Fred Goodwin Resigns As Trustee Of Queen's Silver Jubilee Trust

Fred Goodwin

First Posted: 5/02/2012 16:09 Updated: 5/02/2012 19:07   PA

Disgraced banker Fred Goodwin has resigned as a trustee of a prestigious charity which has close links with the Queen.

Goodwin left the Queen's Silver Jubilee Trust before he was stripped of his knighthood last week.

His title was "cancelled and annulled" by the monarch after a key committee found he had brought the honours system into "disrepute".

The ex-chief executive of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) was appointed a trustee by the Prince of Wales and there is speculation he resigned to save the royal family embarrassment.

He took up his post with the Trust in 2004 and helped guide the organisation which funds the activities of charities that encourage young people to do good deeds within their communities in the UK and across the Commonwealth.

The body was established in 1977 - the monarch's Silver Jubilee year - after a major fundraising appeal led by Charles.

The Queen herself set the aims of the Trust to focus on raising money to support young people.

Sir Alan Reid, Keeper of the Privy Purse and the man in charge of the monarch's finances, is the Trust's chairman while Sir Christopher Geidt, the sovereign's private secretary, is a trustee.

In 2009 Goodwin stepped down as chairman of the Prince's Trust charity after holding the role for six years. The move came soon after it was announced he was quitting as RBS chief executive after a huge financial bail-out by the Government.

A Buckingham Palace spokesman confirmed the development in a short statement. He said: "Fred Goodwin has resigned from the Queen's Silver Jubilee Trust."

He confirmed that his decision to step down came before his knighthood was rescinded.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Filed by Lucy Sherriff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:14 on 06/02/2012
did you know under british tax law if you raise money for a charity you only have give 10% of to the charity ! the other 90% can set off against expenses .
this is why we have have every other shop in the high st as a charity shop .

and then we have celebs doing charity works it pays realy well and the public think they are doing it out a kind heart , some big companies are charitable trusts ,its a tax duct wake up how much did he get paid by the charity ?
03:15 on 06/02/2012
Is he still a banker?
02:18 on 06/02/2012
resigned, thas a nice way of saying sacked
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
22:47 on 05/02/2012
A fred sketch at:
http://macdunlop.wordpress.com/2012/02/05/397/
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
22:42 on 05/02/2012
With a comfortable pension no doubt...
20:51 on 05/02/2012
I wonder how many people would have done things differently to the way this man did if the circumstances were similar for them? I am not going to judge him as to whether he should have been stripped of his awards but I have seen loads of people in positions that were beyond them and also loads of people promoted above their level of competence because of their club, who they know, what school or university they attended, to make way for some other hand picked star etc. This man has ridden a wave that he was either placed upon or got himself on to at some point and I think, even now, that there would go a great many others if they had the opportunity.
12:40 on 06/02/2012
Your decision not to judge Goodwin is supine; the attempt to dilute the issue by dragging in extraneous issues, plain daft. Goodwin was given the knighthood for "services to the British banking industry". The quality of those services has resulted in thousands of Goodwin's former employees losing their jobs; thousands of Royal Bank of Scotland stockholders seeing their share values plummet; and the British taxpayer collectively called upon to pump £billions into Goodwin's former bank.

Goodwin has merely been deprived of a knighthood the grounds for which were obviously wrong. That wrong has now been corrected.

He does, however, continue to enjoy a pension of £400,000 a year for life.
09:17 on 07/02/2012
Hi Kern
Thanks for your comment, one of the good things about this sort of debate is that different views can be aired in an adult way. I am not saying that he should not have been stripped of his knighthood but merely that I think many other people would have and still would do the same as he did if they were presented with the opportunities he undoubtedly was, i.e. they would milk it for all they are worth. I am not saying I think they would be right to do so though!
cheers
Tony
19:51 on 05/02/2012
Arrrr.... umm... yes..... he resigned, of course he did.
19:13 on 05/02/2012
NOW ,WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF THE CROOKS,DOES HE TAKE ALL THE BLAME.THAT SHOULD JUST BE THE START NOT THE END.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fozwords
My cup is always half full
18:57 on 05/02/2012
I'd love tomeet him and shout hello freddie, hows things today.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fozwords
My cup is always half full
18:56 on 05/02/2012
gOOD RIDDANCE
18:30 on 05/02/2012
Sounds rather like throwing the rattle out of the pram
17:26 on 05/02/2012
On a question of titles; When a celeb gets a knighthood should he not be addressed by his real surname. That would stop them cashing in.
17:04 on 05/02/2012
If he is botherd by losing the Sir Fred moniker all he has to do is change his name by Deed Poll to Sir Fred Goodwin - cost him £20 - he can afford £20 !!!
19:12 on 05/02/2012
I think he would rather someone else paid
09:37 on 06/02/2012
Yes it is a sad fact when this can happen for £20