Abu Qatada, Bin Laden's 'Right-Hand Man', To Be Released On Bail 'In Days'

Abu Qatada

PA/Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 6/02/2012 15:34 Updated: 6/02/2012 17:40

Radical Muslim cleric Abu Qatada will be released on bail within days, an immigration judge has ruled.

In a strongly worded statement, the Home Office criticised the decision to release Abu Qatada, the radical cleric once described as "Bin Laden's right hand man." A spokesperson said:

"This is a dangerous man who we believe poses a real threat to our security and who has not changed in his views or attitude to the UK.

"We have argued for the strictest possible bail conditions to be imposed on Qatada, because this government will take all necessary measures to protect national security. This is not the end of the road and we are continuing to consider our legal options in response to the European Court's ruling.”

Abu Qatada, who is being held in the high security Long Lartin jail in Worcestershire, is to be set free with stringent bail conditions, Mr Justice Mitting told the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Siac).

Qatada is expected to be released next week.

The bail conditions will be similar to those set in 2008, with Qatada confined to his home for all but two one-hour periods each day.
He will also be allowed to take one of his children to school.

Mr Justice Mitting said it would take "between a few days and about a week" for the Security Service (MI5) to check the proposed bail address, which was not revealed by the court, before Qatada can be released.

The judge also ruled that the Home Secretary has three months to show progress is being made in negotiations with Jordan or restrictions on Qatada's liberty may not be acceptable any longer.

Earlier Qatada's lawyers argued that the radical Muslim cleric once described by a Spanish judge as "Bin Laden's right hand man in Europe" should be released regardless of the risk to Britain's national security.

He had made the appeal to be released on bail after European human rights judges ruled he could not be deported to Jordan without assurances that evidence gained through torture would not be used against him.

Lawyers for home secretary Theresa May battled to keep him behind bars, while British diplomats sought assurances from the Jordanian authorities that evidence gained through torture would not be used against him.

Ed Fitzgerald QC, representing Qatada, told an immigration judge in central London that Qatada had now been held for six-and-a-half years while fighting deportation.

He told the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Siac) that that was "against a background of almost nine years detention without charges on the grounds of national security".

Mr Fitzgerald said: "The detention has now gone on for too long to be reasonable or lawful and there is no prospect of the detention ending in any reasonable period.

"However the risk of absconding, however the risk of further offending, there comes a point when it's just too long."

Mr Fitzgerald added that the eight-and-a-half years Qatada spent in custody was equivalent to a 17-year jail sentence.

The bail hearing was ordered after Qatada, won an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) last month.

Human rights judges ruled last month that sending Qatada back to face terror charges without assurances that evidence gained through torture would not be used against him would deny him his right to a fair trial and be a "flagrant denial of justice".

Qatada's defence team said he has been kept behind bars for more than six years already and should be released.

The ruling last month was the first time that the Strasbourg-based court has found an extradition would be in violation of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the right to a fair trial, which is enshrined in UK law under the Human Rights Act.

The Henry Jackson Society think-tank said the ruling "undermines national security" while former home secretary David Blunkett warned Qatada was "extraordinarily dangerous and we don't want him on our streets".

Qatada, also known as Omar Othman, 51, featured in hate sermons found on videos in the flat of one of the September 11 bombers.

Since 2001, when fears of the domestic terror threat rose in the aftermath of the attacks, he has challenged, and ultimately thwarted, every attempt by the Government to detain and deport him.

Law Lords ruled almost three years ago that he could be sent back to Jordan and Lord Phillips, now president of the Supreme Court - the highest court in the land - said torture in another country does not require the UK "to retain in this country, to the detriment of national security, a terrorist suspect".

But the human rights court went against that judgment, agreeing with the earlier 2008 decision of the Court of Appeal which said there were reasonable grounds for believing he would be denied a fair trial in Jordan.

But Tim Eicke QC, for the home secretary, said Mrs May did not accept that Qatada's detention was unlawful.

The length of detention "has to be weighed against the risks" and "he poses a particularly serious risk to the UK".

"The secretary of state has also taken all steps to diligently try to achieve removal and deportation as soon as possible."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Radical Muslim cleric Abu Qatada will be released on bail within days, an immigration judge has ruled. In a strongly worded statement, the Home Office criticised the decision to release Abu Qatada,...
Radical Muslim cleric Abu Qatada will be released on bail within days, an immigration judge has ruled. In a strongly worded statement, the Home Office criticised the decision to release Abu Qatada,...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 268
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:33 AM on 02/09/2012
Okay.... what EXACTLY has old rug face done? Well? What's he charged with? being "dangerous"... what's that precisely?

We have the right to not have him in the country but to keep the fella locked up fpr more time than some people actually serve for killing someone.... that just ain't cricket old boy.

Can't say I like the cut of his jib but there y'go....doesn't give us the right to lock him up without a fair trial..... what's this place coming to?

If actually convicted we could force him to share a cell with David Blunkett..... heh heh!

Charge him or kick him out of the country..... where he goes so long as it's not here just ain't my concern.
11:55 AM on 02/07/2012
This should read I AM DANGEROUS-GET ME OUT OF HERE.
09:33 AM on 02/07/2012
What a commendable way to squander countless hundred-thousands (if not millions) of taxpayers' money.
09:26 AM on 02/07/2012
Was the ruling he could not be deported really a surprise? Thought not!
09:00 AM on 02/07/2012
they are all like him
06:48 AM on 02/07/2012
just hang the dungheap
06:44 AM on 02/07/2012
What I would like to know is who is feeding and housing him, as well as his family, whilst here in the UK. The EU human rights brigade might not like him being shipped back home but let's have some cash to support him and the cost of policing his whereabouts. The cost of that must be known and that goes for all the other illegals as well that the EU says we can't deport.
09:34 AM on 02/07/2012
I suspect the British taxpayers have the pleasure of footing that bill!
09:57 AM on 02/07/2012
Yeah right!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:08 PM on 02/07/2012
I used to have a car called Brum.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacksdad41
Quant Je Puis
10:16 AM on 02/07/2012
@blinstu - no doubt about it - he and his family are being paid for by the British taxpayer as they will be when he is set free. On Radio 4 this morning the Uk are to appeal to an even higher court within the Euro human rights court and have 3 months from the day of release to come up with a concrete guarantee that Jordan will try him based on evidence not obtained via torture (not that that has been proven - it is his defence who claim that) and purely on the evidence held. The foreign office are preparing a case working with the Jordanians and the Jordanians have promised a fair trial. If the paperwork and the case is presented correctly and the supreme court agree, he can and will be deported, if not we are stuck with him, his family, his benefits bill, his protection (believe it or not) until he shuufles off this mortal coil or he conveniently falls under a bus - I know my preferred solution. If it wasnt so unfunny it would be funny, Imagine a British Christian subject spouting racist derogatory remarks, connected to a known terrorist and able to avoid justice in Jeddah or Islamabad and being protected by the state in a decision made in a court under the cloak of the Arab league - yeh right!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:32 PM on 02/08/2012
Wait, are you suggesting that Britain is a better place to live than either Saudi Arabia or Pakistan?

Kinda stating the obvious there mate.
06:02 AM on 02/07/2012
We should keep him under house arest here in UK and get him to report to Paddington every week for the rest of his life.
It is cheaper and more PC . 6 years of imprisomenr has not changed him
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:23 AM on 02/07/2012
Send him back to Jordan, okay, its wrong according to the EU ...... let him argue for his "rights" from there.

How politically incorrect to abuse the Jordanians and their system of justice anyway - we must respect their culture, send him home to his own people and their justice.
09:20 AM on 02/07/2012
How can it be against someones "human rights" to send them home?
One way around it would be for the UK to offer to hold the trial here, and if he is then found guilty, then they can take him back with them.
He would recieve a fair trial as it would be held in the UK court.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donald J Sullivan
Monetary Reform Now
04:35 AM on 02/07/2012
Guilty not guilty too late for that debate it's gullible to debate. Either way I don't see this guy getting off so let the wheels of justice turn.. he's screwed either way. Where does he think hes going the world is sooo small......oh man is he screwed big time.He is actually safer where he is..think about it!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:51 AM on 02/07/2012
Actually, they have a perfect alibi if they want to bump him off.

Just blow him up.....booooooom.......say he was a precision guided suicide bomber that caused no collatoral damage:)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:54 AM on 02/07/2012
.....seriously though. Bomb making accidents happen allllll the time:)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:22 AM on 02/07/2012
It's frightening! The lawyer that represent and argue successfully for this alleged "right-hand man of Bin Laden", who after living comfortably off Legal Aid Fees, may one day be "elevated" to become one of Her Majesty's judges.

However, he may simply be following European Human Rights case law and argued his case accordingly. But take comfort that the whole European Human Rights Court and all its institutions may well be swept away before too long as the whole European Union with its inept policies ranging from agriculture to banking etc ultimately bringing the whole continent to bankruptcy would finally free Britain to administer its own laws and protect both the rights of the alleged criminal as well as the rights of the citizenry.

MattandGloss
09:33 AM on 02/07/2012
Lets just hope the people that Qatada has inspired dont cause any problems. I wonder how the lawyers that have helped him stay here all these years would feel if any of their friends and family were killed by this man or his followers?
I wonder if it did happen if they would still feel that the "human rights" laws were helping?
09:51 AM on 02/07/2012
We can only hope that will happen!
03:16 AM on 02/07/2012
Deport him to his native country and then have a predator drone take him out.
02:32 AM on 02/07/2012
Correct me if I'm wrong, but nowhere in the article does it say what actual danger this man is supposed to pose: it's not as if he's got super powers! He's just a man, and if he's done nothing that they can charge him for he should be as free as you or I.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimbraid1
02:56 AM on 02/07/2012
You are gullible and naive to the extreme , this man can still do enormous damage by meeting radicals at his house, and have you ever heard of the internet and mobile phones ?, stupid man.
06:31 PM on 02/07/2012
None of these things you mention are in-themselves illegal. If the man is found to plot some crime, then by all means arrest him. We can't hold people indefinitely just because they might plan crimes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:38 AM on 02/07/2012
I agree...to a point. My opinion is that this guy is a real threat. However, how can we be sure? We have all been lied to by these MPs so many times about so many things, so how can we possibly know? Does he have weapons of mass destruction? How can we trust MPs that steal from us?

Anyway, I think they might be telling the truth about this guy but your point is 100% accurate. What I just do not understand is, if it was possible for our justice system to (wrongly) send youths to prison for 4 years for failing to incite a riot through facebook, why isnt it possible to jail this guy? Don't they have anything on him at all?
09:44 AM on 02/07/2012
Video evidence of him telling people to k..l infidels.
People like this give Islam a bad name.
06:32 PM on 02/07/2012
Well quite, if they don't have anything on him, he shouldn't be held.
02:11 AM on 02/07/2012
Absolutely disgraceful. This guy who is an obvious threat to civilsation is allowed to stay here in OUR Country.He even came in on a forged passport,surely thats enough reason to deport him as an undesirable?
Why are we & Government allowing OUR Laws to be overturned by the unelected EU?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimbraid1
02:56 AM on 02/07/2012
Excellent question !!
07:48 AM on 02/07/2012
But our Government did elect the EU,we the people did not hence no referendum.