 babies born. In comparison, one woman in 167,000 died following a legal abortion procedure.

Although these findings will no doubt stir a heated debate among mothers and pro-life campaigners, the researchers add that their study wasn’t conducted to promote abortions.

The overall message, according to the researchers, is that both abortions and giving birth are safe.

"We're trying to help women who are having all reproductive experiences, know what to expect” and that abortion risks are often "exaggerated", says a spokesperson from the study, according to Reuters.

"Abortion care and pregnancy care should not really be any different than consenting people for any other procedure."

Leading provider of sexual and reproductive healthcare services, Marie Stopes International agrees with these findings.

A spokesperson told The Huffington Post: "We know from experience that abortion is a safe and straightforward procedure for women who choose not to continue with a pregnancy."

"We are pleased that this new research confirms this. Abortion is one of the safest health interventions and evidence repeatedly shows that it not linked with any short term or long term side effect.

"Unfortunately we also know that there are still too many abortions being carried out by unsafe providers, particularly in the developing world. Unsafe abortions are entirely preventable yet annually leave 8.5 million women in need of urgent medical care and cause 47,000 deaths – 13% of all maternal deaths globally.

"Organisations such as Marie Stopes International must continue to work in partnership with governments, donors, advocates and other service providers to make sure women all over the world are able to access safe abortion services when they choose, irrespective of where they live".

Anthony Ozimic of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) disagrees: "Whatever the merits or otherwise of this study and its authors’ conclusions, the fact remains that the Republic of Ireland, where abortion is banned, has one of the world’s best records on maternal health, better than the US or the UK where abortion is available easily.

"The key to saving pregnant women's lives, whether in the developed or developing world, are improvements in primary healthcare and specialist pregnancy care. Abortion neither treats conditions nor cures illness," Ozimic told The Huffington Post.

Similar guidelines were issued in the UK last year by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecology, who said that abortions were "generally safer than continuing a pregnancy full-term".

In the UK, there are roughly 189,574 abortions a year and of these abortions, 2,085 took place for children who would've been born with a disability, 775 for chromosomal abnormalities including Down's syndrome and 496 for problems with the nervous system.

Although the total number of deaths caused by abortions is not known, according to the Office of National Statistics (ONS), 8.2 women die from childbirth in every 100,000 babies born.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK LIFESTYLE

Having a legal abortion is up to 14 times safer than giving birth, a controversial new study claims. American researchers from the Columbia University Medical Center in New York, suggest that wome...
Having a legal abortion is up to 14 times safer than giving birth, a controversial new study claims. American researchers from the Columbia University Medical Center in New York, suggest that wome...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,298
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arachne646
No more hurting people--Peace
17:12 on 27/01/2012
Why is this study called controversial? Of course pregnancy and birth are a risk to a woman's health and life. They are a greater risk to a woman's health and life in the USA not because of the availability of abortion (Canada and other countries have much easier access and lower maternal/fetal morbidity and mortality) but because of the lack of universal healthcare and the vast gap between the rich and the poor in US society.

No public healthcare and big gap between rich and poor is related to worse rates of maternal sickness and death in a nation.
Ease of obtaining an abortion is not related to the rate of maternal illness and mortality.

We should be focused on the terrible healthcare poor and middle-class women and men are getting in the USA, and make sure that comprehensive birth control and sexual health counselling are provided to everyone so that the huge rates of unplanned pregnancy and untreated HIV and maternal and infant mortality drop to similar levels to those in other developed countries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nadine Lumley
unseatHarper circle ca
18:07 on 26/01/2012
The fact remains women in the Republic of Ireland can board a boat post haste and get their pregnant azzes over to where abortions are legal and hencforth get one.

This comment has been removed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
23:53 on 25/01/2012
Becoming a deadbeat dad is 14 times better for the father's finances.

What's the point?
This comment has been removed.
wetcoastm
Free Speech As Dictated By Our Sponsors
21:11 on 25/01/2012
I don't see what the controversy is. They are two different procedures. There is always a risk when you are giving birth. Even if you are young and healthy. Pregnancy is risky anyone who has gone through one knows the risks.

It is good that legal abortions are not killing women, one of the factors is most likely that women usually have abortions in the first trimester.

This story just sounds like sensationalism.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Meatloaf
21:59 on 25/01/2012
The reason for the story is that the anti-abortion crowd is always trying to play up the risks of abortion. They try to link it to cancers, depression, suicide, etc... Any study that points to abortion being safer than caring a pregnancy to term is going to send them into such spasms that if you listen carefully you might actually hear it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Audra Norris
Free thinking conservative
05:08 on 26/01/2012
Why don't you look at non biased research. Suicide, cancer etc... All increased.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greg Mirsky
Riga dimd, Riga dimd, Kas to Rigu dimdinaj?
20:57 on 25/01/2012
What kind of "study" this is? Dying young saves you from possible illnesses in the future?
photo
marrmae1
Obama's Legacy: A Trifecta of Scandals!
20:08 on 25/01/2012
Pshaw!
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phil Divver
I keep telling myself..."It's Only a Movie!"
15:58 on 25/01/2012
I think it would be a legitimate question to first ask who funded this "study"? ...and many with more questions about this study's legitimacy to follow. I can only suspect as to why this study became a newsworthy article in the HP Lifestyles UK.

There are an awful lot of un-named and vague references in this article along with a lot of unsubtantiated and manipulated statistics tossed about in its content. Like...Do the deaths of the stated 167,000 fetuses count as a statistic?

"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics­." (Mark Twain & Benjamin Disraeli)”
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhloxJeana
Never baptize a cat.
18:05 on 25/01/2012
It's been known forever that pregnancy and childbirth are inherently dangerous. The anti-choice camp has been trying to frighten women with inflated risks associated with abortion. It amazes me when someone can argue with science when it doesn't produce the answers they want.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phil Divver
I keep telling myself..."It's Only a Movie!"
19:50 on 25/01/2012
I agree, pregnancy and childbirth are common occurances which are inherently risky by nature. I do not agree they are dangerous. You, I and the rest of us past, present and future humans on this planet had lives because we were born from "risk takers"...our mothers. With abortion there is also an element of risk for the pregnant woman. This is human life on this planet.

With abortion there is no risk for the fetus (who has no voice in this matter)....it is known fact that the fetus's life will be willfully and purposefully terminated by other humans.

The only question there is for all of us both individually and then collectively to answer is... whether abortion (the act of taking a human fetus's life) is morally, ethically and legally right or wrong? Can people answer this very basic question without others muddling this question influencing the individual with fabricated justifications based on unreliable and erroneous information?
15:05 on 25/01/2012
There is so much semantics squabbling with this issue...

If people base their opinion on abortion on what words are used (child or fetus), they aren't thinking nearly enough about the issue.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhloxJeana
Never baptize a cat.
18:08 on 25/01/2012
A child doesn't need a uterus, it isn't parasitic or threaten the health or life of anyone. If you think those who have abortion aren't putting any thought into it, you clearly think women aren't capable of making decisions for themselves. Why not just "confine" them during pregnancy for their own good so they don't accidentally hurt their fetus? That's the next logical step.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iamone3
18:50 on 25/01/2012
Some of these women are 12-15, and no they currently don`t have all the information needed to make a decision that they won`t later regret.
23:16 on 25/01/2012
Actually, I am a pro-choice woman, and I made my comment based on the fact that many of the comments in this thread are about words. Words, whether the fetus is called a fetus a clump of cells or a child or an unborn adult or who knows what else, do not make the situation any different. Many comments here are attacking people who are calling the fetus a child and I think that's a waste of time. Calling it a child makes it no more viable at 8 weeks than calling it a fetus makes it an issue that requires no thought.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sofia Champion
The future is now.
14:17 on 25/01/2012
This study was done in vain. Pro-lifers will spew the same drivel no matter what evidence shows.
16:40 on 25/01/2012
Then I'll think of NEW drivel, to annoy you with! I'll make up wild statistics based on quantum mechanics!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhloxJeana
Never baptize a cat.
18:09 on 25/01/2012
Don't forget metaphysics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
A truly free society is inevitable!
12:33 on 25/01/2012
That's like saying we would all be safer if we were all dead.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
manumoka
14:20 on 25/01/2012
in what possible way?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhloxJeana
Never baptize a cat.
18:09 on 25/01/2012
Really? It's sad when people can't decipher science.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
A truly free society is inevitable!
20:55 on 25/01/2012
You're tellin' me! Science says when you go back through any life to the very beginning and end that life anywhere in between you have KILLED that life. If we went back to days after you were conceived and cut you up and sucked you out of your mother with a Wet-Vac you would not be here. Your life would have been exterminated. You would be a victim of murder.
04:53 on 25/01/2012
Birth control use to be illegal in our country. Can you imagine that.
Margaret Sanger is famous for fighting the fight to make birth control legalized first by doctor prescription in special clinics around our country. This was to help poor and middle class women.

Rich women and the upper middle class had no problem buying illegal birth control. Birth rates dramatically dropped for the upper class and were still very high with large families for the poor.
Worse, births use to kill a high percentage of mothers. Abortion was considered a routine option for poor and lower middle class women. Poor women use to have 8-12 children, if they lived. Having babies kept them in poverty. Surprisingly, abortion used to be practiced a lot. People died from abortions, but dying from birth was extremely high.
photo
SkreetGil1
Obama changes: Not me, not ever
08:29 on 25/01/2012
My two older sisters when to a all girls catholic high school.

And the girls would brag about going and getting a D&C.

Rich women and girls will always get safe abortions.
15:54 on 25/01/2012
Thank you. Good comment.
16:41 on 25/01/2012
why would they brag about getting C's and D's instead of A's and B's? They sure set the bar low
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhloxJeana
Never baptize a cat.
18:12 on 25/01/2012
And we used to have orphanages because low income had more children than they could provide for. Now we just have unwanted children.
18:32 on 25/01/2012
Also, women use to die quite often when they were poor in childbirth, from abortions, and disease. Mostly childbirth. The children left after a mother died were poorly taken care of and often split up into other relative families, put in orphanages, while the father remarried or left.
04:46 on 25/01/2012
Almost all abortions are done by Christians.

Why aren't Christians voting to have free access to birth control and integrated family planning education? If they really care about abortion, why not? That they don't shows they aren't really serious about abortion.