Stephen Hester Bonus: Ed Miliband Calls On David Cameron To Explain £963,000 Pay Package

Stephen Hester

Huffington Post UK   Dina Rickman First Posted: 27/01/2012 11:24 Updated: 27/01/2012 12:50

Ed Miliband has called on David Cameron to explain RBS chief Stephen Hester's £963,000 bonus, after accusing him of "nodding through" the pay package.

"This is a terrible failure of leadership by the prime minister. For months he's been promising action against excessive bonuses, excessive pay, and now he's nodded through a million pound bonus for Stephen Hester.

"He's also been lecturing shareholders about how they need to show they can get a grip on executive pay. He's the biggest shareholder in RBS. He owns 83% of it through the biggest government, and yet he has let this bonus happen. He's got to come and explain why he's done this," the Labour leader said.

London Mayor Boris Johnson also joined condemnation of the bonus, saying the decision by RBS was "absolutely bewildering" and "should have been blocked by ministers".

"I find it absolutely bewildering because RBS occupies the same status in the economy as Gosbank did in the Soviet Union: it's a state-owned bank," he told the BBC.

"This is not a free-booting, private sector, risk-taking enterprise, this is a state-owned concern that taxpayers have had to step in and bail out.

"The idea that this is not in the control of the government seems to me to be far-fetched. Stephen Hester is an able man probably doing a difficult job and his contract must have been drawn up, I guess, when he was appointed in 2008 under Alistair Darling and Gordon Brown.

"I do not know what they were thinking of when they drew it up that way, but it certainly seems to me to be right that the government should step in and sort it out.

Asked what he would have done as prime minister, he said: "I think a state-owned bank should be run on public sector lines."

Liberal Democrat foreign minister Jeremy Browne and Labour's shadow business secretary Chuka Ummuna have also voiced their anger at the payout.

But one shareholder, Paul Mumford at Cavendish Asset Management, told the Huffington Post UK that Hester was only paid the "going rate" for doing his job.

"It is one those industries where you do have to give high-powered rewards to get the right people along," he said.

"You're up against an international market as well, with the big American banks which had problems in the past, but where the remuneration packages are quite unseemly."

Tory MP Brian Binley, who sits on the Commons Business Committee, told the Huffington Post UK: "I understand the government's position in that contracts are contracts, the last thing we want is people going to court to argue for their rights.

"I also understand the need to ensure that we attract the really important jobs. But I also understand the need for individuals in important positions that get paid a lot to recognise the difficulties at this moment, the damage the banking sector did to the economy, and I think we want to see bankers acting responsibly.

"I think Stephen ought to recognise these difficulties, and I think a gesture, in the circumstances, would be helpful."

Browne said on BBC 1's Question Time on Thursday night that Hester should "reflect" on his bonus and his earnings, which saw him take home in three days what a soldier fighting in Afghanistan did in a year.

"I think he should reflect on that," the Liberal Democrat minister said.

"He is working for a company which is five sixths owned by us, the taxpayer, and I think he has to think like a public servant, not like someone who's there to line their own pocket.

"He needs to think like a public servant who has a duty to his country, not just his own wealth."

Browne added: "No-one's forcing him to take this money. He could struggle on with £1.2m."

Chuka Umunna, who leaders Labour's shadow business team, said he was "flabbergasted" that Hester had been given a bonus.

He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I don't think I would have paid any bonus in these circumstances."

Umunna said the bonus was issued on an "annual basis" so there was "discretion" able to be applied by the government.

Pay at RBS has become a lightning rod for public fury over huge rewards in the financial sector ever since its £45bn state bailout.

The bank's remuneration committee had reportedly been considering a bonus of up to £1.5m for its highly-regarded leader but Cameron publicly said it should be less.

The decision followed talks with UK Financial Investments (UKFI), the body which manages the taxpayer's stakes in Britain's bailed-out banks.

Boris Johnson: People will be at a loss
1  of  8
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
"People will be at a loss as to why somebody can get a whacking great bonus like that when they're basically running a government concern, and I'm at a loss to understand why this has happened.

"If you're going to have a Government institution like that, there should be a concept of service and a concept of duty to the wider British public who stepped in to bail out that bank in 2008."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

Ed Miliband has called on David Cameron to explain RBS chief Stephen Hester's £963,000 bonus, after accusing him of "nodding through" the pay package. "This is a terrible failure of leadership by ...
Ed Miliband has called on David Cameron to explain RBS chief Stephen Hester's £963,000 bonus, after accusing him of "nodding through" the pay package. "This is a terrible failure of leadership by ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 147
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
18:27 on 04/02/2012
No one in Westminster will put a stop to any bonus, as most of them hope they will be working in the banks when they leave.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
meddleman
19:28 on 28/01/2012
Evidently, the government will not vote against the bonus when it is presented to the RBS shareholders in the Spring. Cameron, therefore, obviously supports it along with the rest of the millionaire Cabinet. It's surprising how taxpayers' money can be found for some things but not for others.
16:02 on 28/01/2012
Briefly, the financial sector was conned by the Rating Agencies when they gave a risk award to a new investment vehicle of AAA. They called it a low risk investment equal to a British Gov. Bond. This enabled the banks to sell these investments around the world.The valuation was not properly conducted.In the words of the USA investigation this was "a shocking abdication of responsibility. This was a lucrative scam accounting for just under half of Moody's total ratings revenue in 2007"
After some years the investments began to fail.The Financial world realised that these failing investments were so vast that all the banks in theUSA,EU & UK would be bankrupt.If this happened the resulting job losses in the financial sector would be so large that the taxpayers would not be able to cover the benefits claims.
So Gordon Brown flew to the USA &EU with the idea that more money would have to be printed and loaned to the banks which they would repay over a period of time.It was seen that the taxpayer was the vehicle to create the loans not to repay them.This has since been changed because the banks were so involved with the MP's at Westminster that they persuaded the Gov. to create an austerity programm so that the people also repaid their loans. A shocking example of conflict of interest between the banks& Gov. that enabled the banks to continue with their super salaries and bonuses.
15:28 on 28/01/2012
Maybe Labour (I think Milliband is something to do with the party?) should have set-up a voting right about pay and bonuses, when they bailed out the RBS to the tine of 84-ish percent of bans worth?

It beggers belief that someone (the tax-payer vis the Government) owning so much of the RBS can't control the bank?
09:58 on 28/01/2012
Bankers and Polititions, must be an old boy network. The coalition is treading on dangerous ground.
08:59 on 28/01/2012
This man has a contract for wages and bonus - agreed most likely with Brown and Darling. How would you like it if your employers said 'sorry, we don't think you are worth it' and cut your wages! Same thing. What I do think is disgusting is all these lottery winners getting millions of pounds (the couple in Scotland 141 million) why don't they cut the odds and spread it around a little more?
10:39 on 28/01/2012
I aggree partly but why so much and why do taxpayers have to bail them out? As for the couple who won £141 million - I think thats the fault of the lottery company really - why do they have to give so much to just two people. Surely they could give the winners less and donate the rest to charities that need it in these hard times. Also, do these bankers and politicians have no consciense? How do they really feel about taking all this bonus when there are others that are so needy. It just doesnt seem right.
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
18:51 on 28/01/2012
The taxpayers- The ordinary people on PAYE- Or is that businesses, importers, exporters, etc. The majority of PAYE goes on supporting the benefit system.
As for the lottery- If I want to win; I buy a ticket. If I want to give to charity; I give to charity, If I actually did win I would give more to charity. And the lottery pays out millions to charities and good causes. The system is regulated by a contract to pay the prizes that accumulate from ticket sales. Stephen Hester is regulated by a contract that stipulates his pay and bonus conditions.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:41 on 28/01/2012
the real problem here is that rbs was expected to make big profits after righting off loads of debts from the year b4 thats what we paid for all those debts . the polidiks and bwankers knew rbs would return a handsome profit
01:43 on 28/01/2012
Let me get this right. The Bank was busted and the taxpayer bailed it out with money that the country cannot afford because that is busted too so the taxpayer will have to pay even more to get us out of hoc AND THIS GUY HAS THE NERVE TO STEAL NEARLY MILLION POUNDS FROM US ON THE NOD OF A POLITICIAN? How long do they think they can keep this up for?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DaveJohnWard
07:54 on 28/01/2012
So let me get THIS right. You agree to do a job, for a salary and a bonus package, and then when you are awarded it, a complete stranger who has never met you, knows nothing about how well you have done that job, decides that you don't deserve it because he hates what you represent. Is THAT how you want to run the country? Grow up!
21:38 on 29/01/2012
Are you related to Mr Hester?
11:29 on 28/01/2012
Quote: "the taxpayer bailed it"

My taxes have not increased as a result of the "bailout". The funds were generated by the Bank of England electronically. If Government let the Nationalised banks get back to profitability then there is a good chance that there will be no need to collect extra taxes.

Of course, they could let a bunch of lowly paid civil servants run the Nationalised banks and achieve the results so typical of government departments. No doubt all the critics will be happy about there being no bonuses but personally I'm not in favour of pyrrhic victories which end up with massive losses.
17:06 on 28/01/2012
I believe our taxes will rise.The bailouts have merely postponed the inevitable. The ordinary "joes" will have to pay in the end and they have every right to demand, in return, more accountablity of their leadership, in politics and in commerce. It behoves the leadership to set an example too, if everyone else is having to make sacrifices.
01:36 on 28/01/2012
This balding man at RBS should not have the nerve to cash his shares in, however I think a charity or two could well benefit from the money should he wish to redeem himself. I'm of the opinion that all workers should be rewarded for their excellent work, over and above their normal duties' CEO's should not accept anything in this financial climate. I am not against a terminal bonus if his/he rpresence has made a difference for the better.
23:43 on 27/01/2012
I am glad that old Boris has the good sense to anticipate public outcry, regarding the `Hester debacle`. But you need to know , that Toriyism is based firmly on personal gain.
Here in Scotland , even at grass roots level, we see the full picture.
Cameron will never stop the infamy of coruption , that we know exists in Westminster, because he is a major part of it. Here in Scotland , between the Tory government, and the financcial instututions that attempt to control all life in the UK, we recognise a self serving bond.
For a Prime minister of the UK to publicly state that £26.000 is a ` fair and decent income `for a mother, with maybe 1 , 2, or more children in her single care, and knowing that most of them would consider this ammount a godsend, because in reality, it is almost half of this figuer, and he knows this. Not the propaganda version,put forward by his ministers, such as Darling , ( I can handle any job in government, although rather badly) , and Grayling, and co, who have been caught out, on more than one occasion , basically telling lies, to the UK public, to support their politically motivated views , and definitely to their personal financial gain, as long as they are allowed to continue working in this way. Thank God we have the very well supported SNP in Scotland.
01:36 on 28/01/2012
I don't think A. Darling is a member of the government being a socialist. I was agreeing with more or less all that you said except for the last sentence...the Fat Controller's apposites in Salmond's Nationalist Party do not understand the sentiment and strong feeling that want Scotland to remain part of a United Kingdom.
23:24 on 27/01/2012
i would suggest that milliband plus many other mps should engage before they speak, who actually drew the contract up for this man ? in 2008. and what were the bonus levels pre 2008 compared to this one. Its all a bit strange to me but i would suggest that milliband the other ed all of his front bench plus ex ministers still siting in the house should button it when it comes to the finance of this country
00:22 on 28/01/2012
It is only my opinion , as an ignorant Scotsman, but if this Tory government , can disolve all the benefits system, in the UK, to the disadvantage of many families in the UK, and single woman, caring for children, who rely on these greatly exagerated , for political reasons, benefits, and in so doing , break the previous contract established by the previous government, why do they have so much difficulty, breaking with the contracts of Fat cat CEO`s , of , allegedly taxpayer controlled banking businesess.?
It is only a thought , but I personally, would give som every serious consideration, before attempting to buy a used car from persons like this, no matter which country I lived in.!
23:12 on 27/01/2012
Milliband - dont you just love him = part of Browns team of ne'er do wells handing out knighthoods to bankers during the boom now has the audacity to criticise anyone about this matter!
02:46 on 28/01/2012
I can only assume your are English, I am Scots, and I totally agree with you regarding Mr Brown.
His deal for leadership of this country, was based on a deal with Tony Blair. Almost, as with the Tory goverment we now experience , he received no support form the voting public.
As far as I know , he is on `the talk and book signing circuit` circuit , as Mr Cameron will participate in, as soon people recognise his true value to the nation. Personally, I think he has achieved more than his level of competence can allow him to decently control in life.
22:36 on 27/01/2012
stop giving our money away to people who dont need it.
22:15 on 27/01/2012
Stop pouting Miliband, your predecessor Bully Boy Brown agreed the contract for his payout... You ain't convincing nobody with your inane drivel...Grow up!
This comment has been removed.