Financial Transaction Tax Could Be 'Destructive' Says Mark Hoban

Mark Hoban Financial Transaction Tax

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 31/01/2012 13:04 Updated: 31/01/2012 13:36

Treasury minister Mark Hoban has made an interesting revelation during his evidence to a Lords committee on a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT), saying introducing one in any country could be "destructive".

Although he reiterated the government's position that it favoured a tax so long as it was introduced globally, towards the end of the session he told peers that while the rates being mooted of 0.1 percent sounded low, the profit margins on such transactions were quite low as well. "So it can be quite destructive," he concluded.

He also questioned assumptions that the financial services industry was under-taxed, saying he was: "not really quite sure what people mean," in making that claim.

His comments come as a timely intervention after the French president Nicolas Sarkozy announced that France would be unilaterally imposing a financial transaction tax, without waiting for agreement from other members of the eurozone.

David Cameron has criticised France for going it alone, but suggested the UK might benefit if Sarkozy proceeded. He was backed up by Boris Johnson, who said French banks should move to London to escape the tax.

But the Mark Hoban appears to be more openly hostile to the concept in general, saying he had "some skepticism about what it is meant to achieve."

Hoban told the committee that the government had no objection to an FTT, but said: "If there was an EU-only FTT then business would transact outside the euro area ... this would be a very unwise thing to do."

However to some laughter he added that: "Sweden went through the process of introducing an FTT and it helped the Danish and UK economies," before pointing out that France had a similar tax to the FTT, which the country abolished four years ago.

Hoban said he doubted whether a eurozone-wide FTT was inevitable, saying that "plenty of people", including financiers in Ireland and Luxembourg, would not appreciate the tax at all.

"One needs to step back and look at who is arguing for a transaction tax and why," he argued, adding that there was no guarantee that an FTT imposed in the UK would be spent on overseas aid. He was clear that any FTT would not be spent on supplementing the EU budget.

Hoban added that there had been lively discussions both at the Treasury and within Europe over the notion of residence and incorporation.

The Treasury's position appears to be that if there were an FTT applied in eurozone countries, banks with unincorporated branches in those countries would not have to pay the FTT. But Hoban said: "If a German bank is incorporated in UK then tax is payable on "both" legs of a transaction. But how you collect that is a challenge."

"The complexity of this tax does require careful consideration," he concluded.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

Treasury minister Mark Hoban has made an interesting revelation during his evidence to a Lords committee on a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT), saying introducing one in any country could be "destructi...
Treasury minister Mark Hoban has made an interesting revelation during his evidence to a Lords committee on a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT), saying introducing one in any country could be "destructi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
novelist2000
veritas non olet
03:38 AM on 02/01/2012
The way I see it is this: Since the privatisation waves, less money is in government hands. But privatisations do not reduce costs, i.e. education, health, roads, police etc, so at some point the government has to find new money for their 'fixed expenditure'.

An interesting example is the Public Eye Award in Davos to Barclay's Bank for speculations in food commodities which pushed up food prices artificially. But people on welfare still have to eat and with the job situation these days, their food money must often come from the government. A financial transaction tax would have clawed back a little from Barclay's speculation profits. They caused more government expenditure and it is only fair that they should contribute. Britain wants to leave all the profits in the hands of the speculators and the costs to the wage earner/income tax payer - not a good look.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Vapula
Failure is not an option
03:05 AM on 02/01/2012
It could be but there again it might not be.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
10:35 PM on 01/31/2012
A financial transaction tax will impact on the government tax take, which will in turn affect the value of the currency. Investors will want a bigger return for a bigger risk. I hear downgrades from the rating agencies if this tax goes ahead. A financial transaction tax will also impact on company profits for those involved and layoffs will be made to keep the business competitive.
03:27 PM on 01/31/2012
I await the U-turn